- Registrado
- 17 de Abr, 2019
Don't do this. The Ralphamale is gonna hop the border and personally drag him to the nearest FBI office and then you'll owe him $10k.If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Don't do this. The Ralphamale is gonna hop the border and personally drag him to the nearest FBI office and then you'll owe him $10k.If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
A report has to be from a legitimate person with superficial credibility, through a legitimate avenue, include information that law enforcement is willing to act on, and be easy enough to resolve relative to the fact that it's an Internet-based report that it's even worth looking into. That's pretty tough. If there's real hard evidence of him posting CSAM or asking for it—especially asking for it in exchange for something else—and it can be definitively tied back to him in a way that even a 50 year old fed would easily understand it without his eyes glazing over, then probably a report through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is how you should go about it. The NCMEC is what every major website or service I've seen that reports CSAM goes to (e.g., someone uploads it to their cloud account, sends it over Facebook Messenger). They collate the information and provide it to law enforcement, which regularly bases CSAM investigations (and other things involving children) off of NCMEC reports.It looks like his address is already in the OP. Doesn’t someone just need to make a police report / report to the feds Non-anonymously?
You don't even need to go that high up, Dallas has a local department specifically about Internet Crimes Against Children, of which you can find on their list of directories; however, that is only recommended if there is evidence on the table of that specifically occurring where the person residing in the immediate Dallas, Lubbock, or Austin area engaging in internet crimes with minors, or operating a website that specifically operates in CSAM production.A report has to be from a legitimate person with superficial credibility, through a legitimate avenue, include information that law enforcement is willing to act on, and be easy enough to resolve relative to the fact that it's an Internet-based report that it's even worth looking into. That's pretty tough. If there's real hard evidence of him posting CSAM or asking for it—especially asking for it in exchange for something else—and it can be definitively tied back to him in a way that even a 50 year old fed would easily understand it without his eyes glazing over, then probably a report through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is how you should go about it. The NCMEC is what every major website or service I've seen that reports CSAM goes to (e.g., someone uploads it to their cloud account, sends it over Facebook Messenger). They collate the information and provide it to law enforcement, which regularly bases CSAM investigations (and other things involving children) off of NCMEC reports.
What happens after that is up to law enforcement. But unfortunately sending an email to the US Attorney's Office for the district he lives in about this guy engaging in cybercrimes is probably not going to do anything at all because in the grand scheme of things, some retard DDOSing random websites is not worth the time or money to resolve. You have to view it this way: it has to be made so easy, simple, and provable for a law enforcement officer's understanding that it's basically a slam dunk.
I suggested the NCMEC because its reports are taken seriously and used regularly by law enforcement—both feds and state—as a basis to investigate. When police/feds go to a judge for a warrant to search/arrest, the information coming through the NCMEC is taken seriously. If you report it directly as a random Internet person, everyone just views it as a message from a random Internet person. That doesn't hold much sway. It's the difference between contacting a company to do something as an individual vs. contacting a company through an attorney using the attorney's official letterhead.You don't even need to go that high up, Dallas has a local department specifically about Internet Crimes Against Children, of which you can find on their list of directories; however, that is only recommended if there is evidence on the table of that specifically occurring where the person residing in the immediate Dallas, Lubbock, or Austin area engaging in internet crimes with minors, or operating a website that specifically operates in CSAM production.
That specific department, of which exists in many US metropolitan areas, works as a semi direct extension of the NCMEC, with speed dial to FBI, of which also happens to have a field office right down the road. There's a bit of a trinitarian thing here in that regards. Not that your advice isn't sound, it is, absolutely and 100% and it is the recommended go to for normal civilian reporting, it's just, "There are more available options on the table than normal due to the nature of location, if the location is true, and the nature of the crimes, of which if there may be evidence of."I suggested the NCMEC because its reports are taken seriously and used regularly by law enforcement—both feds and state—as a basis to investigate. When police/feds go to a judge for a warrant to search/arrest, the information coming through the NCMEC is taken seriously. If you report it directly as a random Internet person, everyone just views it as a message from a random Internet person. That doesn't hold much sway. It's the difference between contacting a company to do something as an individual vs. contacting a company through an attorney using the attorney's official letterhead.
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
Like this? or something?If there's real hard evidence of him posting CSAM or asking for it—especially asking for it in exchange for something else—and it can be definitively tied back to him in a way that even a 50 year old fed would easily understand it without his eyes glazing over, then probably a report through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is how you should go about it.
This could easily be a joke. You need solicitation, offering, or posting it, really. Maybe also talking about having it.
I've never heard of it, but I'll take your word. The more avenues are taken, the more likely something results. I've just never seen that, personally, but that could be a jurisdictional thing or how the reporting process works.That specific department, of which exists in many US metropolitan areas, works as a semi direct extension of the NCMEC, with speed dial to FBI, of which also happens to have a field office right down the road. There's a bit of a trinitarian thing here in that regards. Not that your advice isn't sound, it is, absolutely and 100% and it is the recommended go to for normal civilian reporting, it's just, "There are more available options on the table than normal due to the nature of location, if the location is true, and the nature of the crimes, of which if there may be evidence of."
Texas, and Dallas, have historically been places of "Fuck around find out" when it comes to law enforcement, to the point where most executions in the United State occur there, and the Fed presence has been high since Waco, along with other international crime community presences since 9/11.This could easily be a joke. You need solicitation, offering, or posting it, really. Maybe also talking about having it.
I've never heard of it, but I'll take your word. The more avenues are taken, the more likely something results. I've just never seen that, personally, but that could be a jurisdictional thing or how the reporting process works.
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
No, the distinction here is that he's a pedophile and he's making it my problem.In the past you have been quite derogatorily vociferous regarding people making posts advocating for IRL intervention (such as people reporting individuals who have been factually proven to beat children, their spouses, their animals, etc...).
So, the nuance here that makes it acceptable is that you included a bounty?
Good to know.
To be fair. on the recordIn the past you have been quite derogatorily vociferous regarding people making posts advocating for IRL intervention (such as people reporting individuals who have been factually proven to beat children, their spouses, their animals, etc...).
So, the nuance here that makes it acceptable is that you included a bounty?
Good to know.