🦊 Furry David Frederick Hoffman / UnrealSkybox / leto / unicodefag

Is the thread information all that is available? Is there ip/device info/anything scraped from when he was on the farms?
 
It looks like his address is already in the OP. Doesn’t someone just need to make a police report / report to the feds Non-anonymously?
A report has to be from a legitimate person with superficial credibility, through a legitimate avenue, include information that law enforcement is willing to act on, and be easy enough to resolve relative to the fact that it's an Internet-based report that it's even worth looking into. That's pretty tough. If there's real hard evidence of him posting CSAM or asking for it—especially asking for it in exchange for something else—and it can be definitively tied back to him in a way that even a 50 year old fed would easily understand it without his eyes glazing over, then probably a report through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is how you should go about it. The NCMEC is what every major website or service I've seen that reports CSAM goes to (e.g., someone uploads it to their cloud account, sends it over Facebook Messenger). They collate the information and provide it to law enforcement, which regularly bases CSAM investigations (and other things involving children) off of NCMEC reports.

What happens after that is up to law enforcement. But unfortunately sending an email to the US Attorney's Office for the district he lives in about this guy engaging in cybercrimes is probably not going to do anything at all because in the grand scheme of things, some retard DDOSing random websites is not worth the time or money to resolve. You have to view it this way: it has to be made so easy, simple, and provable for a law enforcement officer's understanding that it's basically a slam dunk.
 
A report has to be from a legitimate person with superficial credibility, through a legitimate avenue, include information that law enforcement is willing to act on, and be easy enough to resolve relative to the fact that it's an Internet-based report that it's even worth looking into. That's pretty tough. If there's real hard evidence of him posting CSAM or asking for it—especially asking for it in exchange for something else—and it can be definitively tied back to him in a way that even a 50 year old fed would easily understand it without his eyes glazing over, then probably a report through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is how you should go about it. The NCMEC is what every major website or service I've seen that reports CSAM goes to (e.g., someone uploads it to their cloud account, sends it over Facebook Messenger). They collate the information and provide it to law enforcement, which regularly bases CSAM investigations (and other things involving children) off of NCMEC reports.

What happens after that is up to law enforcement. But unfortunately sending an email to the US Attorney's Office for the district he lives in about this guy engaging in cybercrimes is probably not going to do anything at all because in the grand scheme of things, some retard DDOSing random websites is not worth the time or money to resolve. You have to view it this way: it has to be made so easy, simple, and provable for a law enforcement officer's understanding that it's basically a slam dunk.
You don't even need to go that high up, Dallas has a local department specifically about Internet Crimes Against Children, of which you can find on their list of directories; however, that is only recommended if there is evidence on the table of that specifically occurring where the person residing in the immediate Dallas, Lubbock, or Austin area engaging in internet crimes with minors, or operating a website that specifically operates in CSAM production.

You would need a very specific set of circumstances to make that applicable.
The perp or victim residing within the Dallas general area
Evidence that the perp is engaging in Internet crimes against minors and children from within the past 2 years.

But that would be a very specific set of conditions, very specific. I don't even know why I brought it up.
 
You don't even need to go that high up, Dallas has a local department specifically about Internet Crimes Against Children, of which you can find on their list of directories; however, that is only recommended if there is evidence on the table of that specifically occurring where the person residing in the immediate Dallas, Lubbock, or Austin area engaging in internet crimes with minors, or operating a website that specifically operates in CSAM production.
I suggested the NCMEC because its reports are taken seriously and used regularly by law enforcement—both feds and state—as a basis to investigate. When police/feds go to a judge for a warrant to search/arrest, the information coming through the NCMEC is taken seriously. If you report it directly as a random Internet person, everyone just views it as a message from a random Internet person. That doesn't hold much sway. It's the difference between contacting a company to do something as an individual vs. contacting a company through an attorney using the attorney's official letterhead.
 
I suggested the NCMEC because its reports are taken seriously and used regularly by law enforcement—both feds and state—as a basis to investigate. When police/feds go to a judge for a warrant to search/arrest, the information coming through the NCMEC is taken seriously. If you report it directly as a random Internet person, everyone just views it as a message from a random Internet person. That doesn't hold much sway. It's the difference between contacting a company to do something as an individual vs. contacting a company through an attorney using the attorney's official letterhead.
That specific department, of which exists in many US metropolitan areas, works as a semi direct extension of the NCMEC, with speed dial to FBI, of which also happens to have a field office right down the road. There's a bit of a trinitarian thing here in that regards. Not that your advice isn't sound, it is, absolutely and 100% and it is the recommended go to for normal civilian reporting, it's just, "There are more available options on the table than normal due to the nature of location, if the location is true, and the nature of the crimes, of which if there may be evidence of."
 
IMG_1679.jpeg

Made this on my phone.
 
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.

We are defining arrested as in apprehended by police (hopefully beaten liberally) and mirandized, hauled to central booking, booked, arraigned, etc... or just apprehended by the police, mirandized, and hauled to central booking is enough?
 
For the last 4 years I've seen stories about safe for work spaces on every social media under the sun be victim of CP spam over and over, and I thought I was the crazy one and the sudden uptick in this content wasn't real and my algorithm was bias. But now I know some fag spends more than my rent on proxies and has enough CP to put the largest onions to shame. And all of this content is traded on some google indexed webpage in the open. It's days like these that push you.
 
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.
If there's real hard evidence of him posting CSAM or asking for it—especially asking for it in exchange for something else—and it can be definitively tied back to him in a way that even a 50 year old fed would easily understand it without his eyes glazing over, then probably a report through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is how you should go about it.
Like this? or something?
leto.png

 
This could easily be a joke. You need solicitation, offering, or posting it, really. Maybe also talking about having it.

That specific department, of which exists in many US metropolitan areas, works as a semi direct extension of the NCMEC, with speed dial to FBI, of which also happens to have a field office right down the road. There's a bit of a trinitarian thing here in that regards. Not that your advice isn't sound, it is, absolutely and 100% and it is the recommended go to for normal civilian reporting, it's just, "There are more available options on the table than normal due to the nature of location, if the location is true, and the nature of the crimes, of which if there may be evidence of."
I've never heard of it, but I'll take your word. The more avenues are taken, the more likely something results. I've just never seen that, personally, but that could be a jurisdictional thing or how the reporting process works.
 
This could easily be a joke. You need solicitation, offering, or posting it, really. Maybe also talking about having it.


I've never heard of it, but I'll take your word. The more avenues are taken, the more likely something results. I've just never seen that, personally, but that could be a jurisdictional thing or how the reporting process works.
Texas, and Dallas, have historically been places of "Fuck around find out" when it comes to law enforcement, to the point where most executions in the United State occur there, and the Fed presence has been high since Waco, along with other international crime community presences since 9/11.
It's comically, the worst place in the United States to attempt to crimes of this nature, if they can be evidenced of such.

Of which, I think a very good example of this documentation, is documented here.
 
Making the case that his site condones and encourages pedophilia and posting of illicit material of children is trivially easy, and has been done to get him (unfortunately temporarily) kicked off of hosts before. The problem is actually connecting it to a real, specific human being for the authorities to go after. He needs to be linked to it in a way that's thorough, leaves no room for doubt, and is independently verifiable without having to blindly accept someone's word or blindly trust that a screenshot of a no-longer-available page was not edited or missing vital context. Otherwise, it's just hearsay and internet drama, because they have a strict standard of evidence that has to be met (imagine if some assmad redditor inspect element-ing a few screenshots was enough to get you arrested).

Reporting the site itself has been done, over and over, including by 4chan staff who have experience with NCMEC and federal authorities. NCMEC and the local authorities they contact (probably related to individual IPs making posts) haven't been able to get very far, since he's behind a tangled web of pseudonyms and proxies and infrastructure extending across multiple national borders, eclipsing the jurisdiction of any individual police department. The FBI would be the best bet, but one of the 4chan mods stated that the FBI has been completely ignoring their reports and that there's nothing more they can do if the feds aren't playing ball.

Maybe if enough noise was made about "a notorious pedophile spamming right wing sites with illegal material to try and get them taken down" and it reached the right politispergs online who had bigger audiences, it could reach the eyes it needed to, but I'm not holding my breath if the damn glowniggers don't want to do their fucking jobs. The ball's already in their court and they don't seem to be doing anything.

Daily reminder that every fed goes to hell when they die, no exceptions.
 
Reminder to anyone trying to claim the bounty to put accurate dates of incidents chronicled in this thread in NCMEC and to leave a email for a detective to reach out so you can provide information that the website can't recieve.

NCMEC won't forward your incident report if you don't fill out the fields correctly, be as detailed and straight forward as possible. It is extremely important for dates to match evidence archived in this thread. Your interaction with the detective can make or break the case, be sure to provide evidence, do not link and be like "read for yourself".
 
Última edición:
If anyone gets this guy arrested I will pay them $5000.

In the past you have been quite derogatorily vociferous regarding people making posts advocating for IRL intervention (such as people reporting individuals who have been factually proven to beat children, their spouses, their animals, etc...).

So, the nuance here that makes it acceptable is that you included a bounty?

Good to know.
 
Última edición:
In the past you have been quite derogatorily vociferous regarding people making posts advocating for IRL intervention (such as people reporting individuals who have been factually proven to beat children, their spouses, their animals, etc...).

So, the nuance here that makes it acceptable is that you included a bounty?

Good to know.
No, the distinction here is that he's a pedophile and he's making it my problem.
 
In the past you have been quite derogatorily vociferous regarding people making posts advocating for IRL intervention (such as people reporting individuals who have been factually proven to beat children, their spouses, their animals, etc...).

So, the nuance here that makes it acceptable is that you included a bounty?

Good to know.
To be fair. on the record
1. The individual in question is responsible for the first KF takedown (Directly admitted to complaining to Cloudflare over the Keffals incident) This is shared equally with Matt Lav and Clayparty; of which, that is a separate rabbit hole altogether that will not be discussed here.
2. The man has aggressively, been a cancer to various websites since 2019, utilizing tech autism to launch a reign of terror, that has enabled some of the internet's worst posters.
3. The man, on record, has fucked animals, solicits and encourages content with animals being fucked or tortured
4. The man, on record, has groomed children, is grooming children actively, is on record of doing both, and is even on record with attempting to meet up with a minor.
5. The man, on record, has created around 1700 false accounts within the past month after the events that took place here
6. The man, on record, has been DDOSing this website when the initial registration flood did not go in his favor
7. The man, on record, has attempted to infiltrate the main Kiwifarms website to "hack" or "infiltrate" for the sake of blackmailing Null, or users of the site.

This is on record. Off the record, there's a lot more at play here that is mostly red strings on corkboards; but the ultimate issue, as far as this place is concerned.
"Mr Null happens to like his website very much. Mr Leto, is very mad at Mr Null's website, and is actively shitting in his cereal bowl."

I think Null has the right to have his patience tested in this; of which, who could blame him?
Imagine the crack addict down the street from you, banging on your door for 84 hours straight while throwing bricks and shitting on your doorstep because someone in your apartment said "Get a job". But as said crack addict is doing this, he is actively beating a young woman, while fingering a dog's asshole. You'd lose your patience as well.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo