COVID-19 will bring on the Great Reset the world needs - Conspiracy theorists are always right

world economic forum great reset nwo.jpg
Explore the Great Transformation Map:


COVID-19 will bring on the Great Reset the world needs

To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, says Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab.

GENEVA: COVID-19 lockdowns may be gradually easing, but anxiety about the world’s social and economic prospects is only intensifying.

There is good reason to worry: A sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable.

To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.

Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.


A GREAT RESET IS NEEDED

There are many reasons to pursue a Great Reset, but the most urgent is COVID-19.

Having already led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, the pandemic represents one of the worst public-health crises in recent history. And, with casualties still mounting in many parts of the world, it is far from over.

This will have serious long-term consequences for economic growth, public debt, employment, and human well-being.

According to the Financial Times, global government debt has already reached its highest level in peacetime.

Moreover, unemployment is skyrocketing in many countries: in the US, for example, one in four workers have filed for unemployment since mid-March, with new weekly claims far above historic highs.

The International Monetary Fund expects the world economy to shrink by 3 per cent this year – a downgrade of 6.3 percentage points in just four months.

All of this will exacerbate the climate and social crises that were already underway.

Some countries have already used the COVID-19 crisis as an excuse to weaken environmental protections and enforcement.

And frustrations over social ills like rising inequality – US billionaires’ combined wealth has increased during the crisis – are intensifying.

Left unaddressed, these crises, together with COVID-19, will deepen and leave the world even less sustainable, less equal, and more fragile.


A WILL DOES EXIST

Incremental measures and ad hoc fixes will not suffice to prevent this scenario. We must build entirely new foundations for our economic and social systems.

The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream. In fact, one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles.

Almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office.

Likewise, populations have overwhelmingly shown a willingness to make sacrifices for the sake of health-care and other essential workers and vulnerable populations, such as the elderly.

And many companies have stepped up to support their workers, customers and local communities, in a shift toward the kind of stakeholder capitalism to which they had previously paid lip service.

Clearly, the will to build a better society does exist. We must use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need.

That will require stronger and more effective governments, though this does not imply an ideological push for bigger ones. And it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way.


REFORMS NEEDED

The Great Reset agenda would have three main components. The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes.

To this end, governments should improve coordination - for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy - upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a “stakeholder economy.”

At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action.

Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes.

Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.

The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability.

Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion (US$838 billion) recovery fund.

The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.

Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run.

This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance metrics.

The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges.


During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centres; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.

The COVID-19 crisis is affecting every facet of people’s lives in every corner of the world. But tragedy need not be its only legacy.

On the contrary, the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future.


 
A "great reset" will only happen if there's a war or a Black Plague-level pandemic that leaves people dead in the streets, not some "post-capitalist" commie wet dream. It's also absurd to think that a "great reset" will keep any of the pet liberal groups in power and relevance, by "default" gays and lesbians will fall out of favor with mainstream society if not maligned as criminals.
 
This mirrors many ideas I’ve had before about the economy. Only, these days, I’m not sure it’s such a good idea. No, I don’t think I like this “Great Reset” one bit.

You see, my worry was that under the present form of extractive crony capitalism, where shareholders get the majority of the value and wage laborers get the table scraps (as opposed to producer-capitalism with fairer compensation and less usury), the gulf between the rich and the poor would widen to such an extent that eventually, the wealthy would pull away from the rest of us and become like demigods, living off in their Rapture/Elysium-like gated communities with 200 IQ CRISPR-modified Gattaca babies and Neuralink in their heads to control their armies of drones and fend off the starving plebs who would otherwise mob them. Within a century or two, the rich would become untouchable. Basically a separate, superior species. Think Black Mirror, only an order of magnitude creepier.

The only means I saw of forestalling this eventuality was wealth redistribution. However, it is now becoming clear that socialism can benefit the rich and lead us to the same exact dark future, as well. They can use socialism to redistribute wealth from the middle class to the poor, thus dynamiting the middle class and destroying their political power, allowing the rich to get away with anything and everything. That is the plan. That is the “Great Reset”. The destruction of the middle class, the confiscation of their property, and the immediate widening of the insurmountable gulf between the rich and the poor. All the while, the wealthy plan to hide from all of it in offshore tax havens and palatial accommodations in international waters, beyond the jurisdiction of any nation.

I’ve been trying to warn people for years. It seems the problem is worse than I ever could have possibly imagined.
 
This mirrors many ideas I’ve had before about the economy. Only, these days, I’m not sure it’s such a good idea. No, I don’t think I like this “Great Reset” one bit.

You see, my worry was that under the present form of extractive crony capitalism, where shareholders get the majority of the value and wage laborers get the table scraps (as opposed to producer-capitalism with fairer compensation and less usury), the gulf between the rich and the poor would widen to such an extent that eventually, the wealthy would pull away from the rest of us and become like demigods, living off in their Rapture/Elysium-like gated communities with 200 IQ CRISPR-modified Gattaca babies and Neuralink in their heads to control their armies of drones and fend off the starving plebs who would otherwise mob them. Within a century or two, the rich would become untouchable. Basically a separate, superior species. Think Black Mirror, only an order of magnitude creepier.

The only means I saw of forestalling this eventuality was wealth redistribution. However, it is now becoming clear that socialism can benefit the rich and lead us to the same exact dark future, as well. They can use socialism to redistribute wealth from the middle class to the poor, thus dynamiting the middle class and destroying their political power, allowing the rich to get away with anything and everything. That is the plan. That is the “Great Reset”. The destruction of the middle class, the confiscation of their property, and the immediate widening of the insurmountable gulf between the rich and the poor. All the while, the wealthy plan to hide from all of it in offshore tax havens and palatial accommodations in international waters, beyond the jurisdiction of any nation.

I’ve been trying to warn people for years. It seems the problem is worse than I ever could have possibly imagined.
Bullets.
Wealth redistribution does nothing. If they want to live in a space station above Earth we fucking shoot it out of the sky.
Are you fuckers so dumb that you don't get the purpose of the 2nd Amendment? It's to prevent this shit from ever happening.
That's why they want to remove your guns. Because without them, good luck fighting back.
 
Bullets.
Wealth redistribution does nothing. If they want to live in a space station above Earth we fucking shoot it out of the sky.
Are you fuckers so dumb that you don't get the purpose of the 2nd Amendment? It's to prevent this shit from ever happening.
That's why they want to remove your guns. Because without them, good luck fighting back.
Well, that’s one way of doing it. I prefer to dig into the intel side of things.

The system that they’re aiming for is something that a number of people have come to call techno-feudalism. Think about it. What is a wealthy, augmented demigod, with 200 IQ Gattaca children, a Neuralink in their head, and a private robot army? That’s a feudal lord. The only competition they have is from other feudal lords (CEOs) with their armored knights and cavalry (drones, PMCs). They want a world where the serfs—that’s you and me—can no longer challenge their power.

If we do nothing, if we don’t expose them and we don’t fight back, that’s the future they have planned. It’s reprehensible.
 
Well, that’s one way of doing it. I prefer to dig into the intel side of things.

The system that they’re aiming for is something that a number of people have come to call techno-feudalism. Think about it. What is a wealthy, augmented demigod, with 200 IQ Gattaca children, a Neuralink in their head, and a private robot army? That’s a feudal lord. The only competition they have is from other feudal lords (CEOs) with their armored knights and cavalry (drones, PMCs). They want a world where the serfs—that’s you and me—can no longer challenge their power.

If we do nothing, if we don’t expose them and we don’t fight back, that’s the future they have planned. It’s reprehensible.
Yes but you don't stop them by exposure when they control the means of exposing them.
 
This is dumb. Covid 19 has only accelerated what was about to happen anyway. High debt to income ratio, increasing reliance on debt to fuel growth. High level of misallocated capital and equity in stock markets, high technology and real estate which only creates and facilitates unnecessary economic supply and demand.

Sure technology makes things "better" but how better before your returns are so marginal and maybe even detrimental? How often do we need to use a fucking uber to order our food? Do we really need to buy everything online?

And when there is only two fucking outlines for buying shit online, its just a fucking monopoly and not a competition. Especially if that infrastructure was built on high level of capital and zero profitability. You can't tell me that 40% of online market share by Amazon isn't a monopoly.

It'sjust a matter of who has more money than other guy and how long he can last.

That's not competition of the fittest. Thats antitrust. That's not improvement. That's just market bullying.

This was all created by the government and the big business. Cheap money, big loans, and zero profitability.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo