Consider Restricting Posts That Can Appear In "Featured Post" On Front Page

[Prokhor Zakharov]

It's always been my understanding for some time that the front page of KF is intended to be acceptable for someone to pull up at work.

Some of the posts that have been featured on the front page have content that no one would likely feel comfortable pulling up on their device at work.

Is this a change in policy? Or have I misunderstood how this is applied?

If my understanding is correct, and policy is that the front page of KF should be something that is acceptable for someone to pull up at work then I think there needs to be a limitation for what is allowed to appear as a featured post on the front page.

 

[TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve]

Yeah, the Nikocado asshole pic, no matter how censored, wasn't appropriate for the front page. I don't know if that's even what the post was about but hopefully it's been pulled from rotation. That's the only egregious one that's popped up for me but I definitely don't want a repeat

 

[Sneaky lurker]

Why would you use a pornographic site at work?

 

[Null]

The banner images are user generated by people with gold banners.
The featured posts (the bylines with text) are written by mods.

If you want to complain about a specific featured item you need to actually say what it is.

 

[souschef]

You can do it on the fly with the ublock extension

Just right click what you don't want appearing on the page -> block element -> create

Use with the stealth theme and you're golden

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

The banner images are user generated by people with gold banners.
The featured posts (the bylines with text) are written by mods.

If you want to complain about a specific featured item you need to actually say what it is.

Yes, I meant the banner images. So we should just ask for a review if one comes up that is potentially an issue?

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Us gold-tinged faggots are the ones responsible for that shit, so we should also be responsible for policing it; if you're a gold faggot you should have a "report this feature" button

If you abuse the feature you should be whipped with carrots

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Us gold-tinged faggots are the ones responsible for that shit, so we should also be responsible for policing it; if you're a gold faggot you should have a "report this feature" button

If you abuse the feature you should be whipped with carrots

That sounds like a good solution to me.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

That sounds like a good solution to me.

Real talk it could be an issue if someone was malicious - there's no easy way to report, nor emergency takedown report.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

One of the banners features nicocado avocados asshole, but cropped so you dont see the actual deathstar. If it was slightly less cropped, it would be a problem.

 

[crushedrocks]

One of the banners features nicocado avocados asshole, but cropped so you dont see the actual deathstar. If it was slightly less cropped, it would be a problem.

I don't think it's cropped nearly enough. You can still see the hair on his ass cheeks.

 

[Mound Dweller]

You can still see the hair on his ass cheeks.

Bro come on, it's a bit spicy but also the very definition of sfw, it's literally got a massive censor bloc over the middle of the legally objectionable bit, you see more explicit imagery at the beach.

Fair enough if borderline is too borderline, but if NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER is kosher then how not this?

 

[Battlefield42]

Green reddit type shit. Consider suicide

 

[Jershua Coomer Troon]

Yeah, the Nikocado asshole pic, no matter how censored, wasn't appropriate for the front page. I don't know if that's even what the post was about but hopefully it's been pulled from rotation. That's the only egregious one that's popped up for me but I definitely don't want a repeat

I don't think it's cropped nearly enough. You can still see the hair on his ass cheeks.

 

[crushedrocks]

Bro come on, it's a bit spicy but also the very definition of sfw, it's literally got a massive censor bloc over the middle of the legally objectionable bit, you see more explicit imagery at the beach.
Ver archivo adjunto 8801489
Fair enough if borderline is too borderline, but if NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER is kosher then how not this?

It's just what I think, but my word isn't the be-all-end-all.

 

[Haloperidol]

I think it’s hilariously on point. Having a small chance of fat guy ass appearing in front of you really captures the experience. But I get why people don’t want to see it on the front page and moving the bar up a bit wouldn’t hurt. I’m kind of on team htfu though.

 

[Rango Dango]

Bro come on, it's a bit spicy but also the very definition of sfw, it's literally got a massive censor bloc over the middle of the legally objectionable bit, you see more explicit imagery at the beach.
Ver archivo adjunto 8801489
Fair enough if borderline is too borderline, but if NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER is kosher then how not this?

honestly for those who dont know the original image this looks like a man sitting on a chair so id say its fair game

 

[catpetter]

I thought people were talking someone sponsoring a post with his uncensored ass. This here is fine in my opinion since you can't see the inside of his asshole which is the most gross part of the image

 

[Mound Dweller]

I thought people were talking about his uncensored ass

That's because censorious no-fun-allowed n'wahs always exaggerate.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

If possible, if you could put a little "Report" button for any banners that may be inappropriate, it seems like that would be the best way to handle this.