Consent as the Modern Leftist Moral Compass

[FunPosting101]

There is an element of truth to that however promiscuity culture is not limited purely to homosexuals. It is also deeply suspect if we can successfully control the spread of other diseases because of the natural selection factions associated with them. That being said the advent of nexplanon condom has fallen off a cliff more or less globally, which I am fine with except the cost of all of this is returned to the tax payers in the end.

Well, HIV is the one big STD everyone understandably worries about, and due to the way that homosexual men typically have sexual intercourse, it more easily spreads through that particular population assuming no protection is used. The same is really not true for heterosexuals, even the promiscuous ones. Both because condom use is more frequent, and anal sexual intercourse is not as common.

 

[Carmen The Aids Rabbit]

I'm gonna be honest with you, mate, I don't think they have a moral compass. I just think they want to never be held responsible for anything.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I'm gonna be honest with you, mate, I don't think they have a moral compass. I just think they want to never be held responsible for anything.

Occam's razor.

 

[Otterly]

Yes, because it’s also subjective. If someone consents then it’s OK, so anything’s OK as long as someone consents. It removes the absolutes and thus removes moral constraints and progs love that because it let’s them be degenerates
And people use consenting adults in the bedroom but what that slippery slopes into is gillick competence and then children being trooned out.
You can see the thing happening.
-minors inherently cannot consent to certain acts (absolute state of some things are not ok.)
-ok maybe some acts (gillick competence.)
- the concept of a ‘willing minor’ is introduced by Scott weiner’s sodomy bill.
-Trudeau a Canada extends MAID to ‘mature minirs.’
-pushes for child transition - if they can consent to x they can consent to y!
(You are here)
-of they can consent to transition, and are deemed a mature minor then they can consent to sex.
That’s the end goal

 

[Whatevermancer]

This is common too, if they're not Satanists they're just emotional, their current feelings dictate everything.

No, you don't get it, all morality is based upon vibes. Golden rule is based upon vibes, the ten commandments are based upon vibes (God isn't real and had to be invented to bestow the morals upon the humanity since living in a world without vibes-based morality is scary).

 

[Divine Power]

If someone consents about a terrible thing it is not OK, end of the line.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

No, you don't get it, all morality is based upon vibes. Golden rule is based upon vibes, the ten commandments are based upon vibes (God isn't real and had to be invented to bestow the morals upon the humanity since living in a world without vibes-based morality is scary).

Nope, not all morality is based upon vibes, my morality is objective. God is real and everyone is just going to have to accept that, eventually.

Regardless, even if it wasn't true, what's important is that we enforce it as if it were true. This is because Christian morality is superior to all other (incorrectly) claimed objective sources of morality, and we obviously can't operate optimally under purely subjective morality.