#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema Done
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
https://youtube.com/watch?v=I4Xhov8ETLI
Moron Meyer rambles about how comics are better then manga because the characters and stories never die/end.
I guess he never read Judge Dredd because characters generally stay dead. Also, characters not dying or staying dead removes any stakes, permanence, and makes the struggles of characters meaningless. Why struggle when you will eventually win and any negative consequences gets wiped from the board? Why have characters die when they will come back eventually? Why have a story in the first place if it isn't going to end?
 
But it's also Liam's fault.

In a way it is. Liam unintentionally did more damage to comicsgate than anyone before or since. Liam had this idea that there needed to be more communication among people in comicsgate. He provided a forum for that and kicked off a total bloodbath that brought down warcampaign and had nearly everyone in CG at each others throat. Things were never the same after "Live with Liam".

@FROG is somewhat correct for once in that Liam did let him down and did let comicsgate down. But where is incorrect is in attributing the blame. @FROG is ultimately responsible for his own decision to use Liam to do his dirtywork for him and also responsible for his decision to promote a seriously mentally ill paranoid guy within comicsgate.

And he also kind of got even with Liam when he drove Liam all the way to that phony suicide attempt and his subsequent hospitalization.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=I4Xhov8ETLI
Moron Meyer rambles about how comics are better then manga because the characters and stories never die/end.
No Dick, the fact that American comics never end(or need constant retconing to keep the stories fresh) is a flaw, at best a quirk. If you like comparing runs of comics of a character that's fine, but don't act like it's an objective improvement.
I'm gonna die. I'm gonna die before I ever got to find my twin sister's killer. What? That's the reason I joined the force, remember? To find the man who murdered my twin sister.

That's my whole story. Debbie, there's no way you told me that
Upon reflection this lead in at least makes sense, it's for a bullshit opinion but at least it makes sense with what he's talking about 3/10
I guess he never read Judge Dredd because characters generally stay dead. Also, characters not dying or staying dead removes any stakes, permanence, and makes the struggles of characters meaningless. Why struggle when you will eventually win and any negative consequences gets wiped from the board? Why have characters die when they will come back eventually? Why have a story in the first place if it isn't going to end?
Having a consistent universe with strict rules that adds to and changes things to give a character new challenges?
Fucking gay.
Only old fat men care about that! 20260711_102508.jpg
 
"I'm approaching my ending, not enjoyable. I will tell you, not enjoyable. It's not fun.

It's not my favorite thing. I really liked my thirties, even my late thirties. Those were great times.

It's very healthy. I was broke as shit, but you know, I just, you know, go run trails in Austin. It was fun.

Um, but as someone approaching their end, um, it is not okie dokie." -- Zack
"You have the personality of a man who lives to a hundred. I don't want to live to a hundred. Oh, gross.

I'm tired of going to the bathroom. I don't want to go to the bathroom for 48 more years. Sick of this shit."-- Zack
"He got the Jude law hairline rock in there. Um, but anyway, so, uh, enjoy life, you miserable old cunts. Why would any fan want their favorite characters to wither and die? I know every manga doesn't end with like, like the Pokemon kid in hospice, but like, why would you want their adventures to end? Your adventure is going to end.

Honestly, your adventures probably ended a while ago. You're like those retired Marines for like 41 and just like, ah, fuck. Go, go."-- Zack
I think Richard thinks about his life in a very healthy way and should keep it up.
 
I will say, while as far as I know, Zorro has never been a religious character, so I don't see a problem making him an atheist per se, I do think the dialogue around that fact in those panels sucks ass, and feels very much like baby's first thoughts on theology.

I actually wasn't sure if Zach was legitimately critiquing it, or this was some kind of attempted sarcasm, because Zaq is just so out to lunch, I can't fucking tell anymore.
Zorro in the original "The Curse of Capistrano" ans subsequent Johnson McCulley works was overtly Caholitc, working with church fathers, monks, etc. which was set at odds against the local corrupt California government. he's shown as being very close with Father Felipe in the novels.

In the next Hollywood iterations, Zorro was also helped by Franciscan Friars (the silent film), and then finally, when it came to talkie films, he actually chastised the other caballeros in a call to action: “You sit idly sipping wine while the naked back of an unprotesting soldier of Christ is beaten!”

Yes, Zorro was overtly Catholic. And in the realm of Mission-era California, pretty much everyone would have been so it didn't really need to be stated outright.
 
Zorro in the original "The Curse of Capistrano" ans subsequent Johnson McCulley works was overtly Caholitc, working with church fathers, monks, etc. which was set at odds against the local corrupt California government. he's shown as being very close with Father Felipe in the novels.

In the next Hollywood iterations, Zorro was also helped by Franciscan Friars (the silent film), and then finally, when it came to talkie films, he actually chastised the other caballeros in a call to action: “You sit idly sipping wine while the naked back of an unprotesting soldier of Christ is beaten!”

Yes, Zorro was overtly Catholic. And in the realm of Mission-era California, pretty much everyone would have been so it didn't really need to be stated outright.
He was also a shipwrecked Irishman, wasn't he? Or was that the real life guy he was based on?
 
He was also a shipwrecked Irishman, wasn't he? Or was that the real life guy he was based on?

I think the reference here is to William Lamport. Lamport was Irish and tried to organize a revolution in Mexico. No shipwreck though. But he is often associated with Zorro. Lamport was imprisoned for many years and eventually burned at the stake by the inquisition in Mexico.
 
Sooner or later that retard is going to have to get over anything Rippa related. Other than his sad therapy sessions he literally gets no benefit from doing this at all, regardless of the lies and delusions he tries to come up with.
 
And @Smug Freiza god rest his soul.

I do wish @Mister Dongs had not ascended to Valhalla. 😢

This is why @Mister Dongs was such an irreplaceable asset to this thread; he could autistically go through the mindnumbingly boring hours of streaming from the CG homos and deliver the TLDR version.


The main reason I started coming here to KF was for the weekly (or so) summary updates of Comicsgate drama from Mister Dongs and Smug Freiza. Neither of them have been sighted since April 2024.

Partly inspired by Enlightened Fans habit of screenshoting grok as if it's the ultimate source of knowledge, this week I've been working very hard building an automated drama radar that detects movement and activity in the community, consumes all the mind numbingly boring 4 hour streams, analyses and archives it all.

The machine needed an operator and thus 'Mister Smug Dongs Frieza' was born.

Screenshot_20260713-150842.png

The AI has been training on both Mister Dongs and Smug Freiza posts. It's far from complete and will get better as it learns more. But for example...

Drama Radar Fortnightly Review​

The Age of Kings is Over​

By Smug Dongs


Internet communities have an unfortunate habit of reinventing feudalism.

Everyone arrives proclaiming that nobody should have authority. Five years later they're pledging allegiance to YouTubers wearing baseball caps.

ComicsGate has spent years in exactly that phase.

The last fortnight suggests the monarchy may finally be ending.

The first kingdom to quietly close its gates belonged to Frog Tony, a man whose greatest gift is discovering internet arguments that were already halfway through when he arrived. His show, Detractor Kings, came to an end with remarkably little ceremony. At the time, it looked like the natural conclusion of yet another livestream that had simply run its course.

Screenshot_20260716-154203.png

Interesting.

But not historic.

Then ComicsGate Kings announced it was packing up as well.

Screenshot_20260716-154105.png

Now things became rather more curious.

Two different creators. Two different audiences. Two different shows.

The same title.

The same metaphor.

The same destination.

Apparently it's been a bad fortnight to be a king.

Titles matter because they reveal how communities see themselves. There was a time when calling your show Kings made perfect sense. ComicsGate revolved around a handful of personalities. Their streams became courts. Their moderators became palace guards. Their audiences defended them with the enthusiasm usually reserved for medieval peasants who'd mistaken YouTube memberships for hereditary titles.

The crowns looked permanent.

History enjoys embarrassing people who think anything is permanent.

Curiously, while the kings have been disappearing, the queen refuses to leave the board.

Chrissie Mayr, professional podcaster and part-time constitutional crisis, continues popping up in conversations with the reliability of an unpaid tax bill. Every few days somebody confidently announces that the matter has finally been settled.

Then somebody tweets.

Then somebody clips a stream.

Then somebody responds to the tweet about the clip from the stream explaining why they weren't going to respond.

The discussion survives entirely on the fuel generated by people insisting they'd rather not discuss it anymore.

Queens, it seems, play by different rules.

Kings require kingdoms.

Queens merely require subjects incapable of shutting up.

Then there's Liam Gray.

There was a time when Liam was less of a person than a weather system. Entire weeks of ComicsGate discourse could disappear into the gravitational field surrounding whatever Liam had most recently done, said or allegedly implied.

These days his role has changed.

He increasingly appears as a historical reference rather than the headline itself.

Former kings rarely disappear.

They become landmarks.

Nobody storms the castle anymore.

They simply use it for directions.

Taken individually, none of these stories mean very much.

Shows end.

People keep arguing.

Former protagonists become supporting characters.

The interesting part only emerges when you step back.

The stories no longer belong to individual creators for very long.

A livestream generates a clip.

The clip becomes tweets.

The tweets become another livestream.

By the end of the week nobody remembers who started the conversation, only that they're now participating in it.

That isn't how kingdoms function.

That's how republics function.

Which brings us back to the original question.

Has the Age of Kings ended?

The evidence suggests it has.

Not because anyone staged a revolution.

Not because a new monarch conquered the old.

Simply because the throne doesn't appear to matter as much as it once did.

The castles are still standing.

The roads between them have become far more important.

Before anyone gets too excited, this doesn't mean the Age of Wisdom has begun.

Republics have an unfortunate habit of electing idiots.

The next fortnight should provide plenty of evidence for that.

file_000000002d4c71fbaf9add06feba4fc7.png

 
Última edición:


Transcript:

Hi everyone, it's your boy Zach. So I'm not sure why this is making the rounds, but it is. And I'm very excited because I am always ready to talk about this.

This is one of my favorite subjects ever. It is Alan Moore hating Rorschach, but there's more to it. So much more.

So it was kind of funny. I was like, I feel like I've done this exact video. I haven't done this exact video.

As far as I can tell, I did some research. I've just given my take on this multiple times, but I went to the what is it called? Original Sources. An interview from 1987 with Alan Moore that shines light on this.

It was kind of funny when I was researching. Like, have I ever done this before? I just like Alan Moore, like what are the all the videos I've ever done on Alan Moore? And I saw like my views from like my heyday. Bro, this channel was never popular.

This is the common thing right now. It's like you changed, that's why you lost all your viewers. First of all, I didn't lose them.

I literally told them to go away when I realized that 80, 90% of them were just here for culture war, but it was never a lot. Even at the so-called height of the channel, it was like five to ten thousand viewers, but it averaged like 7,500 forever, for years. Until I started going to the movies.

I was like, wait a minute, Drinker lies. And then when I said that, like everyone freaked out. So anyway, I have spoken about this before, but I was also relying on memories of old interviews, and then I was like, I could just go reread them.

And so let's just get into it. So this person, gotta zoom in a little bit, they're talking about Rorschach, and they say, the only character that has any kind of sense of justice, principles, and morals dedicates his entire life fighting against injustice and crime, refuses to compromise his ideals, even at the brink of death. The creator of the character wants us to think that this is the most evil and disgusting character of all time that we are supposed to hate.

Is this because I lack media literacy or what? Because I don't get it. Well, you don't get it because what you're saying isn't true. It's like that thing I say about those right-wing news sites.

It's like, a lie you made up is by its nature exclusive, because they'll say like, exclusive! But, you're not getting it because you're not accurately describing it. And we're going to go to the original interviews. Let's just go to them right now.

Why beat around the bush? So, here is, so this is a comics interview from 1987. At the time of the interview, issue 11 had just come out, issue 12 was done, and it was going to come out shortly later, and Alan Moore was basically saying, he was very chipper. If you ever think of him just as this like, this old bitter guy, he wasn't always that way.

He used to be 29, and very successful, and very happy. So, he was around 29, 30 when this interview was conducted. So, the interviewer says, the characters in Watchmen are pretty extreme, some of them.

Obviously, they've been designed that way. In most comic books, there's a lot of care and love put into the characters, and then people kind of latch on to them. I get the feeling that you don't want people latching on to the characters in Watchmen that way.

And, he's like, whoa! How does he talk? Whoa! Whoa! I'm just going to use a regular voice, an American voice. Well, I think, this is Alan Moore, well, I think that all of the characters have a great deal of care put into their creation. But, what I've tried to do is just not make it so obvious, because I don't like this very simple, cheap, and ultimately useless manipulation of the reader's emotions that seems to go on.

Basically, most characters in comics are sort of anodyne ciphers, and I cannot tell you what anodyne means off the top of my head. They're just complete blanks. Um, I'm guessing it means blank.

Um, context clues. I was talking to a friend, and I used the word affectation. And they're like, I don't know what that means.

I'm like, okay, Django. Why do you have the vocabulary of a former slave? You don't know the word affectation? It's like, quit being an asshole. It's like, quit being dumb! Um, we were talking about how gay guys have that voice, and the, um, so-called fact that when they come out of anesthesia, they don't have that voice.

They just talk regular. And my buddy didn't, my buddy's been all around the world, and doesn't know the word affectation. I don't know the word anodyne.

Um, uh, they're just complete blanks with, you know, well, their actual characteristics. They've all got about the emotional depth of My Little Pony. And consequently, people tend to think of those characters as nice, attractive, well-rounded characters.

If they were to have those people around them in real life, they'd probably realize just how far short these comic book characters fall of real personalities. Okay, so. Actually meant to start, like, ... farther down.

Okay, what I tried to do in Watchmen was to take a number of quite radically diverse characters, some of whom would be probably fairly well instantly likable. I find Dan Dreiberg very likable. He's a very human character.

I find Hollis Mason very likable. I find the Silk Spectre likable, both her and her mother. The strange thing is that with characters like Rorschach and the Comedian, who politically and the way they behave are the exact opposite of myself, and I should suspect of most of the readers out there, I was pleased with the way those characters turned out.

Although I didn't spare any sort of effort in portraying the Comedian as a complete amoral monster, I found that while writing the stories, I was starting to develop, not sympathy, that's too strong a word, a curious respect for him as a character. And the same applied for Rorschach. Even though I still found them loathsome, I could come to respect the character in a certain way.

And I think that if I can accomplish that, I can come up with two completely unlikable characters and then make the reader almost have a respect for them despite their unlikeability. Then that is something which is more difficult and much more worthwhile achieving than coming up with characters that are just obviously there as sickly pieces of marshmallow designed, you know, just to lure the readers by their sweetness. So I want to go back to this amazing illustration, which I believe was created for the uh, there was like a tabletop book or a tabletop game.

This interview is a lot about that as well. So I'm getting back to the kind of summaries of what Alan Moore. Okay.

So first of all, a bunch of people just discovered that he's a communist. Like very recently. They're like, I don't like communists.

It's like, it's not the 1950s. I think communist is just like a synonym for leftist, but yeah, he's an actual like communist. And has been since the 70s, I believe.

I'm gonna fight communism by watching netflix little house on the prairie and looking for things that are woke. Didn't find anything in this hour-long video, maybe in the next. But anyway, um Yeah, so the deal, the thing that's so amazing about Rorschach and Alan Moore, his creator, is that Rorschach was, as he said, the opposite of him, or the opposite of how he saw himself.

Rorschach was racist. Rorschach was homophobic. Rorschach was misogynist.

Rorschach was right-wing. So Alan Moore said, I'm not that, I'm the opposite. Why do all British people sound just like different animated animals? Like this would be like an anteater or something.

I'm Alan and eating moo. But anyway, being a good writer, he made these full characters. So Rorschach isn't just racist, just misogynist, just homophobic.

Moore, accidentally, maybe subconsciously, unconsciously, gave Rorschach the max stats on every universally beloved human trait. So he's like, I'm gonna make him a racist. He's also extremely loyal.

I'm gonna make him a misogynist. He's also got a great sense of humor. I'm gonna make him homophobic.

He's also the bravest man who ever lived. Like what the fuck? Let's look at Rorschach's traits. Amazing sense of humor.

Infinite integrity. Infinite or maximum bravery. Loyalty.

So you got humor, loyalty, honor, integrity. These are the things you go back to any Homer, you go to any mythology, any urtext. This is the thing that everybody loves.

Everybody loves a guy with a great sense of humor. Everybody loves a loyal friend. Everybody loves or admires someone with honor and integrity.

So he accidentally created a conservative character that everybody loves. The most liberal people out there love Rorschach. The most liberal people out there love the Punisher.

It's the craziest thing. Oh, so this guy says, The reason Rorschach is one of the most beloved comic book characters of all time is that Alamore put everything he hated into him. He sculpted him in the image of what disgusted him the most, and Alamore is, to put it simply, a vile fucking human.

At its core, what he hates is the very concept of good. Thus his creation in the image of his ire is profoundly good. He has never self-reflected on this fact and never will.

He physically can't comprehend that he's the bad guy in all of his stories. Fuck Alamore. Watchmen is good in spite of him.

It's more complicated than that. Watchmen is good because of him. And everyone else on the team and everyone who approved it and financed it and all that type of thing.

That being said, he's expressed for decades frustration that fans will come up to him and they say, I love Rorschach. I would love to know him. And he's just like, I don't understand.

Rorschach is ugly. He's stinky. He's a racist.

He's also the best friend you will ever have. The most loyal friend. There is a moment in the comic, and I'm not crazy about the movie.

They did a great job in the movie, where, you know, Rorschach's bumping his gums, being very, uh, autist-coded, and Driver just gets sick of him. He's like, you, you eat my food while insulting me. Nobody puts you in your place because everybody thinks you're a goddamn lunatic.

And, in, it's slightly different. In the comic, you just see him from behind and he's extending a hand and he's just like, basically like, I'm sorry. I know it's difficult to be my friend.

Look at me, I'm getting a little choked up. I value your friendship. Words to that effect.

Blanket on. Actually, I have it on my, I, I forgot to get it ready, but, um, let me go to YouTube, turn the volume down, go to my page, go to my community posts, open it up. What does it say? Okay, so, I can't, I can't zoom in it.

He goes, uh, Daniel, you are a good friend. I know that. I'm sorry that it is sometimes difficult.

And he's, uh, he's referring to being his friend. Bro, the most sincere apology, not an automatic apology, not a forced apology, the most sincere apology in the history of fiction on earth. So you got a guy who can apologize when he goes too far.

He's aware of himself. He appreciates the friendship of others. So you give this guy like the max, you know, the, the video games where they got like the sliders and sometimes when you slide one up, it automatically slides one down so you can't just make like a perfect character.

So like he slides, you know, humor to the maximum and then, you know, anti-racism goes to the, to the bottom. So he's, he's a racist. I was actually even thinking about it.

Not only are Rorschach's good traits universally admirable right now, they have been through all of, what, 40,000 years of human history. The things that are his faults only became faults like a couple hundred years ago. Nobody cared if you were racist 200 years ago.

Nobody cared if you were sexist 100 years ago. Nobody cared if you were homophobic 50 years ago. And a lot of them, I have this friend and everyone's always surprised I'm friends with him because they're like, he's so dumb and mean.

I was like, yeah, but he's, he's more dumb than mean. He's mean because he's dumb. He's actually a pretty cool guy.

People can't help being dumb. Rorschach can't help being raised. Do you think he's gonna have charitable views on women raised by the mother he had? Do you think he, he was of his time? Again, this was set in the 60s initially.

He would have grown up in the 40s and 50s. But despite all of his challenges, he's a hell of a guy. Everybody fucking lost it.

And especially, I've talked about this with like Asmongold. Every factory, every restaurant, every platoon I've ever been has a guy like Asmongold. And he says super offensive things, but you see in his heart like he's a good guy.

He's just, you know, he's a peckerwood. It happens. They're out there.

but uh, yeah, so maximum bravery, maximum honor, maximum integrity, maximum loyalty, great sense of humor, best apology in the history of humanity. And they always emphasize, you know, he's dirty, he's stinky. He got that fit on though, you know.

He's looking good. He's a baller on a budget. He's got the trim, you know, you know physique.

He's got the cinched weights on the the trench coat. Although I will say, I will say, it always bothered me. Like I said, I'm not a huge fan of the movie, but Jackie Earl Haley, perfect casting.

Performance perfect. The look, everything. I just disagreed on how fast the blobs would move in the mask because you can pretty much gauge it from the comic.

It, as far as I could tell, it would sometimes coalesce into a shape for a little bit. And then like heat or movement or impact would make it change. And sometimes it would just suddenly change to another shape.

But in the movie, it's kind of like always changing most of the time. Very quickly. I never got that impression.

I think sometimes it was just kind of there and then his, you know, he would get upset and his cheeks would heat up or something like that. Or he would get punched or he would start running, breathing hard, and I thought I think that's what made it change. Also, I think just sometimes he would just blob into a different shape.

But uh, yeah, sorry, sorry, Helen. He created like the best, and he didn't create any shitty like Captain Democracy versus the Legion of Libtards. He's like, I really hate conservatives.

Let me make a character that makes fun of conservatives. But also, I'm a good writer. So I'm going to give him good and bad qualities.

And he just happened to give the character he hates, probably the second most, the maximum stats on the most admired qualities in every culture in all of human history. I had one other thing to say, but I forget what it was. Something about Rorschach? Something about, I don't know.

I think I talked about everything. There was one other thing. I'm gonna think about it right after I stop recording this.

But um, uh, and it's so funny because nobody else was really able to write when they did that, like, before Watchmen. Nobody was really, like, the funniest thing is that only the communist who hates Rorschach can write him properly. Because, oh, I thought of it.

So, when Alan Moore was hired to write Swamp Thing, he was very excited. It's one of his first American assignments. I think it might have been his first American assignment.

And he was talking to them and he goes, Which swamp? And they're like, what? He goes, he's from a swamp. Which one? They're like, I don't know, you decide. He's like, I think I'm gonna make it Okichobe.

He's the type of guy, when you say, this guy's from the swamp, he says, which one? He's going to fill out and flesh out this character. So he wanted to zing conservatives. He instead proved that he's better at creating conservatives than conservative heroes than they are.

Actually, he probably created more conservatives. Think about it. Who would draw someone to conservative more? Rorschach, with all his faults, or some flamboyant, campy, conservative YouTuber? It's not what the fans want to see.

It's literally what the fans don't want to see. It's just hilarious. It's like, who are the conservatives? It's like, Az.

It's like, fat gay Brit? Like, what the fuck? Disperu, a Brit who doesn't wash his teeth or anything else. All these, like, these drunk townies. It's like, My SI has just told me about Soapy Skulls.

The first Tuesday, he's just tearing his balls. What the fuck? Congratulations. Alan Moore, you have recruited more people to conservatism than extremely flamboyant, closeted YouTubers have pushed away.

Faceplant, patriots. I just watched every single season of, um, what's the gayest show out right now? Gossip Girl. I was like, wait, that was like 20 years ago, right? Whatever.

Whatever's the gay show right now. The funny thing is when they, uh, defend him, it's like, it's his job, man. His job is to watch movies and TV shows made for eight-year-old girls.

That's his job. That he chose to have. And this is your defense of him.

Anyway, uh, I love Orshan. Great character. Great character.

Thank you, Alan Moore, communist, for creating him. Thank you for being a good enough writer at the time to give him good and bad traits. And thank you for giving him the maximum on all of the best traits of a human.

Anyway, thanks for watching. Bye.

[SPOILER/]
 
For whatever its worth these days, none of the characters in Watchmen were original. They were derivative riffs on comics characters that DC bought from a company called Charlton. Watchmen was supposed to originally directly use the Charlton characters, but it was decided eventually not to use them because the creative team would do financially better if they were "original" characters. Though the character Alan Moore plays today when he is in public would never admit that.

Rorschach in particular is interesting because he is in many ways Alan Moore's somewhat negative take on Steve Ditko. The appearance of Rorschach is directly derivative of two Ditko characters: "The Question" and "Mr. A". Ditko was a very hardcore right wing guy. And in the 1980s, False rumors were circulated among certain comics fans/pros that Ditko was a crazy homeless anti-social person. That he was nearly homeless and should be seen as a victim. Mostly because he had little interest in entertaining "fans" or talking about his work. He felt creatively that art should speak for itself. That talking about it in fanish ways simply reduced his art.

I believe that Alan Moore was actually trying to demean Steve Ditko through how he wrote Rorschach and ridicule Ditko's beliefs. But the problem was that the sort of moral absolutism that Ditko believed in was far more popular in a comic book character than the sort of nhilism that is at the center of Alan Moore.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=6M38ciJIQG4
I decided to try and watch Meyer's oldest video on his channel and just comparing his voice then to now is day and night.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fZN0y7X3V5A
He really is a bitter old man.
This faggot UNIRONICALLY tried(and failed spectacularly) to explain why people loved Rorschach. What the tard came up with is that he's polite to his friends. Not, you know the only character with morals he's willing to stand for in the whole book.
Like I said here before. Dick is too stupid to understand politics, he's just an impotent and overly emotional child.
 
He was also a shipwrecked Irishman, wasn't he? Or was that the real life guy he was based on?
No he came back to California after studying in Spain to find the corruption rooted in his home and decided to do something about it was the whole plot.

I believe that Alan Moore was actually trying to demean Steve Ditko through how he wrote Rorschach and ridicule Ditko's beliefs. But the problem was that the sort of moral absolutism that Ditko believed in was far more popular in a comic book character than the sort of nhilism that is at the center of Alan Moore.

Alan wanted the rights to use Ditko's characters and was denied and so he made them a subversion intentionally as a kind of "eff you." Childish and lame. Alan Moore is overrated because he's dark and edgy and that means "serious and adult" to retards.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo