Business Closing of HuffPost Canada 'abrupt' and 'devastating,' editor says - whitepilling?


The closing of HuffPost Canada and HuffPost Québec was an abrupt development for the journalists who were in the middle of a workday when their new ownership made the announcement.

"It was devastating," Maija Kappler, lifestyle editor for HuffPost Canada, told CBC News in an email on Tuesday. "I love my job so much, and I know it will be really difficult to find another one in journalism."

The outlet said in a statement on its website that it will "no longer be publishing content" as of March 9 while existing content will be kept as an online archive. The site was shut down later in the day.

"People who were working on stories weren't able to finish and publish them," Kappler said. "There are stories written by freelancers that have been submitted and were ready to be published, but we have no way to get them out now.

"For a group of people as dedicated as our staff, that's been hard to deal with too — it was just so abrupt."


BuzzFeed recently acquired HuffPost from Verizon. BuzzFeed, which also announced layoffs for the U.S. newsroom on Tuesday, said it's closing HuffPost Canada and HuffPost Québec's operations and laying off 23 workers as part of a broad restructuring plan for the company.

Kappler said layoffs weren't ruled out when the acquisition was first announced in November, but she didn't expect them to happen so quickly after it was finalized in February.

"I've been with HuffPost Canada for about two-and-a-half years, but some of my co-workers have worked here since it was launched," she said. "I can only imagine how hard it is for them."

BuzzFeed also said it is beginning consultations in Australia and the U.K. to propose "slimming operations" in both places, according to a statement from the company.

"One of my co-workers said to me that part of what's hard is losing an important support network during the pandemic," Kappler said. "We were a small office and really close, so that's a hard part of it."

Decision not connected to unionization, company told union​

"All of our staff are now out of a job," the HuffPost Canada union said in a series of tweets. It said the decision "was made before our organizing effort and is not linked to our unionizing."

Kappler, who was among about two dozen workers at HuffPost Canada who had filed for union certification in February, said they're hoping to get more information.


In a statement of its own published shortly following the announcement, BuzzFeed Canada's union criticized the decision to "take these websites' homepages offline barely an hour after employees were told of their impending closure, and without warning."

"We cannot overstate the loss of an entire publication from this country's media ecosystem," the statement read. "We stand in solidarity with the HuffPost Canada union and ask BuzzFeed to provide fair and generous severance that recognizes the dedication of these employees."

Kappler echoed the BuzzFeed Canada union's sentiments.

"Canadian media is shrinking all the time, and so many talented journalists are getting fed up with the instability," she said. "A healthy media landscape is diverse and wide-ranging, but it seems like every year, Canada's gets smaller.

"That means important stories continue to go unreported, and it's a loss for all of us."
--------------------------
Totally not connected to unionization at all. Good riddance!
 
https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry...6c5b6a466466f3715?ncid=tweetlnkcahpmg00000002 - a news story about the writer's historectmy and her fledgling relationship

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry...6074b8?ri18n=true&ncid=tweetlnkcahpmg00000002 - a news story about the fact that John Oliver thought that Megan Merkle (a "black" foreigner who married into British Royalty, and then caused constant drama). He must be psychic, who would have thought that would happen?

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry...1c5b6530400340bf7?ncid=tweetlnkcahpmg00000002 - a news story about Jimmy Kimmel (a comedian known for wearing blackface) calls the royal family racist based solely on unsubstantiated claims.

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry...1c5b6af8f98bdcde8?ncid=tweetlnkcahpmg00000002 - a news story about Donald Trump (a US politican) stopping by one of his businesses in NY.

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry...ac5b69078ac6c786f?ncid=tweetlnkcahpmg00000002 - "Rape Culture" pepe le pew removed from Space Jam 2.

Such important stories are going to go unreported, guise!! Canadians don't care that much about US Politics (or, could just read US News on it), US Pop culture, or rape culture in Space Jam 2? HOW ARE WE NOT PROFITABLE?!
A bigger mystery is why those stories, almost like entirely not involving Soviet Canuckistan, required an expensive Canada bureau?
 
The closing of HuffPost Canada and HuffPost Québec was an abrupt development for the journalists who were in the middle of a workday when their new ownership made the announcement.
I'm going to have to ask you to stop posting things like this. It's unprofessional for me to walk around with a diamond-hard boner at the news of journoliars getting what they fucking deserve.
 
Two nearly identical KF posts about HuffPo bloggers getting shitcanned?


In this case, sure, why not?
Two is better than one!

doublemint.jpg
 
Aww what a tragedy. They weren't even able to put out their new daily article about how sitting in a corner by yourself is actually supporting systemic racism or how eating a sandwich means you are a transphobe.

Truly the world has lost an important voice today.
 
23 employees.

"Hey let's unionize and become a huge pain in the ass for the company that just bought us"

Get fired.

Many such cases. Sad!
And as the cherry on top, they formed one of those Silicon Valley "unions" whose principle function was to bitch about FUCKING WHITE MALES!!!! as opposed to salaries, benefits, working conditions, job security, etc... it seems that the oligarchs have figured out Lenin's trick of not worrying about the opposition by controlling it themselves.
 
I'm kind of baffled why these people think they were providing something of value.
As an experiment, I will piss out my window and see if I hose down a journalist with more of interest to say than anyone working for Huffington.

Got my cat, so I'm calling that a success. She says 'Meow' which means, 'Asshole, I have to lick myself clean.'
 
I'm kind of baffled why these people think they were providing something of value.
As an experiment, I will piss out my window and see if I hose down a journalist with more of interest to say than anyone working for Huffington.

Got my cat, so I'm calling that a success. She says 'Meow' which means, 'Asshole, I have to lick myself clean.'
I realized a couple years ago I'm unironically more interested in what random assholes have to say about anything than journalists. Journalists mainly regurgitate information from other sources, so not too much different from random assholes. Their opinions are pretty uniform, once I read a headline there's a good chance I can guess what the take is going to be on it, while random assholes will sometimes come out of left field with some weird take on things that can actually be insightful once in awhile. But the main factor is journalists think that they have an assumption of authority from the general public; if they're saying something, they don't need to back it up, they have the facts (they think) and people trust them (they think). They also increasingly don't try to write in any kind of professional manner. But ilovefisting69 (for example) commenting on someone's youtube video or on reddit or here doesn't have that supposition from the public and has to actually back up his statements and write in a persuasive way to get anyone to take what he's saying seriously. ilovefisting69 has to have a damn good argument and some sources to convince me what he's saying may be true, something which journalists don't seem to think they need to do. Additionally, random assholes have a better chance of having real life experience that doesn't involve being a journalist. Journalists tend to have pretty similar bougie interests (usually stuff like eating at restaurants, watching netflix etc) and if they write about a specialty like "tech" its usually really surface level stuff.
 
I realized a couple years ago I'm unironically more interested in what random assholes have to say about anything than journalists.

Basically, this.
Once upon a time, you had people with a skill become journalists to write about things pertaining to that skill. James Oberg used to work in Mission Control and he became probably the leading Western expert in the Soviet space program through the Cold War. He spent most of his professional career looking for evidence of unreported cosmonaut deaths, and ultimately concluded there was no evidence of any unreported deaths in Soviet space missions (but he did prove at least one training accident).
These guys graduate as "journalists?" Why should I listen to them?
 
I was a journalist for a few years a long time ago and so glad I got the fuck out of that racket. Even at the small town newspaper level there is so much conflict of interest in the journalism industry it really makes you contemplate if anything you read from any company can be trusted. If these retards had any sense they would get a masters in business or do a few certificates in digital marketing, project management, proposal writing or something so they could transfer their writing skills (and I use this word very loosely here) to something practical that spans across all industries and something for which there will always be a need. That trendy, far-left pop journalism that sprung up over the 2010s definitely reached it peak a few years ago and clearly the market was extremely oversaturated for this type of content since so many of them have been shutting down or downsizing in recent years as a lot of old guard media companies adapted to the changes and started churning out content in a similar manner.
 
Última edición:
Trump is responsible for this.

Its his fault for not getting elected like journalists were almost aparently hoping for so they would have material to bitch about.

Edit: They are realizing that now that their "boogeyman" is gone, they have literally nothing of value in the eyes of the establishment that hired them to defame said boogeyman
 
Última edición:
IIRC, Huffington Post was started with an all-volunteer staff back in the day. Huffington then sold it for millions, keeping the money and telling the staff they could go fuck off.

These idiots volunteered to work for a company with that history. And now, they're surprised to find out how much their work is actually valued.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo