Chris court appearance

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
His toys at his house are gunna be stolen by trolls who burglarize his house when the police finish their investigation of his house.
Doesn't he live in a townhouse/apartment community? I'm pretty sure the neighbors/police are watching it closely with the amount of notoriety surrounding it...although criminals aren't the brightest I can imagine some sport getting caught smashing a window at 2am and getting caught quickly in the near future, hell I put money on a break in attempt coming.
 
I'm sure the reason for his outburst about getting his toys was because the police officer(s) that interrogated him kind of played the idea that if he talked to them, they will "see what they can do about his things."
 
Chris acting out might actually be beneficial to his defense. He's showing zero remorse and more concerned about other things. I'm not a lawyer and not really sure how this all works, but if they're able to bring in evidence that solidifies that, with his autistic diagnosis, along with some shred of evidence that Barb is lucid and may have instigated it I imagine a Not Guilty plea could be within the realm of possibility. Either way, this is just speculation but I'm dying to know how the trial plays out and what his lawyer goes with for a defense.
 
Fellow lawfags, a moment of silence for David Heilberg, please.

Whenever we internally relive the most soul crushing battles of our professional careers, at least we can say this: we were not required to defend Chris on charges of raping Barb.
 
Reckon this is all going to play out simply. Chris will argue that when he fecked the auld lassie, he was whatever wee oc character he fancies being at the time, therein technically, he wasn't the one fecking and thus cannae be convicted, meaning his lawyer will go the right of not guilty due to insanity. On the other hand, the prosecutors can easily argue the same thing as his lawyer, but go harsher with the sentencing. So either way, Chris is finally going to the place he really should have been to start with.
 
I don't think Chris is in denial. He has at least some inkling of the deep shit he's in. The fixation on getting his toys is a coping mechanism. What is clear is that he has no guilt or regret about raping his mom.
 
Fellow lawfags, a moment of silence for David Heilberg, please.

Whenever we internally relive the most soul crushing battles of our professional careers, at least we can say this: we were not required to defend Chris on charges of raping Barb.

I would offer to buy him a drink just for having to wrangle this tard.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo