UK ‘Chestfeeding’ to be banned in NHS crackdown - The health service is to limit trans ideology with new constitution

The NHS is to crack down on transgender ideology in hospitals, with terms like “chestfeeding” set to be banned.

Victoria Atkins, the Health Secretary, will this week announce a series of changes to the NHS constitution which sets out patients’ rights.

Referring to “people who have ovaries” rather than “women” will also be prohibited under plans to ensure hospitals use clear language based on biological sex.

The new constitution will ban transgender women from being treated on single-sex female hospital wards to ensure women and girls receive “privacy and protection” in hospitals.

Patients will also be given the right to request that intimate care is carried out by someone of the same biological sex.

It follows concerns from patients about biological men being allowed in women’s hospital wards. NHS guidance has previously stated that trans patients could be placed in single-sex wards on the basis of the gender with which they identified.

Kemi Badenoch, the women and equalities minister, has backed calls for a public inquiry into the “pervasive influence” of transgender ideology in the NHS.

The new NHS constitution will emphasise the importance of using “sex-specific” language in the health service after references to women were expunged from advice on the menopause and diseases such as cervical and ovarian cancer.

A government source said: “The Government has been clear that biological sex matters, and women and girls are entitled to receive the protection and privacy they need in all healthcare settings.

“Our proposed updates to the NHS constitution will give patients the right to request same-sex intimate care and accommodation to protect their safety, privacy and dignity.”

The document sets out the rights of patients and medical staff. All NHS bodies, as well as private and third-sector providers that supply NHS services, are required by law to take it into account when making decisions. The changes proposed this week will be subject to an eight-week consultation.

The updated constitution will state that placing transgender patients in single-room accommodation does not contravene equality laws as long as it is for an appropriate reason, such as respecting a patient’s wish to be in a single-sex ward.

Maya Forstater, chief executive of the campaign group Sex Matters, said the changes represent a “major step” towards reversing NHS England’s “capitulation to the demands of gender extremists, which has damaged policies and practices, created widespread confusion and harmed patient care”.

She added: “These much-needed changes to the NHS constitution will help secure essential sex-based rights in healthcare across England.

“Clear language, single-sex wards and access to intimate care provided by a health professional of the same sex are crucial to the wellbeing and safety of female patients. They should never have been compromised.”

Last year a report by the think tank Policy Exchange said NHS trusts were compromising women’s rights by providing same-sex intimate care based not on their biological sex but their self-declared gender identity.

In 2021, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital became the first NHS trust in the country to formally implement a gender-inclusive language policy for its maternity services department – which will now be known as “perinatal services”.

Midwives have been advised to use gender-inclusive language and staff were provided with a list of alternative terms to use when addressing patients, including “mothers or birthing parents”, “breast/chestfeeding” and “maternal and parental” in all general communications.

Instead of saying “breastmilk”, they can choose from “human milk” or “breast/chestmilk” or “milk from the feeding mother or parent”.

There has been fierce debate around attempts to reduce the use of the word “woman” in discussions on subjects including pregnancy and childbirth, and any move to do so has provoked ire from some feminists.

Author JK Rowling was vilified after she questioned a decision to use the term “people who menstruate” in a headline.

Earlier this month, a group of more than 130 MPs, peers, doctors, psychiatrists and academics wrote to the Prime Minister to demand a public inquiry into transgender ideology in schools and the NHS.

They argued that the treatment of “confused and vulnerable” children by medical professionals has been a “major scandal”.

It came after a report by Dr Hillary Cass, a leading paediatrician, which found that the evidence for allowing children and young people to change gender is built on “shaky foundations”.

The landmark review said that social transitioning should be approached with “extreme caution” because “we simply do not know the long-term impacts”.

In response, the NHS is to review all transgender treatment it provides, including to adults, and treatment for any new patients aged 16 and 17 seeking to change gender at adult clinics will be paused immediately.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/27/nhs-to-limit-trans-ideology-with-new-constitution/ (Archive)
 
I'm sticking to the Roe V. Wade explanation - the real people in charge are starting to realize that unfruitful lifestyles = Russian pwnage or Muslim colonization or just plain running out of people born with an IQ high enough to keep shit running.
I wonder: they want the autists, but need to halt the -to-troon-pipeline? Technically-obsessed, socially-disinterested drones are no good if they keep 41%-ing themselves, maybe.
 
Got renamed to chestplate about 40 years back. Same reasoning behind it as the chestfeeding bullshit, but no one much cared cause it's not the sort of thing you wear in the street.
I'm not sure that ever really caught on in bonglish. The British Museum still uses "breast plate" to describe exhibits and they'd be right at the forefront of that sort of dumbshittery.
 
Chestfeeding?

chestburster-avp.gif
 
It's the first official credible non-political document condemning the transgenda, it provides cover for anyone who wants to genocide criticize trannies to be able to say "this isn't bigotry it's good public policy and the experts agree with me".
True. But those people were criticising anyway, nothing has materially changed but we are seeing a massive sea change here.
The Tavistock Institute basically started in the 20s as an experimental research private project
Excellent post. See below
God, that is one of the best, most succinct but simultaneously detailed and thorough posts I've ever seen on KF.
It is. Let me add one more thing though. The Tavistock has been involved in some very very dark stuff as well - basically social engineering and it was involved in seeding that stuff to the USA. There’s a lot online about the Tavistock. Some really batshit crazy stuff, but even the stuff that’s officially documented is sinister (and I wish we had a thread on it.) for the gender stuff to be linked to the Tavistock means to me that there is a link to social engineering and that opens up all sorts of questions.
I do wonder if the ‘readiness for war’ stuff is true. Throw the plebs some bones to make them die for Blighty again. There’s been a few temperature-taking articles about the draft here and I’m sure the government departments tasked with monitoring the comments sections were not thrilled with the prevailing sentiment, which was ‘fuck you, you hate us I’m not dying for you.’
 
The backlash is coming fast and hard.

It's almost like "support for trans rights" was absolutely astroturfed in the UK and in reality, no one supported this shit.
It was the same in the US. Just one day the media said everyone was supposed to be pro-troon or they could be fired and cancelled for wrongthink.
 
Got renamed to chestplate about 40 years back. Same reasoning behind it as the chestfeeding bullshit, but no one much cared cause it's not the sort of thing you wear in the street.
It’s really redundant to begin with, considering both men and women have chests and both men and women have breast tissue, even if it’s a lot more pronounced on women. Very weird change.

Anyways, the complete 180 of the NHS regarding trans healthcare feels like goddamn whiplash. Part of me is really angry that they endorsed this shit to begin with and potentially ruined the lives of hundreds of healthy children, but part of me is just so relieved that they’re not even pulling any punches with banning this shit full-stop.

And no, I am not shocked at all that Britbongland is enacting stricter regulations before the US does. The United States is too cucked by its own pharmaceutical industry, corporate interests, and general apathy. It’s difficult here to have reasonably thoughtful discussions on why transitioning minors is actually really, profoundly, horrifically fucked up without it threatening your job security or general livelihood.
 
Última edición:
I do wonder if the ‘readiness for war’ stuff is true. Throw the plebs some bones to make them die for Blighty again. There’s been a few temperature-taking articles about the draft here and I’m sure the government departments tasked with monitoring the comments sections were not thrilled with the prevailing sentiment, which was ‘fuck you, you hate us I’m not dying for you.’
On the American side, seeing straight white men in military commercials, instead of the "Hannah's two moms" bs, really seemed to get a lot of attention, of the "we know you're gearing up for another Global American Empire war for trans-BLM kids, and we're not interested in fighting it for you" variety.

It's important not to let the fact that you're being monitored deter you from sharing your views. If anything, it's an opportunity to demoralize or radicalize the hall monitors.
 
Yes, poor Eddie Izzard was basically compelled to proclaim a trans identity - which he had always firmly refused - to hold high office in the Labour party.

Fuck off.

Eddie - sorry, Suzie! - Izzard was in hog heaven over this shit. He's been AGP for years and was finally getting a socially acceptable outlet. I know it hurts, because I used to love his stand-up too, but let's kid ourselves, man has always been a histrionic egotist.
 
True. But those people were criticising anyway, nothing has materially changed but we are seeing a massive sea change here.

Anyways, the complete 180 of the NHS regarding trans healthcare feels like goddamn whiplash. Part of me is really angry that they endorsed this shit to begin with and potentially ruined the lives of hundreds of healthy children, but part of me is just so relieved that they’re not even pulling any punches with banning this shit full-stop.

It's pretty clear that a great deal of opposition was boiling away under the surface, but there was the constant fear of "cancelling" that kept people in line and prevented it breaking out into the open. Cass gave the official stamp of approval to turn around. It's also pretty clear, as I've speculated elsewhere, that there is a bit of a civil war going on behind the scenes on this matter, and on several other matters of similar import. The civil service seems quietly factionalised, with a growing contingent that want to roll back many of the progressive policies that have been implemented in the last 3 decades. I think we're going to see more of this in the next few years.
 
Chestfeeding is an atrocity and it only serves to harm the infant because sweat off a man's tit is not milk. Even then, lots of nutrients and stuff that the baby needs can only be found in a mother. Woe behold upon the pooner who had a baby because she ain't gonna be producing milk no more.

Glad to see Bongistan of all places took a stand to actual child abuse.
 
Fuck off.

Eddie - sorry, Suzie! - Izzard was in hog heaven over this shit. He's been AGP for years and was finally getting a socially acceptable outlet. I know it hurts, because I used to love his stand-up too, but let's kid ourselves, man has always been a histrionic egotist.
Him and his “sisters” are going to lose the next election for Labour, so let’s see how happy he is after that.
 
Congrats, Britain, for once you don't deserve the asterisk.

A very good point, the trannies don't seem to notice it's even more insulting to them than it is to actual women
1. It's ostensibly done to accommodate pooners, who hate breasts.
2. Saying "chestfeeding" is kowtowing to troons and that overrides a slightly negative connotation the word might have. It's not like the "it" pronoun which is so blatant a dehumanization that troons themselves need to add disclaimers.

Chestfeeding is an atrocity and it only serves to harm the infant because sweat off a man's tit is not milk. Even then, lots of nutrients and stuff that the baby needs can only be found in a mother. Woe behold upon the pooner who had a baby because she ain't gonna be producing milk no more.
Unfortunately you misread this. The "chestfeeding" the Brits are banning is "using the gross pooner term to refer to the practice of breastfeeding (normal or roided or mantit)". Actually poisoning a child with troon pus and roids is not prohibited (yet).
 
Sadly I think Labour might get in.
When Tories are busy pushing Labour's agenda whenever they're voted in, it makes sense people are voting them back out.
I sure as hell would rather have a democrat in speaker Johnson's house seat. At least he's not lying to me about being a democrat!

I have yet to see them do one thing to roll back Blair's horrible agenda, even after Blair himself came out and said a lot of it was a mistake.
From mass migration to arrests for flying the union jack.
It's all still happening under a "Tory" government.
 
Another factor that people might be overlooking because it hasn't had much on the Farms about it is the still ongoing Horizon scandal with the Post Office. It is a now decades old disgrace caused by IT systems errors suggesting money had gone amiss that resulted in ruined lives and destroyed families, including multiple actual deaths and some people fleeing the country, as a result of shitty management, lies and deliberate hiding of problems. All of which lines up very well with the Tavistock stuff all well as the NHS handling of transgender matters in general except for two factors. Firstly more of the victims of the NHS will be children and secondly at the moment there is a possibility the comeuppance might be coming within years not decades.

While there's been little to no public consequences for many of those involved with the Horizon stuff currently it's come close. One person surrendered their damehood, exceedingly uncommon, and others are likely to end up being politely shuffled out of their cushy jobs a few years before they planned to be. Public sentiment towards them is even worse, if a politician advised they'd be seeking capital punishment for every single Post Office senior staff they'd get a 5 point jump in the polls for their party at the moment.

Now consider that if the same thing happens with this stuff it's going to hit the NHS, politicians, public education, the police, researchers, charities, NGOs and more with a chance of actual consequences occurring before they can scuttle off somewhere else.
 
Gawd bless Queen Muvva Cass and 'er luverly troon-smiting smile.

Now, if we can just get her to write a report about those thieving gyppo bastards...
 
Didn't the UK have a "vaccine" mandate?
No, covid vaccines were never mandatory at a national level, except briefly for certain kinds of care workers. However, it was NHS policy was to push it on patients at every opportunity and it did mandate vaccines for its own staff.
 
Don't let this shit fool you. The tranny ideology is still alive and well. They're just trying to hide it now
I kind of wonder how long that will last though as the same thing is happening with DEI. They are trying to put it behind the curtain but the truth has been revealed and the lawyers are salivating.
What on earth is happening behind closed doors here??
As I said a long time ago: Lawsuits are going to bring an end to this shit. They have already butchered and dosed so many children that the damage from litigation outcomes will bankrupt all of them and I think they know that is the case.

Perhaps the hope is that by appearing to change course some damage can be mitigated but it is too late once the iceberg has opened your hull.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo