There is no actual, official version of events. At least to my knowledge there haven't been any releases from the autopsy report, all the public has is conjecture and hear say.
We don't. What would be a good place for it?
You're technically correct and good of you to point out.
I'm telling you the guy did it only because he thought it would be funny. No grand conspiracy.
The guy did it because he was fucking a tranny and suddenly viewed himself as a revolutionary hero.
No, because the left isn't racist, bigoted, or fascist, you fool! Only Nazis celebrate the death of wholesome left-leaning hippies. Since all right-wingers are racists, you can celebrate when they get killed.
The guy was a terminally online gooner perpetually stuck in Trantifa Discords and lived with a Troon and troon-adjacents.
Late response, but man that was so nice to read through. I can't possibly imagine why her (now former) boyfriend would want to continue dating someone who's revealed to be a mentally ill loon that celebrates the murder of an innocent man. She truly deserved all that shit that happened to her.
Yeah but I don't think he did it because he's some Antifa "larger conspiracy" bullshit (which is what I was trying to get at). I think he thought (using the process you described above) "hey you know what would be really funny and is "morally ok" to do" and well the rest is history. If he were a republican he would have done the same thing but idk shoot Hasan or something (whoever is the closest left wing version of Kirk, you decide). But when right wingers go down that rabbit hole they end up TND/TMD/TTD/TKD and pull a christchurch or what those two spics did at that mosque recently.
Yes but I think stochastic trantifa terrorism is far more plausible than any other conspiracy.
It is hard to pinpoint whether he's part of some Antifa group specifically because Antifa is hard to refer to as one specific group, because they are usually just small cells of radicalized anarchist retards with loosely the same ideals that comes down to fighting 'fascists' i.e. getting violent with everyone that doesn't think like them.
I wasn't a huge fan of kirk (I'm not Christian and he had this not very hidden view that "America is a Christian nation" shtik never sat right with me- that said he overall wasn't wrong, nor was he stupid or vindictive or truly hateful or stupid like many in the right wing podcast race sphere), but I and many of the dems I interacted with were disgusted and horrified when he was killed. It was an attack on the first amendment. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean you kill them when they aren't calling for violence (kirk never did).
What I hate is that the modern Left just can't let shit go.
Well he was against trannies and pro Israel which makes him a double genocider and thus a fair target. The issue with the left is that they all think they would be the ones on the beaches killing nazis like it's wolfenstine when in reality they would be right with the nazis using science and all to justify the murder of people they don't like. Remember the Nazis didn't wake up one day and go "yup it's jew killing time" they justified it with "approved science". They do not see themselves as a collective, they see themselves as the guiders of culture. Remember fascism only survives when it is on a constant war footing and when the enemies are exhausted new ones are always found. But people aren't stupid, they recognize a facade and a hypothetical one at that. The biggest question is how much longer must we listen to them? How much longer should we let them run around without facing consequences both socially and legally? We have the moral majority we just have to make it known.
That is because America IS a Christian nation.
kirk got shot because he was actually a threat. some retard like nick fuentes is never going get the ire of violence because he doesn't have enough integrity to hold a position long enough to actually piss anybody off. The "america is a christian nation" shtick is a direct existential threat to the jewish cultural hegemony because it's correct - the founding fathers were freemasons and they created a cosubstantial, hermetic system based on christian principles that still functions. The foundational principles of the constitution and the declaration of indepdendance ARE the values of trinitarian christianity and jesus christ as the logos.
It won’t. The people who believe that shit heard it come from a lunatic woman’s mouth and still chose to run with it. They’ll believe what they want to believe and nothing will stop them.
Ill take "What is Taqiyya?" for $200
christianity takes the stance that admitting faith is the most important thing of all but, like islam, the foundational period of the religion took place in an adversarial environment where faith had to be concealed and still has a pretty extensive cultural doctrine about how and why to conceal it that isn't explicitly mentioned in the text for obvious reasons
I didn't think Charlie Kirk was important enough to be worth the CIA's time. Maybe I just don't pay attention.