- Registrado
- 27 de Sep, 2022
I am a conspiracy guy, but I’m waiting until the trial is over to really dive deep into this one so my opinion isn’t solid yet. It’s not inconceivable to me that there was more behind the scenes and someone powerful wanted Kirk dead, it’s also not inconceivable to me that it was a lunatic radical and the feds jeeted things up making it appear more sketchy that it was. It’s also not inconceivable that there’s more to the story of a lunatic radical, such as multiple lunatics, and that’s being kept on the downlow for opsec reasons.
The biggest point against it being a glowop for me is the why. Why would the glowies want Kirk dead? There’s plenty of other people who I would count as a bigger threat were I a glowie, but we only know what we know and so far I don’t feel like I know enough to make any solid decisions.
The bullet in the neck is the biggest hmmmm for me. I know it’s possible for there to not be an exit wound, but it’s odd for that to happen with that caliber and whenever it’s a big deal something that’s odd yet possible needs a solid explanation to rule out other possibilities such as a second shooter with a different weapon.
One book I highly recommend reading is Fry The Brain by John West. It’s about sniping, and has plenty of examples of sniping operations in history from the IRA to the Middle East to mass shooters and it’s phenomenal at explaining the mechanics and tactics used for all of these. If nothing else you’ll learn how complex both sniping and forensics are, and how due to the nature of sniping a clear picture of these things can sometimes just not exist.
So, I guess all I can do is wait until more information comes out and go from there. But one last thing is that there’s a difference between asking logical questions and just being a retard. When you treat dudes asking actual questions about an event like they’re retards you’re not really helping anything because if you’re correct the evidence should be in your favor. Especially considering the amount of distrust people correctly have surrounding intel agencies and politics questions are the natural response, at least within reason.
The biggest point against it being a glowop for me is the why. Why would the glowies want Kirk dead? There’s plenty of other people who I would count as a bigger threat were I a glowie, but we only know what we know and so far I don’t feel like I know enough to make any solid decisions.
The bullet in the neck is the biggest hmmmm for me. I know it’s possible for there to not be an exit wound, but it’s odd for that to happen with that caliber and whenever it’s a big deal something that’s odd yet possible needs a solid explanation to rule out other possibilities such as a second shooter with a different weapon.
One book I highly recommend reading is Fry The Brain by John West. It’s about sniping, and has plenty of examples of sniping operations in history from the IRA to the Middle East to mass shooters and it’s phenomenal at explaining the mechanics and tactics used for all of these. If nothing else you’ll learn how complex both sniping and forensics are, and how due to the nature of sniping a clear picture of these things can sometimes just not exist.
So, I guess all I can do is wait until more information comes out and go from there. But one last thing is that there’s a difference between asking logical questions and just being a retard. When you treat dudes asking actual questions about an event like they’re retards you’re not really helping anything because if you’re correct the evidence should be in your favor. Especially considering the amount of distrust people correctly have surrounding intel agencies and politics questions are the natural response, at least within reason.
Última edición:
.30-caliber class deformed/damaged bullet jacket fragment