Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

I admit I am not following it all that closely, but I thought the prevailing opinion is that the bullet hit his body armor, flattened a bit and slowed down, and then ricocheted and went into his neck, which explains why the wound was so big and why there apparently was no exit wound.

Also, I did see some of Candace's video talking about what the camera from behind saw, and she said she didn't see any blood. To me, that actually seems consistent with the prevailing opinion, that the shot came from the front and didn't have an exit wound. Now, I agree with others that I don't like it that Candace might be taking advantage of this event to garner more clicks, but she does seem to be doing some real journalism here, and I have to respect her for that.
Doubt there was armor, bigtime. And if so, not above class 2. He obviously didn't have 3+ rifle plates on. That's only way that 'theory' would make any sense.
Anyway, even rifle plates don't deflect rounds like that. The round probably did make an exit they didn't see (or are lying about for clicks) or diverted inside. We should fine out soon enough.
 
Doubt there was armor, bigtime. And if so, not above class 2. He obviously didn't have 3+ rifle plates on. That's only way that 'theory' would make any sense.
Anyway, even rifle plates don't deflect rounds like that. The round probably did make an exit they didn't see (or are lying about for clicks) or diverted inside. We should fine out soon enough.
Nice one, can you explain this tweet from the Turning Point spokesman though?

1758458471782.webp

https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/1969551427648569633
 
Whenever I turn on NPR (I hatelisten while in traffic) they're desperately discussing Kimmel everyday as if it's an actual tragedy with nothing that predated it. Giving minute by minute updates like there's an ongoing hostage crisis. It really can't be described any other way but sick and evil. The way they speak about the 1st amendment with so much snark, adding a little chuckle at the end of their shitty talking point, and after they finish smearing American principles they act like the victim. They repeat so much shit like, "I thought they were supposed to be the party of free speech!" Implying only one party supports the 1st A, nigger.

I know I'm repeating some talking points from other posters, but it's just so hard to process this divide in morals.
I remember when they had a faggot hype up the mindy project. If kimmel was so great and funny then why doesn't npr pick him up? or maybe he should start his won youtube channel? Or is this an excuse for them to not talk about Palestine?
 
niggers killing each other does not concern me. niggers killing my own people does.
That is my point. Are you telling me that when a hood rapeape robs and murders a white woman it's politically motivated?
You've yet to tell me. Was the democratic politican woman who got smoked by that schizo a few months ago a "victim" of the drumpf putler russian superhacker climate change denial buzzword buzzword regime? Yes or no.
I fucking hate candace owens so much
shes a retarded schizo gorilla nigger
and all these stupid faggots on x and whatever else doing all this conspiracy shit
saw some faggot today saying that charlie was AKSHUALLY shot from behind or some shit
and all the stupid faggots that are all DA JOOZ posting (even some faggots in this thread).
Oh and the 'why'd charlies staff take the cameras?!?!'
what the fuck is wrong with these people.
I hate them just as much as the people celebrating his death.
yeah how dare they ask questions about something instead of just blindly believing that [other side] did it! How dare they point out that charlie kirk gets assassinated mere DAYS AFTER he starts questioning the jews, their control of the media, their funding of tranny globohomo orgs, the Gaza genocide, blackrock... How dare they point out trumps and netenyahus bizarre reactions to his death! Don't they know that they are supposed to be good little goyim and just listen to everything the media tells them??? how DARE they question the medias narrative on something!!!! don't they know that the media would never EVER EVER lie to them?!?!!? Next they'll start questioning the USS liberty or the 9/11 attack! Oy vey can't be having that!! shut id down!
 
A troon? You fucking chud. That’s a BEAUTIFUL woman! Tyler Robinson is clearly a straight MAGA supporting republican.
Why did he kill the most famous and influential conservative commentator? Uhhh..,, because…. Well…. You see… he just wanted to okay!!
Minor nitpick, but prior to this, I don't think Charlie was the most famous or influential. Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson were way more mainstream.
 
Was he using subsonic rounds? The lack of exit wound is sus, but if it really did bounce off a vest that could explain it? I am less inclined to believe mossad is behind it, and more inclined to believe "insane troon terror cell". A lot of weirdness out of this.
I've never heard of 30-06 subsonic. They have other rounds and I'd assume they'd all be the same. This is a 'don't jump to conclusions' thing cause I'm already seeing some saying this means it was some close up pistol job.
 
That is my point. Are you telling me that when a hood rapeape robs and murders a white woman it's politically motivated?
You've yet to tell me. Was the democratic politican woman who got smoked by that schizo a few months ago a "victim" of the drumpf putler russian superhacker climate change denial buzzword buzzword regime? Yes or no.
Which one? Gabby Gifords or Mellsia hortman? My understanding is both were shot by leftists.
 
Sounds like cope to me. I'm sure there will be a formal autopsy or at least I sure hope there was.
I'm sure there will be, but I'm just trying to make rational conjecture based on what everyone saw. I think you and others lumping together retards talking about armpit man shooters and camera guns, with people who have a bit of understanding about ballistics and have legitmiate concerns over the lack of transparency and the type of information the feds released is bordering on CIA tactics. I'm not saying there is a grand conspiracy, or that it was Israel, I'm saying that some details are very concerning: the lack of exit wound, the type of ammo used, the size of the entry wound don't add up, and God forgive me for not trusting the government drivel with open arms.
 
I've never heard of 30-06 subsonic. They have other rounds and I'd assume they'd all be the same. This is a 'don't jump to conclusions' thing cause I'm already seeing some saying this means it was some close up pistol job.
Yeah, this is NOT going the way people in charge want it to. Trump is starting to do things that he was voted in to do, like classify antifa as a terror organization and congress boomers are starting to ask the questions the public wants asked like why does hassan get so much leeway on twitch. Waiting for the "Well the cia needs him to agitate arabs to sow unrest in the middle east, here is the money they send us" card to be played.
 
Nice one, can you explain this tweet from the Turning Point spokesman though?

Ver archivo adjunto 7945386
https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/1969551427648569633

I really hate this kind of propaganda. At a time when you want to think the best of Charlie and his organization, along comes these people trying to turn him into a saint, and to try to turn this horrible tragedy into a bizarro miracle. And then you're left not knowing what to believe. This person, Andrew Kolvet, is the official spokesman for TPUSA, so I suppose I believe he actually spoke with the coroner. I guess I also believe that the coroner told him there was no exit wound. But then do I believe Andrew or the coroner that Charlie was a "man of steel" whose bones miraculously stopped the bullet? No. Why do they have to do this. If it's possible for bones to stop bullets, just say so, don't go trying to turn Charlie into this superhero. Or if the real reason the bullet didn't exit is because it hit some body armor first, just say so. But then that wouldn't help with the myth-making.
 
But then do I believe Andrew or the coroner that Charlie was a "man of steel" whose bones miraculously stopped the bullet? No. Why do they have to do this. If it's possible for bones to stop bullets, just say so, don't go trying to turn Charlie into this superhero. Or if the real reason the bullet didn't exit is because it hit some body armor first, just say so. But then that wouldn't help with the myth-making.
I have seen bullets do all sorts of crazy things in test medium, but obviously not a lot of official reports on humans. Seems awfully unlikely, but we don't know anything yet about the rounds, or really much at all still. But I agree, they shouldn't be even consider bringing in potential miracles on this so far.
 
Which one? Gabby Gifords or Mellsia hortman? My understanding is both were shot by leftists.
Is that so?

Well, it doesn't really matter. When the melissa woman was shot I saw leftists pin the blame on drumpf for "letting it happen" because muh guns bad.
Yeah, this is NOT going the way people in charge want it to. Trump is starting to do things that he was voted in to do, like classify antifa as a terror organization
ANITFA hasn't been relevant since like 2017. This is obviously just a gay ploy to bring attention away from the epstein files
why does hassan get so much leeway on twitch
Because the turkroach is a nepobaby with connections to the TYT. The fact that Dan Clancy, CEO of twitch personally agrees with his politics doesn't help either.
I really hate this kind of propaganda. At a time when you want to think the best of Charlie and his organization, along comes these people trying to turn him into a saint, and to try to turn this horrible tragedy into a bizarro miracle. And then you're left not knowing what to believe. This person, Andrew Kolvet, is the official spokesman for TPUSA, so I suppose I believe he actually spoke with the coroner. I guess I also believe that the coroner told him there was no exit wound. But then do I believe Andrew or the coroner that Charlie was a "man of steel" whose bones miraculously stopped the bullet? No. Why do they have to do this. If it's possible for bones to stop bullets, just say so, don't go trying to turn Charlie into this superhero. Or if the real reason the bullet didn't exit is because it hit some body armor first, just say so. But then that wouldn't help with the myth-making.
the virgin 30-60 that shot charlie kirk and didnt exit his body vs the chad JFK magic bullet somehow passing through multiple people and ricocheting off an engine block
 
Gen Z will be fine, millennials are the ones we need to worry about.
Information access is pivotal, and I've met people over 35 who still can't properly look shit up or use a computer. I expect Zoomer politics to go a lot faster than current politics if only due to greater familiarity with tech. Though the way I hear some people claim it, Zoomers can't do shit either, but trust articles meant to demonise young people to justify H1B1 hiring so I'll consider those claims nebulous.
I think the case that this was a real FCC violation is tenuous at best
EDIT: Disregard I'm retarded

This isn't directed at you but what's annoying about this whole event is that the Left fudged the sequence of events and reacted so intensely with the view asserted, some people here on the right think that's what actually happened.

His comments were made on the 15th of September.
1758458024917.webp 1758459439645.webp
Nexstar put out their statement regarding pre-empting the live shows on the 17th – a Wednesday.
ABC then said they were putting the show on indefinite hiatus on the same day, some hours after the Nexstar announcement.
After the Nexstar thing, a podcast came out – recorded prior to either announcement – that the head of the FCC said in reaction to Benny Johnson asking him to do something, that "we could look at it."

Everything that happened to Kimmel was independent of he FCC. Carr's remarks came out after the Nexstar drop but before the earliest article on ABC dropping Kimmel I could find (Nexstar might've even made the announcement late on a Tuesday) but also in some random youtuber's video. They're trying to assert the drop was a result of FCC involvement when, as far as I know, the FCC still isn't involved in any official capacity. All this is is doing is trying to build a case for Kimmel to sue or something. Kimmel isn't close to being a victim here in any capacity.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Atrás
Top Abajo