Biden once said if you don't vote for me, you're not BLACK. Obviously he's a condescending white racist who views Black people as his property. He's for slavery. You know what that means. . .
Boomer libs only seem to get really riled up when they try to hide behind "poor abused minorities" or "Hitler devil bogeyman". That's not working on late Millennials/Zoomers anymore.
Don't be silly, of course he doesn't use the red phone to call Disney. He uses one of these:
Way back in 2014, I was on Tumblr, and the grand jury testimony was released. Brown's friend Dario (who was there) laid out the truth about everything by ratting Brown out. He testified about the theft of the cigarillos, Brown's first attempt at grabbing the cop's gun by reaching into the car, and his final lunge towards the cop (his hands were NOT up, he was by no means surrendering). I clipped this data and sent it to multiple people who were promoting the "hands up, don't shoot" narrative. It didn't affect them at all. I recently saw a protest outside a federal building and they were still chanting "hands up, don't shoot". These people are immune to reality and reason.
Yeah-that’s not gonna fly when you have antifa communists with rifles rolling up your neighborhood.
Something needs to exist to do that but it should do nothing more.
One of my closest friends is polar opposite of me, an outright leftist. Also a sperg like me.
The irony here is that the opposite is true - the only people I really get on with IRL are some extended relatives, old friends from my school days, and some members of the church I attend. I find more people I agree with on, of all places, Kiwi Farms rather than closer relatives I see and hear from practically every day. They live in a parallel reality.
Yeah this was really the first conversation where I pushed back because I’m just so tired of biting my tongue and his reaction to the grave dancing was infuriating.
What did he say that's controversial? Got any choice, in context quotes you think anyone on the right would balk at?
Your theory involving the United States using Christianity as a central foundation for its various social and legal structures (which is true, more often than not) is interesting to me. I find it interesting because numerous practices we associate with the USA, such as the idea of a democratic republic, did not stem from Christianity but rather much older Greek societies, which were categorically pagan. Your theory also interests me because this association with the divine is implied, through quoting Locke, to award the USA (not in Locke's context, but the context in which you cite him) a sort of unique inoculation against things that might erode its values, such as atheism. Associating these things so closely with God seems like a misstep; the pagan Greeks also likely had theories similar to this, attributing their success to their own gods, and we saw what happened to them as they slowly crumbled due to many of the same problems harming the modern USA. (Women occupying positions of political power, foreigners in the military, an influx of barbarians, etcetera.) Locke had interesting ideas, but his theory you borrow from him where European society was uniquely protected because God wills it strikes me as a big folly.
ain't that Harry Sissy the rapist?awww these poor retards got their Propaganda Tonight or whatever show cancelled because Jimmy Kimmel can't stop being a lying cocksucker, aww I'm all broke up inside
0X68BrBw9TnFTh6w.mp4
Not sure if he's a rapist, but he is a skeevy little lovebombing rat. He got into women's pants through duplicitous means. But its a far stretch to say he raped them when they all willingly fawned over him and his leftist grift.
That's part of the reason it went away so quickly compared to Kirk's. Early details and theories around the murder were easy to counter signal due to the circumstances. It was easier to imagine them being the target of a pissed off Dem than a Republican because of recent votes. Basically the attempted Left-wing tactic of making Kirk's assassin a groyper but actually more tangible. When the narrative got even more confusing regarding the killer's schizo-motive (Tim Walz told him to do it?) it basically just went away. Kirk's assassination probably wouldn't have attracted as much political outrage if the shooter didn't give any clues to his politics with the evidence he left behind. It would've been a lot easier for counter-narratives to flood the news cycle, with "it was Maga," "it was lefties," "it was Jews" all competing for space and there would've been enough pollution with the narrative that people would attribute the official narrative specifically to counter theirs or something.
If they gave even the slightest damn, maybe they should've kept watching his show. Because everything points to the ABC pulling the plug as a final straw with him.
Didn't Ta-Nehisi Coates go into retirement 'cause he literally wrote a book that justified radical Islamic terrorism 'cause Hamas/Hezbollah/ISIS are "oppressed brown people"?