Thanks both for the transcription and embed.
10:56 from Gamergate's post:
[using that calm, condescending tone of someone who's clearly worked up and angry but calmly explaining something]
Did you know that the George Soros **Open Society Foundation** and the **Ford Foundation**, the groups who funded that *disgusting* article justifying Charlie's death. Do you know benefit from generous tax treatment?
They are *literally* subsidized by *you*. And me, the American tax payer.
And how do they reward us? By setting fire to the house built by the American family over 250 years.
Also seeing the video mentioned of Vance's speech. I'll take a look at it. The transcription is looking
, and people are dynamic, Vance could learn and prove himself. We'll see.
I'll try to put this as fairly as possible: Vance's speech felt off. It lacked emotion on parts I didn't expect. His face didn't match what he was saying some of the time.
Particularly where he says "the groups who funded that *disgusting* article justifying Charlie's death." When you
stress the word "disgusting", especially in a context like this, if you feel it, your face shows. Try it. You'll notice your eyebrows narrow, you'll squint a bit, you might nod in impact, or use your hands. Vance did none of these, to the point where the stressed "disgusting" feels dubbed or divorced from context.
He also oddly blinks right on the word "desprate" shortly after. Once again, trying it, if you feel it, you'll have a very sharp focus spread on your face, very unblinking in nature. Maybe a misread of what he meant by "desprate", but considering the rest of his speech, it's a
forceful desperation.
Neither's to say he's a robot, or necessarily disingenuine, but, going from the transcript, to the audio, to his emotions, it hits incredibly differently, which was the last thing I was expecting. I see the anger and the conviction, but for how, as others have noted, refreshingly blunt he's being, it doesn't show on his face at the most critical parts. Maybe he's not trying to rock the boat any more, but if that was his goal, then he wouldn't explicitly condemn the left as violent animals in capable of being in civilized society, as 0713 puts it well.
