Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Destacado
Still blaming him for shit he never did, for something he had nothing to do with
f.webp
 
Laughing Putin dijo:
A smart assassin would put messages on the bullets to deflect attention away from his true identity.
Presiona para expandir...
A smart assassin wouldnt chat shit about their target openly to their family, have leads through discord, be in the same state or openly show their views to their conservative family

Dude was anything but smart its not 8d chess its some faggot who wants to be the next luigi
 
skunt dijo:
Your position at [insert company] is worth less than the negative press you generate if you're exceptionally retarded. If you are exceptionally retarded and display your own views while acting as the company, then you will get fired so fast it'll make your head spin.
Presiona para expandir...
For years they dealt with the PR hit. Is the difference really just a lack of USAID? I can't think of any other difference.
 
Overwritten Tapes dijo:
It's like Franz Ferdinand 2
Presiona para expandir...
It really is but most people arent ready to hear that yet

he was the moderate trying to bridge the gap between young people politically, when the call for moderation comes all the hard liners will have to do is point to charlies and say "he was there biggest advocate atleast of working to communicate and they KILLED him, what do you think they will do to us?"
 
Kermit Jizz dijo:
Why is this happening? I have never in my entire life seen companies so utterly terrified of offending conservatives. This is going beyond firing employees for blatant calls to violence, they are now actively kowtowing. Why, what is driving this behavior?
Presiona para expandir...
Trump controls the state and the courts, and he's flexed in ways that show that he's very much willing to go for the neck.

Trump has legit put troops in major cities for reasons that are ostensibly "illegal", does what he needs to get done, a bunch of pissant libs try to injunct it and bitch about it in court, but it doesn't fucking matter because he's completed whatever mission he had in mind by the time anyone can complain about it, and then finally it makes its way to a SCOTUS that agrees with him anyway in most cases.

Trump has been flexing force in a way that shows that he's gonna win. If he doesn't win legally, it doesn't matter, because he will have already physically completed whatever he needs done by the time you sue him for it anyway, with a court system that will eventually find him to be the winner anyway.

Couple this with mass defunding to liberal causes through the ellimination of liberal grants and things like USAID, and you've got a situation where it makes no business sense to fuck with the right. Because you're not getting paid to do so, and if you're too stupid with it, he'll call you a terrorist and deport your CEO if he feels like it.
 
Observotron dijo:
In this case, I meant it more in a modern sense, but by definition progressiveness is the moving away from more traditional values. I'm using the term traditional to define tradition (as in established social and cultural norms that are generally continued from previous generations and upheld with a modicum of respect)

Generally speaking, traditions that are established for an extended period of time are eventually considered "conservative values". I won't be up my own ass about it, and I'll admit that there are times throughout history where the breaking away of those old values are necessary to preserve a culture or people, but to circle back to my original point - modern progressives don't exist to preserve the future of America, they exist purely to change what they don't like.

They exist to serve, and hold a stranglehold, on minority demographics to instill party loyalty, and will oftentimes use half truths and misdirection to imply that voting for them is the only way to "save" America, despite the fact that they outwardly want to change what the country is.
Presiona para expandir...
They are doing what they are always doing, pushing for and promising a providence that is impossible on earth short of remarkable advancements both socially and technologically. Humanity can't be corralled into these advancements no matter how many 5 year plans you stack, so they promise providence to get power and cause millions to suffer trying to do the impossible.

They do all of that and prove, at it's core, liberalism is a conservative value.
 
23iwakura23 dijo:
Couple this with mass defunding to liberal causes through the ellimination of liberal grants and things like USAID, and you've got a situation where it makes no business sense to fuck with the right. Because you're not getting paid to do so, and if you're too stupid with it, he'll call you a terrorist and deport your CEO if he feels like it.
Presiona para expandir...
It's like it was fake and gay the whole time...
 
Barbarus 3 dijo:
A smart assassin wouldnt chat shit about their target openly to their family, have leads through discord, be in the same state or openly show their views to their conservative family

Dude was anything but smart its not 8d chess its some faggot who wants to be the next luigi
Presiona para expandir...
NoIdeaWhatImDoing dijo:
a smart assassin wouldn't have told his dad that he killed the dude.
Presiona para expandir...
There is such a thing as being book smart but lacking common sense, especially when consumed by an ideology. We’ll probably never know how he admitted it to his father (documents/court testimony?), whether to taunt him (yes it’s possible) or the weight of what he’s done came crashing down.
 
Kermit Jizz dijo:
For years they dealt with the PR hit. Is the difference really just a lack of USAID? I can't think of any other difference.
Presiona para expandir...
Thinking about it, @Peaches the Wonder Cat is probably right. Every single person celebrating is a potential Luigi at your company.

If they are this giddy about a stranger being killed, imagine what they’ll do to their boss…
 
Kermit Jizz dijo:
For years they dealt with the PR hit. Is the difference really just a lack of USAID? I can't think of any other difference.
Presiona para expandir...
I'm all but certain that the wokeslop "blockbuster" movies that no one paid to see were being subsidized on the back end by laundered USAID money for at least 9 years.

Would not shock me at all if money was being spread around in other industries. Additionally, the borderline psychotic anger from the right has literally never been as high in modern US history as the last 10 calendar days. Most large orgs have risk assessment structures, either internal or contracted, to monitor this stuff. The balloon may have gone up from them to not do anything to draw further anger from the right.

No PL, but conversations I've had recently make it sound like >3 Fortune 50s and other large orgs are going to be absolutely hemorrhaging middle managers and laptop femoids who just could not contain themselves on social media.

Layoffs were coming anyway at a lot of of these places, and with a term For Cause, they don't have to make unemployment payouts in a lot of cases. So Legal/Finance/Marketing are going to see it as a twofer.
 
Última edición:
gay dijo:
that's Jackson Bellows, not Tyler Robinson.

that's salty_n_cute on Instagram, both of these were /pol/ suspects before Robinson came to light.

how are these niggas still being posted.
Presiona para expandir...
because there's no highlights of it or anything useful, So you have to sift through literally all these pages of moral ish
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo