Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

What did AOC and Ilhan Omar say?
Acknowledging that a guy who said nasty shit about them personally for years wasn't actually a perfect angel isn't cheering or condoning, they both condemned it.
George Floyd is still a saint in the left's eyes. Try to be a teacher and tell your colleagues that maybe you can use a different figure as an example of black people being oppressed. Then correct them that also Trayvon Martin is not a good example, and that Breonna Taylor is complicated.
If you value human life, they don't have to be saints for what happened to them to be bad. Same for Charlie. The point is that police shouldn't be allowed to act recklessly and kill people.
The democrats / left consistently refuses to do anything about the violent behavior of their extremists. In the statistics always brought up about political violence, do you think burning a police station should count? What about the murders in CHOP/CHAZ?
The far left antifa types who riot hate the democrats, they don't act according to their whims like the proud boys do for trump. If right wingers had a sincere belief that things need to calm down then they wouldn't go "but dems did it first!" every time especially when dems didn't actually do it first. During the George floyd protests, democrat politicians consistently condemned rioters. And to their credit a lot of Republicans did the same after Jan 6th until it became more politically valuable to pretend the whole thing was fake.
For example, have you been in a meeting where everyone shares their pronouns? Have you seen people snap their fingers, completely unprompted, when a black woman says one of the left's popular one-liners? Were you ever asked to quantify your "privilege" in a privilege walk (or similar activity)?
These things are cringe. It's cringe when right wingers create situations where they can yell at minimum wage workers about Charlie at Starbucks or whatever for tiktok likes too, but i don't think either of these are genuinely big issues. There will always be annoying hyper political people, sometimes they'll be your boss or whatever and that does suck, but there doesn't need to be a government that says things like "I hate my enemy and I want the worst for them", there doesn't need to be a president who uses every excuse possible to get more violent and openly prosecute opponents. It seems so obvious that all the worst shit comes from one side consistently.
I don't want to get in an infinite back and forth in the middle of this thread so im gonna leave it there. Stuff seems bleak
 
Última edición:
img_1_1759531722635.jpg
 
I'm sorry, I thought college students were THE LEADERS OF TOMORROW and the EDUCATED NEXT GENERATION unlike you older people and/or tradesmen?

Suddenly now that everyone knows college students got roasted in debates easily, suddenly they are helpless little debate puppies that can't properly defend their ideas?
That's how it is now?
 
I'm sorry, I thought college students were THE LEADERS OF TOMORROW and the EDUCATED NEXT GENERATION unlike you older people and/or tradesmen?

Suddenly now that everyone knows college students got roasted in debates easily, suddenly they are helpless little debate puppies that can't properly defend their ideas?
That's how it is now?
Most college students are not that intelligent and the classes they take are exceedingly easy. Most of the basic classes they have you take can literally be done during your early high school years and pass with minimal effort. The only programs that actually matter are gonna be the ones after the first 4 years anyways unless you're deviating from the usual shit.
 
Found these videos where this dumbass nigger said that this one guy who is a "Charlie Kirk fan" who killed 2 beaner woman. And 4 people who killed a nigger called trey reed, and how the killers of him were white, and that he supported an associate or his sister or someone who said that Charlie Kirk deserved it. And then this nigger said that they lynched this trey reed nigger. And now he has a new video about how some baboon football college player is funding another autopsy, and another guy on the same team is a bad guy because he was wearing a maga hat and he's southern looking

d274145ffa092c9c75c55f6ca893e8c6.mp4
562177b1f3d24e7479c3cbf71206d478.mp4
What's worse is the comments on the first video
Ver archivo adjunto 7997408Ver archivo adjunto 7997409Ver archivo adjunto 7997410Ver archivo adjunto 7997411
Well looks like I found a smart nigga talking about the same motherfucker

And here's the thing, he actually made sense, the nigger ive mentioned before decided to label the killers of 2 beaner women and one nigger, as Charlie Kirk fans. And this guy says that's not the case at all, as he said that anything that is coming out about trey reeds from his grandmother is factual, and that if she didnt mention it, then its fake. As for the killer of the 2 women, he stalked those women for a year, whether or not he was a fan of Charlie Kirk or not.
 
https://m.youtube.com/@GamersOnGames/posts
1759774151023.png 1759774209149.png 1759774245165.png 1759774284207.png 1759774348500.png 1759774385365.png
1759774979359.jpeg
Gamers On Games aka Dave Simpson is currently paraphrasing Bender from Futurama while advocating for violent attacks against conservatives on YouTube. His supporters, who are identified as members of the transgender and Brony communities, continue to openly celebrate the killing of Charlie Kirk and to engage in leftwing terrorism leftwing targeting ICE and law enforcement agencies.
 
Acknowledging that a guy who said nasty shit about them personally for years wasn't actually a perfect angel isn't cheering or condoning, they both condemned it.
They condemned it and in the same speech said about how much he was a hateful bigot who spread racism, and all other -isms. In leftist ideology, that justifies any type of violence.

AOC:
We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was: a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted Black Americans the right to vote was a ‘mistake,’ who after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi claimed that ‘some amazing patriot out there’ should bail out his assailant,
The statement about the Civil Rights Act is wrong as that is plainly not the part of the Act that Charlie criticized.
The statement on Paul Peolosi's attacker... so now she is AGAINST bail reform? She wants innocent (until proven guilty) people to not be out on bail with their families?

I didn't say that they cheered or condoned, but I can see how it may be interpreted that way. I did read AOC statement again before posting, so I knew she didn't say anything like "Slay queen! He is dead!!". However, let's be honest and say that she never said anything of the sort about Michael Brown, Floyd, etc.
What did she say about Breonna Taylor? Did she say "we should be clear about who her boyfriend was: ..." or just blamed the system and never brought up any nuance?

Or read this - on Rittenhouse
What do you think the left would have said if she went "we should be clear about who the dead guys are:--"

(Btw, I don't even think that what republican politicians did about giving all the honors to Charlie Kirk was appropriate; neither is saying how hateful he is in a speech that summarized is "he should not have been killed, buuuut he was a racist bigot". All she did is not to use the word "but", but it is clearly implied)

If you value human life, they don't have to be saints for what happened to them to be bad. Same for Charlie. The point is that police shouldn't be allowed to act recklessly and kill people.
You are not understanding my point. Again.
The issue is not the killing (I personally don't think it was murder) of Floyd, but instead it is how he was made into a saint. Most liberals/democrat voters don't know he had past criminal charges, or that he had a deadly dose of fentanyl in his system. You cannot speak a single negative thing about him.
I will give you that Floyd's killing is more debatable on whether it is a murder or not. Have you ever tried discussing Michael Brown with a liberal?
1759773852606.png

The far left antifa types who riot hate the democrats, they don't act according to their whims like the proud boys do for trump.
Not sure why you are bringing up this point. They hate the democrats, but the democrats try to get that vote (with the limit of not angering Israel). What do you call this if not trying to court the BLM crowd?
This is a demonstration of association with pan-africanist ideology, which is directly linked to the likes of Du Bois, Angela Davis, and Frantz Fanon. More respectable and academic, same beliefs as antifa (these are actually the philosophical roots of the black-liberation / american antifa movement).
1759774299032.png

If right wingers had a sincere belief that things need to calm down then they wouldn't go "but dems did it first!" every time especially when dems didn't actually do it first. During the George floyd protests, democrat politicians consistently condemned rioters. And to their credit a lot of Republicans did the same after Jan 6th until it became more politically valuable to pretend the whole thing was fake.
Democrats condemned rioters enough to grant them CHAZ/CHOP and to kneel in that pathetic display.

I think republican politicians and about 80-90% of people in this thread are retards who want to play civil war, at least until it will become real. I support the cancellation wave, but everything after that could have been handled better to calm things down and really set a moral victory (which would have gained them a lot of support from moderates, enough to not have to worry about the mid-terms or the next elections). Not popular opinion on this thread, I did get my hats and other negative reactions, it is what it is. They think I'm retarded, I think they are.


Pelosi: I don't think the president's calling out the military are warranted. I think that there, by and large, have been peaceful demonstrations in large numbers across the country. There has been some violence, and there is no place for that in any of our expressions of concern that the American people want to make.
Again, compare and contrast this type of tepid response with what it is said when discussing the "far right"

Did Trump condemn Charlottesville? Quite plainly, he did , but he was not as mad about it as for BLM protests. Why can people from one side never be honest about their politicians?


These things are cringe. It's cringe when right wingers create situations where they can yell at minimum wage workers about Charlie at Starbucks or whatever for tiktok likes too, but i don't think either of these are genuinely big issues.
These things are not just "cringe". They create an awful work atmosphere. So many people are socially excluded unless they pretend to be woke or stay completely silent. If this is an NGO, fair enough, but when it is among government employees and teachers, you have these people running the system and indoctrinating the new generation.
The fact that you call them cringe gives me the idea that you haven't experienced all of these, also because you reference "tiktok". I was a woke liberal (for lack of a better description), with liberal friends. People who just dismiss these things as "cringe" don't understand the harm they cause and the brainwashing behind them.

I would invite you and everyone to read this essay.

There will always be annoying hyper political people, sometimes they'll be your boss or whatever and that does suck, but there doesn't need to be a government that says things like "I hate my enemy and I want the worst for them",
Yet, you have one side whose top career politicians called the other "basket of deplorables" and "trash".

there doesn't need to be a president who uses every excuse possible to get more violent and openly prosecute opponents. It seems so obvious that all the worst shit comes from one side consistently.
You have one side that is completely ignoring the Twitter Files (ie censoring people by requesting private social media to ban their accounts or delete posts. Not just twitter, it seems it happened on other social media as well - see Zuckerberg), then crying when the other side also attempts (but doesn't carry out) censoring?
I find it interesting that you can easily decouple democrat politicians with the liberal intelligentsia (mainstream journalists, etc) that does their bidding.

You are on a website that was almost killed, if not for far-fetched solutions that luckily worked to keep it alive. For a while it was only accessible on the dark web. Debanking is done only from one side (a bit outside of US politis, but the candian truckers example should never be forgotten).

In terms of violence, it's fair to say the moderate leftists use social exclusion as a weapon, whilst the antifa extremists will happily beat you. (Hope this does not seem dramatic - but if you have female loved ones, you should really be concerned with the hate towards terfs, which is celebrated. Many rape cases that have been covered up by the mainstream media - see Loudon County and the NYT). The democrats.. well, they have zero power in the streets, but they will happily elect and nominate a judiciary that will let out violent offenders because they value the criminals more than the law-abiding citizen. Democrat politicians are terrified of angering their leftist vocal voters too much.


You have only dismissed concerns and refused to acknowledge any of the criticisms I raised. If you want to DM me and continue this conversation, I'd be happy to.


TLDR: I have written a wall of text so many will have skipped it - I am a former "woke" liberal, and my friends are all liberal (and knew some antifa types). I still talk about liberal politics with them so I understand better than most how both sides think.

The left/liberal side is completely incapable of understanding the right. They don't understand the arguments and, more importantly, don't understand the reason why people are angry.

A nazi will punch you in the face. A liberal will laugh about you being stabbed by a schizophrenic criminal that was left on bail after the 50th crime he committed.
 
Última edición:
Long long English no tldr: Why, other white people, do Jews hate you? It is not a religious question.
I just want to point out that "action over belief" is a big reason, beyond simple ethnic hatred, why so many jews run so many organized anti-white hate groups and anti-white lawfare efforts in the white nations which took them in after WWII. Their word for it is tikkun olam - to repair the world by fixing what's wrong with it, such as gentiles being anything except simultaneously enslaved and dead. In other words, not only do they hate you, but they believe trooning out your son and selling your daughter to muzzie rapists is solving the problems of Creation which God is too incompetent to solve for Himself. They believe, in doing so, they're rectifying a mistake.
 
Fair point that the OJ case was bad because of the cops and prosecution not doing their job properly

Not out of "revenge for Rodney King" or some other bullshit things other jurors have said,
Do you think those jurors actually did it for Rodney King or they say that because they think it makes them look good?
 
I find it utterly hilarious that the author can't see that the logical conclusion of the ideology he teaches was unfolding right in front of his eyes. He still thought by the end of it that there was some way out for this sort of pedagogy. This is what happens when you treat everyone as equal. (side note that Keisha girl was 100% autistic)
 
Candace has shared a screenshot of a group chat with Josh Hammer, Rob McCoy, and 6 other TPUSA affiliates where Charlie Kirk explicitly said he had no choice but to "leave the pro-Israel cause" after losing a Jewish donor for refusing to cancel Tucker, just 48 hours before he was assassinated.
IMG_7798.png

 
Most college students are not that intelligent and the classes they take are exceedingly easy. Most of the basic classes they have you take can literally be done during your early high school years and pass with minimal effort. The only programs that actually matter are gonna be the ones after the first 4 years anyways unless you're deviating from the usual shit.
I'm more referring to how libs circa 2010 - 2024 were always talking how college students were so heckin educated and so heckin fresh and always hyped up the genius next-gen studentorinos, doubling down each election cycle as college students increasingly voted-D and leaned lefter and lefter*.

Then Charlie Kirk's schtick gets attention due to recent (unfortunate) events and it's suddenly like THAT DOESN'T COUNT THEY WERE ONLY COLLEGE KIDS!!!**

* = as conservatives in college got better and better at hiding it
** = college kids regurgitating their professor's arguments
 
George Floyd is still a saint in the left's eyes. Try to be a teacher and tell your colleagues that maybe you can use a different figure as an example of black people being oppressed. Then correct them that also Trayvon Martin is not a good example, and that Breonna Taylor is complicated.
If not fired, no one will want to speak with you and will bully you until you resign.
We really need to go back to no politics or religion at work. We need to bully those fuckers back to Reddit.

Bitch, I’m only here because I like going on holiday and buying new gadgets, I don’t need to listen to your retarded theories why the government trying to replace us with 70 IQ Somalis is a good thing. If you spent less time spouting the corporately accepted political opinions you’d have to do your job and you’d soon get fired when everyone else realises you’re shit at it.
 
That's got to be fake. It's almost crafted to be red meat for her grifting heart. She would have been a member if only them dang dirty jews hadn't shot him! Way too on the nose.
What takes it way over the top for me is how it is, of course, about inviting her on his show. Like lmfao negress get the hell out.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo