🦊 Furry Chakats

[AnOminous]

I'm just going to go old school on this and say you all know what they are, and why they suck.

They deserve a thread. You all know it. So get to it.

 

[Feline Darkmage]

You beat me to the punch. But here, incase anyone in the godforsaken subforum somehow doesn't know about these creatures.

http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Chakat (Neutral Source)
http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Bernard_Doove (This is the fag who made these things)
https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Chakat (The more accurate description, going into great details on why they're shit)

Fuck these Mary Sue pieces of autism.

 

[LofaSofa]

How do these unholy chakat fursuits work? Is it just one person in the body and front legs while the back legs drag along? Or is there another person in the back walking with the back legs with their head up the other ones ass?

 

[obliviousbeard]

Oh jesus, there are still these fuckers? I tought they were all shunned away from internet during the early 2000s

 

[Miss Hortensia]

How do these unholy chakat fursuits work?

The answer lies in your attached picture:

 

[Feline Darkmage]

Oh jesus, there are still these fuckers? I tought they were all shunned away from internet during the early 2000s

They've had a subreddit for 4 years, and it still gets posts.
https://www.reddit.com/r/chakat/

 

[Hypodermic Johnny]

How do these unholy chakat fursuits work? Is it just one person in the body and front legs while the back legs drag along? Or is there another person in the back walking with the back legs with their head up the other ones ass? Ver archivo adjunto 257423

I hate to show my autism here, but while it has a similar body, that's *not* a Chakat. That's one of the Pit Lords from World of Warcraft/The Burning Crusade. There's kinda like big scaly demonic alligator-centaur things. They look like that normally.

Unfortunately, while there are some examples of "taur" fursuits, I can't seem to find any that are *specifically* chakats. Which is probably for the best, all things considered. The creatures alone are insufferable enough already.

 

[Computery Guy]

According to the article on 1d4chan, these scary fuckers were designed as a Star Trek fan species.

Jesus CHRIST.

 

[Haltmann]

They've had a subreddit for 4 years, and it still gets posts.
https://www.reddit.com/r/chakat/

If it brings any comfort, it looks like most of the posts all come from this user:
https://www.reddit.com/user/SnowCatPV

And it goes back for MONTHS. It looks like he's talking to himself. Then if you go back farther it's all this guy posting. Almost no comments on anything.

 

[Fag Albert]

I'm so glad we're finally getting around to these things.
http://www.chakatsden.com/chakat/

I hate to show my autism here, but while it has a similar body, that's *not* a Chakat. That's one of the Pit Lords from World of Warcraft/The Burning Crusade.

Thanks for taking the autism bullet for me.

 

[Reynard]

If I'm not mistaken, the wife of the popular artist Kacey has a chakat fursona. Don't quote me on that, as I'm playing off of memory, but I'm sure a bit of snooping through WikiFur should confirm or deny this.

 

[AnOminous]

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Chakat (The more accurate description, going into great details on why they're shit)

Fuck these Mary Sue pieces of autism.

I specifically recommend the 1d4chan article. That's the one that introduced me to and horrified me at these horrible perversions of extremely bad tropes combined with bestiality.

 

[Antipathy]

Chakats: Purified autism.

I mean, really, what else is there to say? It's extremely niche fetish fuel that makes the world worse by merely existing.

 

[Dollars2010]

Chakats need to be banned.

Spoiler: too spooky

 

[SP 199]

Chakats need to be banned.

Spoiler: too spooky

Ver archivo adjunto 257743

 

[Hypodermic Johnny]

Actually, given the...let's call it, more 'dense' nature of furries, and their desire to basically rip off popular things, I wonder how many of them actually have chakat characters/fursonas that are full horrible (i.e. are the special snowflake species personified) versus "it looks cool/fits my taur fetish AND my cat fetish so I'm making it my fursona but I don't actually know how deep the autism rabbithole actually goes here" crowd. Are there slapfights between the TRUE and HONEST chakats and the poseur chakats?

These are the questions that plague me.

 

[John Furrman]

Chakats are beloved by zoophiliacs in denial.

and their desire to basically rip off popular things

Furries don't care about being original. They don't expressly or consciously set out to be unoriginal, it's just a byproduct of how most furries are. You're putting the cart before the horse with that assertion.

 

[FierceBrosnan]

Chakats are beloved by zoophiliacs in denial.

So chakats are gateway bestiality? Good lord.

 

[John Furrman]

So chakats are gateway bestiality? Good lord.

Nah, the people who would fuck an animal would fuck an animal regardless of being a furry or not. Notwithstanding, Chakats are a couple standard deviations more weird than a typical bipedal anthro.

 

[nad7155]

I'm just going to go old school on this and say you all know what they are

You are so knowledgeable about so many things, but it makes me sad that you know about this.

I had no idea what a "chakat" was and had to look it up.

I am very happy I was ignorant in this area.