Culture Centrists. The real threat to Democracy - Could your co-worker be a dirty moderate?

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
The warning signs are flashing red: Democracy is under threat. Across Europe and North America, candidates are more authoritarian, party systems are more volatile, and citizens are more hostile to the norms and institutions of liberal democracy.

These trends have prompted a major debate between those who view political discontent as economic, cultural or generational in origin. But all of these explanations share one basic assumption: The threat is coming from the political extremes.

On the right, ethno-nationalists and libertarians are accused of supporting fascist politics; on the left, campus radicals and the so-called antifa movement are accused of betraying liberal principles. Across the board, the assumption is that radical views go hand in hand with support for authoritarianism, while moderation suggests a more committed approach to the democratic process.

Is it true?

Maybe not. My research suggests that across Europe and North America, centrists are the least supportive of democracy, the least committed to its institutions and the most supportive of authoritarianism.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/23/opinion/international-world/centrists-democracy.html




fish-hook-theory-far-right-far-left-centrist-i-see-26693955.png
 
I'm a centrist just because it produces endless 'tism from everyone else around me.

They cannot understand how I'm neither absolutely with or against them.
 
So everyone who doesn't support huge-government is a fascist now? What do they think "libertarian" means?

Non left-of-center is authoritarian now?
Unless it's changed since I was in school, highschools still teach politics as a spectrum with communism on one end and fascism on the opposite end. Libertarians are diametrically opposed to communist policies therefore they must be fascists.
 
I once heard that "middle of the roaders" (centrists) get run over. Now the IngSocJus crowd is trying very hard to turn that into a reality.
 
campus radicals and the so-called antifa movement are accused of betraying liberal principles.

Radicals reject liberal ideology in general.

"You reject liberal ideals?!"

"Uh, yeah, have you even been listening to our stump speeches for the past 130 years?"
 
For Devil's Advocate purposes, I can understand why a Radical wouldn't like a centrist like Tim Pool. He's of wishy-washy conviction and hides behind Golden Mean fallacies to avoid being wrong, like with transgendered people. There really isn't a middle ground to Trannies are allowed into Women's spaces v. Trannies are not allowed into Women's spaces or Abortion is ending a life v. Abortion is 100% okay.

Even when a middle ground exists, Centrists end up as the useful idiots for one side or the other. Take gun control. A centrist opinion is generally some regulation is good, but because their beliefs are a weird hodge podge collection with no philosophical backing, they end up supporting really dumb things like liability insurance for gun owners, suing gun manufacturers, and red flag laws. They're very susceptible to Living Constitutionalism kind of thinking and it's why upholding constitutional liberties is increasingly unpopular in modern society.
 
NIGGER WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU RESPONDING TO A TWO FOUR YEAR OLD FUCKING ARTICLE?

Edit: fixed cause I keep thinking it's 2020
NIGGER WHY THE FUCK SHOULDN'T I RESPOND TO SUCH AN ARTICLE IF IT'S NOT A CLOSED THREAD? I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE FUCK KIWIFARMS WAS WHEN THIS ARTICLE WAS MADE! I ONLY SAW IT NOW!
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo