Capitalizing "Black" but not "white" now standard for US journalists

https://apnews.com/71386b46dbff8190e71493a763e8f45a

AP changes writing style to capitalize ″b″ in Black

The Associated Press changed its writing style guide Friday to capitalize the “b” in the term Black when referring to people in a racial, ethnic or cultural context, weighing in on a hotly debated issue.

The change conveys “an essential and shared sense of history, identity and community among people who identify as Black, including those in the African diaspora and within Africa,” John Daniszewski, AP’s vice president of standards, said in a blog post Friday. “The lowercase black is a color, not a person.”

The news organization will also now capitalize Indigenous in reference to original inhabitants of a place.

Daniszewski said the revisions aligned with long-standing identifiers such as Latino, Asian American and Native American. He said the decision followed more than two years of research and debate among AP journalists and outside groups and thinkers.

“Our discussions on style and language consider many points, including the need to be inclusive and respectful in our storytelling and the evolution of language,” he wrote. “We believe this change serves those ends.”

The AP said it expects to make a decision within a month on whether to capitalize the term white. Among the considerations are what that change might mean outside the United States.

An ongoing debate over capitalization of Black accelerated in many U.S. newsrooms in recent weeks as journalists grappled with massive protests and sweeping changes in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death at the hands of police.

The Los Angeles Times, USA Today and NBC News last week embraced capitalization, and the National Association of Black Journalists urged other news organizations to follow.

The AP Stylebook of usage policies is highly influential in the industry, with many news organizations, government and public relations agencies using it as a guide.

The death of Floyd, a Black man who died after a white Minneapolis police officer pressed a knee to his neck, sparked nationwide protests and lent momentum to a variety of social changes, from police reform and the public removal of Confederate statues and flags to the capitalization of Black.

“It’s certainly long overdue,” said Doris Truong, director of training and diversity at the Poynter Institute, a journalism think tank. “It’s something that people who are Black have been calling for for a long time.”

It’s also a relatively simple step for news organizations dealing anew with many complex issues, such as whether their journalists can be opinionated on social media or march in Black Lives Matter demonstrations.

Nearly a century ago, sociologist W.E.B. DuBois waged a letter-writing campaign to get newspapers to capitalize Negro, saying a lowercase “n” was a sign of disrespect and racism. The New York Times took his advice in 1930, calling it an act of recognition and respect for those who’d spent generations in “the lower case.”

Negro fell out of fashion with the Black Power movement of the 1960s, coming to symbolize subservience. African American was often used, but is not always accurate — some Black people don’t trace their lineage to Africa.

One Black communications professional who published an open letter to the AP earlier this week calling for the capitalization said Friday he was pleased that the change happened on Juneteenth, which commemorates when the last enslaved African Americans learned they were free 155 years ago.

“Not having a capital letter has felt disrespectful,” said David Lanham, director of communications for the Brooking Institution’s Metropolitan Policy Program. “There is a shared cultural identity with Black Americans and that goes through our shared experiences. That also goes to the lack of geographic history as a result of slavery.”

The Seattle Times and Boston Globe both changed their practices to capitalize Black late last year. The Globe explained that the word has evolved from a description of a person’s skin color to signify a race and culture, and deserves the uppercase treatment much the way other ethnic terms do.

Lanham, who spearheaded an internal process to capitalize Black at Brookings last year, said he expects AP’s shift will lead many other news organizations and other groups to make a similar change.

“Knowing how closely their Stylebook is viewed as the Bible for journalism, this is now the big domino to fall,” he said.
 
The decision has been made. They're not going to capitalize it. Because "capitalizing the term white, as is done by white supremacists, risks subtly conveying legitimacy to such beliefs.”


“White doesn’t represent a shared culture and history in the way Black does,” The New York Times said on July 5 in explaining its decision.

Du fuq?

There are literally thousands of unique black cultures worldwide. Probably more than white cultures really, given the amount of tribes in Africa. How are they shared?
This is as racist as seeing a brown person and automatically assuming they like tacos, hit pinatas, and speak Spanish.
 
Implying white people don't have a strong culture and saying there'd be "ramifications" for capitalizing white, then on the other hand claiming all black people are the same and have the same culture, it's racist both ways and definitive of how hypocritical and ignorant far-left ideas tend to be. It's like that old joke of an ultra PC liberal calling a black guy in Africa or Australia "African American" trying to not be offensive.
Didnt that happen once in a British tv show or something? A lady called a black woman "African-American" and she got a little offended because she was British, not American.
 
“White doesn’t represent a shared culture and history in the way Black does,” The New York Times said on July 5 in explaining its decision.

Du fuq?

There are literally thousands of unique black cultures worldwide. Probably more than white cultures really, given the amount of tribes in Africa. How are they shared?
This is as racist as seeing a brown person and automatically assuming they like tacos, hit pinatas, and speak Spanish.

Somebody should tell the New York Times how racist they are. It's like when Native Americans are all lumped together into one big two spirit hippie commune.
 
I'd have a lot more sympathy of the sole goal wasn't to diminish White people rather than uplifting black or brown or whatever people. It's like they think they're not good enough to be as successful for some reason, and that's pretty fucking racist.

At this point I expect them to deep fake some stunning and brave black folx into hockey games.
 
At this point I expect them to deep fake some stunning and brave black folx into hockey games.
In the stands, maybe. The average skin tone among players lately has shifted from smurf blue to taupe. Occasionally a black person moves to Canada or Warroad, MN and is stuck playing hockey.
 
“White doesn’t represent a shared culture and history in the way Black does,” The New York Times said on July 5 in explaining its decision.

Du fuq?

There are literally thousands of unique black cultures worldwide. Probably more than white cultures really, given the amount of tribes in Africa. How are they shared?
This is as racist as seeing a brown person and automatically assuming they like tacos, hit pinatas, and speak Spanish.
Anyone who thinks there's a shared black culture should see how black Peace Corps Volunteers are received in West Africa.

The decision has been made. They're not going to capitalize it. Because "capitalizing the term white, as is done by white supremacists, risks subtly conveying legitimacy to such beliefs.”

At this point, hardly surprising, but still disappointing. It's heartening to see that Fox, CNN and some other mainstream and mainstream-ish organizations are opting for "Black/White," though.
 
Fom Steve Sailer:

August 2020: the AP announces that not only will Black be capitalized when referring to people and that white will not be capitalized when referring to people, but from now on the phrase will be spelled 'white "people"' due to doubts over the humanity of whites.
 
Fom Steve Sailer:

August 2020: the AP announces that not only will Black be capitalized when referring to people and that white will not be capitalized when referring to people, but from now on the phrase will be spelled 'white "people"' due to doubts over the humanity of whites.

I don't think there's any ounce of truth to the last part, but I kinda hope it is because it's sure to cause a shit storm in more ways than one:
  1. Media-types will defend their position on why Whites aren't people (missing the irony of it all)
  2. It could start an all-out race war.
  3. Will ensure another win for Trump.
 
Fom Steve Sailer:

August 2020: the AP announces that not only will Black be capitalized when referring to people and that white will not be capitalized when referring to people, but from now on the phrase will be spelled 'white "people"' due to doubts over the humanity of whites.
Quoth Cory Baxter, this can't be real.
 
Aren't journalists already expected to default to capitalization for similarly-specified groups?

She is a Latina woman. He is a Caucasian man. They are a Middle-Eastern family.

African-American as a term for a black born-and-raised American has always been bullshit imo, this is an improvement. This is following an established precedent, it's just extra spicy bc Current Year™
 
Aren't journalists already expected to default to capitalization for similarly-specified groups?

She is a Latina woman. He is a Caucasian man. They are a Middle-Eastern family.

Latin is a proper noun, and that carries over to the adjective. The Caucasus is a proper name for the origin of Caucasians. The Middle East is also a proper name for a place.

Both black and white are colors. Neither of them are properly capitalized, and deliberately capitalizing one while not the other is just a deliberate racial insult.
 
Latin is a proper noun, and that carries over to the adjective. The Caucasus is a proper name for the origin of Caucasians. The Middle East is also a proper name for a place.

Both black and white are colors. Neither of them are properly capitalized, and deliberately capitalizing one while not the other is just a deliberate racial insult.
Prescriptivism isn’t really a good way to argue linguistics. Words are adopted and shifted and re-defined constantly. If you’re going to argue that it shouldn’t be capitalized because it also refers to a color, then you would also have to argue against capitalizing colors in other names of places or groups.

Of course it’s going to be written as a bold, reactionary Black good wypipo bad move, but isn’t that to be expected?
 
Of course it’s going to be written as a bold, reactionary Black good wypipo bad move, but isn’t that to be expected?

No, it's to be denounced. The words were not used this way previously and if anyone is engaging in prescriptivism, it is the AP itself by inventing this rule out of thin air to deliberately denigrate one race and favor another over it.
 
The Washington Post announces writing style changes for racial and ethnic identifiers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2...ting-style-changes-racial-ethnic-identifiers/ (https://archive.vn/anSQQ)

The Post to capitalize Black to identify groups that make up the African diaspora.

Beginning immediately, The Washington Post will uppercase the B in Black to identify the many groups that make up the African diaspora in America and elsewhere. This decision comes after extensive discussions with members of our own news organization, consultations with editors in other newsrooms nationwide and evaluations of commentary and analyses by numerous thought leaders and organizations of influence in the Black community. The use of Black is a recognition and acknowledgment not only of the cultural bonds and historical experiences shared by people of African heritage, but also the shared struggles of the descendants of enslaved people, families who immigrated generations ago and more recent immigrants from Africa, the Caribbean and other corners of the world.

In addition to the use of the uppercase B for Black, Post coverage recognizes there are individuals who prefer not to confine themselves to identity based solely on the color of their skin. Just as the U.S. Census asks individuals to categorize themselves by race, ethnicity and nationality, in our journalism, people will have the opportunity to identify as Black, African American and biracial, or something more ethnically specific, such as Afro-Latino, Ethiopian American or other national identifiers, a reflection of the many cultures and backgrounds that constitute this vast community.

This style change also prompts the question of how America’s largest racial community should be identified. Stories involving race show that White also represents a distinct cultural identity in the United States. In American history, many White Europeans who entered the country during times of mass migration were the targets of racial and ethnic discrimination. These diverse ethnicities were eventually assimilated into the collective group that has had its own cultural and historical impact on the nation. As such, White should be represented with a capital W. In accordance with our style change, people who do not want to be recognized as a color also have the choice of representing themselves by their cultural background, as they currently do, identifying as German American, Irish American, Italian American or other representations of national heritage.

Separately, we will limit the uppercase version of the racial categorization Brown to direct quotations and use it sparingly in other instances. Although the term has gained general acceptance, the designation is seen by many as a catchall to describe people of color of vastly diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds who are not Black.

In the three above cases, our style guidance recognizes these racial demographics have been inexorably linked when analyzing America’s development and treatment of its citizens. As such, they should be treated similarly in terms of capitalization. However, other colors as racial identifiers have not been commonly adopted by members of the ethnic groups they are often used to portray, as many consider the terms insults or slurs. Those identifiers will remain lowercase.

In general, racial identification and ethnic background should not be mentioned unless they are clearly relevant, such as in stories about civil rights, problems or achievements of people of color, cultural history and similar topics.

Separately, political terms used to promote racist ideologies or to advocate ethnic superiority or separation should remain lowercase (i.e. white supremacist, black nationalist). And in crime stories, where cultural and historical identity aren’t key to a suspect’s actions, use the lowercase versions of black, white and brown as race descriptors.

American Indian, Native American or Alaska Native – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.

Asian American – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Hispanic or LatinoHispanic refers to people who speak Spanish and/or are descended from Spanish-speaking populations. Latino and Latina refer to people who are from or descended from people from Latin America. Use the gender neutral Latinx if someone identifies that way. This category includes Spaniard, Chicano and Puerto Rican, as well as other national identifiers.

Indigenous or Aboriginal peoples – Both are uppercase when referring to the original peoples of other nations.

Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo