- Registrado
- 30 de Mar, 2023
Good thing Jake Landau (He/Him) isn't responsible for our foreign policy or we'd probably be blasted to bits already.
Canada is a failed state
- Iniciador del tema Sweetpeaa
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 17 de Abr, 2023
If the US military swooped in and kidnapped Carney to a gulag, would it even really change anything?
- Registrado
- 17 de Nov, 2022
Whoever they left in charge would likely be less upfront about the whole “let’s see how much we can loot before the house of cards collapses” thing.
OutInTheRain
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2022
What a fag. If it came out that the Liberal government was facilitating drugs into the US for kickbacks, and using our position in 5 Eyes to spy for China. Then Nukes would not save them. Look at what the US just pulled off. It does not matter what side of the aisle you are on, everyone has to admit that it was extremely impressive. Requiring an amount of coordination and skill that the world rarely sees if ever.
Now if Canada had nuclear weapons we would have....5, maybe. Probably all at one site. What do you think the first stop of Delta or the SEALS will be if the US decides to stuff Carney in a sack? Nuke site then Ottawa, or they hit both at the same time. Even if in the chaos the word to launch went up and a missile was launched, it still would be shot down, leading to radiation all over the part of Canada it was blown up over.
These retards have to understand, the US military is orders of magnitude larger, orders of magnitude better equipped, with more training and more coordination. These people do not realize what is down south and believe nukes are a trump card. They aren't, right now people are worried about the devastation to civilian populations. Like if NK fired one at Seoul. Not that NK could use one to win a war. Nukes come out, gloves come off. Canada launches a nuke at the US, and say flattens Chicago. Then in 6 months Canada will be given over to nature as the survivors eke out a miserable existence in whatever is left of Canadian towns and cities. The retribution would be biblical.
With the assumption that any attempt to nuke an American city would result in an Old Testament style flattening of every Canadian town and city. We have to ask ourselves, is it worth it to preserve the power of a government and establishment that hates us?
- Registrado
- 20 de Sep, 2024
Quebec will never secede.
Even the 1995 referendum wasn’t to fully leave Canada, but to keep Canadian money and trade coverage while no longer participating in the federal political system.
It was a fucking joke.
Quebec is an economic basket case and would be bankrupted by the formulas for repayment of federal funding required under the laws passed by Chrétien to discourage the “Yes” vote in 1995.
The question was also laughably phrased to basically trick “No” voters into thinking that voting “Yes” would lead to remaining in Canada.
Our quality of life has been way below the US since Trudeau II first polled higher than Harper and the dollar lost 5 cents instantly.
We have no buying power, shit healthcare, ridiculous taxes, insane housing prices, no likelihood of owning a home for most citizens and a government hell-bent on borrowing money to piss away on foreign aid.
Última edición por un moderador:
- Registrado
- 4 de Abr, 2025
I'd argue that the average Canadian's quality of life has been lower than the average American's since around 1776.
- Registrado
- 8 de Ene, 2023
It's a good example of "opinion disregarded" on pronouns alone.
A person that identifies as male (he/him) that is most likely moved by emotions? Agreed.
On another topic, I was watching a video on telegram and saw Canada has respectable amount of oil reserves (it's the third country in the rank!), and it could wisely do things to balance things against U.S. - yet I feel the leaders aren't taking the job seriously:
- Registrado
- 4 de Abr, 2025
This isn't directed at you personally, but sometimes it surprises me how ignorant some Canadians are about the wealth of natural resources that exist in Canada. Since its inception, Canada has always been a state that relies on resource extraction. So great is the importance of resource extraction that it features heavily in the majority of sociological and cultural theories regarding Canada, like Innis' staples thesis, for example.
About 50% of all global mining companies are headquartered in Canada. There's about 1050 mining companies in Canada compared to only about 320 in the USA, or about 80 in all of Europe. Many valuable metals and minerals are mined here, including those that are necessary for future technological innovation and green energy. Canada produces about 24% of the world's supply of uranium in 2024, just behind Kazakhstan, and Canada has regularly been one of the top suppliers of uranium for decades. Canada is the second largest producer of softwood lumber in the world, just behind the USA, and regularly supplies anywhere from 25-30% of globally traded lumber. Canada is the fifth largest global producer of natural gas, and has the third largest proven oil supply in the world, as listed in the photo you attached to your post. All in all, with the current trends, natural resource extraction makes up to 16% of the total GDP, and about 53% of the value of Canadian market exports. So, for every dollar that we make from exports, about 53 cents comes from natural resources.
All of this to say: it's odd that in a country so reliant on natural resource extraction and production, that the majority of people seem completely ignorant to this fact.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 8 de Ene, 2023
Don't worry about it. I'm aware how a very rare earth mineral called "Niobium" solely exists in Brazil & Canada, practically:
And another thing which Canada (and United States) is pretty rich in: WATER AND SOIL (arable land). That by itself should be counted as a great thing:
Lobster Cult High Priest
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 11 de Feb, 2021
I support several of those flags.
Leaf should be the Red Ensign
Palestine —> of course
Venezuela —> Yes
Ukraine —> Hell no replace with the Russian flag
- Registrado
- 17 de Nov, 2022
It’s amusing just how quickly these totally organic, not at all paid protesters are able to just pop up whenever America does literally anything, complete with flags and signs they totally have just laying around the house.
Yeah it’s to give Canada the illusion of “moral superiority”, but what fucking leverage do these dipshits think Canada has over our Southern Neighbour, if they’re thinking anything at all beyond “I get paid to do this?”
It’s funny as hell seeing the posts about these on various Socials just laughing at the protests. Either the bot farm went down for maintenance, the pendulum may finally be swinging away from these fuckwits, or it’s just everyone outside Snow Mexico clowning on Snow Mexico.
Nol 2
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 19 de Nov, 2021
Its not that surprising, way I see it. Resource extraction isn't an en vogue industry. Its a hard, polluting industry that requires things other than a college education. It's functionally third world tier. Add in the push for indigenous rights (who totally own everything that isn't explicitly treaty bound) and being trying to become more green. All that put together, along with general push away from blue collar work in the western world generally, talking up your riches in the ground isn't popular.
When was the last time you saw something like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDlPtJw0vQE
- Registrado
- 8 de Ene, 2023
These are paid agitators. As many have said before: follow the money, and you'll find plenty of NGOs and "philanthropists" willing to help the world "become a better place". Couple that with a bunch of lazy bums who have nothing to do and "really need that money", you get these wonderful grassroots manifestations.
It almost feels like Canadians are made to be contrarians "just because". They don't seem to have good arguments otherwise.
- Registrado
- 18 de Ago, 2022
Luckily that wouldn’t ever happen because the US wouldn’t allow nukes in Canada to begin with. There is literally no justifiable reason considering Canadians have and continue to be the spoiled shut-in living in their rich parents basement while posting online about how great communism is and we should tax the rich.
Canadians are protected by the largest, most advanced military on the planet simply because they exist on our border. The level of delusion Canadians have regarding their relevance is second only to the British.
Is it odd? You have media that is entirely state run. See above discussion. There are a large number of Canadians that truly think Americans are going to come in a take over the country any day now. No one wants Canada as a part of the US and literally no one in America thinks that is something we’d bother doing. It would be great if so many Canadians weren’t traitorous faggots and actually acted as a true partner but that would betray Canadians most sacred doctrine: “At least we’re not like Americans.”
- Registrado
- 4 de Abr, 2025
Ironically, resource extraction has a higher representation of indigenous workers than most industries in Canada. 11% of the mining sector's labour force is indigenous, for example. This idea that indigenous peoples are against resource development, like most things, is a farce perpetrated by the federal government in collaboration with corrupt indigenous leaders to prevent a national genesis. Most indigenous people that I've met in my lifetime supported continued development of pipelines and other resource extraction related projects.
I think it's a little bit odd. It's just a bit ironic to me that some Canadians can be so ignorant of the things that happen in their country.
- Registrado
- 30 de Jul, 2021
This is the same sort of person who advocates for wind and solar energy over nuclear because "muh nuclear meltdowns scawy waaaaah"
- Registrado
- 18 de Ago, 2022
Exactly the same in the US as far as the “indigenous” being used as a shield for shitty leftists. They actually supported Trump and still do. More vote Republican and hate the leftist bullshit but there is big money in their “representatives” allowing them to use the poor helpless native trope to short circuit liberal white brains.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Abr, 2018
Unless it was too cold outside although they could be prepared just in case...
- Registrado
- 4 de Abr, 2025
For the average liberal-minded person, who has never met an indigenous person, the indigenous person represents an idea. The indigenous person isn't so much a person as he is a character, unchanging and easy to project ideals upon. He is: mythological; a noble savage; connected to the environment in a mystical way; suffering; an eternal victim - but, he is never a person, just a trope.
This viewpoint robs indigenous people of their identity and their volition, but this is the natural conclusion of a focus on identity-based politics: a dissolution of self-identity and a hyper-focus on identifying. Nouns versus verbs.