Disaster California considers human composting as a greener death option


Is there a greener way to honor those who have died?

Humans have caused unprecedented and irreversible changes to the climate in our time on Earth – pollution that continues even in death. But, across the US, some are posing an alternative: human composting.

Traditional after-death options such as burial and cremation can be tough on the environment, either by taking up land and emitting chemicals into the ground or by using fossil fuels and gas.

That’s why California lawmakers are considering legislation that would allow for human composting, or the natural organic reduction of human remains to soil.

It’s not the first state to do so. Washington state legalized natural organic reduction in 2020, allowing the human soil to be used in a forest as well as given to families.

Colorado has enacted similar legislation – restricting the soil from being used to grow crops that people will eat – as has Oregon. Delaware, Hawaii and Vermont are considering natural organic reduction bills.

Recompose, a Seattle-based company, was the first company in the US to get into the human composting business.

“The natural organic reduction allows a literal return to the earth,” said Anna Swenson, an outreach manager with Recompose. “Some people like the idea of being in a forest when they die. That’s what I’ve chosen for myself.”

The process developed by Recompose, as Popular Science explains, involves placing remains in an enclosure and using warm air and organic materials such as wood chips, alfalfa and straw, which allow for microbes and microorganisms that aid in the transformation.

Bodies are placed in an 8ft-long steel cylinder set in a hexagonal frame. Non-organic materials, such as metal fillings, pacemakers and artificial joints are removed.

Over the course of about 30 days, the body, even bones and teeth, breaks down into soil, creating about one cubic yard of soil, or as CalMatters reported, enough to fill two wheelbarrows.

The process saves about a metric ton of CO2 per person, according to Recompose, either by preventing it from entering the atmosphere or removing it, sequestering some carbon in the soil. That’s the equivalent of about 40 propane tanks, Swenson said. “You can picture a backyard of 40 propane tanks and for every person that adds up,” she said.

Cremation relies on fossil fuels, and emits millions of tons of carbon dioxide each year, while the burial of embalmed bodies can cause chemicals to seep into the earth. “As a body degrades the soil becomes contaminated, and material can leach into the groundwater,” said Francis Murray, an associate professor of environmental science at Murdoch University, to Vice.

Recompose has worked with 60 families in Washington and has been at capacity since it opened in December.

But not everyone is on board with the after-death alternative. The Catholic church has argued the practice doesn’t show respect for the deceased and the California Catholic Conference has opposed the bill in the state.

“We believe that the ‘transformation’ of the remains would create an emotional distance rather than a reverence for them,” Steve Pehanich, a spokesperson for the group, told the Religion News Service.

But Recompose is hopeful the practice will expand into other states, including California, at least for humans. The company doesn’t compost pets. “We’re focused on humans,” Swenson said.
 
The solution to wildfires is the logging industry. Less tree density and under brush helps massively in fire mitigation. Same with ditch burning. The overall cost to the environment is far less with sustainable logging than with millions of acres of woods entering waterways and the air all at once. However following well-proven solutions is outside the purview of modern environmentalism.
Yeah, I know a guy who's a firefighter that's gone through forest fire training or whatever its called. Their instructor had a list of preventions that stop forest fires from getting out of hand and unmanageable that California explicitly does not do. A lot has to do with logging, yeah.
 
Honestly just toss the bodies in the woods or some shit. They'll either feed the wildlife or get cremated in the fires. And it's a hell of a lot cheaper than all this bullshit.
 
"The process saves about a metric ton of CO2 per person, according to Recompose"

And Lester the pimp s bitches be the best says Lester the pimp.

Author may not be aware but for donkeys years now... Humans have had certain beliefs about the departed. I'm the sort to sit in a cemetery and feed the crows. People there visiting their loved ones don't really want to think of them as soil additive.

OP is Soylent Green bunt.
 
"The process saves about a metric ton of CO2 per person, according to Recompose"
Yeah, I'd like to see a review of the actual saving from someone other than the people making a business out of it. For example the full CO2 cost of doing this to each corpse as opposed to the more common options. Because much like vegan diets I suspect there's a hefty CO2 output that's never mentioned.

That said if it works out as a benefit and they can opt into it go nuts. A lot of climate activists should opt in for early access.
 
Pretty sure using feces or materials from meat-eating creatures like dogs, cat, humans etc...wouldn't be good for say growing crops.
 
Pretty sure using feces or materials from meat-eating creatures like dogs, cat, humans etc...wouldn't be good for say growing crops.

But Glorious North Korea does that, albeit they don't have any other options for fertilizer. I'm surprised that people haven't complimented the Best Korea for doing that more often, given how some people are Hardcore Stans for totalitarian regimes such as the DPRK, the CCP, and the KSA.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo