Answer this post
@BSV because you keep dodging when I asked it before and make yourself look like a stupid cunt (more than usual)
MW is making a claim, that DSP has hired her on 3 occasions, without any proof
DSP is making a claim, that he owes x amount in taxes and taking donations, without any proof
KG is making a claim, that he called MW and got her husband who is a detractor, without any proof
Why is it you refute any circumstantial evidence from MW but Phil hasn't offered a shred of evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, concerning his taxes?
I've done this as calmly and easily as possible for you to understand without anything being lost in translation so you have no excuse not to answer.