- Registrado
- 7 de Dic, 2020
Today I've been thinking about how every one in US has broken families. The American does not start a family with a marriage, but instead have a series of sexual détente that result in children from broken homes. In modern American culture this is warmed over with calling the resulting family unit a blended family; a family made up of parts of different sexual transaction and past marriages. In George Orwell's book 1984 no one was allowed to raise their own children. If you had children, then they were assigned to you and thought in school to report on the political attitudes of their care givers. In the Giver by Lois Lowry, the families were made of parents who were assigned children, prevented from having their own biological children, and were expected to have emotionally detached relationships with their spouse and family. In the Giver, during the start of sexual maturity, all citizens are given medication that causes them to remain emotionally unattached. In our America children are given sex-blocking hormones to presentment from going though puberty; the resulting trannies are sexual eunuchs even if they act porn addicts, after the hormones take effect suicidality increases due to lack of natural sex hormones. In the United States and other parts of the West, we are going though a social transition destroying families and human dignity. Ironically, these same dangerous ideas have been well understood to be the draconian tactics of communist dictatorships. The United States is not the largesse of freedom and liberty it once was understood to be. Instead, it is a hellish dystopian nightmare, where every warning of tyranny has come true in real life.
I first realised this watching reality TV: "90 Day Fiancé Happily Ever After?". In Ever After, many of the women and men have young children from past sexual interactions, but are not romantically involved with these partners after the children have been born and are now seeking other sexual and marriage conquests. Historically marriage endured as a technology that allowed for assets to be passed inter-generationally. A family farm. A family business. Family heirlooms. It's old fashioned by present standards, but the destruction of the family is not about love or romance, it is about destruction of wealth and the conversion of common people into a poor-peasant class. It is very difficult to become wealthy overnight. Most wealthy people are the product of dynasty: wealth passed inter-generationally. What wealth can be shared inter-generaltionally with America's fake economy that constantly crashes; the stock crash in the '90s, the housing bubble, and the next bubble FANG (tech or Internet companies). If the economy was not fake, it would be expected that expansions in technology, as was seen in the first half of the 20th century, would be carrying the economy as a whole over from the fluctuations of the crashes. However that is far from the case, with the crises being understood to be so destructive to the lives of Americans that it would be unreasonable not to expect government intervention. The scams of the economy are ridiculous and the bailouts from the government damage the standing of families by devaluing the currency that Americans use every day. This devaluation forces poverty on families which feeds them into the government hand-out programs that exist to perpetuate poverty and dependence. Simultaneous to the fake-out of the economy, the populous is praised to embrace free love and lack of responsibility. With out the compounded wealth of dynasty, government dependence is guaranteed. Imagine your first job. Did you live your phone number with company? Where did you get your phone from? Maybe it was a land-line? Who payed for phone service? Your family. Who fed and clothed you. Your family. Who gave you clothes so you wouldn't be naked at work, it was your family. How did your mother survive feeding from her body, that too was inter-generational wealth transfer. Families install an immense investment in their children to produce independent children. The destruction of the family is the desecration of independent children.
With the decline of the Independence of young adults co-ensides transgenderisum and the rise of men being turned into street walkers. Biologically, some spices experiencing reduced food supply only produce female births. Of course we are not birds in the amazon, but we are psychologically doing the same. Women are less expensive to procure then men. Men will be required to support a family while the women is having children. A women, or a tranny, will never incur that expunge and therefore from early childhood and through puberty a female will always be cheaper then a man, because the family will never have to install the wealth necessary to support a family of the child's own. It is extremely disturbing that the same medication that is used to castrate gay men back in the 1920s, cause women to be temporarily infertile, and turn men into women is one in the same. Artificial oestrogen and progesterone, colloquially "the Pill", has cemented the idea that children are just a ball 'n chain. Families, made poorer by a failing economy are looking to evade the responsibly of children, either by not having children, the Pill, or by seeking out delusional ideologies that allow them to avoid making children capable of supporting a family of their own. Transgenderisum and gay rights cannot be looked at in a vacuum, they both feed back to the failing family and the scarcity of dynasty. Since the 1980, China enforced the Draconian policy of only permitting most families to only have one child. All the while China was imprisoning and executing violators of this policy, Americans and other Westerners were selectively choosing to only have one child and very late in life. The irony being that Americans mostly imposed the one child policy on them selves while it was a command of law in China. Weather or not it's a good idea to undermine Social Security by not giving birth to the nation's future work force, The war on children and the war on the family have been in full effect since 1972, when America abandon the gold standard backing it's cash and was given to print money like cotton were to become extremely scares if not consumed immediately.
Every dystopian fantasy of Communism has or is becoming true in America today. Every country in Africa is a communist dictatorship. In practice, the United States is a communist country. Dynastic wealth transfer in common people is non-existent. Poverty is cured by international wealth transfer, but if wealth cannot be transfer to children, so they may become independent and support their own families poverty is constant. Homosexuality, transgenderisum, and sexual liberation of women are all distractions from the liberation of passing your genes on to your children and achieving immortality though procreation. "You can't become immortal", says Elliott Capital, "but you can have all the meaningless soma sex you anus can take." Women having children in their late 30s and early 40s are more likely not to have children at all or only one; it's a biological reality which is foolish and expensive to fight against. The replacement of the family unit is the government and to lessen the burden of the population on government. Malthusian programs such as transgender indoctrination and never ending gay-pride parades become fare of the government. It doesn't matter what elderly people do and vote because they will be dead before their investment in barbarism comes to maturation. It's dear how Bill Gates says that he cares about the world in 2050. The man is 66 (born 1955) and will probably die at age 85. (His mother had him at 26; mitochondrial telomers are a bitch.) So while his three children will survive him, what consequences should they bare for their involvement; his children being the beneficiaries of a mass extinction campaign carried over 3 generations? Staring with their grandfather at Planed Parenthood and ending with themselves. What of Paul Elliott Singer's two children. What have they benefited from their families' project: the never ending gay-pride parades and government corrosion though Elliott capital's ownership of Twitter?
Actions Should Have Consequences.
I first realised this watching reality TV: "90 Day Fiancé Happily Ever After?". In Ever After, many of the women and men have young children from past sexual interactions, but are not romantically involved with these partners after the children have been born and are now seeking other sexual and marriage conquests. Historically marriage endured as a technology that allowed for assets to be passed inter-generationally. A family farm. A family business. Family heirlooms. It's old fashioned by present standards, but the destruction of the family is not about love or romance, it is about destruction of wealth and the conversion of common people into a poor-peasant class. It is very difficult to become wealthy overnight. Most wealthy people are the product of dynasty: wealth passed inter-generationally. What wealth can be shared inter-generaltionally with America's fake economy that constantly crashes; the stock crash in the '90s, the housing bubble, and the next bubble FANG (tech or Internet companies). If the economy was not fake, it would be expected that expansions in technology, as was seen in the first half of the 20th century, would be carrying the economy as a whole over from the fluctuations of the crashes. However that is far from the case, with the crises being understood to be so destructive to the lives of Americans that it would be unreasonable not to expect government intervention. The scams of the economy are ridiculous and the bailouts from the government damage the standing of families by devaluing the currency that Americans use every day. This devaluation forces poverty on families which feeds them into the government hand-out programs that exist to perpetuate poverty and dependence. Simultaneous to the fake-out of the economy, the populous is praised to embrace free love and lack of responsibility. With out the compounded wealth of dynasty, government dependence is guaranteed. Imagine your first job. Did you live your phone number with company? Where did you get your phone from? Maybe it was a land-line? Who payed for phone service? Your family. Who fed and clothed you. Your family. Who gave you clothes so you wouldn't be naked at work, it was your family. How did your mother survive feeding from her body, that too was inter-generational wealth transfer. Families install an immense investment in their children to produce independent children. The destruction of the family is the desecration of independent children.
With the decline of the Independence of young adults co-ensides transgenderisum and the rise of men being turned into street walkers. Biologically, some spices experiencing reduced food supply only produce female births. Of course we are not birds in the amazon, but we are psychologically doing the same. Women are less expensive to procure then men. Men will be required to support a family while the women is having children. A women, or a tranny, will never incur that expunge and therefore from early childhood and through puberty a female will always be cheaper then a man, because the family will never have to install the wealth necessary to support a family of the child's own. It is extremely disturbing that the same medication that is used to castrate gay men back in the 1920s, cause women to be temporarily infertile, and turn men into women is one in the same. Artificial oestrogen and progesterone, colloquially "the Pill", has cemented the idea that children are just a ball 'n chain. Families, made poorer by a failing economy are looking to evade the responsibly of children, either by not having children, the Pill, or by seeking out delusional ideologies that allow them to avoid making children capable of supporting a family of their own. Transgenderisum and gay rights cannot be looked at in a vacuum, they both feed back to the failing family and the scarcity of dynasty. Since the 1980, China enforced the Draconian policy of only permitting most families to only have one child. All the while China was imprisoning and executing violators of this policy, Americans and other Westerners were selectively choosing to only have one child and very late in life. The irony being that Americans mostly imposed the one child policy on them selves while it was a command of law in China. Weather or not it's a good idea to undermine Social Security by not giving birth to the nation's future work force, The war on children and the war on the family have been in full effect since 1972, when America abandon the gold standard backing it's cash and was given to print money like cotton were to become extremely scares if not consumed immediately.
Every dystopian fantasy of Communism has or is becoming true in America today. Every country in Africa is a communist dictatorship. In practice, the United States is a communist country. Dynastic wealth transfer in common people is non-existent. Poverty is cured by international wealth transfer, but if wealth cannot be transfer to children, so they may become independent and support their own families poverty is constant. Homosexuality, transgenderisum, and sexual liberation of women are all distractions from the liberation of passing your genes on to your children and achieving immortality though procreation. "You can't become immortal", says Elliott Capital, "but you can have all the meaningless soma sex you anus can take." Women having children in their late 30s and early 40s are more likely not to have children at all or only one; it's a biological reality which is foolish and expensive to fight against. The replacement of the family unit is the government and to lessen the burden of the population on government. Malthusian programs such as transgender indoctrination and never ending gay-pride parades become fare of the government. It doesn't matter what elderly people do and vote because they will be dead before their investment in barbarism comes to maturation. It's dear how Bill Gates says that he cares about the world in 2050. The man is 66 (born 1955) and will probably die at age 85. (His mother had him at 26; mitochondrial telomers are a bitch.) So while his three children will survive him, what consequences should they bare for their involvement; his children being the beneficiaries of a mass extinction campaign carried over 3 generations? Staring with their grandfather at Planed Parenthood and ending with themselves. What of Paul Elliott Singer's two children. What have they benefited from their families' project: the never ending gay-pride parades and government corrosion though Elliott capital's ownership of Twitter?
Actions Should Have Consequences.
