UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
The London elite don’t want to move to Manchester. Some inconvenient function will be moved there and it’ll be a punishment assignment for anyone getting uppity or threatening those in power.
They had the option to decamp the Lords to York for a few months and instead of doing so chose to spend the best part of a decade "working around" renovations, because they'd rather have a fucking building site than leave heckin' LANDAN. They need reminding they're supposed to be servants.
 
Última edición:
The London elite don’t want to move to Manchester. Some inconvenient function will be moved there and it’ll be a punishment assignment for anyone getting uppity or threatening those in power.
Same thing happened with the BBC. All the poor staffers and interns got to move to sunny Salford, but the expensive "talent" just had to stay in London because "that's where the action is".
 
He wears a different brand of glasses then Keir Starmer?
No doubt paid for by the same man or one like him though.

Meanwhile in groomer news.
Those who carry out conversion practices - commonly known as "conversion therapy" - could be jailed for up to five years under landmark new plans.

The draft Conversion Practices Bill, which criminalises "abusive acts" aiming to change someone's sexual orientation or transgender identity, was laid before Parliament on Thursday.

The Cabinet Office said the Bill will ensure LGBT+ people are "protected from physical and psychological abuse to change who they are".

Some groups have raised concerns such laws could criminalise exploratory conversations around gender identity or sexual orientation.

The government says it is proposing to legislate because existing domestic abuse or coercive control laws do not address "the unique nature of abusive conversion practices".

The plans - which apply to England and Wales - will, for the first time, set a legal definition of conversion practices as conduct which "aims to change someone's sexual orientation or transgender identity through abusive acts that seriously harm the victim".

Minister for Equalities Olivia Bailey said: "Conversion practices are driven by the false belief that being LGBT+ is shameful and can be forcibly changed.

"Legal loopholes have left LGBT+ people vulnerable to these harmful acts, which is why we must legislate."

Two new criminal offences will be created under the plans: one for carrying out conversion practices "which cause serious harm, alarm or distress", and another for encouraging or assisting such practices to take place outside of England and Wales.

Proposals also include new civil powers known as Conversion Practice Protection Orders, which they say will "pre-emptively protect those deemed to be at risk of abuse".

Those found guilty of conducting abusive conversion practices could face both an unlimited fine and prison sentences of up to five years.

How prevalent are conversion practices?​

It's difficult to know exactly how widespread conversion practices are.

About 5% of the 108,000 people who responded to the government's UK-wide LGBT Survey in 2018 said they had been offered some form of conversion therapy, while 2% had undergone it.

But the survey did not define what it meant by conversion therapy, and did not ask when or where it had happened.

Galop, an anti-LGBT abuse charity which has campaigned in favour of a ban, has today released new figures and says between 2022 and 2025 it identified more than 300 calls about conversion practices.

Researchers analysed a sample of 195 of those calls and found reported examples of physical and sexual violence, attempts at forced marriages and people being forcibly taken abroad to undergo conversion practices.

The majority of cases (132) were reported as ongoing or recent, and more than half (123) were reported as being initiated by parents.

Many cases involved more than one type of reported conversion practice, with Galop finding:

  • 158 cases involving coercive and controlling behaviour
  • 52 cases of religion-based conversion practices, including forced or coerced prayer, religious "aversion therapy" and exorcisms
  • 47 cases involving physical violence
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/47029982
Legislation to ban conversion practices was first promised in 2018, but was subject to several government U-turns and the resignation of the government's LGBT+ Advisory Panel.

The BBC understands that advisors had previously failed to reach a consensus over whether bringing in legislation risked criminalising parents or professionals who had exploratory conversations with young people experiencing gender-related distress.

The government says the draft proposals include exemptions for legitimate healthcare, and set a "high threshold" for criminality so that "only acts that are abusive, seeking to change someone's identity" will be covered by the law.

Dr Hilary Cass, author of a landmark report into children's gender identity services, said it was important the legislation allowed healthcare professionals to do their job "without fear of litigation".

She said: "I am pleased to see that the government is bringing forward legislation which not only gives a clearer definition of what conversion practices are, compared to previous drafts, but also what they are not."

Mary-Ann Stephenson, Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said it's "crucial" the legislation has "clear definitions and boundaries" to protect legitimate medical treatment and therapy and to make sure religious freedoms are not "disproportionately restricted."

The proposals will likely lead to intense scrutiny, both from campaigners who say the legislation is long-overdue, and from those who have concerns over the potential unintended consequences of a ban.

Andrea Minichiello Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, says any legislation brought forward would "needlessly restrict freedom of speech and prayer".

She told the BBC the legislation would have a "chilling impact" on therapists and religious leaders attempting to support people with questions around their sex or gender.


She said: "Genuinely abusive and harmful practices are already illegal in the UK. A new ban would target prayer and consensual conversations that many people find beneficial.

"The counselling room and the pastor's room are places that should be free for them to explore that fully."

Williams told the BBC she will launch a legal challenge against any law banning conversion practices.

Baptist minister Justin Kennedy, who says he underwent conversion practices in his early 20s, says a ban will help prevent harm.

He told the BBC he was left suicidal after spending six years undergoing "deliverance therapy", where pastors would pray over him to "clear out demons" and try to blame "past trauma" for his sexuality.


He said: "When somebody that you respect, and who you believe holds knowledge of God tries to rewire you, the knock-on effects are absolutely drastic.

"The only thing I lost through deliverance therapy was my faith, and what came in its place was shame and suicidal ideation."

The BBC understands a process of pre-legislative scrutiny for the Bill will begin in the coming weeks, and is expected to last around three months.

It will then need to go through several stages in the House of Commons, where MPs can table and vote on amendments, and the House of Lords before it can become law.
 
Just a reminder to you all,water is good but if you're sweating like jimmy saville in a hospital, unsupervised,make sure you're drinking a bit of diaoralyte too, if you have it. If you don't,squash with a pinch of salt will work too.

I've now got a banging fucking headache and it's miserable. And the idea of a padded bra makes me feel sick.
 
He had child-rape images on his computer and allegedly blamed his researcher for the images. (X)
"Shit doesn't stick to a freemason" by the owner of the local hardware store.
I spent quite a bit of my wedding day, wondering what would have happened if I was a muslim woman who said, 'help-get me out of here.' Would they have locked the door and called the police? Or had they someone on standby outside with a ladder and we'd all have gone out the window into a waiting car. It all felt really performative, tbh, because how many women who are being coerced into marriage are having civil wedding as opposed to being married by an imam or hindu priest?
I used to stop off at this petrol station on the A34 pretty regularly. It was the cheapest place by far, and you could be in and out of there in a few minutes, as it wasn't a proper service.
It was manned by what looked like a Pakistani family. Normally there was a woman in her early 30s and a younger lad (20ish), who I assumed was the woman's younger brother.
I visited this place about 4 times a week for a number of months. So they would have recognised me.

One time I made an offhand joke to the woman, "Oh, it is how much?" in a jovial way because fuel had gone up quite a bit. She got visibly shaken (not annoyed) by this, which was weird, and started rattling off the price per litre.
I just told her there was no need and paid up, not wanting to upset her further.

I avoided the place for a few weeks. After a while I decided I was being silly because I hadn't actually meant to upset her and had done nothing wrong really.

The next time I went in there. I saw what was obviously her husband with her, and he gave me the creeps, and it was some dude in his 60s with one eye.
Then it all fell into place. The lad was the son, and she must have had him when she was 15. So she was probably a child bride.
 
Última edición:
The immigration minister is reportedly about to be sacked after writing a column in the Times calling for foreign care workers to be excluded from the ILR reforms that the Home Secretary is pushing for.

In one way it's impressive - it takes effort to get sacked from a government that only exists in name only and has no actual power anymore.

UPDATE: Mahmood has asked Starmer to sack Tapp and Starmer is refusing to do so.
 
Última edición:
I'm afraid at this rate you'll have to import one from the USA. I don't think they make them big enough there in the UK for your needs.
Hopefully we can get the tariffs waived.
Littering though, it’s awful. The state of everywhere - cans strewn by the roadsides, people just throwing rubbish everywhere and fly tipping. It’s heartbreaking to see
 
You just know there’s a live laugh love decal in the kitchen.
It's so funny you mention this because that's mine and his nibs bench mark for what he calls, entry level humans. I'm sure you know the type I mean 😂.

Also people who bag up dog shit and hang it from trees or fences are the fucking worst. Absolute cunts.
 
The London elite don’t want to move to Manchester. Some inconvenient function will be moved there and it’ll be a punishment assignment for anyone getting uppity or threatening those in power.
In fairness, even as a Northerner, I wouldn't want to move to Manchester either. It was rough as fuck when I was younger, and I've heard about how "ethnically rich and diverse" it's become in the last 20 years. I've just never fancied visiting, personally.

When it comes to a capital for the North, I've always felt that York would be the best possible fit. The Minster is one of the most beautiful buildings on Earth, it has historic shit on every corner, the Shambles was nice 20 years ago before it was all Harry Potter slop shops, and the city desperately needs investment. It has really great bones, but needs a bit of work to clean it up a bit, deal with some of the empty buildings and bring in some new (tasteful) development to give people more to do when visiting. Making it a sort of Northern hub for the government would potentially get people interested in it again.

I get that Manchester is where most of the financial shit is in the North, but come on. Just look at this! Nobody can tell me that this isn't the Northern icon we need.
6ffu88zodhfg1.jpeg
 
Atrás
Top Abajo