UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Posting across the sheep shagging.

To the surprise of absolutely no-one Ofcom confirm the BBC produced Hamas propaganda. BBC. churn out their single required confession and continue doing so.
The BBC committed a "serious breach" of broadcasting rules by failing to disclose that the narrator of a documentary about Gaza was the son of a Hamas official, UK media regulator Ofcom has ruled.

An Ofcom investigation into Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone has concluded that the programme was "materially misleading".

The BBC's director general has previously apologised, saying there had been "a significant failing in relation to accuracy".

Ofcom has ordered the BBC to broadcast a prime-time statement about its conclusions.
"As this represents a serious breach of our rules, we are directing the BBC to broadcast a statement of our findings against it on BBC2 at 21:00, with a date to be confirmed," it said.

It is the first time the BBC has received a sanction from Ofcom and been ordered to make an on-air apology since 2009.


Hamas is proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the UK, Israel and others.

Ofcom's statement said: "Our investigation found that the programme's failure to disclose that the narrator's father held a position in the Hamas-run administration was materially misleading.

"It meant that the audience did not have critical information which may have been highly relevant to their assessment of the narrator and the information he provided.

"Trust is at the heart of the relationship between a broadcaster and its audience, particularly for a public service broadcaster such as the BBC.

"This failing had the potential to erode the significantly high levels of trust that audiences would have placed in a BBC factual programme about the Israel-Gaza war."

Misleading the audience is "among the most serious" breaches that can be committed by a broadcaster, it said.

The on-air apology ordered by Ofcom is the regulator's first sanction on the BBC since the scandal over Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand's comments to actor Andrew Sachs on Radio 2 in 2009.

BBC accepts ruling 'in full'​

The documentary was pulled from iPlayer in February after the boy's family links emerged.

In July, an internal review carried out by the BBC's director of editorial complaints and reviews, Peter Johnston, found that the programme breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy.

A BBC spokesperson said: "The Ofcom ruling is in line with the findings of Peter Johnston's review, that there was a significant failing in the documentary in relation to the BBC's Editorial Guidelines on accuracy, which reflects Rule 2.2 of Ofcom's Broadcasting Code.

"We have apologised for this and we accept Ofcom's decision in full. We will comply with the sanction as soon as the date and wording are finalised."

The BBC told the Ofcom investigation it had "publicly acknowledged a serious breach in its own editorial standards", and had "undertaken to implement a series of measures to ensure future compliance with its own standards and those of the Ofcom Code".

A spokesperson for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said: "It is right that Ofcom has looked into this. It is critical for trust in the BBC that appropriate action is taken on these findings to make sure this never happens again."

'Very problematic' omission - Ofcom​

Ofcom's report said the narrator "occupied a unique and prominent position in the programme, acting as a trusted guide to viewers".

"Given the highly contested context of the Israel-Gaza war and the narrator's central role as the editorial voice of the programme and trusted guide to the viewer, we considered the omission of important information about his familial connection to the Hamas administration to be very problematic."

It added: "Had viewers been made aware of this information, they may have evaluated the commentary provided by the narrator in a substantially different manner."

The programme was made for the BBC by an independent production company, HOYO Films.

In July, the BBC's review concluded that HOYO Films bore most of the responsibility for the failure to make clear the boy's family links, but that the BBC bore some responsibility and should have done more in its oversight.

However, Ofcom's report said it "is clear that the BBC held editorial responsibility for the programme as broadcast".

It added: "We considered the BBC's failure to carry out rigorous compliance checks and provide adequate editorial oversight of a documentary detailing the experiences of Palestinian people living through a highly contentious conflict resulted in a serious omission, which had the clear potential to mislead viewers."

BBC review found 'no family influence'​

The BBC's internal review found that three members of the production company knew of the father's position in the Hamas-run government in Gaza, but no-one within the BBC knew this prior to broadcast.

However, the BBC's report criticised the corporation's own team for not being "sufficiently proactive" with initial editorial checks, and for a "lack of critical oversight of unanswered or partially answered questions" ahead of broadcast.

The review also said it had seen no evidence "to support the suggestion that the narrator's father or family influenced the content of the programme in any way".

HOYO Films said it takes Ofcom's findings "extremely seriously and [we] apologise for the mistake that resulted in a breach of its code".

"We are pleased that the ruling was in line with Peter Johnston's review, which found that there was no inappropriate influence on the content by any third party, it was impartial, fairly edited and all payments were legitimate."

The documentary "remains a vital account" of the Gaza conflict, and the contributors "deserve to have their voices heard", the statement added.

Various sources boliviate about Tel Aviv being banned
Well, at least we have Ayoub Khan in the house, Birmingham MP and a voice of tolerance, unity and de-escalation in these difficult times. “Sports entertainment events should be enjoyed by all regardless of their race, ethnicity and background,” Khan wrote on X on Thursday. One hundred per cent this. Heart emoji. Slay, king. This is not just the best part of sport. It’s the only real point.

“Now is the time to ease tensions, set aside political difference and focus on the football,” Khan concluded, scattering flowers of all shades, fluttering his fingers to release a cascade of butterflies, and opening his arms to embrace, personally, brothers and sisters of every caste and clime.

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ned-from-game-at-aston-villa-in-europa-league
Except it turns out Khan also wants to ban supporters of an Israeli team from watching a football match in Birmingham. He wants to do this because in this case, and in this case only, it’s too much bother, and because this is all about love.

But wait. We’ve still got Zack Polanski, who released a video this week specifically about Birmingham, who believes in tolerance and diversity above all things, and who quoted sections from the Benjamin Zephaniah poem The British to make the point that Birmingham is not, repeat not, a no-go area for any group.

As Polanski says, it is instead time to “be cool”, to prioritise unity and understanding. So of course Polanski will now be speaking out urgently against the banning of Israelis, taking the opportunity to rise above division, because this is the absolute best of Britishness, the one non-negotiable principle of this mixed and porous island at the jumping-off point between the continents.

Except, it seems he won’t be doing that. The Greens’ Polanski has so far resisted this temptation, and is instead the only leader of a major political party not to question the decision to ban Maccabi Tel Aviv fans from attending the Europa League tie against Aston Villa at Villa Park next month.

In isolation this does seem jarringly out of character. What about the coolness? And the unity? Zack! Are you OK, Zack? Is the internet down? It is true that the video of love was not an entirely clear lens, containing a lingering closeup of only one flag, the flag of Palestine, because borders only divide us and unity is all.

And, yes, Polanski also appeared to believe at one point that you can make your tits bigger with a course of paid hypnosis, as first trailed in pick-up artist bible The Game, a book about how to say things people want to hear in order to get them to agree with you.

Either way, the decision is now out there. It remains at the time of writing unreversed. Supporters of Maccabi Tel Aviv will be barred from watching their team play at Villa Park on 6 November due to safety concerns identified by West Midlands police and ratified by the Birmingham Safety Advisory Group. There may yet be a messy volte face, as the government brings its pressure to bear. It may emerge that the safety concerns override any other argument, that there is a genuine terror threat that makes the rest of this debate fade into nothingness.

But as things stand the British authorities have decided for the first time that overseas sports fans will not be welcome in this country, that it is simply too hard to police, and that this needs to happen in the name of peace and unity.

It shouldn’t really matter what your views are here, as long as your views are even vaguely consistent with the laws and principles of the territory. It doesn’t matter what you think about the bloodshed in Gaza, which presents its own distinct case for a transparent and properly leveraged sporting boycott of Israel, and of anyone else involved in violent acts of war.

This is just a terrible decision. Not to mention a depressing and alarming decision. And also an insultingly mendacious one as long as we’re going to pretend it’s about safety and nothing else.

On a sporting level it makes no logical sense. Who are we not going to ban now? How are the England team, source of vastly inflated police bills around the world, going to get away with showing their face anywhere if this is the standard? How about Paris Saint‑Germain, whose Champions League celebrations led to mass arrests and death on the streets? Or any trip to Napoli, a city-wide parkour of buttock-stabbing rage?

But no. We will instead draw the line at a few hundred Israeli supporters. This is based, as far as anyone knows, on some serious unrest last season during the trip to Ajax, where 62 people were arrested, 10 of them Israelis, 49 of them Dutch or residents in the Netherlands.

Even without hard evidence that Maccabi fans want to start trouble, the idea this could be seen as an act of de-escalation is basically nuts. What do we think is going to happen now, even if this act of peace‑keeping is reversed? That the game is going to pass in a doe‑eyed spirit of love for all? That it will be less, not more, contentious as a result of this act of heavy-handed prohibition?

It’s a terrible moment for Birmingham, which might be better off worrying about the huge rise in reported antisemitic hate crimes in the West Midlands, quite a feat given how few Jewish people actually live there. Most obviously it is an alarmingly feeble admission of inadequacy on the part of the British police, whose entire job description is to preserve order while upholding the law.

These are the same police who spend every weekend permitting, as they should, gatherings of all tones, who have in the past walked through flying bricks to preserve the right of a few hundred National Front supporters to march provocatively through south London, and done so as a mark of pride, because this is the thing about living in a liberal democracy.

Mainly it is just a terrible decision for the country, and for what we should now expect. It gives a horribly open door to those who want to plug their own line of political division, to claim that there really are mid-90s-Mogadishu-style no-go zones. This is votes in the bank, pure political capital. Is Nigel Farage going to conclude: “Hmm, no real need to appear in Birmingham in a union flag frock coat eating tripe out of a Beefeater helmet?” Or that he might on balance decide to show up and do that?

There are so many ways of making a statement out of this event if you want to. Stay away. Turn your back. Protest and be protected. Instead, here we have sport once again being marched about in a headlock, a propaganda Tannoy for the loudest voice, and wreathed as ever in the platitudes of tolerance and unity.

Sadly, Polanski’s video left out the key part of Zephaniah’s poem, the coda at the end that states “all the ingredients are equally important” and “treating one ingredient better than another will leave a bitter unpleasant taste”, an unfortunate piece of editing given the week’s events. For now the fix on the hoof for this particular note of division is obvious enough. Examine the details. Reverse it if possible. Police it robustly. And then go out there and model something better.

A pro-Gaza MP who welcomed the ban on Israeli football fans from Villa Park previously cast doubt on the atrocities committed in the Oct 7 attacks.
Ayoub Khan, the independent MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, cast doubt on claims that women were raped during the Hamas-led massacre in 2023.
His comments have come to light as he faces a backlash for celebrating the decision to bar Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters from attending their team’s Europa League match against Aston Villa on Nov 6.
Fans of the Israeli club were informed of the ban on Thursday following a recommendation from West Midlands Police to Birmingham’s safety advisory group.

Sir Keir Starmer has led criticism of the ban. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said MPs who celebrated it were “absolutely disgusting”.


Mr Khan, 52, who led a petition to boycott the match, said: “From the moment that the match was announced, it was clear that there were latent safety risks that even our capable security and police authorities would not be able to manage fully.
“With so much hostility and uncertainty around the match, it was only right to take drastic measures.”
In October 2023, when he was a Liberal Democrat councillor for Aston, Mr Khan posted a video of himself on social media appearing to question the extent of atrocities committed by Hamas in Israel.
In a now-deleted TikTok video posted just weeks after the Oct 7 attack, he responded to claims by Isaac Herzog, the Israeli president, that Hamas fighters were carrying “official al-Qaeda material” that showed how to build a weapon with cyanide.
Mr Khan said: “Sky has interviewed the Israeli president who claims that the Hamas militants were carrying with them very important documents.
“In fact, they were instructions, instructions not how to behead babies or rape women, which I’ve yet to see evidence [of] and I’m afraid nothing has come to light.”

About 1,200 people were killed in the Oct 7 attacks. Evidence suggests sexual assaults and gang rapes also took place at the Nova music festival site, including a UN report which found Hamas attackers raped women’s corpses.
At the time of Mr Khan’s post, numerous eyewitness accounts of Hamas rapes had appeared in media reports.
Israeli military officials claimed in the aftermath of the attacks that babies had been beheaded. This claim has never been verified.

The Lib Dems launched an investigation into Mr Khan’s conduct after receiving a complaint and offered him anti-Semitism training.
However, Mr Khan initially refused to take the training, insisting his posts were not offensive.
He said at the time: ”So let me make my position absolutely clear. At no stage have I considered my material on TikTok offensive, nor have I agreed with anyone that I would undergo a training course in anti-Semitism. There is simply no need.”
It is not clear whether he ever took the anti-Semitism training.

Pro-Gaza independent MPs' remarks on Israel​

Shockat Adam, MP for Leicester South
In September, Shockat Adam was criticised for saying the Israel Defense Forces had “blood-soaked tentacles” in a speech in the Commons.
Critics said the remarks echoed longstanding anti-Semitic stereotypes because octopuses have historically been used to represent claimed Jewish power, including by the Nazis.
In November 2024, Mr Adam hosted a pro-Palestinian campaign group in Parliament despite its director, Majed al-Zeer, being accused by the US treasury of being “one of the senior Hamas members in Europe”.
During the October 7 terror attack, a campaign group run by Mr Adam’s brother, Ismail Patel, planned a march through Leicester.
The Friends of al-Aqsa organisation was included on a poster promoting the march – which took place in 2023.
Adnan Hussain, MP for Blackburn
In May 2024, Adnan Hussain compared the war in Gaza to the Holocaust, saying on Facebook: “If you've ever wondered what you'd have done during atrocities like the holocaust [sic], know that, you'd have done exactly what you're doing right now.”
According to the International Definition of Anti-Semitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis,” is an example of anti-Semitism.
In August 2025, he said in a post on X that Jews should have been “given land” in Europe after the Holocaust – not Israel.
Later that month, he said in another post that Israel was “ethnically cleansing” and “committing genocide against the Palestinians”.
At a Free Palestine rally in 2014, Mr Hussain gave a speech that claimed Israel’s military operation in the summer of that year was a “holocaust” and called for a boycott of companies that supported the country.
“They let Gaza burn, they hate Gaza. Now let’s make Israel burn,” he said.
Ayoub Khan, MP for Birmingham Perry Barr
In August 2025, Ayoub Khan was accused of a “grotesque minimisation of terrorism” after equating Hamas hostage Emily Damari’s experience of being held captive to the lives of people in Gaza.
He had written on X on July 30: “One would have expected her to understand that ordinary Palestinians who have been held hostage for decades in what is effectively an open-air prison – deserve the same dignity, justice and freedom! Stop conflating!”
In June, Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, accused Mr Khan of “aligning himself with anti-Semites”.
He responded to the Government’s condemnation of Glastonbury performer Bobby Vylon’s “Death To The IDF” chants by asking why there was no ministerial statement when Israeli football fans chanted “Death To Arabs.”
Before becoming an MP, Mr Khan was a Liberal Democrat councillor for Aston on Birmingham city council.
He declined to take anti-Semitism training over TikTok videos in which he said he “has a problem with the credibility” of accounts about the Oct 7 massacre and said Suella Braverman, the then home secretary, was “misguided” to say the “From the river to the sea” chant was anti-Semitic.
Iqbal Mohamed, MP for Dewsbury and Batley
In July, Iqbal Mohamed said Israel was committing a “holocaust” against Palestinians.
He posted on X: “The Israeli gov't & the IDF, brazenly aided & abetted by the US, UK, & many EU & other states, are committing a pre-declared live-streamed genocide/holocaust on the Palestinians with the latest plans of putting 2million people into concentration camps.”
The Jewish Leadership Council responded by saying: “This egregious accusation isn’t a lazy slip of the tongue but a repeated and calculated act to taunt Jews and accuse us of the very crime of which we were victims. It’s anti-Semitic and should be retracted.”
In October 2024, he used his maiden speech to claim there was a “genocide” in Gaza.
He told the Commons: “I implore the UK Government to take a moral and legal lead and to do everything in their power to uphold the UK’s obligation to halt the genocide and end the 76 years of unlawful occupation.”
On Thursday, he claimed that allowing Israeli fans to attend the Aston Villa match would see “terrorists run riot”.

Mr Khan was one of several Independent MPs elected at the 2024 general election who stood on a pro-Gaza platform in areas with high Muslim populations.

In July, he took up a role as director of Your Party, the new hard-Left political party led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana.
Mr Khan was approached for comment but did not respond.
 
To the surprise of absolutely no-one Ofcom confirm the BBC produced Hamas propaganda. BBC. churn out their single required confession and continue doing so
Now, Ofcom, do the bullshit we get from the Beeb about the US, Syria, EU and Ukraine/Russia.

Fat fucking chance. At least they got pulled up on this though.
 
Fuck the turkey off, get yourself a brace of pheasants instead. Much better eating and don't need to be started cooking on Christmas Eve.
Starting your turkey on christmas eve is why the turkey is bad. It only needs a couple of hours at most. Make sure you're covering it in lots of fat and wine, so it stays nice and moist. We're a cosmopolitan family at christmas, so there's turkey, roast beef, goose, and turkey. I always grab the brown meat; breast is for sandwiches on boxing day.

Which reminds me. Time to get the sprouts on.

Does that mean that having a TV Licence now means funding terrorism by default?
Always has been.
 
It's why I stayed here after I came from Mumsnet
Hit me up if you need a nostalgic reminder that No Is A Complete Sentence or want to complain about how unreasonable SIL is and be reassured that YANBU.

As for Christmas turkey, on Boxing Day and for several days after, all the turkey crowns get reduced in price by as much as 75%. Clear out the freezer in preparation.
 
Ah, the BBC is therefore the mouthpiece for Hamas.

Does that mean that having a TV Licence now means funding terrorism by default?
ITV is pretty pro-Hamas/Iran too. Channel 4 News is basically full Islamist. They were practically recruiting for Islamic State when they had their sandbox server running.

I actually can’t watch news on the telly box as I feel like I’ve gone mad and am watching some sort of alternative dimension we’re in the only person who isn’t retarded when I actually know I’m retarded and this shouldn’t be the case.
 
ITV is pretty pro-Hamas/Iran too. Channel 4 News is basically full Islamist. They were practically recruiting for Islamic State when they had their sandbox server running.
Aaaaargh. Why are they like this?
Why is the entire establishment so pro muslim to the point most of the upper crust is accused of converting (probably just conspiracy theory but who knows these days), including the king?
If it's fear, the only reason they have to be afraid of islam is because they've spent decades flooding the country with them. I don't understand the relentless muslim worship and apologia. I couldn't care less about the palesimians, not even their muslim brothers give a fuck about them.
Why can't we have a government that cares about Britain and her people instead of raping children in the name of allah?
 
They've flooded the country with muslims for 40 years. In that time they have been handed jobs in high ranking positions, from government; education, home secretary, councillors, to positions in media, entertainment, insurances companies, police, NHS and more.
People aren't turning to islam, it's that our entire structure is run by muslims in the background, similar to what the commies did when they took over.

Want to know why mosques get built on top of churches, in the middle of residential streets or in places of natural beauty? Because London has final say in all council-led decisions and has the power to over-ride local councils. London planning permission office is stuffed to the gils with muslims and they rubber-stamp anything that helps muslims, regardless of the impact on the local residents.

They are now a majority voting bloc and the easiest to win votes from, hence why politicians aim to appease and appeal to them.

Insurance scams are ran by muslims against muslims, signed off by muslims working in insurance, injuries acknowledged and illegally signed off by muslim doctors, not investigated by muslim police officers.
The ambulance you have to wait four hours for is because a closer one was rerouted by muslim dispatchers to help inbred muslims first.
Honour killings are part and parcel of bradford but the muslim police cover it up.
Many such cases.

We all know this is true, we just want to believe it isn't.

Some say we are being taken over. The truth is we have been taken over.
 
Aaaaargh. Why are they like this?
Why is the entire establishment so pro muslim to the point most of the upper crust is accused of converting (probably just conspiracy theory but who knows these days), including the king?
If it's fear, the only reason they have to be afraid of islam is because they've spent decades flooding the country with them. I don't understand the relentless muslim worship and apologia. I couldn't care less about the palesimians, not even their muslim brothers give a fuck about them.
Why can't we have a government that cares about Britain and her people instead of raping children in the name of allah?
Because lefties are retards and our entire establishment are lefties of some flavour now.
 
Starting your turkey on christmas eve is why the turkey is bad. It only needs a couple of hours at most. Make sure you're covering it in lots of fat and wine, so it stays nice and moist. We're a cosmopolitan family at christmas, so there's turkey, roast beef, goose, and turkey. I always grab the brown meat; breast is for sandwiches on boxing day.


You can cook a 10 pound turkey in an hour and half if you prep it right. but you'll need some room in your fridge. You have to spatchcock it, dry brine it and leave it uncovered in your fridge for a day or two. Then it cooks up fast and the meat is very juicy. When you remove it from the oven tent it in foil and let it sit for a hour or so before carving it.

Its also a good idea to remove the tendons from the drumsticks before you cook it. Make the drumsticks better and easier to eat.

Use the spine, wingtips, tail, neck and giblets to make stock for your gravy.
 
"Brummies unite against racism"

It's funny how The Guardian desperately tries to astroturf anti-racism groups and pretend that they're totally organic and the whole of Birmingham is united against the scourge of the far-right, then they show a picture of half a dozen retiree civil service weirdoes who probably aren't even from Birmingham (one of them is from Moseley, a posho trendy village on the outskirts full of hipster graphic designer cunts where houses cost over 350k on average). Then there's this quote:

"When Mus unfurled the leaflet lying on her driveway, she was left shocked, angry and upset. “White Britons are already a minority in London … it is clear that if these trends continue white people will become a minority in Britain,” it read. The leaflet, written by a far-right group, was distributed along her street three years ago in Moseley, a leafy suburb of Birmingham. It went on to blame NHS waiting lists, a shortage of social housing and even traffic on “the rising populations. “There we go again, blaming us for everything and causing division,” she thought at the time".

I don't get these weirdoes, if diversity (ie.less whites) is so great and glorious and beautiful, why would you be upset about people pointing out the fact that whites will soon be a minority in Britain, isn't that exactly what you people want?
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • capture_20251019110853496.jpg
    capture_20251019110853496.jpg
    350.9 KB · Vistas: 75
The Observer was an absolute banger today as it is every Sunday, not for any of the "news" in it of course though, utterly mogs GBnews shitty paywall too :smug:
This little article seems worth highlighting though, talks about something I've not seen brought up anywhere else yet and is very hmmm inducing indeed.
:thinking:
https://observer.co.uk/news/interna...son-receives-warm-reception-at-tel-aviv-forum/https://archive.is/NFlLc
1760882808932.png

The British far-right activist was invited to Israel by a government minister​


The far right agitator Tommy Robinson received a warm welcome in Tel Aviv where a room of hundreds gave him a standing ovation and cheered as he railed against the British government, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, preached a message of fear and Islamophobia and claimed to support the Jewish community. A crowd of men wearing kippahs chanted his name outside before joining a line to buy beer.
As he began speaking, a lone man stood up to yell that “Tommy Robinson is a racist”, before being booed and jeered out of the room by hundreds of people yelling “shame”, before he was assaulted and spat on.

“Do not believe the media, do not believe Keir Starmer,” Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, told the adoring audience. “I feel embarrassed coming here as a British citizen as I know my government betrayed every single one of you, betrayed your country,” he told them, referring to Britain's recent recognition of a Palestinian state.
“Israel has lost the propaganda war,” he told crowds at the Tel Aviv International Salon, a discussion forum whose previous guests include many former Israeli ministers, intelligence officials and the former chief rabbi of Britain, Lord Jonathan Sacks. He thanked Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party for hosting him.
Robinson also took aim at the Board of Deputies of British Jews, who opposed his visit to Israel. “The board of deputies has sold out the Jewish community of Great Britain,” he told the room – to cheers.

That Robinson was being treated like a visiting dignitary was no accident: His warm welcome came courtesy of Israel's diaspora minister, Amichai Chikli. In the days leading up to his speech in Tel Aviv, he toured the Gaza border with Chikli, visited a West Bank settlement and also toured an impoverished south Tel Aviv neighbourhood to meet with a local far right activist who shares Robinson's hostility towards immigrants.
Chikli declared that he invited Robinson to Israel on 3 October following an attack on a Manchester synagogue on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. Speaking to The Observer before Robinson spoke in Tel Aviv, Chikli took pride in taking Robinson on a tour of Israel including taking him to Israel’s parliament, the Knesset. He claimed he was yet to hear Robinson say anything he considers anti-semitic.
"He's a true friend of the state of Israel. He's a true friend of the Jewish people. I think he's an extraordinary human being, super authentic, charismatic, and I personally really support what he is doing," he said. "We feel who is with us and who is not. It's as simple as that."
The invitation outraged the Board of Deputies of British Jews, who labelled Robinson “a thug who represents the very worst of Britain”.
Chikli, they added, “has proven himself to be a diaspora minister in name only. In our darkest hour, he has ignored the views of the vast majority of British Jews, who utterly and consistently reject Robinson and everything he stands for.”
The diaspora minister rebuffed their comments while speaking to The Observer saying he “didn't understand their negativity”.
“I wasn't really convinced by those who are saying that he's problematic and far right or whatever, I think he's a very serious man,” he said.
With Israel increasingly a pariah state following a two-year military campaign in Gaza that has killed at least 68,000 people, Chikli has sought to deepen his government’s connections with members of the global far right. In turn, many like Robinson eager to receive a stamp of approval from the Jewish state.
Last year Chikli toured Europe in an effort to deepen these bonds, even if it meant meeting with ministers outside of government. Among others he met with Spanish far-right party VOX, French extreme-right leader Marine Le Pen and conducted multiple visits with Hungarian leader Viktor Orbán. The latter has long been accused of using antisemitic tropes in his campaigns.
But it was his invitation to Robinson that outraged many Israelis: Two people, including a rabbi, were arrested outside Chikli’s home earlier in the day after protesting Robinson’s visit.
British-Israeli strategist Raoul Wootliff shared their outrage. ⁠“Tommy Robinson is a racist thug who has built a criminal career on spreading hate, including antisemitic libels. Watching him treated like a visiting dignitary by the Israeli government is an obscene insult to both ordinary Israelis and Jews in the UK,” he said.
Wootliff also questioned why the Israeli government had rolled out the red carpet for a far-right agitator with nothing approaching a government position.
“Diaspora minister Amichai Chikli has turned his ministry into a platform for the far right, attacking the Board of Deputies and dismissing Jewish communities who fight this hatred every day,” he said. “It is a betrayal of the people he is meant to protect.”
Tommeh is doing proper good for himself recently isn't he?
 
Tommeh is doing proper good for himself recently isn't he?
They've got the union flag upside down. (More accurately, they've got the fly on the hoist, because it's a bad shoop job, but the end result is the same)

Maybe they're courting him as someone they expect to have increased political influence in the UK in the coming years?
 
Last time I went to birmingham there was a massively and obviously human shit that was just in one of the main streets.
Tommeh is doing proper good for himself recently isn't he?
far right
welcome in israel
You know back in my days the only reason a right right person would be warmly welcomed to israel was because of napalm. Remember when american jews said that posting photos of mattresses was far right hate speech? I do.
 
You can tell very easily when they switched to fake crowd noise to drown out the booing as Liverpool and Man U took the knee.
I bet you can. Though if people are booing, that makes it less obvious than when they're just sitting there. This was the fake crowd cheering at the Olympics.



Do none of the people involved in this not at any point stop and ask themselves if it might just be unethical to lie like that?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo