UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

Destacado
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.
Presiona para expandir...

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Presiona para expandir...
Overly Serious dijo:
@Morethanabitfoolish Wait, when they say "all drugs", they actually mean all. As in, well, all?

The SNP are fucking lunatics who I would say might actually edge out the Greens for sheer bone-headed mendacity. It is terrifying that they get elected.
Presiona para expandir...
As far as I can tell yes. While there are caveats for amounts to be classified as "dealing" rather than personal use the intent seems to be yes, all drugs.

Even the BBC pointed out the people heading up their efforts around this stuff quit specifically because they were being pushed to give fast solutions in line with what the SNP want to do rather than the science supported. Here's a couple of old articles, the third is the second but with some more detail.

Scotland’s public health minister has resigned from the SNP government days after figures revealed the country’s drug-related death toll had risen to another grim annual record.

Joe FitzPatrick said he had “agreed” to quit after discussions with first minister Nicola Sturgeon on Friday and hours after Scottish Labour lodged a motion of no confidence in him. On Tuesday, the National Records of Scotland revealed there had been 1,264 drug-related deaths registered in Scotland in 2019, an increase of 6% from 1,187 in 2018 and a death rate more than 3.5 times that of the UK as a whole.


FitzPatrick, MSP for Dundee City West, one of the areas worst affected by Scotland’s ongoing drug crisis, described the rising death toll as “the most heartbreaking and difficult problem I have faced”.

“As the minister responsible for this area I, ultimately, take responsibility. It is clear that my presence as a minister will become a distraction, when we should be focused on achieving the change we need to save lives,” he said.



The public health emergency, which was the subject of political deadlock between the Holyrood and Westminster governments over drug legislation before the pandemic, was condemned by experts earlier this week as a “national tragedy and disgrace”.

Nicola Sturgeon said “no one should doubt Joe’s hard work, dedication and sincerity” but acknowledged: “Scotland’s record on drug deaths is simply not good enough and as first minister I know we have much more to do.”

She immediately appointed the former equalities secretary, Angela Constance, to a new position of dedicated minister for drug policy, to report directly to her.

Constance said: “Government can and will do more and I am determined to use the short time before the election to work with the drug death taskforce on the actions necessary to reduce Scotland’s drug deaths and better support those living with addiction.” Scottish parliamentary elections will be held in May.

Responding to the resignation, the Scottish Labour health spokeswoman, Monica Lennon, said: “Joe FitzPatrick doesn’t bear that responsibility alone.

“Having been neglected for too long, Scotland’s drug deaths emergency must now be given the full attention of the Scottish government. Urgent funding is needed to boost access to treatment and residential rehab. The Scottish government must get behind safe consumption facilities, like the voluntary service being run in Glasgow. This must be a turning point.”
Presiona para expandir...


The chair and vice chair of the Scottish Drug Deaths Taskforce have resigned after being told to get a move on.

The Record can reveal that Professor Catriona Matheson and deputy Neil Richardson mutinied after being ordered by Scotland’s drugs minister Angela Constance to produce a blueprint for urgent reform by the summer - months earlier than first laid down.

The bombshell by Constance was conveyed earlier this month - and the two bosses immediately jumped ship, drafting a scathing joint letter two days before Christmas that denounced the way they were being hustled along.

It is now thought the Taskforce - which had been accused in Parliament of moving at a “snail’s pace” could be reshaped or even disbanded in the wake of the fracas.

The resignation letter claims the Taskforce was being forced to act fast in implementing strategies without assurances they were safe.

It says: “We have always understood the need for urgency in our work but we feel the current demand for speed is counterproductive and driven by other factors such as meeting targets, rather than achieving the sustainable change that evidence shows is more effective.



“We feel ever further and irretrievably distanced from the remit and purpose of the original Terms of Reference, and the spirit of trust, challenge, and collaboration behind it, on which our participation was invited at the outset.

“We remain committed to saving lives being lost to drugs, through the vigorous and urgent synthesis and dissemination of evidenced based best practice – putting evidence into action as soon as we are confident it is safe and effective to do so.”

The Taskforce was specifically formed in July 2019 as an emergency response to demands in the Daily Record for a public inquiry into spiralling drug deaths, which stood at 1,187 for the year.

But there has been growing tension between the Scottish Government’s desire to move fast to bring down the annual numbers, which rose to 1,339 for 2020. The latest quarterly figures do, however, show a small decrease.

Professor Matheson has maintained that the Taskforce’s work should only be judged after around three years and that the programme they were working to was over five years.


Her letter slams the drugs minister, blasting: “We are dismayed that a major work programme – our frontline delivery innovation initiatives for multiple complex needs – has been omitted in your correspondence.

“Rushing the final stages of this programme, and during a further covid surge, jeopardises its success.

“We will continue to drive initiatives to reduce drug related deaths in our respective roles. However without a shared conviction with Scottish Government of the importance of evidence based priority and progress we can no longer lead the Scottish Drug Deaths Taskforce.”

At the formation of the Taskforce in August 2019, then health minister Joe FitzPatrick wrote in the Daily Record: “I recognise that some people believe a public inquiry would help deliver change. Sadly, these inquiries can often take years to conclude their work.

“I want us to move considerably faster. That is why I will soon be convening an expert group to examine the key drivers of drug deaths and advise on what further changes either in practice or in the law could help save lives and reduce harm.”

The need for speed was emphasised by Constance, whose frustration was clear in letters to the Taskforce, which was due to run until the end of 2022 at least.

In response to the resignation letter, sent on Christmas Eve, Constance wrote back, saying: “I note that you feel the remit and purpose of the original Terms of Reference of the DDTF has changed since you became Chair and Vice Chair.

“Of course there has been significant change since the DDTF was established. This includes not only my appointment as dedicated Minister for Drugs Policy in December 2020, but the launch of the National Mission in January and the establishment of the Implementation Group shortly thereafter.”

She adds: “I would reiterate - and as I communicated to DDTF members - that the transition following the set of final recommendations from the Taskforce will need to be managed carefully.

“I also understand that the Taskforce has oversight of projects that will not have ended by July or December 2022. This is why my officials are considering the purpose, remit and governance of all the groups that are part of the National Mission and how they dovetail with the Taskforce’s current remit and new timescales.”

In response to a query from the Daily Record, Constance said: “As we come to the end of the first year of our National Mission, it is vital that we accelerate our existing work, and our focus on delivery and implementation.

“Recent quarterly statistics for suspected drug-related deaths showed a slight decrease, but it is clear there is still an urgent need to implement changes that will make a real and tangible difference to people’s lives.”


When First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced a £250 million drugs war chest in January this year, she finally accepted the extent of the emergency and admitted the Scottish Government had moved too slowly.

Key thrusts of its work have been on long term measures, like reducing stigma against drug users and establishing progressive Medication Assisted Treatment Standards.

Professor Matheson previously admitted that tackling the scourge of street Valium has been her most challenging problem, which has given her sleepless nights.
Presiona para expandir...
1688769738875.png


 
Morethanabitfoolish dijo:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/19/public-health-minister-resigns-over-record-drug-related-deaths-in-scotland https://archive.ph/oKNfy
Presiona para expandir...
Like the health minister can actually do anything about people voluntarily choosing to do things that kill them. It's clearly connected to the lack of enforcement of drug laws making both distribution and receipt of them much easier for addicts. The more access addicts have, the more likely they are to take a lethal overdose.

I think it would ultimately balance itself out over time (as the most likely to die did in fact die), and you can put treatment alternatives in place for people who actually want them, but nice job scapegoating the health minister for something he can't do shit about.
 
AnOminous dijo:
Like the health minister can actually do anything about people voluntarily choosing to do things that kill them. It's clearly connected to the lack of enforcement of drug laws making both distribution and receipt of them much easier for addicts. The more access addicts have, the more likely they are to take a lethal overdose.

I think it would ultimately balance itself out over time (as the most likely to die did in fact die), and you can put treatment alternatives in place for people who actually want them, but nice job scapegoating the health minister for something he can't do shit about.
Presiona para expandir...
The problem is, as you can see in his replacement too, the SNP appointed health ministers seem to think, "just legalise it brah" is the perfect solution. Any attempts to actually provide risk based assessments which will show the problems with that plan are greeted with baboon like screams for them to go faster and ignore the problems.

The SNP know they're not going to get a legitimate report through that supports them. So the health ministers want a rushed assessment that says what they've been told to find out while also claiming, as I listened to the latest one do on the BBC, that Westminster is responsible for the deaths by not legalising the drugs.

Every member of the SNP government has one priority over everything else. Blame the UK government for everything.
 
teriyakiburns dijo:

BBC seething because Jeremy Vine one of their presenters is about to be outed as a nonce.
Presiona para expandir...
Signing off with "wah, his career might be over" makes me want to see the author punted out of a window.

EDIT - for those who don't read the Mermaids thread they lost in court. Naturally this means they won.

By Lauren Moss and Josh Parry, LGBT correspondent & producer
BBC News

A transgender charity's attempt to get an organisation it described as having an "anti-trans focus" removed from the charity register has been dismissed.
Mermaids launched the legal challenge after the Charity Commission registered the LGB Alliance in 2021.
The LGB Alliance supports lesbian, gay and bisexual people, but Mermaids alleged the group sought to undermine its charitable activities.
On Thursday the tribunal ruled Mermaids was not entitled to bring the case.
Mermaids' challenge is believed to be the first time a charity sought to strip another charity of its charitable status.
But the tribunal ruled that while Mermaids and its supporters may have been affected by LGB Alliance "emotionally and/or socially," this did not give them the legal right to appeal against their registration as a charity.



Mermaids was set up in 1995 to support children and young people questioning their gender identity. It said the LGB Alliance sought to "destroy" its reputation and sources of funding.
LGB Alliance says it exists to advance the rights of lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people. It insisted it is not transphobic and does not endorse discriminatory behaviour towards any group or individual.
Kate Barker, chief executive officer of LGB Alliance said she was "delighted" with the decision, but added "the cost to us and to our supporters has been huge".
Mermaids said it is disappointed by the ruling and is considering whether to appeal.
The tribunal had been asked to consider whether LGB Alliance should have been registered as a charity, but the two judges on the panel were unable to reach an agreement. Both judges agreed the case should be dismissed.
The tribunal heard arguments about the definition of homosexuality, transgender rights and gender identity services for children and young people, during a week of evidence at the general regulatory chamber in London in September.

The Charity Commission said its role is not to regulate public debate on sensitive issues but to apply the law when registering charities.
Presiona para expandir...
Edit 2 - a brief break from the Mumsnet thread mocking this stuff to post this one.


A chambers which unlawfully victimised a barrister for standing up to Stonewall has been ordered to pay her £20,000 in costs for “unreasonable conduct”.
Allison Bailey was placed under investigation by Garden Court Chambers for challenging the campaign group’s “trans extremism”, leading an employment tribunal to rule last year that the 53-year-old criminal defence specialist had been discriminated against at work for her gender-critical beliefs.
The case, which attracted huge interest, including support from JK Rowling, was hailed as historic for enshrining a legal protection for employees to express such views.
Now, an employment tribunal has made the unusual decision of awarding a substantial sum in costs to Ms Bailey for the way Garden Court and its legal team conducted itself during the acrimonious litigation.
The panel singled out for criticism the chambers’ failure to compile an adequate trial bundle, which is crucial for the coherent running of a case.
The stinging judgement says it was unclear whether this was the result of poor resourcing or an issue of “personality” on the part of those involved.


Led by Employment Judge Goodman, the panel stated: “Stepping back from the detail, we considered whether there was unreasonable conduct in the preparation of the bundle.
“We concluded that there was.

“As set out, in several respects it went well beyond normal disagreement.”
The Telegraph has approached Garden Court Chambers for comment.
The findings amount to a serious embarrassment for an employer that bills itself as one of London’s finest set of trial advocates.
£20,000 is thought to be the highest costs sum a tribunal can award against a party without having to launch a parallel litigation to argue over the precise amount, which would run up further legal fees.
Ms Bailey has already been awarded £22,000 from Garden Court in compensation for injury to her feelings.
She lost her case against Stonewall itself last year but has an appeal pending.
The lawyer and gender-critical activist ran up costs of £765,665 for the litigation last year - she has relied heavily on a public fundraising campaign to fund the court action - while Garden Court spent £675,673.
Ms Bailey said on Friday that she believed Garden Court had wanted her to pay up to 50 per cent of their costs.

‘Complaints she was transphobic’​

The dispute arose from a 2018 email to colleagues arguing against the chambers becoming a Stonewall Diversity Champion.
She told fellow barristers that the campaign group was involved in “harassment, intimidation and threats” against those opposed to its point of view.
The chambers subsequently tweeted that she would be investigated over complaints that she was transphobic, and Ms Bailey claimed her income was subsequently squeezed.
On Friday Ms Bailey said: “This win demonstrated the discrimination and aggravated discrimination to which I personally was subjected by a set of barristers who define and present themselves as defenders of human rights, but it also demonstrated the institutional approaches and beliefs that cause that discrimination to arise - as is now being demonstrated in other cases brought by other women against other institutions.”
She added: “The case demonstrated that standing up for women’s sex-based rights, safeguarding norms and against the medicalisation of puberty in gender non-conforming children and youth, and against Stonewall’s particular brand of campaigning on self-ID, is protected under the Equality Act.”
Presiona para expandir...
 
Última edición:
The forefront name is Huw Edwards ( the news presenter).

However, the kid / 20 year old has now lawyered up and made an official statement that none of the mother's claims are true (all previous claims have come from the mother, via the Sun). She also said that the kid was a crack addict.

People are now saying that this was a deliberately inflated story to distract with what's going on with George Osborne -

George Osborne got married to his former ministerial aide Thea Rogers 2 days ago. George divorced his wife Frances for Thea after he was caught cheating in 2019. During the ceremony, an older woman threw orange confetti over them - a move similar to Just Stop Oil, but they've denied involvement - and all wedding attendees had already received an email detailing Osborne's history of cheating, familial estrangement, and several allegations of rape against young girls. Lots of journalists and politicans - e.g. David Cameron, Michael Gove - but there hasn't been much coverage since.

Osborne has said that it was part of an ongoing stalker problem that they were already aware of, and that the woman and email sender's identity/ies are known to them. The email seems to have a lot of personal insider knowledge:
https://pastebin.com/3DRZpzDP

From: To Tell The Truth <totellthetruth0719@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 6 July 2023 at 15:23
To:<>
Subject: URGENT: George And Thea Wedding!

There’s rather a wide variety of people who’ll get this email. If you’re one of the lucky ones, then you’re either: one of George Osborne and Thea Rogers’ wedding guests, one of their close friends, their family, someone working for those people or someone in the profession of journalism, someone hosting the wedding or someone for whom the information in this email might prove useful.

If you’re a Spad reading this email meant for your boss, do them a favour and chuck it their way. They’ll want to see if their dirty little secrets are aired in it after all.

If you're a priest or whoever's meant to be carrying out the happy service: you might want to know this before you go ahead with the holy oil.

And if you’re a journalist-or indeed, a politico for whom this information may come in handy-reading this? Pull up a chair, make a brew and get the popcorn. This email is being sent to every one of George Osborne and Thea Rogers’ wedding guests it’s possible to get hold of-and it's being shared with your eyes too.

Have fun.

Don’t worry: some screenshots are included at the end so you can see a little hint of just how many other lucky names got this email from the number of drafts waiting to be sent-lots and lots and lots of you (your email addresses leave much to be desired, some of you)-and there are plenty of sources linked here, all of whom got their words past their well-remunerated lawyers, so you don't have to take this email's word for it. Journos, take a look around your offices-it's likely at least someone else will have made the cut. Spads, you know from a little glance at the addresses at the top that your whole offices will have been graced with this. And family-well. It won't take long for you to find out just how many of you made the list. Time to start wondering which of your circle would know all your email addresses...

Feel free to share far and wide, my friends...

If one of the former categories-we’re sure you’re looking forward to attending the wedding of George and Thea this weekend. Couldn't be a better love story.

Except for the fact he’s been cheating on her, of course.

Remember Sir James Goldsmith-“When a man marries his mistress, he creates a vacancy”? You can’t be that stupid, Matthea-someone will send this to you, it’s inevitable.

So. Who is it? Who’s the lucky girl?

Come on, you all know. SamCam’s little sister didn’t follow him into that job for no reason, after all.

Word of advice, George and Emily…maybe the Chiltern Firehouse isn’t the best place for a public shag. Or at least grind on each other a little less in the back room.



Of course, it isn’t a shock for Sasha Swire-oh, you’ll be loving this, Sasha, every inch of it. You knew all about it, didn’t you? Remember when you called Emily out on it a while back? Pretty public. Right over that nice big photo of George and Emily together.


That picture was taken in February 2020, wasn’t it, George? When you and Thea were already dating? Because you were up at the Fife Arms with Thea in January….

And it was February 2020 that you were spotted at the Chiltern Firehouse with Emily…

But that isn’t the worst of it, is it, George?

Remember that night abroad? Your son Luke does. Charlotte Griffiths does, too. She’s tried to hint at it quite a few times.




Interesting, that little comment-about that little rift between Luke and yourself. Why’d that happen, George?

Because Luke’s been telling everyone what happened that night in 2019. With you and that girl in a toilet cubicle. That girl who couldn’t even stand up. Remember her?

Of course, it’s not just that girl, is it?

How about that little girl in Bruton you came across that night? Remember that? Did you know she’d only just turned 16? How old were you then, George, 49? Thea was pregnant at the time, wasn’t she? November 2020, wasn’t it? That girl made some very interesting posts about it....

Same age as your daughter Liberty, just about. The one who worked at At The Chapel? Was it just a coincidence that your baby ended up with the same name?




And what about that dinner party back in July 2021? A few days before Beau was born, in fact. Thea wasn’t with you. You were very interested in one young girl in particular, do you remember? Very young. Made no mention of your pregnant fiancée waiting at home for you, did you?

Is that why you had that big fight on the day Beau was born?

Speaking of which, what else have you kept from your guests, George? What other complaints about you? You’ve been keeping lots of secrets, haven’t you?

Now, surely you’ll be telling everyone right now that that’s not true, that there’ve been no complaints about your-let's say your behaviour whatsoever.

But you know there have been. And you know why. And it’s only a matter of time before everyone else knows too.

So sorry to shock you all. But honestly, you really shouldn’t be. After all, you’re all reading this pretending not to know that George and Thea started off as an affair, aren’t you?

Come on, now. You all know that. You just ignore it because it’s convenient. And because it makes you all feel a little less guilty about wanting to brush it under the carpet. After all, what does it matter to you what the two of them did to Frances over it?

You all knew what she was struggling with, after all. But that didn’t bother you. It was easier to brush under the carpet, wasn’t it?

(Remember that holiday to Turkey, by the way, back in 2013? School Easter holidays. Lovely trip. One of the kids was on crutches and you swanned off to business class and left Frances to take care of them alone? Or when you had the nerve to claim that you worried you’d “missed out on their childhood” through being Chancellor?

Of course, there were other treats. Like that time in Italy with Frances when you spent the whole dinner conversation ranting about Brexit when even the other tables got fed up with you. That nice photo of you and Luke on the beach with your cocktails-he's got rid of it now. Those Dads4Daughters days you used to turn up at at SPGS, going skating at Somerset House, taking them to Nicki's art classes, or that time in that pink camper van you took them in one summer so you could convince yourself you were a good daddy, even as you were texting your mistress on the side. How nice of you to give them a crumb of your attention. All the nice little stories to tell the press about your budgie and your hamster and helping with Mandarin homework-you'd almost think you loved your family.

And when Frances was having to hold things together while George was telling the world he’d “never been happier” with his lovely new do-over children and upgraded mistress, why would you care? It’s not like most of you haven’t done worse. And even then, she managed better than him. While George was gushing over his first do-over baby to the press, she and Sarah got themselves together and took their kids off to Ibiza for a holiday. Well, someone had to be good parents.

Don’t worry-a couple of you aren’t as shy behind closed doors. We all know you were leaking their affair to the press for months when it was going on. How else would they have known things like this:





(Nice one, Guido. Really owe you guys.)



Don’t worry, though-in case there’s any doubt left, Fraser Nelson confirmed it (thanks, Fraser). Skip to 5:35, for the bit George doesn’t want you to hear:




And to make things really clear, so did Kate Fall’s BFF:






Of course, Sarah Vine wasn’t shy about telling everyone. Thanks for that, Sarah. You really made life easier there:




Steve Back was pretty helpful too. Remember him, George? The one who managed to get photos of you and Thea returning from your little overnight trips together? He has lots of stories to tell-and not just about you and Thea, either-he knew all about you and Emily too:


























He was right about that hush money for Thea too, wasn’t he? Of course, you were breaking the ministerial code, but you weren’t going to care about that. You didn’t care about breaking up your family, after all (very church-like-imagine the priest will be reaching for the communion wine at this point):










So much for worrying about being a good dad. Missing out on their childhoods didn’t seem to bother you when you were having those little overnight trips away with Thea, did you?

It wasn’t a surprise, though, that it was Thea. Breaking up James Purnell’s engagement, that’s old news.

But breaking up Craig Oliver’s marriage as well?







Yes, it’s not just Luke and Liberty she doesn’t care about-Maya, Iona and Honor were, what-10, 8 and 4 when you were holding hands with Craig and heading off to his hotel room at the Hyatt at that conference, Thea?

Did you not fancy being a stepmummy yet? Did you think you’d be able to get George’s kids out the way a bit more easily for the second-chance family?

Except you're not quite as kind a mummy figure to everyone as you'd like people to believe, are you? You’ve been keeping that quiet too.







Of course, it isn’t just Thea, George. Or Emily. (Tamara, George, really? You must have been pinching yourself. She was so out of your league.)

Then there’s Kate. Now, of course, Kate says nothing ever happened between you-but that’s not quite true, is it? After all, there’s a reason her and Thea don’t get on.

She’s another one Sarah mentioned a couple of weeks ago-thanks, Sarah, your work really has been invaluable:




Honestly, you’d have been better off choosing Kate, George.

No wonder things haven’t been all sweetness and light between the two of you. How many times have you split up again? Few times while she was pregnant, wasn’t it?






But then who could blame her? Everyone knows what they walk in on backstage with you, don’t they, George? Everyone knows what you get up to in the green rooms with those girls. Just get younger and younger, don’t they? No need to take this word for it-take a look at the screenshots at the end.




Now, Thea’s temper’s old news-we all know she’s a bully. But did Thea know about your friends asking you to cancel the wedding, George? Because of that temper of hers’? Did you tell her? Because everyone else knows about it.

Don’t worry….just because it’s George and Thea’s turn today doesn’t mean the rest of your circle have been forgotten about. There are a LOT of skeletons dancing in all your closets….Just got to choose who’s next.

So, congratulations, George and Thea. It was thought your wedding guests deserved to know the real truth about you-all nicely sourced and backed up. Now, Thea, you get to walk up the aisle knowing that every single person in there knows the truth about how your relationship started-that you were only ever the second-choice mistress who got upgraded. But now every one of them knows George has cheated on you the whole time-and you’ve put up with it. So much for that pitbull reputation of yours. So much for you being the love of his life.

But more importantly than that-they know that you know just what he’s done. And you’re prepared to put up with it because you’re too scared to throw away what you’ve waited ten years for. One day, your children will know too. Everything you've lied about, everyone you've hurt to get what you want.

George-everyone knows what you’ve done. But more than that-they know the only reason you’re going through with this wedding is to save face. And it doesn’t matter if you call up every journalist that this gets sent to and stop it from ending up in the gossip pages of the papers-they still all know. Everyone knows what you've done and who you've hurt. Ironically, if you’d just cancelled the wedding the way you said you wanted to, you’d probably have come out of this looking much better.

So much for you never having been happier. Now you’ll have to walk through that wedding knowing that every single person there and beyond knows the truth about you and what you've done.

Congratulations!

1.png
 
Última edición:
Alouatta Simia Belzebul dijo:
However, the kid / 20 year old has now lawyered up and made an official statement that none of the mother's claims are true
Presiona para expandir...
His lawyer is incredibly expensive. There's enough there to suggest that someone with very deep pockets is paying for his legal representation, which casts doubt on the sincerity of his denial.
 
Chaos Theorist dijo:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-66202565

Seems very sympathetic to migrants tbh
Presiona para expandir...
It's the BBC, of course it's sympathetic to migrants. They always support more migration, either because they're "oppressed" and we should pay, or because they'll dissolve the native population, or because they want perpetual population growth in order to sustain the current economic paradigm. The idea of doing something different never occurs to them, except as a nightmare.
 
Chaos Theorist dijo:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-66202565

Seems very sympathetic to migrants tbh
Presiona para expandir...
The number of boats carrying migrants from North Africa across the Mediterranean is growing fast - but Europe is struggling to come to terms with this mass movement of people.
Presiona para expandir...
As if that's what we need to do - just "come to terms" with infinity niggers wrecking our countries and communities. There's literally no other option. Fucking Journoscum.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo