Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

[Karl der Grosse]

Rev 60 was much superior to your time-wasting games. Johnny designed Rev 60 so you could play through it in a couple of hours, max. Even better, he designed it so poorly that no one bothered buying it and playing it at all.

 

[Garfgergin]

Rev 60 was much superior to your time-wasting games. Johnny designed Rev 60 so you could play through it in a couple of hours, max. Even better, he designed it so poorly that no one bothered buying it and playing it at all.

I think her name's Brianna. With your admin being a fat gender kook who gets off to drawings of little boys in tights one would think you'd be a bit more respectful of peoples' identities.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Autism that collapses the space-time continuum.

 

[LoverofPi]

I think her name's Brianna. With your admin being a fat gender kook who gets off to drawings of little boys in tights one would think you'd be a bit more respectful of peoples' identities.

HI Ashley. Still thirsty as ever I see.

And fat too.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

With your admin being a fat gender kook who gets off to drawings of little boys in tights

Ashley gets off to interracial twink porn, she's obviously on a more highly-evolved level.

 

[Postal Pippa]

I think her name's Brianna. With your admin being a fat gender kook who gets off to drawings of little boys in tights one would think you'd be a bit more respectful of peoples' identities.

His name is John, also respect? You remember you're on the internet right?

 

[AnOminous]

The first clause in the second amendment has kind of been ground for contention..a big question is it functional or preambulatory

The SCOTUS tends not to over specify on tha one

SCalia had a neat take (even if it was a side step , it was a brillinat one) in IIRC Heller that the clause informed but didn't restrict
(the preamble has been used to try to say it's a collective right)

Much of the reasoning in Heller was lifted directly from The Commonplace Second Amendment by Eugene Volokh. In fact, they directly cite this work for the specific distinction between purposive and functional language (and there are other citations to other Volokh works). This isn't unique or particularly novel reasoning. For instance, the preamble of the Constitution itself is generally not citable as itself granting rights. For instance, one can't sue demanding "the Blessings of Liberty." However, the rest of the text of the Constitution is read in light of the purpose of establishing such things.

It is well worth reading if you are interested in the background of legal scholarship that led to the Heller decision, which came as a shock to many, although it shouldn't have.

 

[fuckidunno]

For instance, the preamble of the Constitution itself is generally not citable as itself granting rights. For instance, one can't sue demanding "the Blessings of Liberty." However, the rest of the text of the Constitution is read in light of the purpose of establishing such things.

yeah,, I mean it's right there in the title ...the preamble (to walk forward) and that's why the non-functional is classically describes as... preambulatory

 

[Sonichu-choo trainwreck]

eww. I was doing a bunch of dishes so I listened to the

"Brianna rewires an entire Porsche" part of the rocket podcast

NOTE : I didn't realize the person building John's PC is his little podcast co-host buddy.

but it brought up some really interesting points...about John


at abt 45:00 john starts talking about his new entertainment system being a safety feature because if his phone is anywhere near him he feels "instinctual need" to check "twitter or whatever" on it. Wrong word John, the word he's looking for is addictively he's a twitter addict.
He, by his own admission would check his phone while driving if he didnt have the carplay system.
OTOH that ALSO means John is still checking messages while driving...just hands free
1) not a very pure Fahrvergnügen experience there ole Johnnie
2) it's still taking attention away from driving (distracted driving)

Apple CarPlay, Android Auto distract drivers more than pot, alcohol, says study

A new study says driver reaction times using this tech were worse than motorists with alcohol or cannabis in their system.

www.cnet.com

John goes on with 46:15 "because I only drive cars that are manuals, it keeps your hands off your phone" -- hands on the phone, manual or not is illegal in MA already

"keeps you engaged the whole time" -- nope, you aren't engaged the whole time John. You said it yourself that you just have to check...that's not being engaged in the driving. the above article ain't the onlyone out there Admit it Johnnie you are a junkie you just switched drugs

 

[Force and Character]

Autism that collapses the space-time continuum.

Ver archivo adjunto 1940833

John, you're over 40 now. Being le epic gamer who is too autistic quirky to socialize with normal people isn't endearing anymore, it's just sad.

Then again, the same could be said about everything he does.

 

[Particle Bored]

The "militia" as contemplated in the Amendment would have been every able-bodied male.

US code still defines the militia as every able bodied male between 17 and 45, and female members of the National Guard. Which is why grabbers ranting about "herp derp, but youre not in a militia" is hilarious.

41 year old unemployed man really bringing the intellectual heft needed to resolve the "kiddie game" debate.

Ver archivo adjunto 1940722

*43-year-old

 

[Grand Fucktard]

"keeps you engaged the whole time"

Jezzus bri bri, why don't you just get a clapped out yugo - they are light you can get a stick and trying to keep the damn thing from stalling will keep you 'engaged'

or...and I'm jus spitballin' here...you could concentrate on driving instead of worrying if you got enough ass pats or if you have to cover up one of your twitter fakelife lies

 

[AnOminous]

US code still defines the militia as every able bodied male between 17 and 45, and female members of the National Guard. Which is why grabbers ranting about "herp derp, but youre not in a militia" is hilarious.

*43-year-old

I'm not sure about the full history of it, but the current statute indicates it was passed in 1956.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14, § 311; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656; renumbered § 246, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)

I believe the last substantive change was adding females who are members of the National Guard, with most of the changes subsequent being renumberings and formatting changes.

 

[Water-T]

Right from that website:
Ver archivo adjunto 1939879
The thing about the main gun isn't even necessary if you buy a license for it. Which would probably be trivial for most tank purchasers.

I think the main legal restrictions you'd run into with a tank is its street legality, you can't really drive it anywhere except on private property in most localities. I'm sure as a member of the local militia you can get some kind of waiver if your piece gets called up.

edit: It's not just "red" states like Texas either, there's huge amounts of tanks in private hands in a hard blue state like California. Just looking up if there were any state restrictions I found at least three separate estate auctions selling 100+ tanks in the last decade for California. Here's a dude who has a Wikipedia page because he owned 220 military vehicles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Littlefield

Not to mention how many TV shows and movies are getting their stuff by renting it from private owners.

Yikes, 85 of that guys tanks are within striking distance of the Wu household!

Even in a tank, John will somehow manage to ram into a bollard with it and make it inoperable.

 

[Grand Fucktard]

Even in a tank, John will somehow manage to ram into a bollard with it and make it inoperable.

We now know the "somehow" --- Somebody tweeted mentioning my name and the tank didn't have Apple carplay. I couldn't just NOT check, it's TWITTER!!!

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Uh oh, someone's making fun of Investment Bro John Flynt's trading decisions! His hot-blooded manliness won't allow this to pass!!

 

[AnOminous]

Uh oh, someone's making fun of Investment Bro John Flynt's trading decisions! His hot-blooded manliness won't allow this to pass!!

I'm glad to see John refuses to take shit from another man.

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole]

Uh oh, someone's making fun of Investment Bro John Flynt's trading decisions! His hot-blooded manliness won't allow this to pass!!

Ver archivo adjunto 1941811
Ver archivo adjunto 1941812

I googled JD Power blah-blah and I think Wu is biased because they rated the Porsche 911 the most reliable car in the US.

 

[Grand Fucktard]

I googled JD Power blah-blah and I think Wu is biased because they rated the Porsche 911 the most reliable car in the US.

probably what John searched on

 

[Homer Simpson]

41 year old unemployed man really bringing the intellectual heft needed to resolve the "kiddie game" debate.

Ver archivo adjunto 1940722

"I have pretty thick skin" says the tranny who calls for sites that say mean words on the internet to have government action taken against them. The tranny who said trolls making jokes on the internet were "violent" to him. Yeah...thick skin.

Autism that collapses the space-time continuum.

Ver archivo adjunto 1940833

I would genuinely love to see him get something like that only to have the people bring up his deleted tweets and bullshit instead of his survival of the gamergate death squads.

Uh oh, someone's making fun of Investment Bro John Flynt's trading decisions! His hot-blooded manliness won't allow this to pass!!

Ver archivo adjunto 1941811
Ver archivo adjunto 1941812

John really is a self righteous cunt. "You didn't agree with me instantly? Well, too bad for you. Muted." The only thick skin john has is on his hunch.