After donating most of it to your local free library programs, of course.
Ver archivo adjunto 4988396
How does someone who's unemployed get a tax refund? This is almost $3,000 of Frank's money down the toilet for a another toy that John is incapable of using to anywhere near its potential.
Also, leaving the "L" off of a Canon lens name is like leaving the "Porsche" off the name of one of his cars. I'll chalk that uncharacteristic lapse up to stupidity.
ETA:
John is one of those morons who thinks that having the most expensive gear turns an untalented amateur into a top-flight pro in any activity.
You see this all the time in areas like photography and fly fishing that attract dilettantes with money. I've seen people with $2,000 fly rods who couldn't cast the line 20 feet, while Joan Wulff can (and has) cast the entire length of a 90-foot line using an old broomstick as a rod.
Owning this lens won't make a bit of difference in the quality of John's shitty snapshots or amateurish videos other than allowing him to shoot in a little less light. A pro photographer will take better images with a handheld cellphone than John will with $30,000 of high-end Canon gear sitting on top of a $4,000 tripod.
And then there's the fact that an 85mm prime lens is designed for use as a portrait lens. It is not a good general purpose lens at all for photo or video. Frank's money would have been better spent on a quality midrange zoom lens.