Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votos: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votos: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votos: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votos: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votos: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votos: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votos: 9 0.7%

  • Total de votantes
    1,211
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
But Brianna… why are you Cisplaining the experiences of trans gamers? Shouldn't the panel have trans people speaking? You wouldn't talk on a panel called "Gaming While Black" would you?

For some reason, Wu apparently thinks they aren't even white anymore after recent tweets like "If you're white, you can't possibly understand what it's like etc." which sound completely fucking retarded since, as obviously white, Wu has even less agency to claim an "understanding" of shit that - as a white person - they just explicitly said is beyond their understanding to begin with.
 
. The problem is she'd still be talking about her experience in the tech industry when she really has barely any. She'd still be lying, just not as much.
It's still a much smaller elephant in the room than saying all this shit with the face of a man and it already exists. The second people call her legitimacy into question it's all about how straight white men don't have to prove themselves. When people say she looks like a man she has nothing but delusion and SJW cronyism to protect her.
 
Wu has a habit of tweeting questions she could google and get an answer for within the first five results. If a man shows actual interest in what she's built her career around? "Not my job to educate you. Google it". That's the response of someone who doesn't give a fuck about a cause beyond what it can do for them. Hell, it would be more polite to just not respond if explaining her views is that exhausting.
Sometimes I don't think she can. It's like she feels like, as you said, she has to double down on everything feminist to show how much of a woman she is. I guess berating men who still have their penis' are on the top of the agenda of self-hate. The SJW bandwagon just supports her shaky tentpole.

Can someone (As Wu won't) describe what being a woman means by SJW standards? Like... What are we supposed to do on a day to day basis differently from a guy in a first world country? Other than not peeing standing up, I mean. If she were shrieking about water purity in third world countries 'n such I would have more of an understanding, but still wouldn't approve of her behavior.
 
How to Be A Massive Dickhead On Twitter By Brianna "John Flynt" Wu:

The lesson taught here is that "internalized transphobia," like "internalized misogyny" or "internalized racism," is just a meaningless SJW buzzword that can't be explained and means that a trans, black, or other minority person is disagreeing with a spastic SJW .
 
John hasn't tweeted a word about his "Gaming While Trans" talk with Miguel that finished over five hours ago, nor has Miguel.

That usually indicates John completely flopped and is pouting alone in his hotel room, double-fisting pharma products, eating Oreos, playing kid vidya, and "stepping on tweezers" (very "super expensive, professional" ones, of course).

Here we all were looking forward to those "opening remarks" John promised to record and upload.
 
Última edición:
The lesson taught here is that "internalized transphobia," like "internalized misogyny" or "internalized racism," is just a meaningless SJW buzzword that can't be explained and means that a trans, black, or other minority person is disagreeing with a spastic SJW .
Which is incredibly fucking bigoted,when you think about it. It appears to operate on the idea that minorities are simply well-intentioned, dimwitted suckers who can't disagree with you or think independently, they're just misled and misguided.
For a group that complains about being "infantilized" so much, Bri and her ilk certainly seem to hold a dim view of the intellect of the common man.
 
John hasn't tweeted a word about his "Gaming While Trans" talk with Miguel that finished over five hours ago, nor has Miguel.

That usually indicates John completely flopped and is pouting alone in his hotel room, double-fisting pharma products, eating Oreos, playing kid vidya, and "stepping on tweezers" (very "super expensive, professional" ones, of course).

Here we all were looking forward to those "opening remarks" John promised to record and upload.

If instead of that we just get a few hours of angry, increasingly incoherent and drugged mansplaining, we know that's true.
 
I'm surprised that she apparently stayed off Twitter during her panel. I expected her to be tweeting every time it wasn't her turn to talk, like that time she was a contest judge.
 
Maybe she can't tweet because they've lifted her in the air and started singing she's a jolly good fellow and they're carrying her somewhere to celebrate how awesome she is.
 
Can someone (As Wu won't) describe what being a woman means by SJW standards? Like... What are we supposed to do on a day to day basis differently from a guy in a first world country? Other than not peeing standing up, I mean. If she were shrieking about water purity in third world countries 'n such I would have more of an understanding, but still wouldn't approve of her behavior.

Being a woman, or gay, or black, or Asian, or trans, or a lizard person all varies based on person to person. We all have different ideas of what it means to be what we are. That's individuality for you, and perhaps the main reason why SJW "standards" change constantly (therefore rendering your question un-answerable). You cannot assign a blanket narrative to a group and expect it to be true in every single case. Personally, I think that's where the whole "internalized" terminology came in. Not every black person is going to support Ferguson protesters because humans are individual creatures, yet that threatens the SJW narrative (and invites the idea that they're wrong) so any dissent is brushed aside as literal brainwashing by the establishment or some bullshit.

Wu's idea of what it means to be a woman is based entirely on over-used media tropes and whatever SJW topic is trending at the moment. Her inability to empathize blinds her to the varied nature of the human condition, which is why all of her characters have Brianna Wu's personality. Wu doesn't see women as human: she sees them entirely as stereotypes.
 
Being a woman, or gay, or black, or Asian, or trans, or a lizard person all varies based on person to person. We all have different ideas of what it means to be what we are. That's individuality for you, and perhaps the main reason why SJW "standards" change constantly (therefore rendering your question un-answerable). You cannot assign a blanket narrative to a group and expect it to be true in every single case. Personally, I think that's where the whole "internalized" terminology came in. Not every black person is going to support Ferguson protesters because humans are individual creatures, yet that threatens the SJW narrative (and invites the idea that they're wrong) so any dissent is brushed aside as literal brainwashing by the establishment or some bullshit.

Wu's idea of what it means to be a woman is based entirely on over-used media tropes and whatever SJW topic is trending at the moment. Her inability to empathize blinds her to the varied nature of the human condition, which is why all of her characters have Brianna Wu's personality. Wu doesn't see women as human: she sees them entirely as stereotypes.
So, basically they're goalpost moving contrarians is what you're saying? Not that that's unknown, but I guess if there was a definition they couldn't bs around it. Sort of like how Wu tells others to Google things when she knows a bunch of different ideals are floating around, so she doesn't have to commit to something "problematic" or something that will go out of style.

...it just seems like a lot of pretend crap worth nothing but headaches. -- But that's easy for me to say as I have no personal investment. :\
 
Remember how in 2015, the biggest threat to John "Feminist" Flynt's fragile ego was getting caught bashing females on Twitter, so much so that he cowardly deleted the following tweet just minutes after posting it, only to have it archived before he could?

That was great.

image.jpeg

https://archive.is/tksWF

PS - You were a teenage Republican lickspittle in 1996, John. Why would you say it "was great" that "Bob Dole was our big joke" then?
 
Última edición:
So, basically they're goalpost moving contrarians is what you're saying? Not that that's unknown, but I guess if there was a definition they couldn't bs around it. Sort of like how Wu tells others to Google things when she knows a bunch of different ideals are floating around, so she doesn't have to commit to something "problematic" or something that will go out of style.

...it just seems like a lot of pretend crap worth nothing but headaches. -- But that's easy for me to say as I have no personal investment. :\

The only way to avoid being "problematic" is to not say anything.

Wu is just smart enough to realize that she's not in a position to get away with spouting the wrong bullshit anymore. A year ago, while she was still riding high on the GG orgasm, she could probably link to a haram source and not get called out on it by anyone important. Her power has waned considerably, and she's alienated a ton of former SJW allies, so a slip up could cost her dearly if she was caught.
 
You know what be fun?

If once, just once! Johnny-boy wasn't at the top of the first page of Lolcow.

Is it possible for him not to be a fucking spaz for just a single god damn day?
 
During my internet wanderings, I came across this video. It's a couple of months old, but I don't recall it being linked here yet. I found it rather amusing.

 
Infantile asspats and vidya sperging - most definitely the results of the "one of the most important opening remarks" in the history of opening remarks.

Untitled-2.jpg
 
How much money is she dumping into that Star Wars game? She seems to be climbing the ranks ridiculously quick for a mobile game.

Yeah, I've just skimmed the game's forums and it sounds like she's certainly throwing money into the game. You have a limited number of actions you can do in a certain amount of time and have to wait hours until you can do them again... unless you pay. If someone were to keep throwing money at the game they could grind as much as they wanted, unlock characters like crazy while also buffing up characters they already own. I'm convinced Wu is throwing a shitload of money at this game. People who have burned hundreds THOUSANDS on this game still aren't anywhere near Wu on the leaderboard.

This may actually be worse than Chris playing Simpsons Tapped Out.

Here's some people talking about the big spenders on their servers. The top players they're talking about have spent thousands of dollars to get there.

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/1345/whos-the-big-spender-on-your-server
 
Última edición:
Yeah, I've just skimmed the game's forums and it sounds like she's certainly throwing money into the game. You have a limited number of actions you can do in a certain amount of time and have to wait hours until you can do them again... unless you pay. If someone were to keep throwing money at the game they could grind as much as they wanted, unlock characters like crazy while also buffing up characters they already own. I'm convinced Wu is throwing a shitload of money at this game. People who have burned hundreds THOUSANDS on this game still aren't anywhere near Wu on the leaderboard.

This may actually be worse than Chris playing Simpsons Tapped Out.

Here's some people talking about the big spenders on their servers. The top players they're talking about have spent thousands of dollars to get there.

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/1345/whos-the-big-spender-on-your-server

I can never understand people who burn ridiculously larges amounts of money on what basically amounts to a simple browser-game.
From that description @Batman VS Tony Danza it basically sounds like a Star-Wars-verse Mafia Wars or similar facebook failgame.
Can think of so many other good uses for that money, like rehab or psych sessions >.>
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo