Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Wu seems to really scrape the bottom of the barrel these days. It feels like she is more and more desperate for attention. At least that is what my gut feeling says, in fact it feels like her -dare I say- "star is falling".
I know it's been said many, many times before, but John Flynt/Brianna Wu really doesn't pass as a woman at all. He's also a total dickhole fascist. OK, that's my 2 cents.
I know it's been said many, many times before, but John Flynt/Brianna Wu really doesn't pass as a woman at all. He's also a total dickhole fascist. OK, that's my 2 cents.
Wu can't possibly think that they will end up on top when all this blows over, do they? Almost all of their publicity has been negative. They would have to be outright delusional to think they will have any career in tech at all by this time next year.
Fame via outrage might be an okay strategy for short-term monetary gain, but you can't make a career out of it. Eventually people will get tired of being angry and move on to something more fun and enjoyable. And Wu will be left all alone.
Wait...Is she saying that white families adopting black kids is damaging? For real?! That bitch! Does Wu have any clue about the state of the foster care system nowadays? Any families of ANY color are needed desperately to save children from horribly abusive homes. I have heard stories that would shrivel Wu's girl-dick. And they think limiting a child's possible adoptive families by color is a good thing? Ugh.
does a great job of tracing the ultimate known source back to a statement by Kay Brown seminar in 1999. But what data was she quoting? Seems odd that a nearly two decade old study that has apparently disappeared would be accepted over any estimate since. The problem, of course is that all (admittedly questionable) data that demonstrably exists supports vastly lower estimates.
I conclude that Kay Brown simply calculated a number herself. Here’s how:
1. The important thing to keep in mind is that in 1999 (and arguably until maybe 5 years ago) the most commonly regurgitated estimate of transgender incidence was 1 in 15,000. [Reported as 1/10,000 mtf, 1/30,000 ftm–15,000 being the combined total].
2. Dividing total late 90s US population by 15,000 produces an estimated US trans population of about 18,000 individuals.
3. Next she must have come up with an annual number of reported murders approx. 19. [This figure is not unreasonable. Transgender Day of Remembrance data show 14 in 1999. Perhaps Brown had a better source, or maybe multiplied some prior year total by 150%–on the assumption of underreporting].
3. Multiplying the one year figure by average life expectancy. Something like 19 x 77=1463… which is used as the lifetime homicide mortality.
4. 1463 x 12 = 17,556. VOILA! That’s close to the total population of 18,000. QED–1 in 12 lifetime trans homicide mortality.
LMFAO!
As awful as the methodology is generally, the principle reason for the absurd result is the use of 1 in 15,000.
Calculations on the back of a napkin could falsify this. Lynn Conway did some work on the matter.
The shame of it is that I doubt an activist like Brown would have believed that population estimate. It was just useful for creating an alarming murder figure.
Using the same methods and current dubious “statistics” one can produce opposite absurd results.
TIME magazine claimed last year a 1 in 200 incidence. Thus, 1.6 million trans-Americans!
TGDoR has been fairly consistentally showing a dozen deaths p.a. in recent years. Again, I’ll presume they missed some, and bump it up to 16 annually.
So that’s 1 per 100,000. Massively better than 4.5 per 100,00 for the general population.
The lifetime death by homicide incidence is 1 in 182. But for transgender folk a mere 1 in 1250 (16 x 80 = 1280, 1.6 mil. ÷ 1280 = 1250).
FINDINGS:
1 in 1250 trans people are murdered.
You are nearly 7 times more likely to be murdered if your cis!
No radical Feminist is going to shit on Mad Max Fury Road's casting. Not when the War Rig was literally filled with badass,women kicking more ass than Max himself for much of the climatic chase battle.
Radical feminists were actually really pissed about Fury Road's "depiction of women". Apparently women taking part in "male-centric violence" is sexist because it presumes that women have to conform to male standards in order to be seen as strong characters.
So there is literally nothing you can do that will appease people who actively look for reasons to be pissed off.
Wait...Is she saying that white families adopting black kids is damaging? For real?! That bitch! Does Wu have any clue about the state of the foster care system nowadays? Any families of ANY color are needed desperately to save children from horribly abusive homes. I have heard stories that would shrivel Wu's girl-dick. And they think limiting a child's possible adoptive families by color is a good thing? Ugh.
I'm curious why the sudden outburst fromJohnny when most other SJW figureheads have gone quiet.
Sarkeesian, Rand-whale and even the drunk have all be on the quiet side for the last few weeks. Even Full MacIntosh has on,y shit out a few minor tweets.
It wouldn't surprise me. There's been a vogue of sorts in the past few years for people to talk about being adoption "survivors." As with most things sjw, it started with some valid conplaints (lots of bad things happen to kids in foster care, white adoptive parents are sometimes woefully unprepared to deal with the racism and cultural conflicts their non-white kids face, etc) and spiraled into OMG I WAS SOLD AS A BABY TO PEOPLE OF A RELIGION I WOULD NOT HAVE PICKED.
It wouldn't surprise me. There's been a vogue of sorts in the past few years for people to talk about being adoption "survivors." As with most things sjw, it started with some valid conplaints (lots of bad things happen to kids in foster care, white adoptive parents are sometimes woefully unprepared to deal with the racism and cultural conflicts their non-white kids face, etc) and spiraled into OMG I WAS SOLD AS A BABY TO PEOPLE OF A RELIGION I WOULD NOT HAVE PICKED. There's also a decent number of biological moms who have placed kids for adoption, felt sad about it, and joined the "adoption is evil" brigade.
Good God, she's actually saying that, what...babies are BORN with religious views, rather than internalizing them from their surroundings and parents whether birth or adopted? And that this is the same as being black in a white family, because all whites are hateful, closed-minded Republicans and all blacks are automatically at odds with adopted white parents?
This manages to be racist, ignorant, know-it-all, AND stupid at the same time.
