Brianna Wu / John Flynt - DEAGLE NATION STILL LIVES

How long will Revolution 60 come to Steam?


  • Total de votantes
    610
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
wow some idiotic page retweets John a minute after he posted the original list, he's so famous and important!

Ver archivo adjunto 76016
Like that music you stole/sampled and tried to pass off as your own?
Bitch please, those could be the crash reports from your shitty game.

[MEDIA=twitter]705514554093125633[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/705514554093125633
Bullshit.
So much for staying out of politics...

Ver archivo adjunto 76106

Just admit you only want Hilary to win and that you hate Sanders already, Wu. You're doing a shit job acting like you're on the fence.
Drop the facade and just admit that you hate Bernie and are only voting for Clinton because she's a woman.
[MEDIA=twitter]705552564528480256[/MEDIA]http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/705552564528480256

[MEDIA=twitter]705561032262066176[/MEDIA]http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/705561032262066176

[MEDIA=twitter]705565702514741248[/MEDIA]http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/705565702514741248

>Godzilla of tech feminists
>Authority on the Unreal engine
>Professional attitude
>Smughearts


Mhhh...

Just following this thread all week and seein' Wu be a tard really makes you appreciate what a clown she really is.

Still talking about politics even though "I don't want to anymore", XCOM sperging, SF posturing, showing a screenshot of a desktop filled with PDF's of the emails that have been sent as confirmation that a report has been received and babbling about doing research and being a smug shit and "opening up to critique" and then dismissing it with you retarded fucking <3's.

And not a single tweet about the Magnum Opus that is Revolution 60 since February 22nd. Almost two weeks that nobody talked about Brianna Wu's Jupiter, her claim to fame.

A real class act.

By the way, your Patreon is down to under 2.2k again Wu. Might wanna rectify that!
Wow! 4 smughearts in a row! Wu's really mad!
Obviously John would never be guilty of telling any BLATANT LIES himself

Ver archivo adjunto 76165
Ver archivo adjunto 76166
You're one to talk about BLATANT LIES and sexual assault.
452px-Finalgg6.jpg

Remember this?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=YFOqdXKim6M
Had anybody seen this? Pro-level, Flynt!
Damn, not even DSP got his ass kicked that quickly!
 
:)

How did writing Socccon get her the money? She has so many lies they crash into each other.
Actually that, for once, is the straight-up truth. She wrote SOCCON and then said "Dad, give me 200 large to animate this", and Dr. Flynt said "No problem, I'll just wipe my butt with toilet paper instead of $20 bills this month".
 
EDIT 2: at 15:40, Wu says that "all her boyfriends had always been hardcore gamers." OK, that's demonstrably false right? Wu was with Frank pre- and post-SRS, so....

He was with her for the surgery. But that wasn't all of her "transitioning." She transitioned around June 1, 2008 but changed her name around 2006. She was presenting to the world as female, so that was probably when she was working GameStop and fucking boys without telling them.

Assuming she's not just making all that shit up.

One of the GSX slaves was a low level worker bee at Harmonix.

https://www.polygamer.net/2016/01/13/pg37-carolyn-vaneseltine/

With this string you can read any back/forth between her and Wu before she was unpersoned.
https://twitter.com/search?q=@mossdogmusic @spacekatgal&src=typd

Weird that they haven't talked at all since June. It's like all the old employees hate her or something.
 
He was with her for the surgery. But that wasn't all of her "transitioning." She transitioned around June 1, 2008 but changed her name around 2006. She was presenting to the world as female, so that was probably when she was working GameStop and fucking boys without telling them.

Assuming she's not just making all that shit up.



Weird that they haven't talked at all since June. It's like all the old employees hate her or something.
Something that is unequivocally pure BS is this bit from 1:17:50, in which Wu discusses how she mathematically computed what makes J. Scott Campbell's pin-ups sexy, and then used these ratios (hip-to-waist, breast-to-ribcage, and facial dimensions) as a model for the mathematical feature ratios of Rev 60s girls.

K, patent bullshit. We've all commented on how awkward the ladies in Rev 60 look, even going so far as to consider that Wus tranniness has skewed her idea of female dimensions. To suggest that Wu would do this amount of technical, mathematical work is unthinkable...and if she had, wouldn't the figures look less freakish?
 
What a fucking story John

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/team-jpg.76214/
Nah, since Wu is the only person on "her team" that would mean she has a lot of self-respect.
...and I don't think that a pathological liar, who lives off other peoples money and has no other life-goals besides playing a internet harassment victim and tweeting excessively has any shred of self-respect - or dignity for that matter.
 
Her tweets say she's been playing SF for 25 years, her actual gameplay makes it look like she just learned. So many mistakes, bad input misses. She could have won that match easily if she had any knowledge of block/counter-attack combos, but all she's doing is button mashing.
brianna wu tries to play street fighter.gif


don't you know it's sexist for vidya controllers to have more than two buttons because women cant deal with like 25 buttons and (stress sigh) we need empathetic emotion-based controls like the finger John massages Frank's prostate with (weird facial tic)
 
Ver archivo adjunto 76237

don't you know it's sexist for vidya controllers to have more than two buttons because women cant deal with like 25 buttons and (stress sigh) we need empathetic emotion-based controls like the finger John massages Frank's prostate with (weird facial tic)
The problem isn't the amount of buttons, it's the size of the controllers. They're too big and bulky for tiny girl hands... But, that's something fixable compared to blaming sexism and boogeymen.
 
Something that is unequivocally pure BS is this bit from 1:17:50, in which Wu discusses how she mathematically computed what makes J. Scott Campbell's pin-ups sexy, and then used these ratios (hip-to-waist, breast-to-ribcage, and facial dimensions) as a model for the mathematical feature ratios of Rev 60s girls.

K, patent bullshit. We've all commented on how awkward the ladies in Rev 60 look, even going so far as to consider that Wus tranniness has skewed her idea of female dimensions. To suggest that Wu would do this amount of technical, mathematical work is unthinkable...and if she had, wouldn't the figures look less freakish?

To add to this, we've also seen Brianna do math. She's as shit at it as she is at SFV and every other thing she ever brags about.

The problem isn't the amount of buttons, it's the size of the controllers. They're too big and bulky for tiny girl hands... But, that's something fixable compared to blaming sexism and boogeymen.
Not that Brianna has to worry about controllers being too big for her man-hands.

She brings up controller complexity pretty often whenever talking about why she thinks women aren't into games. In her IGN posts, she writes these odd fantasies of going into a classroom full of women who are mystified by the idea of a laptop in fucking 2010. The only other video game project for GSK is Cupcake Crisis, which Brianna believes would be a valuable resource for getting young girls into engineering despite it being a game about solving simple math problems. Each of these things are dumb by themselves but, when put together, we get a pretty clear idea of what Brianna Wu/John Walker Flynt thinks of the technical abilities of women. I can only imagine what her interactions with her former female employees was like or what her conversations with Amanda Warner have been.
 
To add to this, we've also seen Brianna do math. She's as shit at it as she is at SFV and every other thing she ever brags about.

Someone who flunked out of Ole Miss as a journalism major, someone who who has demonstrated that he can't even spell mathematics should not be talking about his skills at human factors calculations. But Flynt/Wu is, as we all know, a software engineer who specialized in game design, which means that he -- at the very least -- has some serious chops in trigonometry, matrix math and vector calculus. It's a shame that he never uses these skills and instead devotes his days to dragging and dropping light sources from a menu box in Unreal Engine.
 
In her IGN posts, she writes these odd fantasies of going into a classroom full of women who are mystified by the idea of a laptop in fucking 2010.
For some reason this in particular really bugs me. How low is her opinion of women that she believes they don't know what a laptop is? Wu's worldview is a strange and disturbing thing...
 
This is a repost, but a reminder:

Are Amanda Warner and Frank Wu not accessories to Brianna Wu's crime of inventing Natalie O'Brien to commit what is essentially (though not legally) charity fraud?

I was the person with the "[Edit: Redacted]" twitter account and I politely contacted a few people about if they had worked with Natalie O'Brien. Some of them were Frank Wu, Amanda Warner and Steven Lubitz (@WickedGood, he's Brianna's co-host on Isometric and has spoken with her about Natalie before) and I was blocked by all of them within an hour.

Shouldn't we be questioning these people who are supposed co-workers of Natalie to get an answer on if they've ever met her or worked with her? They will most likely avoid answering because if they say no, it obviously creates suspicions as to how they could have worked with this person in a 4 person company without having met her, and if they say yes then they are participating in the lie. If someone asked me if I'd ever worked with X, I'd have no problem saying yes or no, particularly if I thought that person did get good work because I'd want to vouch for them.

However, none of these people want to even acknowledge Natalie's existence, even to laud her accomplishments.

I think if we direct enough interest to these Wu-orbiters regarding Natalie, eventually one of them will give in and reveal the reality so as to save their own hide.

I think a good start would be to ask Frank Wu (@thefrankwu), Lubitz (@WickedGood), Kiva Bay (@KivaBay), Maddy Myers (@MIDIMyers), Amanda Warner (@AnimatorMommy), Mikah Sargeant (@Mikahsargent) and Georgia Dow (@GeorgiaDow). These are all people who work with or have worked with Brianna and also live in the Massachusetts area. I'm sure @Jaimas and @Smutley would know some additional names.

We can also ask anyone who has given press coverage to Brianna regarding Natalie if they ever met in person or spoke over the phone. @Feministing is one. @krysoberyl wrote this and is a good place to start:

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/upload_2016-2-11_17-48-13-png.72890/

I would do this but I really can't risk getting an IP ban from twitter.
 
This is a repost, but a reminder:

Are Amanda Warner and Frank Wu not accessories to Brianna Wu's crime of inventing Natalie O'Brien to commit what is essentially (though not legally) charity fraud?

I was the person with the "[Edit: Redacted]" twitter account and I politely contacted a few people about if they had worked with Natalie O'Brien. Some of them were Frank Wu, Amanda Warner and Steven Lubitz (@WickedGood, he's Brianna's co-host on Isometric and has spoken with her about Natalie before) and I was blocked by all of them within an hour.

Shouldn't we be questioning these people who are supposed co-workers of Natalie to get an answer on if they've ever met her or worked with her? They will most likely avoid answering because if they say no, it obviously creates suspicions as to how they could have worked with this person in a 4 person company without having met her, and if they say yes then they are participating in the lie. If someone asked me if I'd ever worked with X, I'd have no problem saying yes or no, particularly if I thought that person did get good work because I'd want to vouch for them.

However, none of these people want to even acknowledge Natalie's existence, even to laud her accomplishments.

I think if we direct enough interest to these Wu-orbiters regarding Natalie, eventually one of them will give in and reveal the reality so as to save their own hide.

I think a good start would be to ask Frank Wu (@thefrankwu), Lubitz (@WickedGood), Kiva Bay (@KivaBay), Maddy Myers (@MIDIMyers), Amanda Warner (@AnimatorMommy), Mikah Sargeant (@Mikahsargent) and Georgia Dow (@GeorgiaDow). These are all people who work with or have worked with Brianna and also live in the Massachusetts area. I'm sure @Jaimas and @Smutley would know some additional names.

We can also ask anyone who has given press coverage to Brianna regarding Natalie if they ever met in person or spoke over the phone. @Feministing is one. @krysoberyl wrote this and is a good place to start:

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/upload_2016-2-11_17-48-13-png.72890/

I would do this but I really can't risk getting an IP ban from twitter.
Is this a real article?
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo