Brianna Wu / John Flynt - DEAGLE NATION STILL LIVES

How long will Revolution 60 come to Steam?


  • Total de votantes
    610
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
The whole point of this data analysis will be to produce slides for uni speaking engagements which will probably never happen again now that gamergate is dead and everyone knows she didn't graduate school. Even after all of that she is still like 2nd or 3rd tier after the two goofs who embarrassed themselves at the UN

Also they've always all been in competition with women who actually deserve speaking engagements.
 
So much for staying out of politics...

image.png


Just admit you only want Hilary to win and that you hate Sanders already, Wu. You're doing a shit job acting like you're on the fence.
 

mcc wrote: @spacekatgirl May I give you a piece of probably extremely unhelpful
[all emphasis added] advice?

I found this very telling. Even Flynt/Wu's lickspittles know full well that they must crawl on their bellies and fawningly beg permission before telling him that there's a better way to do something than the half-witted and incompetent procedure he has come up with on his own. Otherwise, they will join the legions of the banned. What a bunch of gutless, spineless, grovelling brown-nosers.
 
Every one of those is some random account Wu reported for not showing proper deference and/or daring to point out that she's a pathological liar and sociopath. How many of those are Wu's own followers, banned because they dared question her? How many of those are just random assholes who attempted dialogue with Wu and then Brianna was her usual "charming" self in response?

Anyway. For those curious, more on Wu and her Apple Fetishism.

Those who've been following the thread doubtlessly remember my earlier discussion with @BOLDYSPICY! - specifically, when I mentioned why Wu got a Net Yaroze and where the core of her understanding of Video Gaming lies. Short version: Wu was the 1990s version of the kid who got a super-expensive ultra-next-gen system (whether it was a success or dismal failure) and hipstered the fuck out of it.

Wu being a tech elitist on top of this is not a new event; those familiar with her work on Socially Unconscious will remember when she attacked the math department of Millsaps for daring to have computers that were over a year old:

800px-1998_04_20.png

The response by the math department, making fun of Wu's spelling, was glorious.

Wu has two beliefs that meet in her tech advocacy: A sort of barely restrained tech-hipster-ism - a love of being the early adopter who lords over the plebs - and a love of flash over substance. Nowhere is this more clear than in her shameless love of Apple products, which basically exist to cater to both markets simultaneously. With Wu, it's all about the combination of prestige and early adoption. Hence she gets expensive $1200 Macs that can barely handle stuff a $500 out-of-the-box business PC from Staples could handle effortlessly, and buys into every stupid worthless iDevice that is custom-designed to feed her sort of Autism.

Apple Watch that essentially has no purpose when you already have an iPhone and iPad? Wu has one (and every model of iPhone and iPad to boot). Apple TV that is trying to fight a battle years after Smart TVs won it by default? Wu wanted to make a version of Revolution 60 specifically for it. Every single one of these Wu is a shameless early adopter for. Wu's advocacy of Oculus and similar is along the same lines.

And it's all about stroking her own ego. She desperately wants to be the cutting-edge go-to gal who gets to say: "See, I told you this was gonna be huge. You should bow down before my impressive skills at early adoption and wealth. Because I have a finger on the pulse of this industry." Unfortunately, Wu has no sense of taste and really poor common-sense, so this happens approximately never. The one time it did was when she got the Net Yaroze and the PS1 became the dominant console of its generation.

Idly: Wu never admits to it, but I'm calling this right now: If, at some point, evidence comes up that Wu was an early adopter for the Atari Jaguar, TurboGrafx-16, TurboDuo, Panasonic 3DO, Philips CD-I, Sega CD, Sega 32X, or Dreamcast, I will be completely unsurprised.

If Brianna Wu held the capacity to check anything's pulse, she would've been suspicious about the lack of said pulse in anything she touches. Of course, there is a saying that 'a broken clock is correct twice a day,' which should mean sheer odds would wind up seeing her back something that didn't bite the big one. So far, if her successes so far are truly limited to the Net Yaroze, it means she has a worse track record (so far) than a goddamn broken timepiece. Which you'd think she'd appreciate the irony, after buying the Apple Watch.
 
If Brianna Wu held the capacity to check anything's pulse, she would've been suspicious about the lack of said pulse in anything she touches. Of course, there is a saying that 'a broken clock is correct twice a day,' which should mean sheer odds would wind up seeing her back something that didn't bite the big one. So far, if her successes so far are truly limited to the Net Yaroze, it means she has a worse track record (so far) than a goddamn broken timepiece. Which you'd think she'd appreciate the irony, after buying the Apple Watch.
The Net Yaroze was released in 1997.
 
The Net Yaroze was released in 1997.

Not sure how that fact alone disqualifies it. Would still mean Wu's/Flynt's only potential early adoption of something that met with even a modicum of success is the Net Yaroze - would've been early enough that people at least didn't anticipate the PS1 making the strides it had, so best guesses in 1997 would've been 'eh . . . hobbyist curiosity maybe?' What would be pertinent would be the fact it didn't have any direct follow-ups on subsequent PlayStation (though PS2 did see Linux for PlayStation 2, so yay?).
 
Every one of those is some random account Wu reported for not showing proper deference and/or daring to point out that she's a pathological liar and sociopath. How many of those are Wu's own followers, banned because they dared question her? How many of those are just random assholes who attempted dialogue with Wu and then Brianna was her usual "charming" self in response?

Anyway. For those curious, more on Wu and her Apple Fetishism.

Those who've been following the thread doubtlessly remember my earlier discussion with @BOLDYSPICY! - specifically, when I mentioned why Wu got a Net Yaroze and where the core of her understanding of Video Gaming lies. Short version: Wu was the 1990s version of the kid who got a super-expensive ultra-next-gen system (whether it was a success or dismal failure) and hipstered the fuck out of it.

Wu being a tech elitist on top of this is not a new event; those familiar with her work on Socially Unconscious will remember when she attacked the math department of Millsaps for daring to have computers that were over a year old:

800px-1998_04_20.png

The response by the math department, making fun of Wu's spelling, was glorious.

Wu has two beliefs that meet in her tech advocacy: A sort of barely restrained tech-hipster-ism - a love of being the early adopter who lords over the plebs - and a love of flash over substance. Nowhere is this more clear than in her shameless love of Apple products, which basically exist to cater to both markets simultaneously. With Wu, it's all about the combination of prestige and early adoption. Hence she gets expensive $1200 Macs that can barely handle stuff a $500 out-of-the-box business PC from Staples could handle effortlessly, and buys into every stupid worthless iDevice that is custom-designed to feed her sort of Autism.

Apple Watch that essentially has no purpose when you already have an iPhone and iPad? Wu has one (and every model of iPhone and iPad to boot). Apple TV that is trying to fight a battle years after Smart TVs won it by default? Wu wanted to make a version of Revolution 60 specifically for it. Every single one of these Wu is a shameless early adopter for. Wu's advocacy of Oculus and similar is along the same lines.

And it's all about stroking her own ego. She desperately wants to be the cutting-edge go-to gal who gets to say: "See, I told you this was gonna be huge. You should bow down before my impressive skills at early adoption and wealth. Because I have a finger on the pulse of this industry." Unfortunately, Wu has no sense of taste and really poor common-sense, so this happens approximately never. The one time it did was when she got the Net Yaroze and the PS1 became the dominant console of its generation.

Idly: Wu never admits to it, but I'm calling this right now: If, at some point, evidence comes up that Wu was an early adopter for the Atari Jaguar, TurboGrafx-16, TurboDuo, Panasonic 3DO, Philips CD-I, Sega CD, Sega 32X, or Dreamcast, I will be completely unsurprised.
Some of those consoles you listed were actually successful
 
Not sure how that fact alone disqualifies it. Would still mean Wu's/Flynt's only potential early adoption of something that met with even a modicum of success is the Net Yaroze - would've been early enough that people at least didn't anticipate the PS1 making the strides it had, so best guesses in 1997 would've been 'eh . . . hobbyist curiosity maybe?' What would be pertinent would be the fact it didn't have any direct follow-ups on subsequent PlayStation (though PS2 did see Linux for PlayStation 2, so yay?).
By 1997 the Playstation was the number 1 console.
 
All indication is that the new Ghostbusters movie is sensationalist bullshit and nobody will give a shit about it in less than a month.

I hope one of you's ready to answer that phone, because I fucking called it.

The trailer reveal was today and the response has been overwhelmingly negative, to the point where Sony's been mass-deleting comments critical of it.

Wonder how Wu will try to spin this shit?

Some of those consoles you listed were actually successful

The only one remotely successful on that list is the Dreamcast.
 
Wonder how Wu will try to spin this shit?

Well, obviously it's because #gamergate all got together to mass downvote the trailer because it features "women in tech" (except the black woman, of course). It's an obvious reference to Wu, since she's a "woman in tech" (and not black)
 
I hope one of you's ready to answer that phone, because I fucking called it.

The trailer reveal was today and the response has been overwhelmingly negative, to the point where Sony's been mass-deleting comments critical of it.

Wonder how Wu will try to spin this shit?



The only one remotely successful on that list is the Dreamcast.

It gets funnier. The black actress playing one of the Ghostbusters has been telling people like Wu to get the fuck over themselves.

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAc...eslie_jones_the_black_actress_playing_a_main/
 

>Godzilla of tech feminists
>Authority on the Unreal engine
>Professional attitude
>Smughearts


Mhhh...

Just following this thread all week and seein' Wu be a tard really makes you appreciate what a clown she really is.

Still talking about politics even though "I don't want to anymore", XCOM sperging, SF posturing, showing a screenshot of a desktop filled with PDF's of the emails that have been sent as confirmation that a report has been received and babbling about doing research and being a smug shit and "opening up to critique" and then dismissing it with you retarded fucking <3's.

And not a single tweet about the Magnum Opus that is Revolution 60 since February 22nd. Almost two weeks that nobody talked about Brianna Wu's Jupiter, her claim to fame.

A real class act.

By the way, your Patreon is down to under 2.2k again Wu. Might wanna rectify that!
 
I hope one of you's ready to answer that phone, because I fucking called it.

The trailer reveal was today and the response has been overwhelmingly negative, to the point where Sony's been mass-deleting comments critical of it.

Wonder how Wu will try to spin this shit?

I suspect it'll be the usual MO - wait for some blogger out there to say that the negative response is due to sexism and that is the sole reason why people are so against it, then Brianna will retweet it and spout out something about sexism and how she relates because a hashtag made fun of her constant lies and the "Godzilla of Fem-Tech" doesn't even have a single game on the market.

Then she'll ramble on something about racism and/or transgenders and how the transgender need to kept in special happy bubbles because they're such fragile creatures, and black people need ghoulish white people like Brianna to educate them how to be a proper black person.

This will be followed about sperging about a game she'll put in all about five hours into, followed by dehumanizing her husband, a nightcap of NyQuil and Ambien, followed by inflating her Patreon account.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo