netkiwimoongladewave
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Jun, 2026
Do you have any of the BC genes? Or is this ‘chance’ ? It does make a difference
I'm not a doctor or a scientist.
I've heard / read over the years that the BC gene mutations are the most recognisable cause, but family history is a big risk factor because there are other mutations that aren't necessarily recognisable / common that can cause it. My understanding is that a family history (of 2 or more) is basically equivalent to having one of the mutations, but it sounds like my understanding might be oversimplified if there is a difference.
Can you elaborate on the difference? Should someone a family history be more / less concerned than if they have one of the widely recognised gene mutations? And if they have one of the recognised mutations and a family history, does that further increase risk (does the risk compound)?
I've heard / read over the years that the BC gene mutations are the most recognisable cause, but family history is a big risk factor because there are other mutations that aren't necessarily recognisable / common that can cause it. My understanding is that a family history (of 2 or more) is basically equivalent to having one of the mutations, but it sounds like my understanding might be oversimplified if there is a difference.
Can you elaborate on the difference? Should someone a family history be more / less concerned than if they have one of the widely recognised gene mutations? And if they have one of the recognised mutations and a family history, does that further increase risk (does the risk compound)?