Both capitalism and communism are jewish though
Judaism is quite complex demographically, it's not like black demographics where half is communist quarter is liberal quarter is neocon. Jews are comprised of the neocons, the neolibs, the liberals, the orthodox/paleoconservatives and the communists. Infighting tends to happen within Jews themselves on topics like Israel, secular Judaism, capitalism vs communism and such. Communist Jews are less Jews and more communist, they often use jew as a shield against criticism even if they're not actually practicing Jewish ie not technically jew but ancestrally jew. Soros is a good example, he's not practicing, he's just a dark lord but criticism of him is supposed anti-Semitism. It's similar to how Jews in America present themselves as victims when it's convenient for grievance grifting but call themselves white oppressors. Both capitalism and communism is Jewish yes but communism is less Jewish and tends to oppress Jews while capippalism doesn't, Marx himself said that much with the line "emancipation of Jews is the emancipation of society from Judaism". Thanks for coming to the Ted talk.
Edit: Didnt want to doublepost
Take a second and look up how the soviets taught biology and light (lol quantum mechanics) and think about how retarded leftists are at explaining things
Soviets were so captured by lysenkoism that they wanted to win science at any cost, not necessarily improve. Same with the Chinese. I still dont get how the Laika incident is held up as a legitimately great achievement by modern communists, they boiled a dog alive and it came back as debris.
Historical and Material Dialectics are functions that describe themselves as objective ("muh consensus") and can explain anything it needs to without trying.
I dont think so, dialectics in general is a creation of Hegel and Hegel most famously described the lack of an objective reality because reality is supposedly defined by the perceiver cause there can be no objective perception unless youre god. I think its more of a recurrent trend used to describe political states if anything, not objective reality.
Are they even socialists at this point? They seem to say hell no.
The stuff before maybe true, I dont know history of Cuba and Jewish interventionism but most modern jews who are self described socialists do believe in socialism cause theyre young stupid atheist jews, the useful idiot types. Older jews probably not unless theyre like deeply american cause American jews are very different from European jews and believe all sorts of nonsense, example being Ethan Kleins parents who were 60s hippies and probably people like Ralph Bakshi as well, the hippie generation jews. Others like David Mamet and Paul Gottfried are paleoconservatives.
Hilariously enough, everything leftists are confused and angry about today are just pure, endless examples of how Historical and Material dialectics is pure, utter bullshit. (Historical Materialism is basically a Marxist view of history, with Materialism as a belief to be secular, dialectics to explain the confusing parts we don't understand yet. The more you learn about it, the more you'll hate it and think it's retarded, trust me. That's their "science".)
Historical Materialism is complete nonsense cause almost every conflict in history was an ideological conflict not a material conflict. You would expect the same people who talk so much about Nazi antisemitism and American racism being inherent traits to describe WWII and Civil war as material conflicts, which they dont. They often dodge that by saying Capitalism is the cause of all bigotry which also doesnt make sense, nobody is going to be "nigger bad" or "gas the kikes" because of material wealth differences.