US Biden limits eligibility for stimulus payments under pressure from moderate Senate Democrats - No Refunds


President Biden has agreed to narrow eligibility for a new round of $1,400 stimulus payments in his $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill, a concession to moderate Senate Democrats as party leaders moved Wednesday to lock down support and finalize the sweeping legislation.
Support our journalism. Subscribe today.
Under the new structure, the checks would phase out faster for those at higher income levels compared with the way the direct payments were structured in Biden’s initial proposal and the version of the bill passed by the House on Saturday.
The change came as the Senate prepared to take an initial procedural vote to move forward on the bill as early as Thursday. Biden and Senate Democratic leaders were scrambling to keep their caucus united since they cannot lose a single Democrat in the 50-50 Senate if Republicans unite against the legislation.



In addition to the stimulus checks, the sweeping economic package would extend unemployment benefits through August, as well as set aside $350 billion for state and local aid, $130 billion for schools, and $160 billion for vaccinations, testing and other health-care system support; increase the child tax credit; and spend billions more on other provisions including rental aid and food assistance.
Biden made a closing pitch for the package to House Democrats on Wednesday evening, citing strong public polling in favor of the measure and telling them: “I know parts of this and everything else we seek to do are not easy, but people are going to remember how we showed up in this moment, how we listened to them … and how we took action.”
At least one Senate Republican — Lisa Murkowksi of Alaska — appeared open to considering a vote in favor of the legislation, telling reporters, “My state needs relief.” Elsewhere, though, GOP opposition was hardening, as Sen. Ron Johnson (Wis.) announced plans to force Senate officials to read the entire 600-plus-page bill aloud before debate could even begin — a process he predicted would take about 10 hours.



“I don’t want to sound like a leftist, but I’m going to resist,” Johnson told a talk radio host in Wisconsin.
The action in the Senate was unfolding against a backdrop of tightened security around the Capitol complex, as the sergeant-at-arms and the Capitol Police warned of potential violent unrest over the coming days. The House moved up votes to allow members to avoid the Capitol on Thursday, the date some believers in disinformation have identified as when former president Donald Trump should rightfully be inaugurated. The Senate is scheduled to remain at work.
Under the plan for stimulus checks passed by the House, individuals earning up to $75,000 per year and couples making up to $150,000 per year would qualify for the full $1,400 payment. The size of the payments would then begin to scale down before zeroing out for individuals making $100,000 per year and couples making $200,000.

Under the changes agreed to by Biden and Senate Democratic leadership, individuals earning $75,000 per year and couples earning $150,000 would still receive the full $1,400-per-person benefit. However, the benefit would disappear for individuals earning more than $80,000 annually and couples earning more than $160,000.
That means singles making between $80,000 and $100,000 and couples earning between $160,000 and $200,000 would be newly excluded from seeing any benefit under the revised structure Biden agreed to.
President Biden's imperative of swiftly passing his $1.9 trillion pandemic-relief program faces one of its final hurdles, settling disputes among Senate Democrats over how to ensure aid gets to those who truly need it. (Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg)
The changes were confirmed by a Democratic aide who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden has always been open to a faster phaseout for higher-earning individuals and that “he is comfortable with where the negotiations stand.”


“He is comfortable and knows there will be tweaks on the margin,” Psaki said at Wednesday’s White House press briefing. “What his firm viewpoint is, is that it needs to meet the scope of the challenge, it needs to be the size he’s proposed, it needs to have the core components in order to have the impact on the American people.”

Economic stimulus or economic relief: Here’s what we know about who might qualify for the next round of coronavirus checks and how much they’ll get. (Monica Rodman, Sarah Hashemi, Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) was among those who had called for changing the eligibility levels for checks, telling reporters this week: “I think we could drop it below the $200,000 and still get households that really need it.”
She said she would hope to redirect the savings from that change toward other needs, such as hospitals.


Narrowing eligibility for the stimulus checks was just one change moderates like Shaheen and Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) had been seeking. Several were also eyeing better targeting money for state and local governments, and changing the structure of weekly federal unemployment benefits in the bill, to keep them at $300 — their current level — rather than raise them to $400 as proposed by Biden and passed by the House.

Senate Democrats do not intend to adopt the suggested change to unemployment benefits, and they will stay at $400 per week, the aide said. The unemployment benefits are currently set to expire March 14; the Biden bill would extend them through August. Democrats are aiming for final passage of the bill ahead of the March 14 deadline.
Around 12 million fewer adults and 5 million fewer children would get the stimulus payments under the new Biden-Senate compromise, according to preliminary estimates from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank. About 280 million Americans in total — 200 million adults and 80 million children — would still be eligible for the checks under the new structure.

Centrist Senate Democrats had initially pushed for even more aggressive restrictions on the stimulus payments. Senior Democratic officials had at one point considered dropping the full benefit for those making more than $50,000 per year, a change they ultimately abandoned after a backlash led by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

Still, liberal lawmakers bristled at the new changes. House liberals have suggested it could be difficult for them to approve the package if it’s watered down significantly in the Senate. Presuming the Senate passes the package later this week, it still would have to go back to the House for final approval.
“I don’t understand the political or economic wisdom in allowing Trump to give more people relief checks than a Democratic administration,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. “People went far too long without relief last year — if anything we should be more generous, not more stingy. It’s also an insensitive compromise for the roughly 80 percent of Americans that live in urban areas, which are known for higher costs of living.”

Biden acknowledged in his comments to House Democrats that “I know we’re all making some small compromises,” but he argued that staying united to pass the relief bill, his first major piece of legislation, would help restore the public’s faith in government and open the door to further successes.

“It’s a show of strength,” Biden said. “We know how much we have to do but it all starts here, it starts by bringing this home.”
On a portion of his call with House Democrats that was not public, Biden told Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) he supports legislation that would permanently increase the child tax credit to $3,000 per child, according to two people on call who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details of the conversation. The legislation would currently do so for only
one year.


Senate moderates were discussing further changes and GOP senators were also preparing amendments aimed at further targeting the legislation, which have potential to peel off Democratic votes as the measure moves through the Senate.
Democrats are advancing the package under a process called budget reconciliation that allows it to pass with a simple majority instead of the 60 votes normally required. With only 50 votes in the Senate and GOP support uncertain, Democrats must ensure they stay united in order to pass the legislation with Vice President Harris breaking the tie.
Attention has focused on Senate moderates who have voiced skepticism about various elements of the bill. Psaki expressed optimism Wednesday that Democratic moderates such as Manchin, and others, would ultimately support the bill.
 
...and spend billions more on other provisions...
How nice of Washington Post to skip over those "other provisions" which most constituents would balk at for any politician. A lot of this bill has nothing to do with Corona.

There's the pension bailout, environment malarkey, tax provisions, federal minimum wage, Native American justice nonsense, and more. Hundreds of billions in this bill have nothing to do with the virus at all and are just Democrats greasing palms.
 
As little as possible. As late as possible.

And not one of those conniving fucks ever missed a single check during this whole fiasco. Their tune would change if they didn't get checks for the duration of their state's lockdown.
 
*takes drag from a joint*

So how many upper middle class and wealthy people who voted for Biden because he sold himself as a "respectable return to normalcy" are regretting their decision? The answer is none. So many people will perform the most spectacular mental gymnastics to justify how they are on the right side of history.

It is beyond depressing to see so many people I once respected and admired turn into nothing more than mindless NPCs. Biden will continue to disappoint them and they will keep making excuses for his actions or go on about how Bernie and AOC will appear from behind the curtain and save the day. Its both infuriating because I want to tell them that they are being lied to by the media and they need to look at the actual data themselves and at the same time realize that they will dismiss anything that goes against their world-view as inaccurate lies and keep swallowing the same corporate propaganda they say is bad.
 
*takes drag from a joint*

So how many upper middle class and wealthy people who voted for Biden because he sold himself as a "respectable return to normalcy" are regretting their decision? The answer is none. So many people will perform the most spectacular mental gymnastics to justify how they are on the right side of history.

It is beyond depressing to see so many people I once respected and admired turn into nothing more than mindless NPCs. Biden will continue to disappoint them and they will keep making excuses for his actions or go on about how Bernie and AOC will appear from behind the curtain and save the day. Its both infuriating because I want to tell them that they are being lied to by the media and they need to look at the actual data themselves and at the same time realize that they will dismiss anything that goes against their world-view as inaccurate lies and keep swallowing the same corporate propaganda they say is bad.
That's how normies function. Low IQ normies think they are important cuz they got dah vote. Same effect with Trumptard's 1488D chess garbage, which is just a fancy phrase for a the 4-lettered-word "COPE".
 
*takes drag from a joint*

So how many upper middle class and wealthy people who voted for Biden because he sold himself as a "respectable return to normalcy" are regretting their decision? The answer is none. So many people will perform the most spectacular mental gymnastics to justify how they are on the right side of history.

It is beyond depressing to see so many people I once respected and admired turn into nothing more than mindless NPCs. Biden will continue to disappoint them and they will keep making excuses for his actions or go on about how Bernie and AOC will appear from behind the curtain and save the day. Its both infuriating because I want to tell them that they are being lied to by the media and they need to look at the actual data themselves and at the same time realize that they will dismiss anything that goes against their world-view as inaccurate lies and keep swallowing the same corporate propaganda they say is bad.
It really is a sight to behold. People have lost their minds over this past decade and are genuinely insane.
Most people are fine, but enough people are not that it's a problem.
 
It's called hyper reality. It's a fucking hell of a drug
"hyper reality" sounds like "red pill" with more syllables.
I'd maybe be able to be fooled into thinking people were always this wack if people across generations in real life didn't notice the same insanity and talk about it all the same. Everyone is observing the same thing, but no one can agree on what caused it, or at least that's been my experience.
 
"hyper reality" sounds like "red pill" with more syllables.
I'd maybe be able to be fooled into thinking people were always this wack if people across generations in real life didn't notice the same insanity and talk about it all the same. Everyone is observing the same thing, but no one can agree on what caused it, or at least that's been my experience.
Hyper reality is the memeplex imposed on the masses.

A great example of hyper realitys effect is when that radio station broadcasted the war of the worlds as a news cast. It was fictional drama but people took as real.

The ability to weave such dreams for the sake of power has always been with us. It's true. It's that technology makes the ability to weave such delusions more potent.

A red pill is when hyper reality ceases to have an effect on a person or persons.
 
>ooh we're going to give you $2000
>but we're going to send millions to interests outside the US
>$2000? oh, we meant $1400! You got the first $600! do the math!
>certain people will get it first!!
>not everybody may get it

Bruh...
tumblr_047cae847659a0f1ec93a3d199cf2351_c9bc5611_500.gif


They know the economy is messed up, people out of work and they're pulling this nonsense? WOW.
 
>ooh we're going to give you $2000
>but we're going to send millions to interests outside the US
>$2000? oh, we meant $1400! You got the first $600! do the math!
>certain people will get it first!!
>not everybody may get it

Bruh...
Ver archivo adjunto 1967540

They know the economy is messed up, people out of work and they're pulling this nonsense? WOW.
$2000 checks right out the door lmao
 
>ooh we're going to give you $2000
>but we're going to send millions to interests outside the US
>$2000? oh, we meant $1400! You got the first $600! do the math!
>certain people will get it first!!
>not everybody may get it

Bruh...
Ver archivo adjunto 1967540

They know the economy is messed up, people out of work and they're pulling this nonsense? WOW.
To be fair, it's people who are still making $80k and over that aren't getting a check. At least from what I understand.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo