Disaster Biden drops Trump design for new Air Force One - Chairforce blames the color blue to spite Trump and please Biden

Article (Archive)

WASHINGTON — The paint scheme for the next Air Force One will remain largely the same as the current version of the presidential aircraft, but with a slightly deeper shade of light blue instead of the current robin’s egg blue.

The Air Force said Friday President Joe Biden has selected the Boeing-made VC-25B’s new livery design, bringing to a close years of debate across two administrations.

The VC-25B’s engines will also use the darker blue from the aircraft’s cockpit area, instead of the robin’s egg blue on the engines of the VC-25A, the Air Force said. And the VC-25B will not have a polished metal section, because the alloys used for the exterior of the Boeing 747-8 airliners that are being adapted into the presidential aircraft do not allow it.

Former President Donald Trump wanted the new presidential aircraft to ditch the robin’s egg blue and white color scheme in place since the Kennedy era, and instead adopt a darker red, white and blue design.

But Trump’s idea proved controversial — and not only for aesthetic reasons. The Air Force said in Friday’s release a thermal study found the dark blue in the Trump administration design would add heat in some environments, and would require more Federal Aviation Administration qualification testing for several of the airplane’s commercial components.

When Biden assumed office in January 2021, his administration downplayed his interest in redesigning the Air Force One paint scheme.

But by June 2022, the administration had decided to drop the red, white and blue paint plan, citing the additional engineering, time and cost it would require. Part of that decision was based on the temperature issue.

In its release on Friday, the Air Force said a decision on the Air Force One livery had to be made by this year to give Boeing enough time to carry out engineering, certification preparation, and supplier selection activities.

The two airplanes were originally expected to be delivered in late 2024, but the program has fallen years behind schedule.

The Air Force said Boeing is expected to deliver the first VC-25B in 2027, and the second the following year — well into the next presidential term.

Andrew Hunter, the Air Force’s assistant secretary for acquisition, technology and logistics, told Congress in May 2022 the aircraft would be two to three years late.

Hunter told lawmakers a Boeing subcontractor had been unable to finish the job of making vital modifications to the plane’s interior, which largely led to the “significant delay.” Boeing had brought on other subcontractors to make those modifications, and had taken on some of the tasks itself, he said.

This means the Air Force will have to keep flying the current Air Force Ones for several more years. The service said in its release it is able to operate the VC-25A until the new planes are delivered.

The Air Force selected Boeing’s 747-8 for its Presidential Airlift Recapitalization program in January 2015. But in December 2016, then-President-elect Trump criticized the cost of the program and threatened to cancel it.

The Trump administration and Boeing negotiated, and in July 2018, the Air Force awarded Boeing a contract for the presidential aircraft the White House said was far lower than the original proposal.

In an April 2022 earnings call, Boeing chief executive Dave Calhoun expressed regret over that deal and suggested the company should not have agreed to the Trump administration’s terms.

As Boeing modifies the 747-8s into the new Air Force Ones, it is adding into each plane a medical facility, a self-defense system, a mission communication system, an executive interior, autonomous ground operations capabilities and electrical power upgrades.
 
But Trump’s idea proved controversial — and not only for aesthetic reasons. The Air Force said in Friday’s release a thermal study found the dark blue in the Trump administration design would add heat in some environments, and would require more Federal Aviation Administration qualification testing for several of the airplane’s commercial components.
While it's not impossible, I know USA politics well enough that it wouldn't surprise me that they would invent reasons that have absolutely tiny consequences just to spite.
 
The Air Force said in Friday’s release a thermal study found the dark blue in the Trump administration design would add heat in some environments, and would require more Federal Aviation Administration qualification testing for several of the airplane’s commercial components.

While believable, that sounds really fragile.
 
Ah, one of my areas of spergery. I love the VC-25. I have been closer to them than most. You can pluck your chin hairs in their reflection. A magnificent airplane to behold, truly representative of the title Queen of the Skies.

The 748, though I’m glad it remains a 747, doesn’t have the same panache with its future livery, either the Trump version or the composite friendly updated one. The robin’s egg blue is a necessary component of its aesthetic.

Knew the Trump livery would be toast whether he was in office or not, as dark paint heats up quick. And I’m saying this as a dark livery fan.

I know, I know… 🧩
 
Ah, one of my areas of spergery. I love the VC-25. I have been closer to them than most. You can pluck your chin hairs in their reflection. A magnificent airplane to behold, truly representative of the title Queen of the Skies.

The 748, though I’m glad it remains a 747, doesn’t have the same panache with its future livery, either the Trump version or the composite friendly updated one. The robin’s egg blue is a necessary component of its aesthetic.

Knew the Trump livery would be toast whether he was in office or not, as dark paint heats up quick. And I’m saying this as a dark livery fan.

I know, I know… 🧩

So you think this wasn't some decision to spite Trump?

While it's true that dark paint yes does make things hotter. I haven't heard of any air crashes or performance issues blamed on the paint.
 
But Trump’s idea proved controversial — and not only for aesthetic reasons. The Air Force said in Friday’s release a thermal study found the dark blue in the Trump administration design would add heat in some environments, and would require more Federal Aviation Administration qualification testing for several of the airplane’s commercial components.
That reason sounds like utter shite, pure BS. It definitely was to spite Trump.

Ah, one of my areas of spergery. I love the VC-25. I have been closer to them than most. You can pluck your chin hairs in their reflection. A magnificent airplane to behold, truly representative of the title Queen of the Skies.

The 748, though I’m glad it remains a 747, doesn’t have the same panache with its future livery, either the Trump version or the composite friendly updated one. The robin’s egg blue is a necessary component of its aesthetic.

Knew the Trump livery would be toast whether he was in office or not, as dark paint heats up quick. And I’m saying this as a dark livery fan.

I know, I know… 🧩
The smurf blue is iconic no doubt, but the reasons given for the rejection of Trump's livery are 99% bullshit. There are quite a number of actively flying commercial jets with liveries that have a similar dark bottom half. These commercial jets are arguably used to their fullest extent more so than any AF1 plane will ever be and they are faring just fine.

ryanair.jpg

Ryanair flys a ton of their planes in this livery all across Europe.

R (1).jpeg

Entire BA fleet has the same dark blue bottom half, though this is a lot smaller than Ryanair's and Trump's livery.

4533744.jpg
AllBlacks1-640x426.jpg

Though not encompassing the entire fleet, there are a few All Black's livery airplanes in the Air New Zealand fleet that fly in some of the most sun beaten climates. The 777-300 flies the Auckland LA route.

southwest.jpg
AirTahitiNui_787-1024x640.jpg

New-JetBlue-Livery-1.jpg

Southwest, Air Tahiti Nui, and the new Jet Blue liveries all have variations of a darker shade of blue, the one that's stated to require more upkeep and whatever from the Biden administration. Southwest has been flying the All Hearts livery for quite a while now. I don't see why Jet Blue would make the change to a dark blue from white if there were serious maintenance concerns over the color.

For context here's Trump's livery. It's basically a derivation of the British Airways Landor livery.

trump-air-force-one.jpg


If you want to argue about keeping a US icon, well the plane means nothing in greater context of the gay tranny flag stuff that's plastered all over the govt buildings.
 
Oh hell. I’m either having a stroke, or a Mandela effect moment. I thought there was more blue on the livery. Eh, it’s probably spite, then. On a completely unrelated aside, American had to change their (literal) paint due to the mica weighing down the planes. If the grey looks duller compared to the initial 2013 paint jobs, that’s because it is.

If I had to compare Trump’s revision to any other livery, however, it’s reminiscent of TWA’s last scheme.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo