Culture Being An "Affluent Homeless" Is Becoming Popular. - Owning as little as possible and using other people's stuff is emerging as the answer to the millennial's economy.

tl:dr = The new hip thing is to own nothing except an IphoneX and a Macbook Pro, have a P.O. box and leech, borrow, co-share everything else. Because the NEW economy is instagram posts and experiences.




More young people are leaning into the rental or sharing economy — owning less of everything and renting and sharing a whole lot more. Housing, cars, music, workspaces. In some places, such as Los Angeles, this rental life has gone to an extreme.

Steven T. Johnson, 27, works in social media advertising and lives in Hollywood. He spends most of his days using things he does not own.
He takes a ride-share service to get to the gym; he does not own a car. At the gym, he rents a locker. He uses the gym's laundry service because he does not own a washing machine.

Johnson doesn't even have an apartment, actually. He rents a bed in a large room with other people who rent beds, for nights, weeks or months at a time, through a service called PodShare. All the residents share a kitchen and bathrooms. Johnson also rents a desk at WeWork, a coworking space.

And he says the only clothes he owns are two versions of the same outfit.

Johnson says he owns so little that he has even been able to get rid of his backpack. "I gave that up two months ago," he says.

He says that for him, this lifestyle isn't cumbersome or confusing. "That's what's great," he says. "When you don't own things, you don't have to keep track of them. You just show up."

He's part of a newish group of young people. He is educated and owns his own business. He could be considered well off, but he is also, in a way, homeless. By choice.

There are two big reasons for this shift: the price of housing and student loan debt. A little more than a third of millennials currently own homes, a rate lower than Generation X and baby boomers when they were the same age.

But is there something else going on as well? Does Johnson represent a fundamental shift in American capitalism as we know it?

Skyler Wang, a Ph.D. student at the University of California, Berkeley who studies the sharing economy, says even if young people own less and are less enamored with ownership than their parents may be, they still have a lot of stuff — it's just not tangible.

"I talked to a lot of minimalists," Wang says. "They're the type of people who love to couch-surf. They own like 30 things, but ... they hoard digitally. They have tons of photographs. They have thousands and thousands of Instagram posts."

They still live in an economy of stuff — it's just different stuff. It's experiences.

How do businesses deal with this? For starters, a lot more companies are getting into rentals. Even Ikea is starting to lease its furniture.

The outdoor chain REI announced recently it is vastly expanding its rental program for things like camping gear. Eric Artz, acting CEO of the company, says this requires a different kind of outreach.

"We're selling joy," he says. "We're selling inspiration when you get out on a trail or go for a bike ride. We're selling the adrenaline buzz at the end of a run, and we're just trying to enable that in any way we possibly can."

Juliet Schor, a sociologist at Boston College who studies the rental and sharing economies, says not everyone is in it for the same reasons. Some are doing it just for enjoyment. Some are doing it to move toward transactions that are less corporate and more personal. Others are willing to spend more for convenience.

But a lot rent and share because they're broke and they need to save money.

"I think it's a mistake to characterize them ... with one kind of economic orientation or orientation to money," Schor says.

That makes it really hard to predict whether renting and sharing is our long-term future, or just a fad — even for Johnson, who is totally plugged in to a rental life.

"It's not something that you can do forever, because you do need to have a place that you can genuinely point to and say, this is my home," he says.
 
It would just plain suck to be that dependent on others anyway -- especially in some "hip" city lifestyle. Hunter-gatherers from eons ago were more independent than they are.
Hunter gatherers also spent like, 10 hours a week max ACTUALLY WORKING.

EDIT - That's conjecture on my part about how little time. I'm a fan of the 'Original Affluent Society' theory, which this article riffing on via the wording of its title. Of course they're getting it horribly wrong to compare corporate slavery to living free off the land, but.... Journalism.
 
Última edición:
This legally could not happen in New York State, the cops bust people who live in cars all the time. Stealth Campers and other off the grid types tend to make illegal modifications to their vehicles that violate safety standards. They'll do shit like have unsecured propane tanks be rolling around in their vehicle or have holes drilled somewhere so they can dump their grey water and sewage. You also have some geniuses try to wire the interior of their vehicle with makeshift wiring that's usually exposed.

Also during the winter these individuals keep their cars/trucks/Uhaul Trucks running in enclosed areas to keep the heat on. They may try to leave to Jersey because jersey has walmarts and other large shopping malls nearby where they can hide out in the parking lot, but they've also been chased away from those places as well. It's really not uncommon to have a vehicle go up in flames. The Car Hobos tend to group together and at least one of them is always trying to manufacture drugs inside their vehicle.

So yeah this is mostly a west coast thing because people there have no standards.
 
Última edición:
Hunter gatherers also spent like, 10 hours a week max ACTUALLY WORKING.

There's a reason that hunter-gatherer societies are incredibly stable and the few that still exist have existed more or less unchanged for tens of thousands of years. Thing is they can only really exist optimally in places like jungles that provide lots of free food.

Anywhere else forces more active measures to stay fed, and hunter-gatherer societies tend to go extinct when their environment changes. Either the society itself changes or they just flat out die.
 
Hunter gatherers also spent like, 10 hours a week max ACTUALLY WORKING.

EDIT - That's conjecture on my part about how little time. I'm a fan of the 'Original Affluent Society' theory, which this article riffing on via the wording of its title. Of course they're getting it horribly wrong to compare corporate slavery to living free off the land, but.... Journalism.

Depends on where you look.

The Inuit and Bushmen had annual famines while the Ojibwa ate buffalo, muskrat and fresh syrup everyday.
 
Última edición:
Depends on where you look.

The Inuit and Bushmen had annual famines while the Cree ate buffalo, muskrat and fresh honey everyday.
How could the inuit have famines when they live in a giant freezer? Literally just store and freeze meat for harsher times. The California Condor survived the ice age extinction by feasting off of large dead sea mammals that washed up. Dead whales were not that uncommon and since you're dealing with something that weighs in tons you could still retrieve large amounts of unspoiled meat from the carcass.
 
Shit like this is why Millennials are despised and why they will never attain power and be the ones to make the rules. It's going to be up to the next generation.

If there is going to be a next generation.
 
I thought the concept of the Morlock and the Eloi were ridiculous until I realized the Morlock are immigrants and the Eloi are wristlet soyboys.
 
Why live in the Valley if you can telecommute?

Brand name cred, plain and simple. Same reason people pay through the nose for Starbucks shit when better coffee exists in five minutes for a fraction of the cost in one's own home.

Maybe at least this way hipsters will solve the problem of getting rid of themselves on their own. We can dream...


Why have a car? Yeah, it's expensive, but at least you don't have to rely on the convenience of anyone else, or a bus schedule, to get shit done. You go where you want when you want. Oh but right, personal responsibility is something millennials seem to be highly allergic to.

I don't get the appeal of the whole stealth camping thing and the van life instahashtaggers are insane, but tiny house living is something I've been working towards. Or these days, probably fulltime RV. Being able to just crank up and take my entire house with me is really appealing. I might be renting a parking space, but I'd own my home (and have better internet than I do right now).
 
Why live in the Valley if you can telecommute?

Brand name cred, plain and simple. Same reason people pay through the nose for Starbucks shit when better coffee exists in five minutes for a fraction of the cost in one's own home.

Maybe at least this way hipsters will solve the problem of getting rid of themselves on their own. We can dream...


Why have a car? Yeah, it's expensive, but at least you don't have to rely on the convenience of anyone else, or a bus schedule, to get shit done. You go where you want when you want. Oh but right, personal responsibility is something millennials seem to be highly allergic to.

I don't get the appeal of the whole stealth camping thing and the van life instahashtaggers are insane, but tiny house living is something I've been working towards. Or these days, probably fulltime RV. Being able to just crank up and take my entire house with me is really appealing. I might be renting a parking space, but I'd own my home (and have better internet than I do right now).
There are people who convert vans to an rv. Rvs are generally just converted vans. It's a trade off from what I read about it. Honestly have thought of it myself but there are some factors to consider like it is really cramp, it can be a challenge to find a place to park for sleeping, etc. I sometimes think of doing it with a sprinter.
 
This is why you should be really leery to let any of these hipster fucks couch surf anywhere you own or rent because they could easily pick up bed bugs in one of these flophouses and then just bring them along, costing you thousands or even tens of thousands in getting rid of those persistent little buggers.
Used to know someone who worked in a lab studying those nightmares from Hell. If you get some of the more resilient ones in your home, you're basically fucked. There is no guaranteed pest management process to deal with them. At minimum, you toss your clothes, bedding, mattresses, and even your carpet. At most, they own your home now.

Bed bugs are horrifying enough to qualify as something most people wouldn't will on their worst enemy.

Unfortunately, someone at a group event I attended last year passed some bed bugs from his house along to at least two or three other people participating in the event for them to take back to their houses - myself included. My being allergic to the bites is probably what helped me figure out what happened relatively quickly before they could multiply into a full-blown infestation. Unfortunately, the heat treatment and follow-up treatment that totally eliminated them from my house was quite expensive as @AnOminous stated - and that doesn't include the subsequent costs for a new mattress, box springs, linen, and bedbug-proof covers for the new and existing bedding. I'm also a lot more fussy what group events I attend now in trying to avoid both the person that spread these nasty critters around and those that got them but won't say whether they did anything to combat them simply because I don't want to deal with this ever again. I even change clothes right away after attending certain events and put the old set in the dryer for a half hour on its highest setting just to be safe (if not paranoid).

Given how many people that couch surf and rely on others kindness tend to be both sloppy and inconsiderate of other peoples' property, letting them randomly couch surf from place to place becomes that much less attractive. Any money you might make - assuming these people pay - can easily be offset by the expense associated with pest removal from the hitchhiking critters that might come along with these boarders.

I'm also willing to bet these public, shared-space places - in their desire to maximize profits - are more than likely not spending money to take steps to minimize the risk of people spreading filth and pests to their space-mates and anyone else that subsequently uses the space.

Remote working is becoming increasingly common so moving to places like Silicon Valley is an insane idea. I know a few people who do tech support for companies while working at home.

(Ninja by @Rogue Boob nothwithstanding) Unless a remote job requires the occasional visit to a specific physical location, why not live someplace with an affordable standard of living? That's probably a much better way to save money than most of the ideas presented in the OP's article.
 
Última edición:
I own rental properties, so this is good news. Don't ever buy a home. Keep renting. Even if they're freeloaders, I can make this work. I'll take what money I can from them. After the 2008 financial crisis, banking and housing regulations got more strict and made investing in real estate a bit more tricky and expensive. Now I can just repurpose cheap buildings into flophouses and not have to worry about expensive residential zoned property.
 
I own rental properties, so this is good news. Don't ever buy a home. Keep renting. Even if they're freeloaders, I can make this work. I'll take what money I can from them. After the 2008 financial crisis, banking and housing regulations got more strict and made investing in real estate a bit more tricky and expensive. Now I can just repurpose cheap buildings into flophouses and not have to worry about expensive residential zoned property.

Another advantage is these short-term flophouse things don't let you stay at them long enough to get any rights as a tenant. So you can fuck them over all you like with no worries. Gee, I wonder who could be behind promoting this trend so enthusiastically.
 
Another advantage is these short-term flophouse things don't let you stay at them long enough to get any rights as a tenant. So you can fuck them over all you like with no worries. Gee, I wonder who could be behind promoting this trend so enthusiastically.



I can charge them for a shower if I wanted. I'll put some vending machines in there too. Before you know it, it'll be like a campus and I can get in on the student loan racket.
 
Another advantage is these short-term flophouse things don't let you stay at them long enough to get any rights as a tenant. So you can fuck them over all you like with no worries. Gee, I wonder who could be behind promoting this trend so enthusiastically.
It's almost as though anyone with half a brain is suspicious when gigantic profit-driven corporate monopolies encourage woke people to surrender their property, rights, and speech.
 
I've heard of Twitch streamers spending $50-100 a day on delivery from companies like Door Dash because pizza is too unhealthy and they don't have time to buy groceries or learn how to cook. The delivery fees are like $10-15. I balk at the $2 fee my local place charges when I'm feeling lazy. These aren't small timers either, but they aren't millionares like the biggest names. They don't see anything wrong with this because they don't see their life ever changing. They have no concept of investing whether it be in assets or themselves.
Considering you have twitch irl now they could literally get paid to make a sandwich. It's because these same people are top autistic to do anything but stream videogames 10 hours a day that they decide this is the best way to go about it. If I was making bux on twitch I'd be living frugally and saving everything for when I get superceded by the next autist.
 
It's almost as though anyone with half a brain is suspicious when gigantic profit-driven corporate monopolies encourage woke people to surrender their property, rights, and speech.


These tards don't even realize the federal government backs loans to potential investors just like they do student loans. The FHA will guarantee a mortgage for properties that have up to 4 units if owner-occupied (and you only legally have to live in it for a year) for only 3.5% down. Certain states have programs as well for first time home buyers, many will go up to a duplex with 0% down.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo