Beachside shooting throws Australia's gun control regime into question - The solution? Even more restrictions.

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema Oh!
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
Article | Archive

A beachside shooting throws Australia's three-decade gun control regime into question​

By Byron Kaye
  • Summary
  • Gun control system faces scrutiny after Bondi shooting
  • More than 4 million guns owned legally in Australia, above pre-1996 levels
  • One of Bondi attack suspects had licence for six weapons
SYDNEY, Dec 15 (Reuters) - After Australia's worst mass shooting in 1996, it took the government 12 days to ban semi-automatic weapons, organise a gun buyback scheme and introduce a licensing system to weed out people considered unfit to carry a weapon.
Sunday's shooting at a beachside Jewish celebration in Sydney's Bondi, which left 15 people dead as well as one of the two suspects, has shaken the country's long-standing faith in that gun control system - among the world's toughest - and raised new questions about whether it remains fit for purpose.

Australia's gun ownership system has been widely credited with one of the lowest gun homicide rates, per capita. But the number of guns held legally has risen steadily for more than two decades and now, at four million, exceeds the number before the 1996 crackdown, think-tank the Australia Institute said earlier this year.
The fact that one of the Bondi suspects had a gun licence and six registered weapons raises questions about whether Australia should toughen its laws further, gun control groups and researchers said.
"Events like this feel unimaginable here, which is a testament to the strength of our gun laws," said Gun Control Australia president Tim Quinn in a blog post about the attack.
"It is essential that we ask careful, evidence-based questions about how this attack occurred, including how any weapons were obtained and whether our current laws and enforcement mechanisms are keeping pace with changing risks and technologies."

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that "if there is any action required in terms of legislative response, we will certainly have it."
Chris Minns, New South Wales state premier, whose jurisdiction includes Sydney, said he would consider recalling state parliament to fast-track new gun legislation.
"It's time we have a change to the law in relation to the firearms legislation ... but I am not ready to announce it today. You can expect action soon," Minns told reporters, without going into detail.
As things stood, the licence held by one of the suspects entitled him to own the weapons he had, NSW police commissioner Mal Lanyon told reporters.
Minns, the premier, said police had recommended an audit of gun licences in Australia's most populous state, adding that "the granting of a firearms licence in perpetuity is clearly not fit for purpose".
Maya Gomez, a lecturer in criminology at Swinburne University of Technology, said NSW gun licence holders must first prove a genuine reason for needing a weapon.
In the aftermath of the Bondi shooting, "questions may turn on the genuine reason provided in terms of the amount, as well as the reasons linked to the types of guns registered and used in the attack", Gomez said in an email.



POSTER'S NOTE: REFRESHED PAGE AND SOMEHOW GOT DIFFERENT WORDING. POSTING BELOW:

SYDNEY, Dec 15 (Reuters) - After Australia's worst mass shooting in 1996, it took the government 12 days to ban semi-automatic weapons, organise a gun buyback scheme and introduce a licensing system to weed out people considered unfit to carry a weapon.
Sunday's shooting at a Jewish celebration in Sydney's Bondi Beach, which left 15 people dead as well as one of the two gunmen, raised questions about whether Australia's gun laws, already among the toughest in the world, remain fit for purpose.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would ask Cabinet to consider limits on the number of weapons permitted by a gun licence, and how long a licence should last.
"People's circumstances can change," he told reporters on Monday as police investigated what they called the terrorist attack on Sydney's waterfront.
"People can be radicalised over a period of time. Licences should not be in perpetuity."
Australia's gun ownership system has been widely credited with one of the lowest per capita gun homicide rates.
But the number of guns held legally has risen steadily for more than two decades and now, at four million, exceeds the number before the 1996 crackdown, think tank the Australia Institute said earlier this year.

"Events like this feel unimaginable here, which is a testament to the strength of our gun laws," said Gun Control Australia president Tim Quinn in a blog post about Sunday's attack.

"It is essential that we ask careful, evidence-based questions about how this attack occurred, including how any weapons were obtained and whether our current laws and enforcement mechanisms are keeping pace with changing risks and technologies."
Chris Minns, New South Wales state premier, whose jurisdiction includes Sydney, said he would consider recalling state parliament to fast-track new gun legislation.
"It's time we have a change to the law in relation to the firearms legislation ... but I am not ready to announce it today. You can expect action soon," Minns told reporters, without going into detail.
As things stood, the licence held by one of the suspects entitled him to own the weapons he had, NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon told reporters.

Maya Gomez, a lecturer in criminology at Swinburne University of Technology, said NSW gun licence holders must first prove a genuine reason for needing a weapon.
In the aftermath of the Bondi shooting, "questions may turn on the genuine reason provided in terms of the amount, as well as the reasons linked to the types of guns registered and used in the attack", Gomez said in an email.
Although Australia's gun numbers are rising, gun-related crime remains low by global standards. In the year to June 2024, 33 Australians died in gun homicides, according to the latest published data from the Australian Institute of Criminology.

That compares with 49 gun homicides per day in the United States through 2023, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

aussie-gun-stats.png
 
Última edición:
Woah, wouldn't you know it, gun bans are and have always been a way to make the citizenry defenseless against their Kike-controlled State. Who'd have thunk... A fearful populace is a subservient populace.
Oh, and a reminder that if your nation has niggers - they vastly skew your gun crime/deaths related data. Do not let your kike State hold your peaceful citizens accountable for sub-saharan nigger crime rates.


Never. Give. Up. Your. Guns.
 
Australian gun control Boomers:
add-ard.gif

And yes these is to make sure to never mention the religion of peace' role in this.
 
The funny part is that if more citizens were armed, the shooter probably would've went down sooner.

Making people fearful of firearms vs educating them on such a tremendous weapon should get you immediately booted from office.
 
Australia's gun laws removed about 20% of the semiautomatic firearms in private hands (aka a massive failure to achieve its goals), created a huge black market for guns that didn't exist before, and basically did nothing to change frequency of violence using guns. Australia had a very low amount of gun violence before 1996, and it has remained very low after. The recent increase is because they imported violent shitskins to replace law abiding whites
 
Woah, wouldn't you know it, gun bans are and have always been a way to make the citizenry defenseless against their Kike-controlled State. Who'd have thunk... A fearful populace is a subservient populace.
Oh, and a reminder that if your nation has niggers - they vastly skew your gun crime/deaths related data. Do not let your kike State hold your peaceful citizens accountable for sub-saharan nigger crime rates.


Never. Give. Up. Your. Guns.
Australians don't need guns. Stop importing your idiotic culture wars into the rest of the world.
 
Australians don't need guns. Stop importing your idiotic culture wars into the rest of the world.
You dont need guns goy., just let the muzzies we imported and any other piece of shit psycho nvm your own government have total monopoly on violence over you.

You have now been tagged and added to the "stupid and harmless faggot" list. You arent peaceful because you cant defend yourself, which means you are incapable of forming any real beliefs or opinions and are thusly a danger to all free men.
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • 1765679452443007.png
    1765679452443007.png
    674.9 KB · Vistas: 150
"Events like this feel unimaginable here, which is a testament to the strength of our gun laws," said Gun Control Australia president Tim Quinn
99% of America feels like this and we have absolutely no gun control. In fact, places with gun restrictions are more likely to suffer shooting than those with not.
 
“It has to be guns and not the violent ape rape Muslims we keep importing. That has to be the reason!”
 
I imagine they'll probably adopt the laws Western Australia pushed a year or two ago. Caliber bans, magazine restrictions, banning more models, and stricter limits on number owned. I wouldn't be surprised if they go further and ban straight pulls (rifle was a BRX1) and increase the caliber ban to include .30 caliber. All of the white Commonwealth countries try to outdo themselves on how they can fuck over their subjects the most, so I wouldn't be surprised if they go harder than Canada. They'll never blame the muzzies, the French attacks in 2015 and the Manchester bombing in 2017 and the subsequent further immigration and laws against speaking out against them only show it's going to get worse.

EDIT: Sure enough, the cucks over at Reddit already are welcoming it.

1765815672441.png
 
Última edición:
The government will memory hole the fact the two shooters got 6 guns. legally. despite the draconian gun laws.
 
gun-related crime remains low by global standards
They always single out guns, but you should alwasy have the total murders visible also. But seeing that like one in 50 murders are done by firearm won't further the narrative. I'm willing to bet more people are strangled than shot in Australia, they seem like strangly people.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo