There is a comic called
Tamberlane which was mentioned earlier in this thread, back in 2018. I believe it was also referenced in the GlitchedPuppet thread a couple years prior with regards to having very questionable grooming material akin to (but different from) the Floraverse comic. However, if you were to navigate to the comic website now and read a bit of it, you might be confused by this comparison. Besides a bit of gender jargon, it seems quite innocuous.
But this connection was not made in error! It came about specifically because, at some point in time around 2015-2017,
all of the characters in Tamberlane were drawn, on every page, without pants and (particularly if male) with genitals visible all throughout the otherwise unsexualized story, like “realistic” Disney animals with their balls out. This included the old man coyote, the cheerful canine father, and yes, even the children. This dedication to anatomically accurate cartoon animals included a scene where the reader is introduced to a very young furry child with clearly visible male genitals as he appears to be in the process of changing into a dress, only to be spoken of with feminine pronouns and name by his mother in the following panels. This is, of course, so that all characters present might treat this trans two year old as normal in the presence of the titular Tamberlane, herself a child still in diapers at that point in the story, which otherwise has the child-friendly veneer of a talking animal cartoon meant for real children. Delightful stuff.
I vividly remember all of this. I clearly recall that the starkness of this exact context (comparison to Glip/Floraverse) is the only reason I have ever had to be exposed to this comic in the first place, and the only reason I remembered it again is because I wanted to see if the author had doubled down on the questionable elements like Glip did. However, if one goes to read the comic now, pants have retroactively been applied to the old pages; no reference to this bizarre initial decision is made anywhere across the entire internet. Of course this is a good thing, and it indicates that the author (who yet identifies as queer and so forth) perhaps realized how disturbing the choice was. Then again, it very well may have been a purely pragmatic decision to ensure that the Kickstarter for the physical books would be both permitted by the site and better received by audiences outside of the queer furry bubble.
The solitary downside of this commendable about-turn is that I’ve been gaslit. I
need to know if anyone else remembers this at all, or if I’m just stuck alone with this cursed knowledge. The author is a dab hand at the memory hole, because other than an announcement that “the Patreon is no longer 18+,” I can find no evidence that the original pages ever existed, not even here on the farms, except for my own wretched recollection.