America and Japan went from trying to kill each other to being the closest of allies in the span of less than 50 years.
The differences in circumstances is so astounding and numerous that it feels inadequate to merely point out that it's a false equivalence, even accounting for the fantasy elements.
Japan was not hated & feared to the degree Paradis is, we could've nuked their island into Chernobyl but we didn't, we accepted their unconditional surrender, but the closest equivalent Paradis could get was sterilization.
You're assuming negotiation wouldn't work outright with no attempt even being made.
You can maybe argue that from everyone but the readers' or Eren's point of view, even though it's still very naive. However, you cannot deny the reality that there was nothing they could do that would prove they're peaceful and not devil's--
AGAIN, they betrayed Paradis and killed their trump card to save their enemies, putting themselves at their enemies' mercy, and yet were still destroyed despite being world heroes after the world rebuilt.
What more could they POSSIBLY have done? You tell me.
The Rumbling is completely theoretical up until the moment it happens.
What? No it isn't. Everyone important knows it's real, especially Eren. Didn't it also happen in the past? I don't know where you're getting this from.
Besides, it's their only option. Yapping got them killed, that's a canonical fact.
There is no proof that the Rumbling will work as intended. It's implied heavily that Ymir has more of a sway over Eren than you might think.
This is true, but I don't think anybody knew that she even existed until they fought her, aside from Eren and Zeke, let alone her impact.
I also think that's the most overlooked retarded plot point. There are lots of stupid things packed into the back half of AoT people criticize, but Ymir having influence over Eren not only sucks from a story perspective but also simply undermines the theme of freedom Isayama jammed down our throats.
I'm sorry it wasn't a pro-genocide murder pro-self-defense patriotic fantasy story in the end.
Me too bro, me too.
Didn't something like 90% of the world end up getting annihilated? I guess technically that's partial. The idea, I assume, would be to have them all march in a relatively narrow column formation that's wide enough to take out the intended targets while only taking out 10% of the world rather than 90%.
Oh, so they definitely wouldn't still wipe out Paradis if it was only 10%, right? The only difference there would be how fast they rebuild and wipe out the devils.
It would have been interesting to see them at least try such a thing only for them to completely lose control of it. Something about the mental strain of controlling thousands of titans at once causing Eren to completely lose his sense of self and enter some sort of dissociative state that results in the full rumbling taking place. Would have made much more sense than him going straight to the kill 'em all option.
It'd make even
less military sense, but it would've at least been more interesting than what we did get.
The idea of partial rumbling they threw around involved only waking up a portion of the wall (they theorized the wall surrounding Shiganshina would've sufficed) and have it march at the Kingdom of Marley. The idea would be to tell the rest of the world that this is the power they wield and they do not wish to do it again.
Except they wouldn't be able to "do it again" even if they wanted to if they lost the Founding Titan (they would and nearly did several times). Furthermore, even if they could indefinitely secure him (impossible) there is no guarantee the next Founding Titan would have the will to fight like Eren did, he might just be a pacifist who chooses to embrace Paradis' annihilation like Eren's predecessor.
Plus if I remember correctly, technological advancements were getting to the point where soon they'd render Titans obsolete, so it was a "now or never" kind of situation. No matter how you cut it, Paradis had to do the Rumbling and
to completion or they'd be destroyed eventually, as we know without question. Why are we debating this?