ASK AMY: Relative doesn’t want to attend gay wedding

----------------------------------
ASK AMY: Relative doesn’t want to attend gay wedding

Amy Dickinson
Dec 18, 2022

----------------------------------

Dear Amy: I have an extended family member whose son is gay. He has been in a relationship with his live-in partner for many years.

I have visited them on several occasions, and have always had a pleasant time.

There has been some talk recently about the two of them getting married. Although I wish them both the best, should I receive an invitation, my beliefs preclude me from attending.

One or both of my younger siblings may attend, thereby representing the family, but I worry that by not attending I will damage the relationship with my relative.

If I were to attend, I would feel like a hypocrite, and the thought of going against my core values is at odds with my fondness for both this relative and his son.

Have you any thoughts, suggestions or advice?

– Man In a Quandary

Dear Man: It seems hypocritical (to me) that your core values sanction – or at least tolerate – a homosexual relationship with two men cohabiting, while you cannot tolerate these two sanctifying their loving relationship through the more legally permanent and meaningful state of marriage.

But your values are your own, and you have the right to interpret these values – or their source material – any way you want.

If you don’t want to attend this wedding, then don’t. I don’t suggest that you raise your objections to this union before or after the wedding – just RSVP that unfortunately you won’t be able to make it, and wish the couple all the best.

It’s their day; don’t make it about you.

If you decide not to sit in judgment of this couple, then your relationship with these family members shouldn’t be adversely affected. I hope you’re capable of that.

----------------------------------

Dear Amy: My fiancee and I have been engaged for four years.

Admittedly, this is longer than I originally would have liked, but outside factors such as our long-distance relationship, COVID, and moving across the country together have continually delayed the wedding date.

While my fiancee and I have been able to accept these delays, it has clearly irritated my mother.

As a result, she has continually poked and prodded about our wedding plans. At best, her interference is exhausting. At worst, it is hurtful.

The most recent incident has made me question how to balance my relationship between my mother and my future wife.

Over Thanksgiving, Mom compiled a list of all the family members’ birthdays and distributed it at dinner.

My fiancee was the only person at the dinner without her name on the list.

When I asked my mother about it, she told me, “Well, you’re not married, so technically she’s not part of the family.”

Being left out upset my fiancee, and it hurt me to find out that my mother would purposely exclude my life partner just to make a point.

What, if anything, can I do to address this snub and to make the woman I love feel like part of the family?

– Long-term Engaged

Dear Engaged: Your mother’s choice to exclude your partner from a list of “family members” was deliberate and unkind – especially since she unveiled this list at a holiday event where she knew your partner would be present. Wow.

I would interpret this as unkind and passive-aggressive, and you should push back with an emphatic and very honest reaction that you are hurt, disappointed, and embarrassed.

A couple of points you might want to make are: This woman is your significant other. Your life partner. When – or if – you have a wedding will be up to the two of you. You should insist that your mother respect your partner, and yes – consider her as a family member.

You might also emphasize that here you are, trying to find the kindest path into your family for your fiancee so that she will feel comfortable and included. Your mother’s choice didn’t exactly lay down the red carpet.

In terms of your fiancee – you might convey to her that your family, like all families, is complicated. People make mistakes and disappoint one another. Emphasize that you two are a team and that you’ll tackle your highs and lows together.

----------------------------------

Dear Amy: I was intrigued by your response to “Doting Dad,” who wanted to be transparent about his resources and estate with his adult children. I really liked your suggestion that people who have wealth should use their resources during their lifetimes, rather than leave it all behind.

– Appreciative

Dear Appreciative: This should only be done with very careful estate planning.
 
If you decide not to sit in judgment of this couple, then your relationship with these family members shouldn’t be adversely affected. I hope you’re capable of that.
Well, that was certainly a cheap shot at the end. Passive-aggressive much?

I would interpret this as unkind and passive-aggressive,
(Sigh.)

Dear Amy: I was intrigued by your response to “Doting Dad,” who wanted to be transparent about his resources and estate with his adult children. I really liked your suggestion that people who have wealth should use their resources during their lifetimes, rather than leave it all behind.
Dear Amy: Your readers are morons. I suspect this is intentional.
 
Dear Man: It seems hypocritical (to me) that your core values sanction – or at least tolerate – a homosexual relationship with two men cohabiting, while you cannot tolerate these two sanctifying their loving relationship through the more legally permanent and meaningful state of marriage.

But your values are your own, and you have the right to interpret these values – or their source material – any way you want.



Oh. Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

I'm lezbeen. But religious people, people who value tradition, or anyone who isn't comfortable HAS. THAT. RIGHT.
Way to sound like an asshurt toddler about to take your ball and go home even though you're just the shitty advice column HACK. Condescending, self-righteous bullshit like this is what turned MANY of us conservative, and has me SYMPATHIZING FULLY with Christians and people just sick in general of faggots.

The fucking self-righteous hypocrite calling someone else a hypocrite. One day the Lord thy God will cleanse the world and bring a REAL rain.

With FIRE.
 
Pathetic. If the pair are getting married then they must be marrying two separate members of the opposite sex, since marriage is an exclusive union of one man and one woman.
He should rejoice that they are seeking to turn their backs on a life of sin and depravity.

Hold up What? They are trying to marry each other? Sorry that's simply not the Sacrament of marriage, no I don't make the rules, the creator of the universe was explicit, long before restricting us to monogamy he explicitly prohibited sexual activities between same sex couples. No it doesn't matter what a licence or law says. It could deny a whole race of people were human and that wasn't true, it could deny a natural born man is male now in many confused nations, it could deny the dignity of life and condemn the unborn or the aged and infirm to execution without trial, doesn't make that just.
 
The fucking self-righteous hypocrite calling someone else a hypocrite. One day the Lord thy God will cleanse the world and bring a REAL rain.
I was thinking about that...it'd be hypocritical if he was openly accepting of the relationship before but had a change of heart all of a sudden (no doubt around the $). All it sounds like to me is he visited them in a polite, friendly way and never really expressed any opinions on the relationship.

He sounds reasonable to me, honestly. I think her advice is good though - just RSVP and say you can't make it. I think he's got a good relationship with them but not so close it would be unusual not to attend. No need to say anything, if you did feel concerned you could always send a gift later on or something like that.
 
Just tell any engaged gays that you don't believe in government-sponsored marriage and that you'll consider their marriage null and void if it doesn't take place after an 8 hour long Catholic Mass.

Marriage used to be an agreement between a man and a woman whereby the man would trade his surplus labor to a woman in exchange for her fertility and domestic work. The purpose was to provide a stable place to raise children and to provide for widows when they are old. Without this, the whole thing is a sham and people are starting to realize it. Like the couple in letter #2 who've been dragging their feet over throwing a meaningless party that, once finished, won't change their lifestyle in any way shape or form.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo