Apple Thread - The most overrated technology brand?

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What killed Steve Jobs?

  • Pancreatic Cancer

    Votos: 65 12.1%
  • AIDS from having gay sex with Tim Cook

    Votos: 474 87.9%

  • Total de votantes
    539
Expanded my abandonment of the old x86 hardware and got a M4 Air to go with my giga nigga crush your feet if dropped 16 inch M3 Pro since the base M4's within range of the M3 pro in power, and I dunno how people are having problems with Kiwiflare and Safari because I usually get past the error loop just by clicking in the address bar and hitting enter.
Everything prior to the bold section is niggershit, but that part is 100% correct. I am on an M2Pro and haven't had major issues, just doing the address re-send with the address bar and Enter key works fine and my iPad hasn't had any problems at all in Safari.
 
another hot take from a tech “expert”
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • 1781392250316.png
    1781392250316.png
    120.1 KB · Vistas: 54
Última edición:
No, the biggest thing, and the very first thing they showed is how they're unfucking MacOS from the nigger disaster that was Liquid Glass. The overrounded corners? Gone. Stupid accents on sidebars and refractions? Gone. Frivolous icons on menus? Gone

I didn't watch anything after that, instead I installed the beta. Lots of shit is broken but the visual adjustments are so worth it that I'd rather stay than go back to Tahoe. And you can see that they're only getting started.

Supposedly the nigger that did Liquid Glass fled the ship right after that to Meta, so they're slowly rolling back the damage he did

I'd still prefer to go back to the glory days of Aqua/Platinum combo. It was peak OS X
I'm glad they did another "this is just a bug fix/performance" release. iOS 26 and macOS 26 were a disaster. They should have let every device that would run 26 upgrade to 27.
 
I'm glad they did another "this is just a bug fix/performance" release. iOS 26 and macOS 26 were a disaster. They should have let every device that would run 26 upgrade to 27.
iPadOS 26 was awesome and really makes an iPad Pro a much more capable device. It is a really cool bridge between iOS and macOS.
 
I'm glad they did another "this is just a bug fix/performance" release. iOS 26 and macOS 26 were a disaster. They should have let every device that would run 26 upgrade to 27.
I honestly really liked macOS 26 and liquid glass in general. Though a bunch of retarded decisions were made such as searching for apps. I never really found liquid glass to be distracting or painful to use. Besides on iOS 26. They fucked it up over there.
That's the version that gave iPadOS a window manager right?
Yep. Also makes people wonder why they don't allow macOS on an iPad (money. The answer is money.)
 
Yep. Also makes people wonder why they don't allow macOS on an iPad (money. The answer is money.)
There are very good reasons not to put the full macOS interface on iPads. Most people asking for that have never tried using a Windows tablet. To make something that works as well as Apple's UX standards require, you can't just throw a desktop OS on a touchscreen. iPadOS 26 is pretty much the perfect balance of capabilities and interface for a tablet, as it allows multiple windows and more customization that iOS does, but uses very intentional design to suit a touch interface.

I experimented last year with my iPad Pro to see if it could be a full substitute for my MacBook Pro in my work. I used a Bluetooth keyboard and Apple Pencil, and for RDP stuff I had a Bluetooth mouse. I found I could do 100% of my job from the iPad Pro, including Remote Desktop support, MS365 admin, using an MDM system for remote workstation admin and maintenance, generating reports for clients and every other task I needed to, without issues. It was kind of a relief when I had to go onsite to be able to leave my MBP at the office, since the 16-inch is a mother to lug around.
 
I honestly really liked macOS 26 and liquid glass in general.
I can't comment on the macOS side, but iOS-wise visually Liquid Glass is beautiful and a nice aesthetic change that pushes againest the cheap minimalism agenda that's been pushed on UI design for years. It looks like an actual evolution in aesthetics for once.

There are actually faggots online complaining that it focuses on being pretty or that it's "Windows 7" as if that's a bad thing and accessibility o algo (I assume over the clear app look? even though it's entirely optional). Apparently autists have been conditioned to only adhere to overt minimalism and anything resembling skeuomorphism or detail sends them into a fit (A Clockwork Orange but it's an autist forced to stare at Windows Vista).

Functionally it's somewhat of a dud though. Some UI was needlessly reworked as well as put behind more buttons, there's some design inconsistency across iOS 26, and general performance is off including reduced battery. It seems iOS 27 is focused on refining it which is great, hopefully they don't fully backtrack from Liquid Glass in the future. I just want pleasant UI again in tech, no more forced corporate flatness or overdone soylent ROUNDING (the recent YT redesign makes me gag).
 
I can't comment on the macOS side, but iOS-wise visually Liquid Glass is beautiful and a nice aesthetic change that pushes againest the cheap minimalism agenda that's been pushed on UI design for years. It looks like an actual evolution in aesthetics for once.

There are actually faggots online complaining that it focuses on being pretty or that it's "Windows 7" as if that's a bad thing and accessibility o algo (I assume over the clear app look? even though it's entirely optional). Apparently autists have been conditioned to only adhere to overt minimalism and anything resembling skeuomorphism or detail sends them into a fit (A Clockwork Orange but it's an autist forced to stare at Windows Vista).

Functionally it's somewhat of a dud though. Some UI was needlessly reworked as well as put behind more buttons, there's some design inconsistency across iOS 26, and general performance is off including reduced battery. It seems iOS 27 is focused on refining it which is great, hopefully they don't fully backtrack from Liquid Glass in the future. I just want pleasant UI again in tech, no more forced corporate flatness or overdone soylent ROUNDING (the recent YT redesign makes me gag).
People complaining about the transparency in OS26 clearly didn’t know it can be turned off or down in Accessibility in Settings.
 
Última edición:
I'm glad they did another "this is just a bug fix/performance" release. iOS 26 and macOS 26 were a disaster. They should have let every device that would run 26 upgrade to 27.
I’m irritated that a watch I bought brand new a few years ago won’t be getting the new watchOS. Not interested in the fugly watch faces they have put out the past few years and AI. But I would like a light version of WatchOS 27 that continues to get some of the updates.
 
They held off longer than 90%of computer companies, that’s as much as anyone could really hope for. Everyone else jacked up today’s prices based on tomorrow’s costs to get extra gravy while they sold down their parts inventories.
Is Apple big enough that they could commission their personal chip factory? So it would be co-owned with a major chip fab but Apple can choose to buy all of it's output or agree to have some output sold off to other customers
 
They held off longer than 90%of computer companies, that’s as much as anyone could really hope for. Everyone else jacked up today’s prices based on tomorrow’s costs to get extra gravy while they sold down their parts inventories.
I agree. Their price increases on computers has been pretty fair.

The chromebooks my school district buys has gone from $275 each to $475 in six months.
 
Is Apple big enough that they could commission their personal chip factory? So it would be co-owned with a major chip fab but Apple can choose to buy all of it's output or agree to have some output sold off to other customers
Not practical. If you want to know more about how the economics of these sorts of big industrial developments work, the 'Asianometry' YouTube channel does great work summarizing what goes on.

Apple is an American company. If they were to do a real partnership in a factory in China, where it would make sense, that would be politically bad for them.

So, they can only do partnerships in the US. That's obviously going to be a joke.... they supposedly have some deal going with Samsung to produce well-behind-the-state-of-art chips for Apple Watches in the US, but that's just spending money on PR in the same way that their sponsorship of the Trump Ballroom is.

And outside of just sponsoring a project, they definitely would never practically benefit from building their own chip fabs. Look at CXMT for example. They are 'only' doing DRAM but it still took a decade of recruiting/R&D/factory building to be able to build mid range DDR5 chips on a 15nm node.

A company like Apple could never justify spending tens, hundreds of billions just to hopefully have more stable memory prices ten years from now. After the AI bubble has burst and there's no money in memory again.

And there's no world in which they would benefit from trying to chase the state of the art nodes which their actual processors are manufactured in. They could spend hundreds of billions for 15 years and at that point they still might not be up there with where Samsung and Intel and whatever racially superior Chinese competitors arise will be at that point.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo