Anti-Tranny Pushback in the Wild - The normies grow tired of sucking the girlcock

I wonder if the only way to maintain women's sports teams (in a progressive area where it's still not safe to TERF out) is to form a "queer transmasc" team or league and announce that it's for folx who only use he/him pronouns, and then all the women can show up and pretend to be pooners for the duration of the games (you wouldn't even have to change your appearance, because transmen don't owe you masculinity, you know) and that would keep all the AGPs away. Call it the Portland All-Men's Manly Roller Derby League or something. Probably wouldn't work but it might at least be funny.
It wouldn't work. There's AGPs who are obsessed with pretending to be übermasc "butch lesbians" or even FtMs. They're fully aware that TIFs are female. They're not afraid of using he/him pronouns if it gets them closer to the targets of their fetish.
Here's a few of these TIMs.
war-''lesbian''.webp john vallone.webp nicholas logan graca.webp
I specifically chose photos that present each of them how they want to be presented. They pose in certain ways to make their shoulders look smaller and their heads look bigger.
advanced agp.webp
I saw this one on reddit recently. (Archive)

eli erlick.webp eli erlick 0.webp
This one is a serial rapist who targets TIFs. You can see how he emulates the people he stalks.

These kinds of AGPs aren't obsessed with the trappings of femininity. They're obsessed with women.
 
It wouldn't work. There's AGPs who are obsessed with pretending to be übermasc "butch lesbians" or even FtMs. They're fully aware that TIFs are female. They're not afraid of using he/him pronouns if it gets them closer to the targets of their fetish.
Here's a few of these TIMs.
Ver archivo adjunto 7426675Ver archivo adjunto 7426672Ver archivo adjunto 7426674
I specifically chose photos that present each of them how they want to be presented. They pose in certain ways to make their shoulders look smaller and their heads look bigger.
Ver archivo adjunto 7426697
I saw this one on reddit recently. (Archive)

Ver archivo adjunto 7426711Ver archivo adjunto 7426712
This one is a serial rapist who targets TIFs. You can see how he emulates the people he stalks.

These kinds of AGPs aren't obsessed with the trappings of femininity. They're obsessed with women.
I think this is scarier than all the Gollum-looking MTFs. The first and the last one really do look like butch lesbians or FtMs. I think I've heard of the last one before. He gives the vibe that he'd trick really autistic extreme leftist FtMs into doing really depraved fucked up shit using social justice buzzwords. Reminds me of Onision in that way with the social justice guise, but Onision is obviously an aging man.
 
Birth rate fell even before the widespread use of BC, due to better healthcare, education and urbanization. When people have the option not to have a fuckton of kids, they typically don’t, unless they’re motivated by some extreme belief system and/or very dumb.
This is the elephant in the room. Of COURSE people like their freedom and more disposable income. Kids take away both. The reason why the "Baby Boom" was called that was because there was a prolonged population drop in the US. I found out it was like, seriously, I'm not kidding, a 100 year decline. Basically, industrialization meant that kids weren't a source of free labor like they were on the farms.

Anyway, we also want to protect the children we do have better. We want our kids to have good lives. That's where the trans movement lost everyone. They went after the kids. We don't really care if a fat 48 year old troon chops off his own dick. Why should we? But we are upset about the kids. AGPs wanted to prove that they're not raving perverts and if there was such a thing as a trans child, that meant their bullshit was real.

They should have accepted being tolerated perverts. Had they, they probably could have kept going. Now society has rightfully turned on them.
 
I’m a firm believer that if trans shit wasn’t so pushed and policed, like quickly banning any criticism on Reddit as “hate speech”, there would be a tsunami of pushback against their ideology.

I’m also a firm believer the troons know this which is exactly why it’s policed so hard
Say about them whatever you want, they did seem to understand you have to control your communication to get somewhere. I watched "what is a woman". It was very bad (very american in how he seemed more interested into scoring epic putdowns and making his opponents seem like weirdos, to be point of interviewing a random nudist) but one thing that was really obvious is how they refused to break rank.
>what do you think of a tranny that doesnt shave
that is an option
>what do you think of a tranny that doesnt chop his dick off
totally legit woman
>what of a tranny that does chop his dick off
also a legit female
>what about someone doing nothing except say he feels like a woman
that can happen
>what about someone obviously not trans that says he's a woman
well, it is very complex and we shouldnt cast judgement

The line was obviously "be open to everything and never ever get lured into making a declarative statement that might be used against us, or even imply disagreement". This was extended to online discussions. Everyone needs to be on board with trannies, call any doubters transphobic and ban anyone speaking out against trannies. Meanwhile don't ever exclude anyone. Even if you secretly think it is stupid, just say a man with a beard is a legit tranny.

The only reason it went wrong is that they were too aggressive and at some point doubling down no longer worked. The women that were swallowing their reluctance and doubt no longer could put up with trannies getting off on invading women spaces and being called disgusting for running away. Now people chose to die on the anti-tranny hill, and others are willing to stand beside them.

@Herr Flick
It’s not video games. It’s infinity porn, available 24/7 on a device in your pocket, and the way it completely destroys how men perceive women, which women pick up on and find repulsive and dangerous.
Videogames was in jest. The reason provided was social media. They also tracked correlation to women getting internet access. With social media women go out less, meaning they don't find a partner as readily leading to less coupling. (one datapoint was that in south asia, women have less access to internet than men, and you dont see as big of a drop in fertility.) Im not sure if that is the only reason, but I found it pretty interesting video of the research in general since it countered some obvious reasons people provide for falling fertility rates (like wealth of a nation).
 
Última edición:
Eye transition (goes to reddit post)
This is making me laugh hysterically. Dude, you're just opening your eyes really big. I can't be convinced that his resting state is to have all whites showing.

HRT gave me double-sanpaku bikurishita eyes sensei!
With any luck those pics are real and its because the HRT is causing increased pressure in his head and making his eyes bulge.
In a few years he's gonna look like this:
Screenshot_20250530_092659_Samsung Internet.webp
Then his head explodes...
 
Absolutely 1000%. Feminists really pushed troonism hard and were in absolute lockstep with the LGBT until a few years ago with JK Rowling. It's now an irony that women are pushing back against feminists because feminists have actually made a concerted effort to abolish women and femininity. Most feminists are very pro-troon, as it's of course part of the hive mind.
In EU countries, the only kind of feminism that is allowed to have an online platform and to be seen and heard in public, is the kind that is Antifa-approved and which exists to suck from the EU tit and other fundings. Antifa is extremely pro-tranny.
State structures responsible for allocation of funding are infested with Antifa or an organization analogous to that. Youth organizations like Scout seem to be infested with Antifa. As seen recently in A&N thread, there is even an Antifa minister in Germany now. https://kiwifarms.st/threads/pro-an...ermanys-new-chancellor-friedrich-merz.220705/
The ultimate goal of Antifa is to create violent and low-trust society, even tho they don't say it loud.
 
Is this the wild?

Gay People Have More in Common With Straight People Than Trans People: Poll

Nick Mordowanec

Gay and lesbian adults identify more with straight and bisexual individuals, nearly doubling in percentage compared to what they have in common with transgender individuals, according to a new survey.

Why It Matters​

It's approaching 10 years to the day since the U.S. Supreme Court guaranteed rights to same-sex marriage in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision, effectively raising public awareness and sentiment towards gay unions. The Trump administration successfully ran on LGBTQ issues including limiting genders to two (male and female), and banning male-born transgender athletes from competing in women's sports.

What To Know​

A new survey published Thursday by the Pew Research Center looked into how LGBTQ adults see the impact of Obergefell, how they view social acceptance for LGBTQ adults more broadly, and how their personal experiences align with public opinion.

About half of gay and lesbian adults said they have a great deal or a fair amount in common with bisexual people (50 percent) and straight people (51 percent), compared to 28 percent who said they have a lot in common with transgender people.

While roughly 70 percent of transgender adults say they have feared for their personal safety at some point, roughly 52 percent of gay or lesbian adults and 28 percent of bisexual adults said the same.

While transgender respondents said they had more in common with gay or lesbian individuals and people who are bisexual, both at 63 percent, just 27 percent of them said they had a lot in common with most people who are straight.

Overall, consistency has continued in terms of American sentiment overall on gay marriage—climbing from 31 percent of support prior to legalization in 2004, to 55 percent support in 2015. In 2023, about 63 percent supported it.

Joanna Schwartz, a marketing professor at Georgia College & State University who studies LGBTQ themes, told Newsweek that the survey's are not quite unexpected considering "a presidential campaign where almost a quarter of a billion dollars was spent trying to marginalize trans people, that people in the broader LGBT population, including people who identify as gay and lesbian, might see trans people as removed from their experience."

Both trans individuals and those who identify as gay or bisexual represent parallel groups, she added, as they've had a long shared history of social marginalization and discrimination.

"The gay rights movement, going all the way back to Stonewall, has significant representation by trans people," Schwartz said. "Historically, it has always been referred to as the LGBT community as opposed to the LGB community.

"For many gay and lesbian members, it's easy to believe that after Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell v. Hodges that the fight for equality is over, but as we've seen in laws like Florida's Don't Say Gay law, it's a fight that very much continues. And the community stand stronger when it stands together."

While most surveyed LGBTQ adults said there is more acceptance today compared with 10 years ago for gay, bisexual and transgender individuals—with an expectation of even more acceptance a decade from now—they acknowledge that different groups under the LGBTQ umbrella are viewed differently in America.

Approximately 61 percent of respondents reported a fair amount of acceptance for people who are gay or lesbian, and roughly 52 percent said the same regarding bisexual individuals. But just 14 and 13 percent expressed a great or fair amount of acceptance for nonbinary and transgender individuals, respectively.

Pew surveyed 3,959 LGBTQ adults from January 8 to January 19, 2025, prior to Trump being inaugurated for his second term.

What People Are Saying​

President Donald Trump on Truth Social, threatening to withhold "large scale" federal funding from California if a trans girl athlete was allowed to compete in California's state finals: "THIS IS NOT FAIR, AND TOTALLY DEMEANING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS."

M. E. Castle, director of government relations for Texas Values, a Christian advocacy group, in a statement posted to X after the Texas Senate approved a two-gender bill: "The message is clear: You don't mess with Texas women. HB 229 makes sure that the reality and truth of the two sexes is clear in Texas law and never altered by school districts, local cities, or bureaucrats ever again! With today's vote in the Senate, Texas will lay the foundation for protecting women's spaces and opportunities."

What Happens Next​

About 41 percent of transgender adults told Pew they feel extremely or very connected to the broader LGBTQ community, compared with 24 percent of gay or lesbian adults and 18 percent of bisexual adults.

Updated 5/29/25, 3:54 p.m. ET: This story was updated with remarks from Joanna Schwartz.

Had to look up “it’s the ads” Joanna. Picture taken on the same day or does he wear the same outfit every day like an anime character?

IMG_2202.webp IMG_2203.webp
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • IMG_2203.webp
    IMG_2203.webp
    1.5 MB · Vistas: 25
Anyway, we also want to protect the children we do have better. We want our kids to have good lives. That's where the trans movement lost everyone. They went after the kids. We don't really care if a fat 48 year old troon chops off his own dick. Why should we? But we are upset about the kids. AGPs wanted to prove that they're not raving perverts and if there was such a thing as a trans child, that meant their bullshit was real.

They should have accepted being tolerated perverts. Had they, they probably could have kept going. Now society has rightfully turned on them.

Simply tolerating degeneracy in the dark corners of society never works out in the long term, because sexual degeneracy is socially contagious, even if the people involved made no conscious attempt to groom others (so think about how much damage they're doing because they actually do).

Sexual degenerates have a compulsive need to spread their illness around, because they cannot feel comfortable in their own skin unless they do, even if society tolerates them or even kisses their collective asses.

This whole libertarian/liberal individualist bullshit is exactly what got us here in the first place. You can't simply say "I disagree with this unhealthy lifestyle you're practicing, but you have a right to do it." No, no they fucking don't. Not when it negatively effects everyone else around them, and society as a whole.

Yes, we should care, because a society that enables a highly autistic 48 year old to lop off his own dick is not a healthy one. It's not a sustainable one. No society should ever enable ANYONE who is willing to destroy not only himself, but his family, for the sake of such moronic fantasies.

If anything, I have the troons to thank for finally slapping me awake to how absolutely asinine the liberal/libertarian worldview has gotten in regards to individualism, how impotent and cowardly they've become in the face of pure evil.

Even "free" or "democratic" societies like the United States had laws against sexual degeneracy up until we allowed some mentally ill retards to manipulate the rest of us and preach to us about how we're infringing on sacred human rights for cracking down on such. Even "democratic" societies are perfectly justified in cracking down on such shit for the sake of public health and safety, for the sake of ensuring it doesn't all fall apart.
 
Última edición:
If anything, I have the troons to thank for finally slapping me awake to how absolutely asinine the liberal/libertarian worldview has gotten in regards to individualism, how impotent and cowardly they've become in the face of pure evil.
Same. I used to think it was all just Boomers being old and not knowing what they're talking about. But the older I get and the more mature I become, the more disgusted I am by sexual degenerates and view them as absolute losers. We act like sexual degeneracy is ~empowering~ but acknowledge drug addiction is not, even when they're both as unhealthy and usually connected.

Edit: Though I guess liberals are also warming up to the idea of drug addiction being normal as well. So many Redditors think daily marijuana is healthy.
 
Off topic, but unfortunately all efforts in this arena do is support the lowest tier of people having children. Having kids and working in education I have all sorts of paperwork come through my hands. A lot of it we don't qualify for and much of it we don't need. English language/home language support, tard support etc. Plus, if you're not used to receiving handouts, you probably won't look into it in the first place. A lot of people would rather not be at the mercy of the State, so they make life choices that give them more agency, like not having children. Beaners and nogs have no such compunction.
Yeah, there’s a lot of help for people on benefits and immigrants and nothing at all for the middle class.
Birth rate fell even before the widespread use of BC, due to better healthcare, education and urbanization. When people have the option not to have a fuckton of kids, they typically don’t, unless they’re motivated by some extreme belief system and/or very dumb.
They don’t tend to have loads but most people I know have 2 and they’d have liked another one but couldnt afford it. A lot of families fall into the situation of having a kid later, then having to space out more than they want because of free nursery hours vs cost at various ages. If you’ve got two kids in full time daycare you are spending more than the average wage for one worker just on childcare. And of course career gaps aren’t looked upon kindly so most people wait, they have kid 2 and then kid 1 is older and by the time kid 2 is out of the nursery and into school they’re too tired to have a third.
If you want people to have more children you need to structure the work and the housing costs so they can afford it.
Just more benefits and a month won’t do anything. You have to make ‘life with three or more children’ worth it.
But the older I get and the more mature I become, the more disgusted I am by sexual degenerates and view them as absolute losers.
Yeah definitely. I also think that almost all the restrictions older societies had on specific groups had reasons too. That sucks for individual freedom, but it’s clear that some behaviours cannot be tolerated at a wide level of prevalence without harming society.
 
Same. I used to think it was all just Boomers being old and not knowing what they're talking about. But the older I get and the more mature I become, the more disgusted I am by sexual degenerates and view them as absolute losers. We act like sexual degeneracy is ~empowering~ but acknowledge drug addiction is not, even when they're both as unhealthy and usually connected.

Edit: Though I guess liberals are also warming up to the idea of drug addiction being normal as well. So many Redditors think daily marijuana is healthy.
I was never fond of it, and I never got why I was being made such a villain when I admitted to being uncomfortable talking about troon stuff. Especially when they would get degenerate, and have their "euphoria" moments when they felt like cute girls, and the egg hatching shit. Then I got the "silence is the same as violence" lecture which started really pushing me away. It was honestly a mixture of shit that really pushed me away, everything was disgusting me, and I was getting upset whenever I said "I'm uncomfortable discussing this" or disagreeing, they would lash out at me.

I feel this is what also led me to my resentment towards the normalization of drug addiction and the "legalize all drugs" movement. Meth really fucked up so many communities, and I want these addicts to be forced into treatments, and arrest the dealers and enablers that fucked them up, but I get a smarmy lecture from some progressive that it's actually cruel what I suggested. It's the enablers I also have grown to despise as well.
 
Targeting responsible people who want more kids but aren’t sure they can make it work is a great idea, I hope we can figure out how to do it effectively.
 
We act like sexual degeneracy is ~empowering~
It's kind of funny when people defend pornography, prostitution, drug addiction, medical malpractice, etc. because they think it's progressive or something. Like people have somehow been tricked into thinking all these things are good, actually and ignore any evidence that they can be very harmful.
 
I have never heard about this. What is it about?
It's liberal politics redefining words, like how to liberals, you can't be racist against white people or sexist towards a man, since those are the "oppressor classes".
"Silence = violence" means that if you're not speaking up for the rights of [Insert Minority Group] by sharing social media stories and protesting, that you support whenever they face violence or misfortune.
"Misgendering/hate speech = violence" means that if you make a tranny feel bad in any way, you're directly responsible for that tranny self-harming or killing themselves.
Basically, by default, you're a terrible racist sexist transphobic homophobic bigot until you donate your earnings toward an Afro-Latinx Nonbinary Homeless Tranny Prostitute and post about Current Thing.
 
Bro in the 2010s a massive amount of feminist rhetoric was about how men and women are identically the same and totally interchangeable in every aspect and it's just socialization and patriarchy that makes women weaker.
Ever heard of the phase, "You can do anything you set your mind to" or some variation of that? If you work hard, you can become a doctor, become a nurse, run a business, become an athlete, overcome poverty or addiction. Replace you with men and women and you get the feminist version of that phrase. Opportunities and personal growth are open to both sexes.

What is doesn't mean is a literal interpretation of "anything" that only a retard would argue, like changing your sex or something else that's impossible.

Also, ever hear of people arguing that a girl can like boy things and a boy can like girl things, but that doesn't mean they are the opposite sex, gay, or messed up? That's the above feminist argument that I'm seeing conservatives use when opposing troon ideology, when ironically they'd normally agree that femininity = femaleness or masculinity = maleness.
 
Ever heard of the phase, "You can do anything you set your mind to" or some variation of that? If you work hard, you can become a doctor, become a nurse, run a business, become an athlete, overcome poverty or addiction. Replace you with men and women and you get the feminist version of that phrase.
Exactly.


What is doesn't mean is a literal interpretation of "anything" that only a retard would argue
ah, ah, ah. You've eaten your cake. You don't get to have it now too. Welcome to the logical tranny hell conclusion of your retarded half-formed ideas packaged in your slick pathos-drenched rhetoric.

You'll never peak if you refuse to get off the plateau.
 
It's liberal politics redefining words, like how to liberals, you can't be racist against white people or sexist towards a man, since those are the "oppressor classes".
"Silence = violence" means that if you're not speaking up for the rights of [Insert Minority Group] by sharing social media stories and protesting, that you support whenever they face violence or misfortune.
"Misgendering/hate speech = violence" means that if you make a tranny feel bad in any way, you're directly responsible for that tranny self-harming or killing themselves.
Basically, by default, you're a terrible racist sexist transphobic homophobic bigot until you donate your earnings toward an Afro-Latinx Nonbinary Homeless Tranny Prostitute and post about Current Thing.
And you can never stop backing the new, trendy cause - you go back to being labeled a bigot the second you stop actively pushing the Cause of the Week. Doesn't matter how much you did already, doesn't matter if you're sick, the second you stop you are almost immediately smeared as a bigot again.

It sounds an awful lot like some of the unspoken logic in "Rules for Radicals" - the book talks about how to go after large, establishment targets but never stops to contemplate the idea that eventually there might be no more targets, or that the radicals might become the establishment.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo