Another Chinese rocket falls near a school, creating toxic orange cloud

China numba waun!


On Monday, a Long March 4B rocket launched from China's Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center carrying a remote-sensing satellite. This 50-year-old spaceport is located in north-central China, about 500km to the southwest of Beijing.


As often happens with the first stages of Chinese rockets launching from the inland Taiyuan facility, the spent Long March 4B booster fell downstream of the spaceport. In this case, it landed near a school, creating a predictably large cloud of toxic gas.


Unlike most of the world's spaceports, several of China's launch sites are located at inland locations rather than near water to avoid such hazards. For security purposes, China built three of its major launch centers away from water during the Cold War, amid tensions with both America and the Soviet Union.


In recent years China has begun to experiment with grid fins to steer its rockets back to Earth—and eventually to potentially land boosters like SpaceX does with its Falcon 9 rocket. However this project seems driven more by a desire to master reuse technology than to protect its population, as China has been launching from Taiyuan since 1968 with seemingly little regard for nearby residents.


Compounding the problem of dropping rocket first stages on the surrounding countryside is that China continues to use toxic hydrazine fuel for its first stages. Hydrazine, which is two nitrogens bound together by hydrogen atoms, is an efficient, storable fuel. But it is also highly corrosive and toxic.


When a Crew Dragon spacecraft exploded during a test in April 2019, it produced large clouds of toxic orange gas that could be seen for miles around on Florida beaches. These reddish clouds were caused by nitrogen tetroxide, the oxidizer that combusts with hydrazine fuel. This spacecraft—and many others in the past, including the space shuttle—used storable propellants for in-space operations. NASA has been working to find "green" propellants that would obviate the need to use hydrazine for even in-space operations.


It is a different story for rockets, however. The use of hydrazine as a fuel for launch vehicles has been phased out for most of the world. The last major US rocket to use hydrazine was United Launch Alliance's Delta II rocket, which used the toxic fuel in its second stage. This rocket was retired in 2018. Russia's workhorse Proton rocket uses hydrazine for its first and second stages.


Yet the majority of China's launch fleet is powered by hydrazine fuel and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer. This includes its human-rated Long March 2F rocket as well as the widely used Long March 4 family. All of these rockets, with their toxic first stages, launch over land and have caused numerous incidents over the years. These fuels are cheap and relatively easy to use, and it would have been natural for China to use them in the 1980s and 1990s when these boosters were developed. But their use continues unabated today.


China is slowly changing. Its new family of large rockets, the Long March 5 fleet, is fueled by liquid oxygen and kerosene, like SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket. Paradoxically, however, the Long March 5 rockets typically launch from the Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site—over the ocean.
 
foot.jpg

I think I found the image.
 
The first rocket fuels (ethanol and kerosene) used liquid oxygen as an oxidizer. Liquid oxygen is very cold, and needs to be kept at a very low temperature to prevent it from boiling. Since the rocket can't carry a lot of insulation, the liquid oxygen needs to be pumped into the rocket before launching. This could take hours, which is fine for a space launcher but terrible for a nuclear armed missile.

The next generation of fuel was hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide (more or less; different rockets used different formulations), which are both liquid at normal temperatures and are not severely corrosive. Because of this, the Titan II ICBM could be stored fuelled and ready to launch within 1-3 minutes of the order.

They wanted to use Satan's urine instead, but that just isn't toxic enough. More seriously, while these are incredibly dangerous chemicals and people who work with it wear what look like space suits, they are stable at room temperature and can be stored in the missile; thus, "storable."

TL;DR: Hypergolics are called "storable" because they are more easy to store than cryonic oxidizers. They are, however, incredibly dangerous, and are the cause of the most serious rocket-related incidents.

The good news is that a replacement for these fuels is being developed and the initial experiments seem promising.

To add some chemistry I picked up from John Clarke's wonderful Ignition! to this,

Chinese rockets (and all "orange smoke" rockets) use hydrazine as a fuel and nitrogen oxides as oxidizer. It's used because it's both storable and hypergolic, which means the fuel and oxidizer ignite on contact. Handy for starting a rocket engine. Early hypergolic rockets used plain hydrazine and nitric acid. Nitric acid ate through the rockets, making "storable" more than a little optimistic. This was solved by the Americans by adding hydrochloric acid to the nitric acid, creating "red fuming nitric acid" (RFNA). The Soviets gave up on nitric acid and went straight to nitrogen tetroxide. There's also a bunch of different hydrazines depending on what you need in terms of freezing point, boiling point, etc. Soviet derived rockets tend to use UDMH, or unsymetricdymethylhydrazine. This is toxic and carcinogenic on contact and has been used in labs to reliably give rats tumours.

That's basically my entire chemistry knowledge lol.
 
The first rocket fuels (ethanol and kerosene) used liquid oxygen as an oxidizer. Liquid oxygen is very cold, and needs to be kept at a very low temperature to prevent it from boiling. Since the rocket can't carry a lot of insulation, the liquid oxygen needs to be pumped into the rocket before launching. This could take hours, which is fine for a space launcher but terrible for a nuclear armed missile.

The next generation of fuel was hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide (more or less; different rockets used different formulations), which are both liquid at normal temperatures and are not severely corrosive. Because of this, the Titan II ICBM could be stored fuelled and ready to launch within 1-3 minutes of the order.

They wanted to use Satan's urine instead, but that just isn't toxic enough. More seriously, while these are incredibly dangerous chemicals and people who work with it wear what look like space suits, they are stable at room temperature and can be stored in the missile; thus, "storable."

TL;DR: Hypergolics are called "storable" because they are more easy to store than cryonic oxidizers. They are, however, incredibly dangerous, and are the cause of the most serious rocket-related incidents.

The good news is that a replacement for these fuels is being developed and the initial experiments seem promising.
You can't just mention Satan's Urine without telling people what it actually is, so I'll tell the Kiwis who aren't quite familiar with it. "Satan's Urine" is one of many nicknames the cute, fluffy chemical known as chlorine trifluoride has gotten. Now, those of you know a little chemistry immediately put two and two together and doubtlessly started questioning the sanity of whoever decided that was a good idea. Thing is, it was the Nazis who felt like whipping up a big ass batch of that in the first place... and it turned out to be far too unsafe for them. Yes, you heard that right. Chlorine trifluoride was too unsafe for use by the people who made jet airplanes made of plywood and caustic, acidic glue that dissolved the plane. Its intended use was on the Eastern Front as an anti-emplacement weapon. Now how does that work? Well, fluorine is a rather energetic element, so energetic that it manages to shove out oxygen when it comes to things materials like to bond with as part of the incredibly exothermic (heat-releasing for the non-geeks) reduction-oxidation reactions (more commonly known as being on fire). So reactive in fact that once the chemical gets released into the air it almost immediately separates into chlorine and fluorine in an exothermic reaction... and the fluorine then begins bonding with quite literally everything it touches, setting it on fire. That includes asbestos, bricks, sand, concrete, you name it. Yes, it will even set water on fire as the fluorine tears the molecules apart to start hate-fucking the hydrogen... which gives you hydrofluoric acid and lots of oxygen atoms that want to bond with something, which is a disaster compounded with disaster. At this point the fact there's a bunch of chlorine around which is almost equally unpleasant is rather academic since fluorine can't stop hate-fucking other elements, and there's three of those for every chlorine. Fluorine will also burn through your skin and replace the calcium in your bones, causing them to weaken and possibly spontaneously break. I don't recommend Googling fluoridosis. Now, it can be stored "safely", because if you just dump it in a steel barrel the insides will react with the compound, making a nice insulating lining. Just don't jostle it or you'll knock the lining off and bad things will happen.

Obviously, such a chemical compound is incredibly unhealthy in just about every other way (don't ask how the Nazis found that out), but at this point that's really just a brimstone cherry on top of the nitroglycerin sundae.

Now with that out of the way, how does a Nazi anti-bunker weapon meant for turning the entire Eastern Front and everyone and everything there into a pile of ash that has burned down twice, once by exposure to the air and a second time by exposure to the fluorine, have to do with rocket science? Glad you asked, because to absolutely no surprise at all, such a chemical compound has an absolutely absurd about of potential energy in it. You add just a tiny bit of liquid O2 and wham, boom, straight to the moon (hopefully in one piece and not several), so of course NASA and all those Nazi scientists it recruited decided to start working with it. Up until a tanker car spilled and in the words of one unfortunate witness "The concrete was on fire!" And it was, and not just the several feet of it that made of the floor, but the sand under it as well after the concrete got burned through.
 
You can't just mention Satan's Urine without telling people what it actually is, so I'll tell the Kiwis who aren't quite familiar with it. "Satan's Urine" is one of many nicknames the cute, fluffy chemical known as chlorine trifluoride has gotten. Now, those of you know a little chemistry immediately put two and two together and doubtlessly started questioning the sanity of whoever decided that was a good idea. Thing is, it was the Nazis who felt like whipping up a big ass batch of that in the first place... and it turned out to be far too unsafe for them. Yes, you heard that right. Chlorine trifluoride was too unsafe for use by the people who made jet airplanes made of plywood and caustic, acidic glue that dissolved the plane. Its intended use was on the Eastern Front as an anti-emplacement weapon. Now how does that work? Well, fluorine is a rather energetic element, so energetic that it manages to shove out oxygen when it comes to things materials like to bond with as part of the incredibly exothermic (heat-releasing for the non-geeks) reduction-oxidation reactions (more commonly known as being on fire). So reactive in fact that once the chemical gets released into the air it almost immediately separates into chlorine and fluorine in an exothermic reaction... and the fluorine then begins bonding with quite literally everything it touches, setting it on fire. That includes asbestos, bricks, sand, concrete, you name it. Yes, it will even set water on fire as the fluorine tears the molecules apart to start hate-fucking the hydrogen... which gives you hydrofluoric acid and lots of oxygen atoms that want to bond with something, which is a disaster compounded with disaster. At this point the fact there's a bunch of chlorine around which is almost equally unpleasant is rather academic since fluorine can't stop hate-fucking other elements, and there's three of those for every chlorine. Fluorine will also burn through your skin and replace the calcium in your bones, causing them to weaken and possibly spontaneously break. I don't recommend Googling fluoridosis. Now, it can be stored "safely", because if you just dump it in a steel barrel the insides will react with the compound, making a nice insulating lining. Just don't jostle it or you'll knock the lining off and bad things will happen.

Obviously, such a chemical compound is incredibly unhealthy in just about every other way (don't ask how the Nazis found that out), but at this point that's really just a brimstone cherry on top of the nitroglycerin sundae.

Now with that out of the way, how does a Nazi anti-bunker weapon meant for turning the entire Eastern Front and everyone and everything there into a pile of ash that has burned down twice, once by exposure to the air and a second time by exposure to the fluorine, have to do with rocket science? Glad you asked, because to absolutely no surprise at all, such a chemical compound has an absolutely absurd about of potential energy in it. You add just a tiny bit of liquid O2 and wham, boom, straight to the moon (hopefully in one piece and not several), so of course NASA and all those Nazi scientists it recruited decided to start working with it. Up until a tanker car spilled and in the words of one unfortunate witness "The concrete was on fire!" And it was, and not just the several feet of it that made of the floor, but the sand under it as well after the concrete got burned through.

Damn science, you scary as fuck!
 
On the contrary! It is an exciting subject, especially nitrogen chemistry, where waking up in the morning with everything where it should be is an exciting moment in your life that may never happen again.

Hydrogen bombs are an exciting subject as well. Doesn’t mean I want to be close to one when it's detonated.
 
Well, it would be much better if the fuel was made from an environmentally friendly resource. The UK is trying to bring eco fuel to the rockets according to space news uk. Ecosene is high-grade kerosene made of plastic waste and upgraded to be used as rocket fuel. Using Ecosene rocket fuel over traditional kerosene for 16 launches per year recycles up to 400 tonnes of plastic every year.
 
Well, it would be much better if the fuel was made from an environmentally friendly resource. The UK is trying to bring eco fuel to the rockets according to space news uk. Ecosene is high-grade kerosene made of plastic waste and upgraded to be used as rocket fuel. Using Ecosene rocket fuel over traditional kerosene for 16 launches per year recycles up to 400 tonnes of plastic every year.
God forbid you cause global warming while bombing people to fuck.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo