- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
No, we're supposed to stop actual abuse and rape and have zero tolerance for it instead of wasting energy getting your panties in a wad over some housewifes fictional smut books.
@Android Raptor Hate Thread
- Iniciador del tema Saddam Hussain Obama
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa. -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 11 de Feb, 2023
I’m kind of disgusted right now tbh. I may be a gay rapist coprophiliac but I draw the line at child pornography or enabling it.
- Registrado
- 3 de Ago, 2022
- minimizing of the impact positive, uncritical rape depictions in movies, games etc. will have on males (and angry horny lesbians I assume, YUCK)
- comparing some cheesy book with 3-4 pages of women getting a bit of rough yet enjoyable sex after 100 pages of flirting with fucking tentacle alien rape porn
It's OK we'll find you another autistic BPD girl, don't worry too much.
This one's kinda broken. We'll try fixing her, but even maestros such as ourselves can't really repair nature's will.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
Males raped and abused women long before movies and vidya ever existed. In fact that's when it was perfectly legal to do those things.
Weird how the countries that are the most infamously awful to women like Saudi Arabia are also very anti-porn, to the point of having country-wide internet filters. If porn was the cause of abuse, you'd think those places would be paradises for women.
I draw that line too, since child porn is horrific abuse of an actual child.
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2019
@Android raptor why can't you answer a simple question?
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
What question?
- Registrado
- 11 de Feb, 2023
Lolicon IS child porn, retard.
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2019
All you had to do was scroll up.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
It isn't. It's gross, but saying gross cartoons is the exact same as real horrific child abuse is an insult to victims of CSAM. It's like saying the Simpsons gag of Homer choking Bart is the exact same as a real kid getting choked by their parent (something I've experienced).
No, do you think all normie housewives that like bodice ripper want to actually be raped or rape others? Do you think all SAHMs that like 50 Shades and Twilight want to be abused IRL? Do you think Anne Rice really wanted to be a sex slave because she wrote the Sleeping Beauty trilogy? Do you think girls that like Hannigram want to murder and eat real people?
- Registrado
- 11 de Feb, 2023
If it depicts a child in a sexual situation, it’s effectively child porn. Pedophiles masturbate to it. It’s not the same thing as someone enjoying a violent video game. Most people who play violent video games don’t fantasize about killing people in real life. EVERYBODY who watches shotacon/lolicon fantasizes about having sex with a real child.
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2019
@Android raptor all lolicons and shotacons want to rape real children. Just ask @Null about the time he ran 9chan and he'll tell you of the overlap of IP addresses between the lolicon/shotacon posters and the ones posting real child porn.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
It's not an actual child. It's a gross cartoon. I can't speak for victims of CSAM, but I'd be insulted as a child abuse survivor if someone tried to insist the Simpsons was the exact same thing as actual child abuse.
Especially when CSAM and other child abuse is such a massive problem. Dumb slap fights over gross cartoons don't do a damn thing to help actual children. It's a waste of energy you could be using to trying to TrackAnObject, or start a donation drive to RAINN, or learn how to be a court advocate for abused children. It doesn't actually help anyone the same way SJWs pitching a fit about random words doesn't actually help marginalized people.
I'm sure there's an overlap, but you still can't compare gross cartoons to actual child abuse and its an insult to CSA survivors to do so. Plus why waste energy on the cartoons when the real shit is massive problem that even big social media sites can't keep up with?
- Registrado
- 14 de Nov, 2012
This quote is a brilliant example of your completely absent sense of empathy. You have no mental capacity to understand how other people feel.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
I can understand how I'd feel if someone tried to say the abuse I went through is the exact same thing as something fictional. I'd be insulted.
From what I've seen, most CSA survivors are primarily concerned with real abuse and real CP and groomers proliferating on social media, especially shit like roblox where moderation doesn't do shit about them.
- Registrado
- 11 de Feb, 2023
Literally nobody said this.
- Registrado
- 3 de Ago, 2022
I think the apparent lack of empathy is a self-defense survival mechanism. She always makes use of terminal contrarianism and repetitive mantras once she feels some pressure.
It's some sort of tactical nihilism defense.
It's some sort of tactical nihilism defense.
- Registrado
- 14 de Nov, 2012
Nobody is saying that lolicon and child pornography are identical. People who do are pedophiles though. It is also 100% something that child abusers collect and use as pornography.
She just likes being hated. It makes her feel powerful. I don't believe she wasn't sexually abused.
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2019
I can't believe it. @Bargain Bin Laden is no longer the weirdest fuck in this thread. In fact he even seems reasonable in comparison. 
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2013
I wasn't sexually abused, but I was physically and psychologically abused and got sexually harassed by grown men as a child (like pretty much every woman on the planet).