Weeeeaaaaak.
Ver archivo adjunto 46239 Ver archivo adjunto 46240 [MEDIA=twitter]638770465662615552[/MEDIA]
Why inject lesbian fetishism into it?
Why make the wizard of oz art at all?
He's digging his own damn grave.
[MEDIA=twitter]638771272118235136[/MEDIA]
Cry me a river.
I honestly don't care about these pictures. They are neither the first characters that are drawn older and sexualized than they were in their respected media, nor will they be the last. That Fluttershy one clearly is debatable, but in my opinion not enough to freak out about.
More interesting is the fact, that Dobson feels the need to justify himself for drawing them like that. Why does he feels the need react to this at all? People probably wouldn't even care, if he just said something like: "Well yes, I think lesbians are hot. So I draw them on occasion. I mean look at a Quentin Tarantino movie and try to guess that guys fetish."
No wonder he draws himself as a tiny blue bear, when each time somebody throws something his way he can't block, he reacts like a bear defending its sad little cave.
But the funniest thing is, that he thinks he has a good reputation to loose.
In fact he would be better off, if he lost his reputation rather quickly.
As for context, this is the tweet I was replying to:
[MEDIA=twitter]637401072256942081[/MEDIA]
Yeees, never in the history of anything have people criticized a show or movie by its trailer. Of course GenZed could be a good show, but a trailer is supposed to show the best aspects of a show and I haven't seen a single good one.
[MEDIA=twitter]638808316693491712[/MEDIA]
So he is inviting others to dogpile him, again?
And then there is this:
This is why Dobson fails.
How non-existent must his own self-respect be, when he tries to play the snarky and wise SJW-cartoonist on one day and on the next, when he has to deal with criticism, he calls himself a "minor web comic artist"? How can he even live with himself?