💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Well no. A "professional" isn't allowed to rehash their own work.

Redrawing/remaking is valid, it can show how far an artist has come or what they've learned that can make them perform the original idea better now.

Starting something off like a rehash but giving it a twist punchline or something can be valid, the change itself can be funny, especially on a running gag. Even then everything's often drawn again.

Bringing back on old piece you like so new people can look at it again can be valid, some people have old stuff they still find value in. While awkward and sloppy and I tend to hate my own stuff, the first piece I ever put on DA I still regard just a little fondly.

Doing a shitty GIMP edit and expecting people to pay you for it is not.
 
"DeviantArt won't let me ignore the criticisms of others more than I already do!"

Edit: So you can like porny artwork, but skimpy outfits for female characters is a no go?
What if the designers are feminists as well?
Face it, Dobson, you're caught in a trap.
 
Última edición:
Gotta admit it. Dobson’s personal hell of his own creation is pretty amazing in its sheer simplicity and continuance. He could easily revamp his patron and push himself harder to achieve his goals, or alternatively, just let go, pursue other career, and turn art to a hobby instead of a demanding, consuming and fulfilling struggle that it is at the moment. Instead he chooses to do neither, staying in the no-mans-land where he keeps hating his trade more and more without progressing in it. Leading to mounting frustration and angry twitter tirades that drive away potential patrons which feeds yet another social media rant.

Heck, at this point he might just openly embrace his teen balloon lesbian fantasies, as even creepy fetish porn would most likely sell as well as the current faux-progressive tumblr tier trash he desperately spews out in hopes of validation.

Dobson is a masochist for self-destruction.
 
Dobson's chimping out

[MEDIA=twitter]598868420050968579[/MEDIA]

BWAH HAH HAH HA-oh, were you being serious?

We're not creating art here, Dobbo. More people are interested in re-imagining Sonichu than Alex ze Pirate. We just wanna rustle your jimmies so you post more hilarious shit like this.

[MEDIA=twitter]598880734212988928[/MEDIA]

Just because someone has info posted online doesn't mean we're gonna troll them for you. NIGGAAAAH~

EDIT: I'm still waking up here, so I hope I can be forgiven for taking so long to notice he blacked out this person's name. So what was the point of mentioning they had their skype info clearly posted? Are you trying to cover your ass in case someone tracks him down from your dA page?
 
Última edición:
He really is the master of stawmen

Dobson, this-

so_youre_a_cartoonist___mod.png


Edit( a hacked comic by me)
 
Oh yes, well how many of us hacks are currently spamming patreon as if this hack is work paying for? Also the edits are funnier than Dobber's ever been.
 
Basically his Patreon goals is for $100 he'll shit himself and do nothing.

For $1000 you will get daily whining bullshit about feminism.

For $5000 you can go fuck yourself!

And he wonders why nobody wants to give him money.
 
Well no. A "professional" isn't allowed to rehash their own work.

Redrawing/remaking is valid, it can show how far an artist has come or what they've learned that can make them perform the original idea better now.

Starting something off like a rehash but giving it a twist punchline or something can be valid, the change itself can be funny, especially on a running gag. Even then everything's often drawn again.

Bringing back on old piece you like so new people can look at it again can be valid, some people have old stuff they still find value in. While awkward and sloppy and I tend to hate my own stuff, the first piece I ever put on DA I still regard just a little fondly.

Doing a shitty GIMP edit and expecting people to pay you for it is not.

Unless Dobson was going to do some experimental/gimmick thing using the same panel art over and over like Dinosaur Comics or The Angriest Dog in the World, he has no excuse.

And he's certainly not clever enough to make the best use of a format like that anyway.
 
Edit: [MEDIA=twitter]598861635730722816[/MEDIA]So you can like porny artwork, but skimpy outfits for female characters is a no go?
What if the designers are feminists as well?
Face it, Dobson, you're caught in a trap.

No. Being a feminist and being into sexy stuff is fine. It's called sex positivity.

It's more that.... I have a hard time believing you actually believe anything you say.

What with that time you were smarmy with a teenaged lesbian.

Things like that.

Dobson. It's that... I sort of view you like a Corporation. To paraphrase the movie of the same name "One minute they will be Bambi, the next they'll be Godzilla. It's because they aren't Bambi, and they aren't Godzilla. They are whatever is most convenient for them at any given moment."

Dobson's chimping out

[MEDIA=twitter]598867139202830336[/MEDIA]

I can only speak for myself, but I don't believe anyone here thinks you have millions.

It's more that you are trying to play to an audience.

Your problem is that you simultaneously alienate that audience when you do things like being persnickity with teenage lesbians.

[MEDIA=twitter]598876717629997056[/MEDIA]

I don't suppose that's a reference to us?

Either way, I don't think anyone needs to agree as to why they don't care for you.

ForeverPandering made it all pretty clear a few years back.

Yeah most of them are probably people that wanted to support him... until they noticed he wouldn't put out any worthwhile content.

Whaaaat? Actual fans of Alex Ze Pirate or SYAC or what not, not following the formula of Picture of thing that happened in Mass Media Dobson doesn't like + Single image of Dobear looking at it angrily + Omg this is such bullshit you guys = money

Surely you jest.
 
Última edición:
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo