💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I can't even understand what's happening here. MM owns a copy of Sonic 06 but she almost bought another one? Why? Even if she forgot she already owned Sonic 06, that game has such a terrible reputation - not to mention being almost 10 years old - that I can't imagine any scenario where you'd consider buying it, except for a Let's Play (even though it's already been LPed to death). Then Dobson responded to it by posting a picture of Shadow from the opening cut scene of Shadow the Hedgehog, a game widely regarded as the second worst (if not the worst) Sonic game ever made.

So Dobson responded to a nonsensical post about a terrible 10 year old game with a picture from another terrible 10 year old game. And this is... is this supposed to be comedy? The fuck is going on?
It's one of Dobbies few Twitter fans who keeps giving him asspats and the response picture is because recently Dobby announced that he's going to be even more lazy and start replying to some tweets with images/image macros.
 
I actually have an open dislike for Steven Universe, and even I know that Cookie Cat shit is hated by most fans as unfunny and trying to hard to be "meme worthy." It was from the very first episode too, so that's even more reason why fans apparently hate it because early episodes were very rough. It doesn't stop the spergier ones from proving that the fandom are the new bronies, though.

He didn't even color Cookie Cat right, it has strawberry ice cream on one side. Cookie Cat also doesn't have a nose or whiskers.

20obrn.jpg


JEEZ, DOBSON, YOU COULDN'T EVEN BE FUCKED TO LOOK UP A REFERENCE FOR A FOCAL POINT IN YOUR PICTURE.
 
I was going to post reference images to show everything he got wrong in the image, but I decided instead to put forth exactly as much effort criticizing it as Dobson did drawing it: none.
 
This is just a minor sperg from me, but why in the hell does Dobson still have his stupid Easter avatar for his Twitter account? It bugs me about as much as that Patty O'Bear avatar he kept on for the majority of March long after Saint Patrick's Day was done. Can't the guy just make some generic Twitter avatar?

Not like it would even take any effort. He has several of his blue bear fursonas he can just crop and put up on Twitter. >_>

Good news, he changed it... back to Patty O'Bear for some reason.

Also his Twitter name is "Maid of Honor" now. Tomgirl announcement incoming?
 
The avatar thing really does highlight the laziness. Scribbling out a Twitter avatar should be a fun little time-killer for an actual artist, but Dobson sticks with something that is painfully out of date rather than expend a few minutes' effort.
 
The avatar thing really does highlight the laziness. Scribbling out a Twitter avatar should be a fun little time-killer for an actual artist, but Dobson sticks with something that is painfully out of date rather than expend a few minutes' effort.
Which actually indicates he somehow got even more lazy. Before icons were the only thing he put any work into (hideous, yes but still he could do one without whining about how hard it is to pick up a pencil before AND after)
 
I can't even understand what's happening here. MM owns a copy of Sonic 06 but she almost bought another one? Why? Even if she forgot she already owned Sonic 06, that game has such a terrible reputation - not to mention being almost 10 years old - that I can't imagine any scenario where you'd consider buying it, except for a Let's Play (even though it's already been LPed to death). Then Dobson responded to it by posting a picture of Shadow from the opening cut scene of Shadow the Hedgehog, a game widely regarded as the second worst (if not the worst) Sonic game ever made.

So Dobson responded to a nonsensical post about a terrible 10 year old game with a picture from another terrible 10 year old game. And this is... is this supposed to be comedy? The fuck is going on?
It's because he can't shadow his art properly :ween:
 
Whenever he draws a face that's supposed to be portraying any kind of emotion, or at least strong ones, his linework just ruins it. It looks like they've all aged a few decades, deep wrinkles springing across their features. How does he not realize how ugly this looks?
 
I've heard it said that every line added to a face adds one year onto a character's life. His characters must be approximately 80 years old, then.
 
You're coming across somewhat salty considering non of this had anything to do with you.

Anyway, WHO WANTS TO LAUGH AT DOBSON'S FAKE TEARS?


Ver archivo adjunto 24797


And his new fan drawing of Steven Universe.

cookie_cat_by_tompreston-d8mhmru.jpg


The toes are weird
The toes are weird. THE TOES ARE WEIRD?!
I wish that was the only thing that was fucked up in that image. How come Dobson can't even do this basic style without fucking it up so tremendeously?
and I don't even like the SU-artstyle. I guess it's supposed to be a throwback to old japanese cartoons (I get severe Doraemon vibes from it), but it just looks like a lame and lifeless copy and somewhat uninspired...

Why is Dobson so bipolar with his art?
The Ruby and Sapphire drawing he did wasn't half bad, and that's because all the characters have simplistic designs.
One image shows a male character with [not brown] hair in an awkward standing pose and the other is a depiction of two lesbians female-looking characters cuddling... go figure.
How many years does a set of extra eyebrows add, then?
Maybe it's just me, but each superfluous set of eyebrows should add about 10 years of enforced labour in the acid mines.... oh wait, you weren't talking about the punishment for the artist?
I'd say it doesn't really add age, but it certainly decreases the perceived IQ of said character. To zero, to be specific.
 
Última edición:
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo