💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
One of these days his past is going to bite him in the ass. Though that's only assuming it already hasn't done so.
You are operating under the misconception that the senpais will notice him. They wont. It's still a calming certainty that any possibility of any contact whatsoever will be smothered by CattyN spam.

Y'know, just because the only medium is ink doesn't mean you have to only use undiluted black ink. But even if you want to be some sort of purist about the whole thing, he could at least do crosshatching to give shades and shape to his work. But of course that takes time away from recreating Super Mario Land in Mario Maker and Dobson can't tolerate that.
Ha, good one. Dobson actually doing something creative with the limitations he has to work with...
No, when he has to use ink, he can only do either linework or solic black spaces, no in-betweens, no shading, no dilution... seriously, who would ever use diluted ink to draw images?
 
Última edición:
He makes weird jumps between liking and hating anime.

(Btw, check out the full convo. The anime hater guy is one hell of a sperg.)


How many "something Day"s does this month have?

 
He makes weird jumps between liking and hating anime.

[MEDIA=twitter]654662243762569216[/MEDIA](Btw, check out the full convo. The anime hater guy is one hell of a sperg.)


How many "something Day"s does this month have?

[MEDIA=twitter]654665446575075328[/MEDIA]


Isnt the point of alex ze pirate that a bunch of gays harass a CIS dude ?

You are operating under the misconception that the senpais will notice him. They wont. It's still a calming certainty that any possibility of any contact whatsoever will be smothered by CattyN spam.


Ha, good one. Dobson actually doing something creative with the limitations he has to work with...
No, when he has to use ink, he can only do either linework or solic black spaces, no in-betweens, no shading, no dilution... seriously, who would ever use diluted ink to draw images?


Wu noticed dobbie for all of a second before declaring "thats not a good comic" and going back to peggle.


Ive worked out why dobbie hates october. Its all the "today is this" days.
 
You are operating under the misconception that the senpais will notice him. They wont. It's still a calming certainty that any possibility of any contact whatsoever will be smothered by CattyN spam.
Riiiight, I keep using actual logic in these situations. How foolish am I?

He makes weird jumps between liking and hating anime.

[MEDIA=twitter]654662243762569216[/MEDIA](Btw, check out the full convo. The anime hater guy is one hell of a sperg.)


How many "something Day"s does this month have?

[MEDIA=twitter]654665446575075328[/MEDIA]
Oh shit, I follow one of the people involved in the conversation (Not Dobson, of course). But good lord, just because you can't use a name you wanted to and think that all anime sucks? That's pathetic beyond planes of existence.

And of course, Dobson has to come in and fuck things up further by showing his own hate for the medium, by using a picture that was meant for a completely different reason than his own (most modern anime, as opposed to "EVERY SINGLE ANIME IN EXISTANCE!").
 
He makes weird jumps between liking and hating anime.

[MEDIA=twitter]654662243762569216[/MEDIA](Btw, check out the full convo. The anime hater guy is one hell of a sperg.)


How many "something Day"s does this month have?

[MEDIA=twitter]654665446575075328[/MEDIA]
What's with his gripe over anime anyways? He ironically seemed to be better at anatomy when he drew that stuff (but it's not saying much)
I'm going to off topic sperg for a sec and say that the guy who kinda created "anime" was the astro-boy guy and he was a huge furry, so it's kind of Miyazaki's fault for jumping onto a thing that was autistic from the start
 
What's with his gripe over anime anyways? He ironically seemed to be better at anatomy when he drew that stuff (but it's not saying much)
I'm going to off topic sperg for a sec and say that the guy who kinda created "anime" was the astro-boy guy and he was a huge furry, so it's kind of Miyazaki's fault for jumping onto a thing that was autistic from the start
its a fake quote anyway.
 
What's with his gripe over anime anyways? He ironically seemed to be better at anatomy when he drew that stuff (but it's not saying much)
I'm going to off topic sperg for a sec and say that the guy who kinda created "anime" was the astro-boy guy and he was a huge furry, so it's kind of Miyazaki's fault for jumping onto a thing that was autistic from the start

Dobbie hates anime because

* his anime club laughed at his shitty choice of film for a showing
* he blames it for holding him back artistically
* he thinks japan is the land of sexist crap
* hes a joyless fuckwit
 
I am just waiting for him to make another one of his famous missteps now. Why? He posted his support towards Totalbiscuit to get better cause the guy has been diagnosed with cancer. I don't know who Totalbiscuit is much, all I hope is he manages to not suffer from it too much (it has affected the liver, he is a dead man walking). For Dobson I just wait to make a couple of misaimed comments about the issue now sooner or later.
 
Última edición:
What's with his gripe over anime anyways? He ironically seemed to be better at anatomy when he drew that stuff (but it's not saying much)
I'm going to off topic sperg for a sec and say that the guy who kinda created "anime" was the astro-boy guy and he was a huge furry, so it's kind of Miyazaki's fault for jumping onto a thing that was autistic from the start

I think it had something to do with an anime club he used to run. He was showing a movie he liked, everyone was riffing on it and he got pissy about it.

Also, he felt anime held him back from his true potential as an artist, his career prospects, or something like that.
 
He makes weird jumps between liking and hating anime.

[MEDIA=twitter]654662243762569216[/MEDIA](Btw, check out the full convo. The anime hater guy is one hell of a sperg.)


How many "something Day"s does this month have?

[MEDIA=twitter]654665446575075328[/MEDIA]
Pansies like Dobs are always rambling on and on about "bullying" and they are also the only group of people that I see using the term "cyberbullying", so it's no big surprise I've come to associate these two terms with whiny milquetoast ninnies and their insipid first-world "Abloo bloo bloo, someone called me a doofus on Twitter" unproblems.
i hope he gets raped and murdered in prison
Well, running away with clenched buttcheeks might actually be the exercise he needs to get rid of his cheeseburger lard belt.
I am just waiting for him to make another one of his famous missteps now. Why? He posted his support towards Totalbiscuit to get better cause the guy has been diagnosed with cancer. I don't know who Totalbiscuit is much, all I hope is he gets better. For Dobson I jut wait to make a couple of misaimed comments about the issue now sooner or later.
Cutesy animal-pics, perhaps?
 
say, the Miyazaki picture/fake quote he is using, in what context was that supposedly even made? I am just saying, cause I know any line out of context can lose its meaning.
That said, why even give a damn about Miyazaki. Guy is a snobbish bastard who pretty much disowns his own son because the later is not blindly following his dad and don't get me even started on the fact he is actually a racist bastard, who made a movie portraying one of Japan's biggest war machine manufacturers as a whimsical hero
 
say, the Miyazaki picture/fake quote he is using, in what context was that supposedly even made? I am just saying, cause I know any line out of context can lose its meaning.
That said, why even give a damn about Miyazaki. Guy is a snobbish bastard who pretty much disowns his own son because the later is not blindly following his dad and don't get me even started on the fact he is actually a racist bastard, who made a movie portraying one of Japan's biggest war machine manufacturers as a whimsical hero
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/anime-was-a-mistake
 
Oh, come on, it's a harmless fetish that only is projected on fictional animu wom-
lost_in_space_by_catty_n-d544lb8.jpg
Yeah, so Dobby was whacking it to the thought of a 16 year old girl dying a slow and horribly painful death by being exposed to the cold vacuum of space. Cause that's not fucking creepy or vile at all.
Actually, DottyN doesn't know shit. Human bodies don't inflate or explode in vacuum, and your blood doesn't boil. Also, space isn't "cold" in a strict sense.

Geoffrey Landis: Human Exposure to Vacuum

Bioastronautics Data Book dijo:
Some degree of consciousness will probably be retained for 9 to 11 seconds (see chapter 2 under Hypoxia). In rapid sequence thereafter, paralysis will be followed by generalized convulsions and paralysis once again. During this time, water vapor will form rapidly in the soft tissues and somewhat less rapidly in the venous blood. This evolution of water vapor will cause marked swelling of the body to perhaps twice its normal volume unless it is restrained by a pressure suit. (It has been demonstrated that a properly fitted elastic garment can entirely prevent ebullism at pressures as low as 15 mm Hg absolute [Webb, 1969, 1970].) Heart rate may rise initially, but will fall rapidly thereafter. Arterial blood pressure will also fall over a period of 30 to 60 seconds, while venous pressure rises due to distention of the venous system by gas and vapor. Venous pressure will meet or exceed arterial pressure within one minute. There will be virtually no effective circulation of blood. After an initial rush of gas from the lungs during decompression, gas and water vapor will continue to flow outward through the airways. This continual evaporation of water will cool the mouth and nose to near-freezing temperatures; the remainder of the body will also become cooled, but more slowly.

Would your blood boil? dijo:
No.

Your blood is at a higher pressure than the outside environment. A typical blood pressure might be 75/120. The "75" part of this means that between heartbeats, the blood is at a pressure of 75 Torr (equal to about 100 mbar) above the external pressure. If the external pressure drops to zero, at a blood pressure of 75 Torr the boiling point of water is 46 degrees Celsius (115 F). This is well above body temperature of 37 C (98.6 F). Blood won't boil, because the elastic pressure of the blood vessels keeps it it a pressure high enough that the body temperature is below the boiling point-- at least, until the heart stops beating (at which point you have other things to worry about!). (To be more pedantic, blood pressure varies depending on where in the body it is measured, so the above statement should be understood as a generalization. However, the effect of small pockets of localized vapor is to increase the pressure. In places where the blood pressure is lowest, the vapor pressure will rise until equilibrium is reached. The net result is the same.)

Would you freeze? dijo:
No.

A few recent Hollywood films showed people instantly freezing solid when exposed to vacuum. In one of these, the scientist character mentioned that the temperature was "minus 273"-- that is, absolute zero.

But in a practical sense, space doesn't really have a temperature-- you can't measure a temperature on a vacuum, something that isn't there. The residual molecules that do exist aren't enough to have much of any effect. Space isn't "cold," it isn't "hot", it really isn't anything.

What space is, though, is a very good insulator. (In fact, vacuum is the secret behind thermos bottles.) Astronauts tend to have more problem with overheating than keeping warm.

If you were exposed to space without a spacesuit, your skin would most feel slightly cool, due to water evaporating off you skin, leading to a small amount of evaporative cooling. But you wouldn't freeze solid!

“Space is a very cold place!” - is this true?

In many scifi movies, space is mentioned as being very cold, a freezing environment that will turn you into a crispy icicle quickly.

But is this correct? How warm or cold is outer space?

In order to answer this question, we must gain some clarity on what temperature actually is.

Temperature is a measure of diffuse energy: It is a property of very large ensembles of particles, such as macroscopic bodies with their many many molecules, and tells us what the average energy of the random motions of these particles is. It is not possible to attribute a temperature to a single particle or a small group. By its very definition it always applies to a very large group of particles, quantifying their average energy statistically.

The energy that is stored in the random motions of a large set of particles is called heat. Heat is not the same as temperature, though if the kind of particles is known, it can be calculated from temperature. The heat of a hot body can be converted into macroscopic ordered kinetic energy (such as rotation of a wheel), though only partially. There must always a colder body be present as a heat sink. Part of the heat of the hot body can then be converted into ordered kinetic energy (also called work), another part will be transferred to the colder body. It is in principle impossible to convert heat into work completely.

That’s why all machines (motors, power stations etc.) have heat sinks: Cooling towers, cooling ponds, cooling fins etc.

There is a number of temperature scales. In physics the Kelvin (K) scale is used. It is not defined by any secondary effect, such as expansion of a mercury column, but directly from the maximum amount of work that can be extracted from a body of a certain temperature. It can be shown that there is a temperature point of absolute zero T = 0 K. It is impossible in our universe to achieve lower temperatures - in fact, absoulte zero can be approached only asymptotically, it is not even possible to actually reach it. T = 0 K corresponds to -273.15 degrees centigrade. The step size of the Kelvin scale is arbitrarily choosen to be the same as that of the centigrade scale.

In modern literature, there is no “degree Kelvin”, the unit is just Kelvin (K). This is because it is derived from the basics of thermodynamic theory and not via some secondary effect.

How many Kelvin does outer space have? The first, simplistic answer would be: none at all! If by “space” we mean an absolute vacuum with no particles of any kind in it, then there wouldn’t be any particles to carry energy, and it wouldn’t make sense to attribute a temperature to it.

But space is not completely empty. It contains a number of different particle types though at very low densities: Photons, molecules, atoms, neutrinos, the not-yet-identified dark matter particles.

Note that the property temperature isn’t limited to baryonic particles, a photon gas has a temperature too (as an average energy can be attributed to the photons).

If we go away from all luminous celestial bodies, into deep space between the galaxies, we would be left with the cosmic background radiation, a diffuse microwave flux left over from the big bang. It has a temperature of 3 K - quite cold!

But as soon as we come near any stars, things get a lot hotter. Supernovas hurl fontains of very thin gas out of galaxies, with a temperature of billions of K! The solar wind streaming away from ordinary stars can still have temperatures ranging from several hundreds of thousands up to millions of K. The dense gas/dust clouds in the galactic plane that make up nebulae are naturally quite colder, the densest and darkest spots where new stars begin to form have only a few K.

But let’s suppose we put some large object, such as a commode or a satellite or an astronaut in space. What will be its/his/her temperature?

It is interesting in this respect to consider that no temperature sensor can actually measure the temperature of its surroundings. It can only measure its own temperature which it acquires by interaction with its surroundings.

The temperature of a body in space is governed by the balance between the radiation it receives and that which it sends out (all bodies radiate away energy, as can be seen from the glow of cigarettes, hot iron in a foundry, the sun and other stars etc.).

So how hot something in space will actually get depends on its material’s properties. If it is a dark object, that is good at absorbing light, it can get pretty hot when subjected to the sun’s radiation in the solar system. The surface of the moon is very hot: around 110 degrees centigrade.

But when in shadow, it will cool down rather severely, as there is no atmosphere to store heat: The night side of the moon has less than -100 degrees centigrade. Quite some temperature extremes on our night sky lamp!

This is why carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels tend to make the earth hotter: The gas doesn’t change the absorption capabilities of the earth in the visible spectrum, but it lowers the planet’s emissivity in the infrared spectrum! Therefore the same amount of energy is absorbed, but less radiated back to space - ergo, it gets hotter.

NASA spacesuits are internally equipped with a network of tubes through which water of human-friendly temperature is pumped, thus saving the astronaut from getting grilled on his/her side in the sunlight and freezing on the shadow side.

Why doesn’t the very hot solar wind heat up bodies in space? It is just too thin! There are too few particles per volume in it to efficiently transfer energy to bodies. In space, heat transport almost exclusively takes place by radiation.

This will be an engineering challenge for future rockets which use nuclear reactors to heat a propellant. They will need some sort of heat sink, but in space you can’t construct a cooling tower! The heat will have to be radiated away. These spaceships will therefore need big radiators.

radiating2.jpg


The other elementary particle types present in space - neutrinos, dark matter - also have a temperature. Neutrino temperature is very low, a few K. That of dark matter, is, naturally, not yet known for sure. Many scientists suspect there may be several components of dark matter of different temperature - hot dark matter and cold dark matter!

So, will space fry you or freeze you? It depends on where you are in it and on your emission/absorption properties. If you are far away from stars, you will cool down until you are in equilibrium with the background radiation at 3 K. When you are close to a star, in a solar system, you can get rather hot if your optical properties are such that you can absorp sufficient energy - but only on your lit side. The other one which is in the shadow will still cool down to uncomfortably low temperatures (unless you rotate rapidly, then some equilibrium will be reached).

If you want to go into space, make sure to wear one of NASA’s or Roscosmos’s fine isothermal space suits. It will keep you evenly and pleasantly temperated.
 
Última edición:
Dobbie wouldnt let facts get in the way of a good hard wank.

It hasnt stopped him with Wu
I think the quote is taken from the movie, though.

Edit:
Kinda stumbled over this image and can't remember ever seeing it in this thread, so I figured, I'll just post it...
Splatoon.jpg

It's truly a marvel how stiff all his poses look, the action lines in this one *should* make this look like a very dynamic and vivid pose, but somehow, it's just really awkward and stiff...
Also, looking at this image, I realize we could save a shitton of time by standardizing complaints about his fuckups, a bit like "Liefeld Disease", only with Dobby it's a whole list of things...
 
Última edición:
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo