- Registrado
- 1 de Oct, 2013
It seems like everything he draws is either inspired by something or a complete rip-off. Even his bear icon looks like he ripped it off of something.
💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)
- Iniciador del tema Null
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Estado
- Registrado
- 10 de Feb, 2015
I think Dobson hasn't drawn anything a while because he's strained both of his wrists: one from tweeting lesbian fap material and one from jerking it raw to said lesbian fap material.
- Registrado
- 27 de Jun, 2014
Why is Alex a butch dyke? I'm not trying to be offensive here, that's literally what other gay people will call someone who looks like that.
It's also completely contrary to how he used to portray Alex, and marks the third major change he's done. It's winning him no fans.
Gensdupays
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Jun, 2013
Fucking stop with the lesbians, holy shit. Pulp novels are cool but you had to retweet the one about the lesbians. He strikes me as one of those people whose real reason for the fetish is that no lesbian is "fully" strictly lesbian and would include a male in their relationship. Disrespectful and sexist. Again, if he were less lazy I'd almost take this as an indicator that he's going to either go tomgirl or MRA. But he's lazy so complaining on Twitter will do.
- Registrado
- 27 de Mayo, 2014
Dobby keeps drawing shit about lesbians because he thinks making his characters lesbians and the like will make his work stand out from everyone else.
Unfortunately, all it does is make his art even more nonsensical and his characters cardboard cutouts.
Unfortunately, all it does is make his art even more nonsensical and his characters cardboard cutouts.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 6 de Dic, 2014
I, uh......what?
Who gives a shit who your characters would sleep with, Andrew, oh my God
- Registrado
- 27 de Sep, 2014
Maybe he thought it would be unfitting for that character story-wise to have a (strong) sexuality or he even feared it would be morally inappropriate for the character to have a sexuality. I mean, on one hand, it's the comic relief (or he would be, if the entire crew wasn't devolving into clowns), so it would be kinda weird for him to also have a libido. On the other hand, since said character is an anthropomop- anthropomorpho- ... er... furry, he felt it best to not tackle the topic of sexuality.
Those are neat theories and they have one thing in common: they are most likely false. The most probable cause for the critter's asexuality is the fact Dobson isn't fantasizing about that dull design bonking someone.
The sexuality of a character entirely depends upon how 'hot and bothered' Dobson gets when thinking about them, so the character that doesn't fulfil a role in Dobsons fap fantasies is the only one that's asexual. Added bonus: Dobson can act all smug about being so progressive by having an asexual character. It's almost Chris-tier logic. Dobson isn't attracted to the furry, so the furry isn't attracted to anyone else, it seems.
It's also possible he wanted to avoid looking like a furry-enthusiast that sexualizes anthropomoph... uh.. furries - which is cute when you think about it. We have ample proof of him sexualizing minors...
Dobson certainly is a special kind of genius to think relying on stereotypes will make a character memorable and unique. His character-design is bad. We already established that. He uses designs lifted from way better media, adds the special "floating eyebrows, dull colors and clamp-hands" touch of DobArt... and we get a really sucky, generic design that's only matched by the generic, boring, stereotype-ridden personalities he creates for his abominations.
Well, the sexuality IS the only definable trait about these characters, so...
Since "Representation matters!" (ie: The Dobson mating call), doing it subtle won't do. It has to be in-your-face and impossible to ignore. That's how Dobson rolls, that's why everything Dobson does sucks.
He can't come up with his own unique style, he can't come up with his own unique characters, he can't come up with his own unique humor, he can't come up with his own unique story, he can't be subtle about anything he does, which amplifies the aforementioned shortcomings up to 11.
This is just perfect. These pulp books are merely spanking material for people who fetishize lesbians without understanding one bit about them. So naturally, it's right up Dobson's alley. It's really amazing how he confirms every theory about how he's not a genuine SJW and just in it for the scissoring.
Edit:
It's a matter of great importance to Dobson... for obvious reasons.
- Registrado
- 30 de Mayo, 2014
For gods sake Dobbers just go back to drawing fucking porn already. We all know he wants to, and lets be honest, I know I at least have far more respect for someone who draws weirdo fetish porn and goes "this is my fetish, fucking deal with it, nobody forced you to click on the image" than someone who hides behind third party oppression for another group of people.
But that would require effort, so it wouldn't happen.
But that would require effort, so it wouldn't happen.
- Registrado
- 23 de Feb, 2013
It's funny, looking again at that 'sexuality' character sheet he did makes me realize how little my characters' sexual preferences matter.
In fact, I'd say at least half of my characters don't have an overt sexual preference and aren't really depicted as having one. It's not even to say that they're asexual, just.. I'm kind of startled by the stark difference in priority here.
I swear I'm not just trying to toot my own horn
I don't even think my characters are all that deep but they're a hell of a lot deeper than wearing their respective pride flags as clothing.
In fact, I'd say at least half of my characters don't have an overt sexual preference and aren't really depicted as having one. It's not even to say that they're asexual, just.. I'm kind of startled by the stark difference in priority here.
I swear I'm not just trying to toot my own horn
I don't even think my characters are all that deep but they're a hell of a lot deeper than wearing their respective pride flags as clothing.
CrimsonKnight
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2015
Even with them showing their pride flags, they're still unlikeable. Atea is grade A sexual harassment, Alex is a flat out bitch, Talus needs to be shot dead, and Sam (I feel bad for him a little) is just the bland butt of the joke type.
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
You know what disturbs me? When he deals with Nintendo and Gamestop he's all bitching, but with Apple he's all polite and pleading. Don't wanna rub Banana-senpei the wrong way I see?
Gothicserpent
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 29 de Mayo, 2014
Oh god, what if Dobson had children.....
- Registrado
- 27 de Jun, 2014
CPS exists for a reason, old friend.
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
And the sequel Blue is the Warmest Bear.
Falcon Lord
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Feb, 2013
I really have nothing to add to this discussion other to repeat something that's been said over and overagain: People would really take Dobson's attempts at inclusion more seriously if his minority characters minority status wasn't their only distinguishing characteristics. I mean, Jesus Christ. He doesn't even bother to try hiding it.
- Estado