Opinion An Open Letter From A Public School Teacher – on indoctrination & inclusion

Link (Archive)

An Open Letter From A Public School Teacher – on indoctrination & inclusion​

I am a public school teacher. And I promise – I am not indoctrinating your children.

To indoctrinate means that you’re trying to get a group of people to accept some beliefs uncritically – without any critical thinking.

As an English teacher, my goal is the exact opposite of that. I want your child to think critically. I spend the entire school year trying to get students to think critically about everything we read. And I hope that every student does not have the same ideas about the text – because that makes for a very boring class discussion.

So if I’m not indoctrinating your child, what am I doing in my public school classroom?

Teaching diverse texts

We read short stories, essays, novels, speeches, poetry, and excerpts of memoirs. By intention, the authors are men and women from various ethnicities and backgrounds. We read texts written by and about people with different skin colors, different socio-economic backgrounds, different genders, different sexualities, and different birth countries.

Why do we do this?

I want each student to see themselves or identify with the narrator in something we read throughout the year. There are plenty of studies which show how important representation is, and especially how any representation in school can impact student success and graduation rates. If I want all of my students to be engaged in classroom learning and be successful in school, then it only makes sense to choose diverse texts.

As importantly as that, we learn when we are exposed to something different than ourselves. Our world expands. We consider a different perspective. This is not because our perspective is necessarily bad, but because our perspective is incomplete.

If our goal is to learn, then considering worldviews outside our own is vital to achieve that goal.

Teaching writing skills

This year, my students will write narrative essays, expository essays, and persuasive essays. Because we’re still bridging the gap of the Covid learning loss, we’ll spend a significant amount of time reviewing basic skills. We’ll learn grammar rules and punctuation rules. We’ll spend some time on how to construct a paragraph. As we go on, we’ll learn how to combine sentences to add variety to our writing. We’ll practice writing thesis statements until they dream of thesis statements.

Though we’ll write different types of essays, our main focus is the persuasive essay. In order to write an effective persuasive essay, students must think critically about a topic and determine their own opinion. They must weigh evidence and determine what evidence best supports their claim. Then they must be able to explain how the evidence supports their claim.

Never do I tell a student what their claim should be. Instead, I encourage them to consider why they believe as they do and be able to defend it with strong evidence.

We practice this by playing Would You Rather, giving students an opportunity to strongly defend why the Marvel Universe is better than DC Comics or why eating waffles is better than eating pancakes. You know, we cover the very controversial issues in ninth grade English.

Eventually, students are debating how involved parents should be in dating and marriage decisions as we gear up to read Romeo and Juliet. This becomes a beautiful conversation about different cultural traditions and expectations, as students listen to their classmates’ reasons and evidence for their claims.

Providing safety for every student

Which leads us to another primary goal for my public school classroom. I want every student to feel safe and wanted in my classroom. It doesn’t matter if the student is wearing a MAGA hat or a hijab, I want them to feel welcome and included in my room. If their great-great-grandparents farmed in this mountain valley or if their parents recently fled here from Central America, I want them to feel protected and appreciated in my room. If they have bright blue hair and are figuring out what pronoun best represents them or if they dress modestly and follow the conservative traditions of their church, I want them to feel secure and accepted in my room.

There is no place for marginalization in my classroom. Each student can state their ideas and opinions respectfully and in ways that honor others. I want them to learn how to discuss issues with honesty and respect. I want them to speak kindly to each other and regard each other with dignity.

The problem with a divisive society

I realize that the concept of welcoming and honoring those who are different from us has become a controversial issue in our society. What a sad place we’ve gotten to!

If honoring others and treating them with respect feels like some leftist indoctrination, then it’s time for some soul searching. If considering the perspective of others feels too woke for you, then perhaps it’s time for an evaluation of your morals.

And it’s especially time for some deep reflection if you claim to follow Jesus, yet you want students who aren’t like you to feel marginalized in public school. Because that isn’t representative of the Jesus I know and love. And though I cannot preach that Jesus with my words in public school, I do try to live that Jesus’ love and care with my actions.
 
It feels like someone gussied up a syllabus and called it an article...with a nice dash of "I have nOoOoOoOOOO idea what you all are talking about! :smug:" to season it.
Though we’ll write different types of essays, our main focus is the persuasive essay. In order to write an effective persuasive essay, students must think critically about a topic and determine their own opinion. They must weigh evidence and determine what evidence best supports their claim. Then they must be able to explain how the evidence supports their claim.
This is where we run into problems: they CLAIM to be teaching critical thinking, and in fairness they do say these words in the classroom, I remember them!

I also remember the grading of these essays.

Presenting cherry picked evidence to come to a bonkers conclusion worked a treat from what I remember, and if they were serious about teaching "critical thinking", it shouldn't have. I found one teacher exactly that wouldn't let you get away with that shit.

Teach a few generations that they can generate "truth" from thin air and wikipedia, where do you think all this dishonest sophists that call themselves journalists came from, that starts to show, and it currently is.
 
I am a public school teacher. And I promise – I am not indoctrinating your children.

So you really starting the article off by just going all out like that? Really? Not even a attempt at trying to sound reasonable, just a straight up lie?

To indoctrinate means that you’re trying to get a group of people to accept some beliefs uncritically – without any critical thinking.

As an English teacher, my goal is the exact opposite of that. I want your child to think critically. I spend the entire school year trying to get students to think critically about everything we read. And I hope that every student does not have the same ideas about the text – because that makes for a very boring class discussion.

Observe how the Communist lies with the same ease you or I can breathe. A English Teacher! The literal cream of the crop when it comes to twisting words and texts into new meanings and a master at the art of language distortion. At no point will this creature advance the point to explain what it means by "critical thinking" and instead it will allow you to put your own view of what it means there, which makes you think it is sensible real life thinking and not Critical Theory which it might as well be.
 
This teacher doesn't mention what grade level she's teaching the authors with the different sexualities and why that is important to learning English. It is indoctrination if these differences are the focus to change to students' minds in these discussions, especially since the teacher's stated goal is persuasive language and writing for inclusion.

JambledUpWords said:
You know, we cover the very controversial issues in ninth grade English.
But the article says doesn't say that.
 
Última edición:
Okay, so if I were to write an essay on how Hitler was the good guy in WWII, and backed up all my points with facts (citations and everything, how would you grade it?
 
Thank goodness. Now try not to admit you are deliberately sabotaging the relationship between children and their parents-
Eventually, students are debating how involved parents should be in dating and marriage decisions
Sigh.
 
I'm thoroughly convinced that nobody has figured out that the whole "inclusion" thing is the most far reaching and oppressive element of the progressive doctrine.

One of the true human rights, the thing seen practiced not just in the US but all over, is the right of free association. As in if I don't want to associate in any way shape or form, up to and including acceptance, with chomos, troons, niggers of all races, or preachy blue hairs, then you can't make me. Least of all in my personal life away from what's obligated by work.

We don't want you at our homes. Or teaching out kids. I choose not to include you weirdos. What are you gonna do about it, faggot?
 
We read texts written by and about people with different skin colors, different socio-economic backgrounds, different genders, different sexualities, and different birth countries.

Why do we do this?

I want each student to see themselves or identify with the narrator in something we read throughout the year.
This, precisely this, is the indoctrination I oppose right here. Who says I can't identify with someone because they don't match me in the categories Current Year Globohomo finds most important? Am I not supposed to see anything worthwhile in "Oliver Twist" because I'm not a destitute British orphan boy consigned to a Dickensian workhouse? (Or worse, am I supposed to identify with the protagonist, purely because our skin colors are close enough?)
One of the greatest delights in literature is to read a novel written a world away in an utterly foreign culture, and come away saying "And yet, we have things in common". This so-called teacher would rob her students of this.
"Feel free to tune out, Tyquavious, a book by your guy will be next."
 
The public school system always indoctrinates, it just differs in what it promotes. Even the Marxists, such as Gramsci and his idea of cultural hegemony, knew that education systems propagate the dominate ideologies and cultures in order to ensure its continued survival. The fact this bitch pretends that she isn't just shows dishonestly because now what she is promoting is now being attacked and falling out of vogue. Even if she wasn't teaching pure globohomo tripe, there is power in what novels you teach. Dickensian works to show the dehumanizing impact of industrialization and capitalism? Nationalist works that show pride in a country? Everything contributes, whether explicitly like Xi thought classes in China or the critical race theory classes now being promoted here, or the implicit messages of even non-controversial works.
 
I want every student to feel safe and wanted in my classroom. It doesn’t matter if the student is wearing a MAGA hat or a hijab, I want them to feel welcome and included in my room.
If this is true, then fair play to this teacher. I'd give someone like this a chance to demonstrate that they really hold these liberal, marketplace of ideas principles.

But here's the gay thing, this teacher isn't just working in isolation. All the well meaning, open minded liberals in the world can't do shit if the powers that be are aggressively trying to ruin anyone who challenges the dogma.

This well meaning liberal would first be subjected to aggressive propaganda to try to convince them that free speech is a naive ideal and is dangerous in the wrong hands. Cue some stock footage of black people burning down cities ("expressions of rage by downtrodden minorities") and most of them will fold.

But even if they don't fold at that, then the powers that be have no problem getting aggressive. They'll call the target all kinds of bogus, nasty (in their circles) names. Suddenly the most sympathetic white liberal turns out to have been the worst klansman white gentrifier, white savior, talking over poc voices, etc, etc.

Basically all of them crack eventually.

It's rare that someone has the spine to endure all that bullshit and stick to their principles. For every one Jesse Singal out there, there's a bunch who've just rolled over.

It's sad.
 
The formal education system was something the British introduced to North America (primarily Canada) to purposely indoctrinate the masses to love the government (that was put there by the British) so they wouldn’t have to engage in another civil war. To this day it is believed this is why Canadians are so weak mentally.
 
Though we’ll write different types of essays, our main focus is the persuasive essay. In order to write an effective persuasive essay, students must think critically about a topic and determine their own opinion.
Potential topics:
  • 13/50 and Why the Media Doesn't Cover It
  • Nathan Bedford Forrest, A True American Hero
  • The Average IQ of the Various Races, and Why It Matters
  • How Children are Disadvantaged from Being Born Out of Wedlock
 
This, precisely this, is the indoctrination I oppose right here. Who says I can't identify with someone because they don't match me in the categories Current Year Globohomo finds most important? Am I not supposed to see anything worthwhile in "Oliver Twist" because I'm not a destitute British orphan boy consigned to a Dickensian workhouse? (Or worse, am I supposed to identify with the protagonist, purely because our skin colors are close enough?)
One of the greatest delights in literature is to read a novel written a world away in an utterly foreign culture, and come away saying "And yet, we have things in common". This so-called teacher would rob her students of this.
"Feel free to tune out, Tyquavious, a book by your guy will be next."
Also worth noting that 99% of these "diverse" stories are all about how they are oppressed by western culture and white men/people.

That obviously speaks to how narrow understanding these educators have of non-white people, but in the end there is also only one thing to call this and that is indoctrination.
 
Small power level here.

I am a former public school teacher who now works privately. And I promise – These psychopaths are indoctrinating your children.

When windows have BLM tranny flags, when there are boards in classrooms for children to put their pronouns, when normal children are being bullied for not conforming to rainbow mafia bullshit with no recourse, when zero tolerance policies are applied only to white students, when the fucking janitor has his head screwed on better and has more common sense than half of the actual educational staff, your children are being indoctrinated. All things I witnessed. Either homeschool your kids or find a private school that isn't totally compromised. Government subsidized child molestation needs to end.
 
Strange, I remember 9th grade English and it wasn't controversial, it was boring.
We read Romeo and Juliette, To Kill a Mockingbird, Great Expectations and some other boring ass shit I can't even remember*.

The half of the year we did English comp we learned how to write boring 5 paragraph essays.
I guess they don't teach that skill anymore judging by the output of today's "journalist" .

For instance, starting an essay with "I am not doing this thing" and then providing examples of doing that thing would have earned you an F even at my crappy public school.

*I get hate every time I say this but A Christmas Carol is the only readable thing Dickens ever wrote and Shakespeare is over rated and just doesn't carry over into the 21st or 20th Century that well.

To Kill a Mockingbird also sucked

TBH Boring ass shit is the kind of stuff kids should be forced to read in school.
Nothing offensive, nothing provocative. Safe, stale, boring ass shit kids can read and get practice learning how literature works.

Granted I don't really understand why the average kid needs to be able to list the main characters and be able to discuss what they think the theme of a work of fiction written by a long dead author is.

If you are going to waste time on that crap, do it with boring ass shit rather than whatever autobiographical coming of age story about the author's sexual awaking that is all the rage this year.
 
Strange, I remember 9th grade English and it wasn't controversial, it was boring.
We read Romeo and Juliette, To Kill a Mockingbird, Great Expectations and some other boring ass shit I can't even remember*.

The half of the year we did English comp we learned how to write boring 5 paragraph essays.
I guess they don't teach that skill anymore judging by the output of today's "journalist" .

For instance, starting an essay with "I am not doing this thing" and then providing examples of doing that thing would have earned you an F even at my crappy public school.

*I get hate every time I say this but A Christmas Carol is the only readable thing Dickens ever wrote and Shakespeare is over rated and just doesn't carry over into the 21st or 20th Century that well.

To Kill a Mockingbird also sucked

TBH Boring ass shit is the kind of stuff kids should be forced to read in school.
Nothing offensive, nothing provocative. Safe, stale, boring ass shit kids can read and get practice learning how literature works.

Granted I don't really understand why the average kid needs to be able to list the main characters and be able to discuss what they think the theme of a work of fiction written by a long dead author is.

If you are going to waste time on that crap, do it with boring ass shit rather than whatever autobiographical coming of age story about the author's sexual awaking that is all the rage this year.
They should read the Catcher in the Rye and Industrial Society and Its Future.
 
The public school system always indoctrinates, it just differs in what it promotes.
True, but not necessarily always towards absolute ideals. For me we did the Crucible as well as Othello in English and no-one ever suggested either that mob accusations with no evidence were awesome or that racism or manipulating people based off their assumptions that racism was occurring. As for history we did Weimar Germany and why it was partially responsible for Hitler and Stalinist Russia and why you should not believe the news when it is largely controlled by one source.

Maybe I got lucky with where and when I went. I remember writing my homework about Stalin and why you can't trust history if the same person it is about is writing it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo